1769 transit of Venus observed from Tahiti

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Fort Venus located on the north coast of Tahiti

On 3 June 1769, navigator Captain

Terra Australis Incognita or "unknown land of the South."[3]

Background

Point Venus Lighthouse, Tahiti (LMS, 1869, p.)[4]

In 1663, Scottish mathematician

Edmund Halley illustrated Gregory's theory more fully and explained further how it could establish the distance between the Earth and the Sun. In his report, Halley suggested places that a full transit should be viewed due to a "cone of visibility". Places he recommended for observing the phenomenon included Hudson Bay, Norway and the Molucca Islands.[6] The next transits would occur in 1761 and 1769. Halley died in 1742, almost twenty years before the transit.[7]

The viewing of the 1761 transit involved the effort of 120 observers from nine nations.[7] Thomas Hornsby reported the observations as unsuccessful primarily due to poor weather conditions. He alerted the Royal Society in 1766 that preparations needed to begin for the 1769 transit.[8] Hornsby's publication in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1766 focused attention on the "cone of visibility" indicating, like Halley, some of the better places to observe the transit.[8] The Royal Society boasted that the British "were inferior to no nation on earth, ancient or modern" and were eager to make another attempt.[9]

When choosing a location for viewing the transit, The Royal Society basically chose the locations Halley suggested in his 1716 article. The committee recommended that the transit be observed from three points: the

King George III approved of the project and arranged for the Navy to provide ships. He allocated £4,000 for the society to help with the expenses.[9]

Choosing an island, a ship and a Captain

In June 1767 British navigator

Admiralty was not interested in specifically where in the South Pacific the observation of the Venus transit would take place. They were more interested in the "secret" mission that would be revealed after the Venus transit observation: the search for the alleged southern continent.[10] HM Bark Endeavour was chosen to take the astronomers and other scientists to Tahiti. James Cook was commissioned as Lieutenant and appointed to command the vessel.[11] Cook was considered the obvious choice as he was an outstanding seaman with navigational qualifications, a capable astronomer, and had observed a 1766 annular eclipse in Newfoundland that was communicated to the Royal Society by John Bevis.[12]

Preparation for the transit

Once the Endeavour arrived on the island, Cook decided to set up the Venus transit

Mo’orea). Both parties were briefed and supplied with the needed equipment.[11]

The day of the transit

Portable Observatory used by Captain Cook, containing “une Horloge Astronomique”, an astronomical clock.

The observers were ordered to record the transit in four phases of Venus' journey across of the sun. The first phase was when Venus began "touching" the outside rim of the sun. In the second phase, Venus was completely within the sun's disc, but was still "touching" the outer rim. In the third phase, Venus has crossed the sun, was still completely within the disc, but was "touching" the opposite rim. Finally in the fourth phase, Venus was completely off the sun, but was still "touching" its outer rim.[2]

On the day of the transit, the sky was clear. Independent observations were made by James Cook, Green and Solander with their own telescopes.[1] Because of the rarity of the event, it was important to take accurate records. The next transit would not occur for more than a century, in 1874.[15]

In his journal, Cook wrote:

This day prov'd as favourable to our purpose as we could wish, not a Clowd was to be seen the whole day and the Air was perfectly clear, so that we had every advantage we could desire in Observing the whole of the passage of the Planet Venus over the Suns disk: we very distinctly saw an Atmosphere or dusky shade round the body of the Planet which very much disturbed the times of the Contacts particularly the two internal ones. Dr. Solander observed as well as Mr. Green and my self, and we differ'd from one another in observeing the times of the Contacts much more than could be expected. Mr Greens Telescope and mine were of the same Magnifying power but that of Dr was greater than ours.[16]

Recording the exact moment of the phases proved to be impossible due to a phenomenon called the "

Earth's atmosphere leads to the smearing of the image of Venus.[17]

Results of the 1769 transit observations

Sketchings of the 1769 Venus Transit by Captain James Cook and Charles Green, showing the "black drop effect". Note the differences in the drawings.

The Royal Society was very disappointed in the results of data collected from the transit and Cook's report. The Tahiti observers had trouble with the timing of the stages and their drawings were inconsistent. They later found out that this was also true with the observers at the other locations. Observers from all over noted a haze or "black drop" that seemed to follow Venus making it very difficult to record time entry point on the sun and the exit from the sun.[2]

For what they believed to be a failure in the observation, The Royal Society decided to blame Green who died on the voyage back to England. Cook's rebuke was so sharp that it was struck from the official proceedings of the Society. Green was not given the opportunity to personally present his own data nor could he defend himself.[2]

Scientific community

Halley's 1716 article called for observers to witness the transit at various places on the globe. The response from the

Calcutta, Tobolsk, Siberia, the Cape of Good Hope, and St. John's in Newfoundland.[18] The 1769 viewing also proved to be a vast international endeavor.[19]

Modern results compared to results from the 1769 transit

Using the solar parallax values obtained from the 1769 transit, the astronomer

perihelion distances to the sun, ~95 million miles and ~91 million miles respectively. These results have been described as "absolutely remarkable" considering what the astronomers had to work with.[19]

References

  1. ^ a b Rienits & Rienits 1976, p. 39.
  2. ^ a b c d e Herdendorf 1986.
  3. ^ Rienits & Rienits 1976, p. 28.
  4. ^ London Missionary Society, ed. (1869). Fruits of Toil in the London Missionary Society. London: John Snow & Co. p. 12. Retrieved 12 September 2016.
  5. ^ Teets 2003, pp. 335–348.
  6. ^ Halley 1716.
  7. ^ a b Rice 2008.
  8. ^ a b Williams 2004.
  9. ^ a b Rienits & Rienits 1976, p. 24.
  10. ^ MacLean 1974, p. 37.
  11. ^ a b Rienits & Rienits 1976, p. 25.
  12. ISSN 0261-0523
    .
  13. ^ MacLean 1974, p. 54.
  14. ^ MacLean 1974, p. 55.
  15. ^ Teets 2003, p. 335.
  16. ^ Beaglehole 1999.
  17. ^ Pasachoff et al. 2004, p. 6.
  18. ^ Teets 2003, p. 338.
  19. ^ a b Teets 2003, p. 347.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1769_transit_of_Venus_observed_from_Tahiti&oldid=1164326038"