6th Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea
February 8 House of Culture, Pyongyang, North Korea | |
Participants | 3,062 delegates |
---|---|
Outcome | Election of the 6th Central Committee and 6th Central Auditing Commission |
The 6th Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK) was held in the
At this congress, Kim Il Sung designated his son
Preparations
Little is known about the preparations for the 6th Congress. It was convened a decade after the 5th WPK Congress (in 1970), outside the party norm of a quadrennial meeting.[2] There was no official reason for its postponement, but it was probably due to the fact that WPK General Secretary Kim Il Sung spent much of the 1970s gathering support (and creating an independent power base) for his son and planned successor Kim Jong Il.[2] In addition, a great deal of time was spent restructuring party organizations and functions.[2] The primary reason for the 6th Congress was to formalize Kim Jong Il as Kim Il Sung's chosen successor.[2]
Delegates and attendees
The 6th Congress was attended by 3,062 delegates with voting rights and 158 without them; this marked an increase of 1,349 voting and 137 non-voting delegates from the 5th Congress.[3] The increase indicates a growth in membership.[3] The 6th Congress is significant for its large number of delegations: 177 delegations from 118 countries were represented.[3] While communist and workers' parties customarily invite "fraternal parties" to party congresses, the WPK had taken the unusual step of not inviting foreign delegations to the 1st, 2nd and 5th congresses.[3] Among those invited this time were the Chinese Communist Party and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.[3] The WPK leadership also invited a number of non-communist parties and organizations to the congress.[3] The official report said that 155 foreign organizations from 105 countries attended the congress, indicating that 22 delegations remained incognito.[4] For unknown reasons, no foreign delegates spoke at the congress.[4]
The Congress
The 6th Congress was held at the
Significant at the 6th Congress was the generational shift within the WPK, with Kim Il Sung planning to formalize the position of Kim Jong Il.
Of the 158 delegates with speaking rights, 39 participated in the debates—much-lower participation than at the 5th Congress, in which 98 of 137 delegates with speaking rights participated.[4] All debate participants were Party bureaucrats and technocrats, making it the first congress at which the "revolutionary generation" was not present.[9] 38 topics were debated: twenty-one focused on the economy, ten on politics, five on social and cultural affairs, one on military affairs and one on possible unification with South Korea.[10] Socialist construction, the designated primary task of the party during the 1980s, was the focal point of the discussions.[10] The 6th Congress ended with Kim Il Sung presenting a summary of what had been decided: "(a) Shining victory of the Three Revolutions—achievements in ideological, technological and cultural revolutions; (b) Conversion of entire society along the lines of Juche idea; (c) Independent and peaceful reunification of the fatherland; (d) Strengthening of the solidarity with the anti-imperialist self-reliant forces; (e) strengthening of Party work."[10]
1st plenum
The 1st plenum of the 6th Central Committee, to elect the central party leadership, was held immediately after the 6th Congress.[11] 34 members were elected to the 6th Politburo, an increase from 15 in the 5th Politburo.[8] Of these 34, 19 were full members and 15 candidate members.[8] Five members were elected to the Presidium,[8] and Kim Jong Il was ranked fourth in the hierarchy of the Politburo and the Presidium.[8] The 6th Secretariat was composed of nine members,[12] with Kim Jong Il ranked second.[12] The size of the Secretariat did not change from the 5th Congress, but of its nine members only Kim Il Sung was from the party's "revolutionary generation" (60% of the members of the 5th Secretariat came from that generation).[12] Kim Il Sung and Kim Jung-rin were the only incumbents to be reelected.[13] The elected 6th Central Military Commission (CMC) was composed of 19 members, of which Kim Jong Il ranked third (behind Kim Il Sung and O Jin-u).[13] This marked the first time in the party's history that the CMC membership was made public.[13] Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il became the only officials with seats in all four bodies: the Presidium, Politburo, Secretariat and CMC.[13] While Kim Jong Il was outranked in the Presidium, Politburo and Secretariat, none of the members who outranked him had positions in other bodies (except for O Jin-ju, second-ranked member of the CMC).[13] Below is a list of members (and their respective rankings) of the Presidium, full and candidate members of the Politburo, Secretariat and CMC:[14]
