4-4-0

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
4-4-0 (American, Eight-Wheeler)
Diagram of two small leading wheels and two large coupled wheels
Front of locomotive at left
1836 Patent drawing of the first 4-4-0 locomotive
Equivalent classifications
UIC class2′B
French class220
Turkish class24
Swiss class2/4
Russian class2-2-0
First known tank engine version
First use1849
CountryUnited Kingdom
LocomotiveGWR Bogie Class
RailwaySouth Devon Railway
BuilderGreat Western Railway
First known tender engine version
First use1836
CountryUnited States
RailwayPhiladelphia, Germantown and Norristown Railway
DesignerHenry Roe Campbell
BuilderPhiladelphia, Germantown and Norristown Railway
Evolved from4-2-0
Evolved to4-4-2
BenefitsBetter tractive effort than the 4-2-0
DrawbacksCould only pull a few cars due to its small size

4-4-0 is a locomotive type with a classification that uses the Whyte notation for the classification of steam locomotives by wheel arrangement and represents the arrangement: four leading wheels on two axles (usually in a leading bogie), four powered and coupled driving wheels on two axles, and a lack of trailing wheels. Due to the large number of the type that were produced and used in the United States, the 4-4-0 is most commonly known as the "American" or "Eight-Wheeler" type, but the type subsequently also became popular in the United Kingdom, where large numbers were produced.[1]

Almost every major railroad that operated in North America in the first half of the 19th century owned and operated locomotives of this type.

The first use of the name American to describe locomotives of this wheel arrangement was made by Railroad Gazette in April 1872.[1] Prior to that, this wheel arrangement was known as a standard or eight-wheeler.

This locomotive type was so successful on railroads in the United States that many earlier 4-2-0 and 2-4-0 locomotives were rebuilt as 4-4-0s by the middle of the 19th century.[1][2]

Several 4-4-0 tank locomotives were built, but the vast majority of locomotives of this wheel arrangement were tender engines.

Development

American development

Five years after new locomotive construction had begun at the West Point Foundry in the United States with the 0-4-0 Best Friend of Charleston in 1831, the first 4-4-0 locomotive was designed by Henry R. Campbell, at the time the chief engineer for the Philadelphia, Germantown and Norristown Railway. Campbell received a patent for the design in February 1836 and soon set to work building the first 4-4-0.[1]

At the time, Campbell's 4-4-0 was a giant among locomotives. Its cylinders had a 14-inch (360 mm) bore with a 16-inch (410 mm) piston stroke, it boasted 54-inch-diameter (1,400 mm) driving wheels, could maintain 90 psi (620 kPa) of steam pressure and weighed 12 short tons (11 t). Campbell's locomotive was estimated to be able to pull a train of 450 short tons (410 t) at 15 mph (24 km/h) on level track, outperforming the strongest of Baldwin's 4-2-0s in tractive effort by about 63%. However, the frame and driving gear of his locomotive proved to be too rigid for the railroads of the time, which caused Campbell's prototype to be derailment-prone. The most obvious cause was the lack of a weight equalizing system for the drivers.[1]

An 1880s woodcut of a 4-4-0 locomotive

At about the same time as Campbell was building his 4-4-0, the company of Eastwick and Harrison was building its own version of the 4-4-0. This locomotive, named Hercules, was completed in 1837 for the Beaver Meadow Railroad. It was built with a leading bogie that was separate from the locomotive frame, making it much more suitable for the tight curves and quick grade changes of early railroads. The Hercules initially suffered from poor tracking, which was corrected by giving it an effective springing system when returned to its builder for remodeling.[1]

1856 relief sculpture of a 4-4-0 commissioned by the Norris Locomotive Works, depicting an early model prior to the adoption of the covered cab
Richmond & Petersburg Railroad
, Richmond Virginia 1865

Even though the Hercules and its successors from Eastwick and Harrison proved the viability of the new wheel arrangement, the company remained the sole builders of this type of locomotive for another two years.