Symbol | Meaning |
---|---|
‡ | Members of the Presidium of the Politburo of the Workers' Party of Korea |
# | Full members | Candidate members | Secretariat members | CMC members |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | ‡Kim Il Sung | Ho Dam | ‡Kim Il Sung | ‡Kim Il Sung |
2. | ‡Kim Il | Yun Gi-bok | ‡Kim Jong Il | ‡O Jin-u |
3. | ‡O Jin-u | Choe Kwang | Kim Jung-rin | ‡Kim Jong Il |
4. | ‡Kim Jong Il | Choe Se-ung | Kim Yong-nam | Choe Hyon |
5. | ‡Ri Jong-ok | Choe Jae-u | Kim Hwan | Oh Baek-ryong
|
6. | Pak Song-chol | Kong Jin-Tae | Yon Hyong-muk | Chon Mun-sop
|
7. | Choe Hyon | Chong Jun-gi | Yun Gi-bok | Oh Guk-ryol
|
8. | Lim Chum-chu
|
Kim Chol-man | Hong Si-hak | Paek Hak-rim |
9. | So Chol | Chong Gyong-hi | Hwang Jang-yop | Kim Chol-man |
10. | Oh Baek-ryong
|
Choe Yong-rim | Kim Gang-hwan | |
11. | Kim Jung-rin | So Yun-sok | Tae Byong-ryol
| |
12. | Kim Yong-nam | Ri Kun-mo | Ri Ul-sol | |
13. | Chon Mun-sop
|
Hyon Mu-gwang | Chu Do-il | |
14. | Kim Hwan | Kim Gang-hwan | Lee Du-ik
| |
15. | Yon Hyong-huk | Lee Son-sil | Cho Myong-rok
| |
16. | Oh Guk-ryol
|
Kim Il-chol | ||
17. | Kye Ung-thae | Choe Sang-uk | ||
18. | Kang Song-san | Lee Bon-won | ||
19. | Paek Hak-rim | Oh Ryong-bang |
The 1st plenum saw the "revolutionary generation" retire from their
Policy decisions
Kim Jong-il as successor
Kim Yong-ju was believed to be Kim Il Sung's first choice as successor, and his authority increased until he became co-chairman of the North–South Coordination Committee.[16] From late 1972 until the 6th Congress, Kim Yong-ju became an increasingly remote figure within the regime; at the 6th Congress, he lost his seats in the Politburo and on the Central Committee.[16] However, rumors were confirmed that Kim Il Sung began grooming Kim Jong Il in 1966.[16] From 1974 until the 6th Congress, Kim Jong Il (called the "Party centre" by North Korean media) became the second-most-powerful man in North Korea.[16]
The choice of Kim Jong Il as Kim Il Sung's successor met with considerable criticism.
Korean unification
At the congress, Kim Il Sung stressed the importance of "achieving the goal of the unification of the fatherland which has been the greatest and long-cherised desire of the whole people is the most important revolutionary task facing the Party".[20] He warned his audience that if Korea remained divided, it might never be unified again because of relations among the big powers.[20] Kim Il Sung called for the establishment of the "Democratic Confederal Republic of Korea" (DCRK), a national government of North and South Korea.[21] The DCRK would be ruled by a Supreme Confederal National Congress (SCNC), with an equal number of representatives from North and South Korea. The SCNC representatives would elect a Presidium, which would rule on its behalf.[21] Under this system, South Korea would remain capitalist and North Korea socialist.[22] However, the WPK leadership named three conditions for North Korea to join the DCRK: (1) Social democratization of South Korea, the ouster of its current ruling class, repeal of the Anti-Communist and National Security Laws and replacement of its military regime by a democratic one representing the will of the people; (2) Reducing tensions with the establishment of a truce and a peace agreement; (3) Reducing American interference in the region, holding open the possibility of improved relations with the United States if it supported Korean reunification.[23]
From communism to nationalism
Man is a social being living in a community called nation, and his struggle for self-determination is waged within the boundary of a nation-state. A search for national self-determination takes top priority over other matters in a revolution of any country. A nation must exist before revolution, construction, ideology, or ideal, and they lose their meanings in the absence of a nation. Whether we uphold nationalism, communism, or any other ideology we must recover our nationhood first."
—Party secretary Kim Jung-rin, on North Korea's unification ideology[24]
The 6th Congress signified a move away from
In contrast to other socialist states (which upheld the orthodox communist belief that the masses are masters of historical development), WPK ideology asserts that the masses can only initiate revolutionary change through a leader.[25] While other socialist states often emphasized certain historical figures, due weight was still given to the people.[25] The opposite occurred in North Korea, where the party line was "The great revolutionary task of the working class is pioneered and led to victory by the Leader and completed under the leadership of the Leader only."[25] From this perspective, the revolutionary task given the working class by the other socialist regimes became the sole responsibility of the leader in North Korea.[25] The leader theory supports one-man leadership, since all important tasks can only be accomplished by a great leader it argues.[25] This ideological outlook may explain why Kim Il Sung appointed his son, Kim Jong Il, as his successor.[25] In North Korea, Kim Il Sung was considered a "Great Leader" with a decisive role; he was cited by official media as the man who established the WPK and founder of the Juche idea.[26] Because of this, Kim Il Sung was not "elected" WPK General Secretary; the position was bestowed on him by divine right.[26]
For the sake of realizing unification of the fatherland, the South and the North should not stick to their respective ideologies of communism and capitalism, but the two should put one common ideology of nation before the two ideologies so as to achieve a union based on the idea of nation.
—Kim Il-Sung, emphasizing that the nation (not capitalism or communism) should be the common ideology of the two Koreas[24]
While North Korea had already begun to move from a foreign policy based upon proletarian internationalism at the
Footnotes
- ^ Campbell, Charlie (4 May 2016). "Inside the Rare Meeting of North Korea's Communist Elite". Time. Archived from the original on 6 May 2016.
- ^ a b c d Kim 1982, p. 125.
- ^ a b c d e f Kim 1982, p. 127.
- ^ a b c Kim 1982, p. 128.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Kim 1982, p. 126.
- ^ a b c d e f Kim 1982, p. 139.
- ^ Kim 1982, pp. 139–140.
- ^ a b c d e f Kim 1982, p. 140.
- ^ Kim 1982, pp. 128–129.
- ^ a b c Kim 1982, p. 129.
- ^ Kim 1982, pp. 126–127.
- ^ a b c Kim 1982, p. 141.
- ^ a b c d e Kim 1982, p. 142.
- ^ Kim 1982, pp. 140–142.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Kim 1982, p. 144.
- ^ a b c d Lee 1982, p. 442.
- ^ a b c d Lee 1982, p. 434.
- ^ Kim 1982, p. 147.
- ^ Lee 1982, p. 435.
- ^ a b Kim 1982, p. 130.
- ^ a b Kim 1982, p. 131.
- ^ Kim 1982, p. 133.
- ^ Kim 1982, pp. 133–134.
- ^ a b Kim 1982, p. 135.
- ^ a b c d e f Kim 1982, p. 145.
- ^ a b Kim 1982, p. 146.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Kim 1982, p. 148.
Works cited
- Kim, Nam-Sik (Spring–Summer 1982). "North Korea's Power Structure and Foreign Relations: an Analysis of the Sixth Congress of the KWP*". JSTOR 23253510.
- Kim, Young (January 1981). "North Korea in 1980: The Son also Rises". JSTOR 2643670.
- Lee, Chong-sik (May 1982). "Evolution of the Korean Workers' Party and the Rise of Kim Chŏng-il". JSTOR 2643871.
Further reading
- Kim, Il-sung (1980). Report to the Sixth Congress of the Workers' Party of Korea on the Work of the Central Committee (Excerpt), October 10, 1980 (PDF). Pyongyang: OCLC 13794830. Archived from the original(PDF) on 24 September 2016. Retrieved 10 May 2016.