Rogers Locomotive & Machine Works, the Locks & Canals Machine Shop and the Newcastle Manufacturing Company in 1840. After Henry Campbell sued other manufacturers and railroads for infringing on his patent, Baldwin settled with him in 1845 by purchasing a license to build 4-4-0s.[1]

St Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad
Coos, c. 1856, Longueuil, Quebec

As the 1840s progressed, the design of the 4-4-0 changed little, but the dimensions of a typical example of this type increased. The boiler was lengthened, drivers grew in diameter and the firegrate was increased in area. Early 4-4-0s were short enough that it was most practical to connect the pistons to the rear drivers, but as the boiler was lengthened, the connecting rods were more frequently connected to the front drivers.[1]

In the 1850s, locomotive manufacturers began extending the wheelbase of the leading bogie and the drivers as well as the tender bogies. By placing the axles farther apart, manufacturers were able to mount a wider boiler completely above the wheels that extended beyond the sides of the wheels. This gave newer locomotives increased heating and steaming capacity, which translated to higher tractive effort. Similarly, by placing the leading bogie axles further apart enabled the cylinders to be placed between them in a more horizontal orientation, thereby distributing the engine's weight more evenly when going around curves and uneven track. These advancements, combined with the increasingly widespread adaptation of cowcatchers, bells, and headlights, gave the 4-4-0 locomotives the appearance for which they are most recognized.[1]

The design and subsequent improvements of the 4-4-0 configuration proved so successful that, by 1872, 60% of Baldwin's locomotive construction was of this type and it is estimated that 85% of all locomotives in operation in the United States were 4-4-0s. However, the 4-4-0 was soon supplanted by bigger designs, like the 2-6-0 and 2-8-0, even though the 4-4-0 wheel arrangement was still favored for express services. The widespread adoption of the 4-6-0 and larger locomotives eventually helped seal its fate as a product of the past.[1]

Although largely superseded in North American service by the early 20th century,

theme parks
in recent years, resembling early designs in appearance.

British development

The first British locomotives to use this wheel arrangement were the 7 ft 14 in (2,140 mm)

Robert Stephenson & Company in 1855.[4]

The first American-style British 4-4-0 tender locomotive on 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)

Stockton & Darlington Railway in 1860, followed American practice with two outside cylinders.[5]

Britain's major contribution to the development of the 4-4-0 wheel arrangement was the

Use

Australia

South Australian Railways S class No. 151, at Murray Bridge in March 1951

The first 4-4-0s appeared in South Australia in 1859. From that initial order for two locomotives, the numbers of this wheel arrangement multiplied and eventually appeared in most of the Australian colonies. Tender, tank and saddle tank versions, varying in size from small engines to express passenger racers with 6 feet 6 inches (1,981 millimetres) driving wheels, worked in

standard gauge
and 5 ft 3 in (1,600 mm) gauge.[7]

The locomotives originally from British builders such as

Gawler, South Australia, and the Phoenix Foundry in Ballarat, Victoria would also build examples. In New South Wales and Victoria, the 4-4-0 ruled the rails for mainline passenger services until the early 1900s. In Western Australia, some were later converted to 4-4-2s.[8][9]

Finland

Finnish Class A4 locomotive of 1872

In Finland, the 4-4-0 was represented by the Classes A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6 and A7.

Indonesia

Java Staatsspoorwegen's narrow gauge 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) 2-B two-cylinder compound saturated steam from Hanomag

The 4-4-0 two cylinder compound tender locomotives began to set its step on Java in 1900s. The Staatsspoorwegen (SS) ordered 44 of these from 3 different manufacturers, they were from Hanomag, Sächsische Maschinenfabrik (Hartmann) and Werkspoor and they were imported in 1900–1910.

B51 12 is preparing for steam

After they had already arrived in Java, they were classified as SS Class 600 with 1,503 mm driving wheels which way much bigger than any operational SS locomotives at the time and used as the main workhorse for express trains. The SS 600s could be found hauling local trains in Tanah Abang–Rangkasbitung–Merak/Labuan, MadiunKertosonoBlitar and Babat–Jombang lines. Some of them were also found in Maos–Kroya–Kutoarjo and SurabayaPasuruan lines. Then, the SS sent their five SS 600s to South Sumatra due to the increasing needs of railway transport in there. These locomotives were withdrawn from active service momentarily in 1929-1934 during great depression because of their cylinder compound technology which has a complicated mechanism system so the SS had to save its budget by preserving these locomotives, but they received extensive maintenance so they still could be used normally.

During

T B25 02 and 03 which were used on rack line
between Jambu–Bedono.

Mozambique

Restored Beira Railway Falcon F2

Between 1895 and 1898,

narrow gauge railway which was being constructed for the Beira Railway in Mozambique. They were supplied in six batches by Falcon Engine & Car Works in England and the Glasgow Railway Engineering Company in Scotland.[11][12][13]

In service, these locomotives were nicknamed Lawleys after the Beira Railway construction subcontractor. The construction of the last batch of ten F4 locomotives was subcontracted by Falcon to the Glasgow Railway Engineering Company in Scotland and these were consequently often referred to as the Drummond F4.[11][12][13][14]

The Falcon F4 was larger and heavier than the earlier F2, with a tractive effort that was increased from the 3,000 pounds-force (13.3 kilonewtons) of the F2 to 3,987 pounds-force (17.7 kilonewtons) at 75% boiler pressure. It could haul 180 long tons (182.9 tonnes) up the ruling gradients, compared to the 160 long tons (162.6 tonnes) that the F2 could manage.[12]

New Zealand

The

Nasmyth, Wilson & Company in 1887 for the New Zealand Midland Railway Company. They were taken over by the New Zealand Railways Department in 1900, when the government acquired the incomplete Midland line
.

Rhodesia

When the Beira Railway in Mozambique was regauged to 3 ft 6 in (1,067 mm) by 1900 and the whole 4-4-0 Lawley locomotive fleet was staged, six of the Mozambican F4 locomotives were acquired by the Ayrshire Railway, which was then under construction in Southern Rhodesia. They remained in service there until 1914, when this line was also converted to Cape gauge and became the Sinoia branch of the Beira, Mashonaland and Rhodesia Railway.[11][12][14]

South Africa

Narrow gauge

In 1907 and 1910, the

WG Bagnall for their 2 ft (610 mm) gauge line. These locomotives had 9-by-14-inch (229 mm × 356 mm) cylinders. A further eleven similar locomotives, but with 10-by-15-inch (254 mm × 381 mm) cylinders, were delivered from the same manufacturer between 1926 and 1946. [citation needed
]

SAR Class NG6 no. 106

In 1915, thirteen of the Beira Railway's retired narrow gauge Falcon F2 and F4 locomotives were acquired from Mozambique by the Union Defence Forces for use in South Africa, where they replaced locomotives that had been commandeered for the war effort in German South West Africa during World War I. At the end of the war, these locomotives were staged until they were placed back in service by the South African Railways (SAR) in 1921. When a system of grouping narrow gauge locomotives into classes was eventually introduced by the SAR between 1928 and 1930, they were classified as Class NG6.[11][14]

In 1936, Bagnall built a single 4-4-0 tank locomotive, named Burnside and with 11+12 by 15 inches (292 by 381 millimetres) cylinders, for the 2 ft 0+12 in (622 mm) gauge line of the Natal Estates sugar plantation at Mount Edgecombe in Natal. [citation needed]

Standard gauge

Natal Railway Co. Perseverance

The third locomotive of the 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)

Cape gauge.[15][16]

Cape gauge

CGR 1st Class with optional tender

Seven side-tank locomotives were built for the

Neilson & Company and practically identical to the previous seven, but equipped with small optional four-wheeled water tenders. They were all designated 1st Class when a locomotive classification system was introduced by the CGR.[15][17]

In 1879, the Cape Government Railways placed four 1st Class tender locomotives in service, built by the Avonside Engine Company. They were intended for fast passenger service on the Cape Western and Eastern systems and were followed by eleven more from Neilson & Company in 1880.[15][17]

In 1881, the CGR placed six more 1st Class tank-and-tender locomotives in service on its Cape Midland system. These were built by Neilson & Company as tender locomotives without on-board coal bunkers and with permanently attached coal and water tenders. Two of them became SAR Class 01 in 1912.[15][17]

Wynberg Tank, c. 1882

Between 1882 and 1891, eleven 4-4-0T tank locomotives for the Wynberg suburban line in

Dübs & Company. Designated 2nd Class and known as Wynberg Tanks, ten of them became SAR Class 02 in 1912.[11][15]

In 1882, two tank locomotives named Grahamstown and Bathurst entered passenger service on the private Kowie Railway between Grahamstown and Port Alfred, which was still under construction at the time.[15]

CGR 3rd Class 4-4-0 Sir Hercules

Eighteen tender passenger locomotives were delivered to the CGR from Neilson & Company in 1883, designated

Port Elizabeth respectively and were equipped with six-wheeled tenders.[11][15]

In 1884, the CGR placed two experimental 3rd Class tender locomotives in service, designed by the Cape Eastern System to be able to use the low-grade local coal with its high incombustible matter content.[15]

In 1889, the CGR placed 24 3rd Class tender locomotives in service. They were the first stock locomotives to be built in quantity to detailed designs prepared in the Cape of Good Hope.[15]

CGR 3rd Class Wynberg Tender

In 1898, the CGR placed six 3rd Class Wynberg Tender locomotives in passenger service on the suburban lines in Cape Town.[11][15]

In 1901, the CGR placed another six 3rd Class Wynberg Tender locomotives in suburban service in Cape Town. They were a heavier and more powerful version of the locomotives of 1898 and were built for speed, with the largest coupled wheels of any locomotive on the CGR to date at 60 inches (1,520 millimetres) diameter.[11][15]

In 1903, the CGR placed the last eight 3rd Class Wynberg Tenders in suburban service in Cape Town. While they appeared to be virtually identical to the locomotives of 1901 at first glance, they were heavier and more powerful.[11][15]

United Kingdom

Tank locomotives

Bogie class 4-4-0ST Horace of 1854

4-4-0T classes began to appear on 7 ft 14 in (2,140 mm) broad-gauge lines in the United Kingdom from 1849. The Great Western Railway built its

4-4-0ST classes after 1855.[18]

P class of 1893–94. Also in 1864, John Lambie of the Caledonian Railway
built twelve Class 1 4-4-0T locomotives.

Inside cylinder tender locomotives

A LB&SCR B4 class c.1910 typical of the British inside frame/inside cylinder layout

Between 1876 and 1903,

London & North Western Railway’s Precursor Class of 1904.[6]

From the mid-1890s until after

mixed-traffic service in later years.[6]

City of Truro

The

London Paddington
.

Although the inside cylinder 4-4-0 had largely been superseded by larger locomotives for mainline express trains by 1920, the type remained in use in Scotland and East Anglia, where lines that could not support heavier or larger locomotives were common. Thus both the

London, Midland & Scottish Railway also continued to build its Class 2P
of traditional inside cylinder 4-4-0s for secondary passenger working.

Three-cylinder tender locomotives

Southern Railway Schools class Stowe, constructed in 1934

Experiments were conducted with three-cylinder compound locomotives by Wilson Worsdell of the North Eastern Railway in 1898, Samuel Johnson of the Midland Railway in 1901 and Francis Webb of the London and North Western Railway. Of these, the development of Johnson's design by Richard Deeley of the Midland Railway into the 1000 Class was the most successful. This class continued to be built by the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) after 1905, until 1932 with the almost identical LMS Compound 4-4-0.

British three-cylinder simple expansion (simplex) locomotives included Nigel Gresley's LNER Class D49 Hunt and Shire 4-4-0s of 1927–28. However, the most powerful and one of the most successful 4-4-0 designs ever constructed was the Schools class of the Southern Railway, designed by Richard Maunsell and built between 1930 and 1935. These were used on secondary express trains between London and South Coast towns, until their withdrawal in 1962.[19]

United States

AM&O no. 87, delivered on flatcars due to breaks-of-gauge

Since the first locomotives in the United States were imported from the United Kingdom, the British 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)

breaks-of-gauge
as railroads began to be joined. Apart from freight reloading issues, another result was that new locomotives for some of these railroads had to be delivered on flatcars.

The 4-4-0 played a major role in the development of rail transport in the United States. Some of the notable 4-4-0 locomotives that saw service on United States railroads are:

An AT&SF 4-4-0 on a passenger train across Kansas, c. 1895
Pennsylvania Railroad class D6 4-4-0 No. 317, built in 1881.
WDWRR 4-4-0 No. 4 Roy O. Disney, built in 1916

By 1910, the 4-4-0 was considered obsolete being replaced by Mikados, Pacifics and other larger engines, although they continued to serve to an extent into the 1950s. The last 4-4-0 to be built was a diminutive Baldwin product for the Ferrocarriles Unidos de Yucatán in 1945. Fewer than forty 4-4-0s survive in preservation in the United States, reproductions excluded.[1]

Between 1959 and 1989, the

Henry Doorly Zoo & Aquarium
.

Operational historic locomotives

North America

There are a handful of full-size 4-4-0 steam locomotives built prior to 1945 that are still operating in the US and Canada.[32][33] The following is a list of locations with at least one working example and tracks on which to run it.

Location Address Road number(s)/Name(s) Track gauge Number of 4-4-0s Year(s) built Notes
Dan Markoff private residence Las Vegas, Nevada, US
4 Eureka
3 ft (914 mm) 1 1875 It retains its original boiler.
Nevada State Railroad Museum
Carson City, Nevada
, US
22 Inyo 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) 1 1875 Appeared in over twenty Hollywood Westerns
Prairie Dog Central Railway Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 3 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) 1 1882
South Simcoe Railway Tottenham, Ontario, Canada 136 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) 1 1883
Walt Disney World Railroad (Magic Kingdom) Bay Lake, Florida, US 4 Roy O. Disney 3 ft (914 mm) 1 1916 Significantly altered from its original appearance to resemble steam locomotives from the 1880s.[34]
Weiser Railroad (Greenfield Village) Dearborn, Michigan, US 1 Edison, 7 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) 2 1870; 1897 The steam locomotive built in 1870 was originally an 0-4-0; it was rebuilt as a 4-4-0 in 1932 by the Ford Motor Company.[35]
Wilmington & Western Railroad
Marshallton, Delaware, US 98 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm) 1 1909

References

  1. ^
  2. ^ Kinert, Reed. (1962). Early American steam locomotives; 1st seven decades: 1830-1900. Seattle, WA: Superior Publishing Company.
  3. ^ Trains magazine, June 1946
  4. ^ Richard Marshall. "A history of Britain's broad gauge railways". Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2010-05-02.
  5. ^ Marsden, Richard. "The London & North Eastern Railway (LNER) Encyclopedia - William Bouch". Archived from the original on 7 July 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  6. ^ a b c Poultney, Edward Cecil (1952). British express locomotive development 1896-1948. London: Allen & Unwin. pp. 56–65.
  7. ^ Oberg, Leon. (1975). Locomotives of Australia. Sydney, London: Reed.
  8. ^ Australian Railway Historical Society, A Century Plus of Locomotives New South Wales Railways 1855-1965, ARHS, Sydney, 1965
  9. ^ Victorian Railways, Power Parade: 1854-1954, Victorian Railways, 1954
  10. ^ Plumb, Geoff. "Java 1973". SmugMug.
  11. ^ .
  12. ^ .
  13. ^
  14. ^ a b c Railway Modelling Scene, South Africa, May/June 1985, article written by Neill Mardell
  15. ^ .
  16. ^ The Natal Mercury of 12 January 1876.
  17. ^ a b c C.G.R. Numbering Revised, Article by Dave Littley, SA Rail May–June 1993, pp. 94-95.
  18. .
  19. ^ "Maunsell Railway Society 4-4-0 locomotive "Stowe"". Archived from the original on 2016-03-22. Retrieved 2006-02-18.
  20. ^ "RDG Co. Surviving Steam Profile". www.readingrailroad.org. Retrieved 2023-10-09.
  21. ^ Moshein, Peter; Rothfus, Robert R. (1992). "Rogers locomotives: A brief history and construction list". Railroad History (167): 13–147.
  22. .
  23. ^ "The Great Locomotive Chase". Archived from the original on 2012-06-17. Retrieved 2012-09-28.
  24. ^ Texas Information Page
  25. ^ Everlasting Steam: The Story of Jupiter and No. 119
  26. ^ "Union Pacific's 119". Archived from the original on 2011-09-30.
  27. .
  28. ^ Fleet-wheeled wonder: New York Central & Hudson River Railroad's no. 999, by Kevin V. Bunker
  29. ^ "Empire State Express No. 999". Genesee County, New York. Archived from the original on December 30, 2005. Retrieved March 1, 2006.
  30. ^ James, Chloe (January 20, 2024). "Disney World Removes Feature From Park, Will Be Gone for Years". Inside the Magic. Archived from the original on January 21, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  31. ^ "Surviving Steam Locomotive Search – US". Archived from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2014-11-11.
  32. ^ "Surviving Steam Locomotive Search – Canada". Archived from the original on 2020-09-15. Retrieved 2017-02-26.
  33. ^ Seel, Rob (April 2011). "Behind the Scenes at Walt Disney World" (PDF). Central Crossings. Vol. 20, no. 4. Central Railway Model & Historical Association. p. 6. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 26, 2023. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  34. ^ Greenfield Village Perimeter Railroad: from concept to reality

External links

This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article: 4-4-0. Articles is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license; additional terms may apply.Privacy Policy