A. Wallace Tashima
The Honorable A. Wallace Tashima | |
---|---|
Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | |
Assumed office July 31, 2004 | |
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | |
In office January 4, 1996 – July 31, 2004 | |
Appointed by | Bill Clinton |
Preceded by | Arthur Alarcón |
Succeeded by | Milan Smith |
Judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California | |
In office June 30, 1980 – January 8, 1996 | |
Appointed by | Jimmy Carter |
Preceded by | Warren J. Ferguson |
Succeeded by | Dean Pregerson |
Personal details | |
Born | Atsushi Wallace Tashima June 24, 1934 LLB) |
Military service | |
Allegiance | United States |
Branch/service | United States Marine Corps |
Years of service | 1953-1956 |
Rank | Sergeant |
Atsushi Wallace Tashima (
Early life
Atsushi Wallace Tashima was born in 1934 in
Career
Upon graduation from law school, from 1962 to 1968, Tashima became the Deputy
Federal judicial service
Tashima was nominated by President Jimmy Carter on May 9, 1980, to a seat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California vacated by Judge Warren J. Ferguson. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 26, 1980, and received commission on June 30, 1980. His service terminated on January 8, 1996, due to elevation to the Ninth Circuit.[4]
Tashima was nominated by President Bill Clinton on April 6, 1995, to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated by Judge Arthur Alarcón. He was confirmed by the Senate on January 2, 1996, and received commission on January 4, 1996. He assumed senior status on June 30, 2004.[4]
Notable cases
- Donald Walden Jr. v. the State of Nevada: On December 23, 2019, Judge Tashima ruled in favor of workers that were not paid for overtime work. In the ruling, Tashima also ruled that a state waives its 11th Amendment rights when taking the case to federal court.[5]
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, No. 19-16487 (9th Cir. Aug. 16, 2019): Judge Tashima partially dissented when the Ninth Circuit held 2-1 that President Trump's asylum ban could take place in New Mexico and Texas but not California or Arizona. Tashima would have blocked the asylum ban in all four states.[6]
- Flores v. Barr, No. 17-56297 (9th Cir. Aug. 15, 2019): Judge Tashima was in a unanimous decision (with Marsha S. Berzon and William A. Fletcher) that ruled that detained migrant children must get sleep, soap, and clean water.[7]
- the United States v. Neal Bain, No. 17-10107 (9th Cir. June 11, 2019): Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Tashima overturned a conviction for armed bank robbery. He held that the defendant's inadvertent placement of a closed pocket knife on a bank counter did not constitute "armed" bank robbery because this action did not "put[] in jeopardy the life of any person by the use of a dangerous weapon," which is a requirement for armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d).[8]
- On March 8, 2019, Judge Tashima ruled that asylum seekers are entitled to habeas review and have the right to appeal their deportations.[9]
- United States v. Sineneng-Smith, No. 15-10614 (9th Cir. Dec. 4, 2018): Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Tashima struck down a statute as unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the First Amendment. The panel held that 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)—which permits a felony prosecution of any person who "encourages or induces" an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States if the encourager knew, or recklessly disregarded the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law—was unconstitutional because it criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expression in relation to its narrow band of legitimately prohibited conduct and unprotected expression. Tashima wrote, "At the very least, it is clear that the statute potentially criminalizes the simple words – spoken to a son, a wife, a parent, a friend, a neighbor, a coworker, a student, a client – 'I encourage you to stay here.'" He also wrote that the statute appeared to apply to statements amounting to "pure advocacy on a hotly debated issue in our society."[10] This decision was unanimously overturned by the US Supreme Court.[11]
- González v. Douglas: While sitting by designation in the United States District Court of Arizona, Judge Tashima ruled that Arizona school officials were motivated by racial animus when they acted to shut down a Mexican-American studies program in Tucson's public schools.[12]
Personal life
Tashima is married and has three children and three grandchildren. He resides in Los Angeles. He is the father of
Awards
- Trial Jurist of the Year, Los Angeles County Bar Association (1995–96)[14]
See also
- List of Asian American jurists
- List of first minority male lawyers and judges in the United States
- List of United States federal judges by longevity of service
References
- ^ Judicial Conference of the United States. Bicentennial Committee (1978). Judges of the United States. The Committee : for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off. Retrieved 2015-07-03.
- ^ A. Wallace Tashima, retrieved 2019-06-24
- ^ a b "JA jurists profiled by JACL, Downtown LA Chapter". downtown-los-angeles-jacl.org. Retrieved 2015-07-03.
- ^ a b "Tashima, Atsushi Wallace - Federal Judicial Center". www.fjc.gov.
- ^ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
- ^ Josh Gerstein (Aug. 16, 2019). "Trump scores partial win on asylum ban as court narrows injunction". Politico.
- ^ Gonzales, Richard (15 August 2019). "Appeals Court Rules Detained Migrant Children Should Get Soap, Sleep, Clean Water". NPR.org. Retrieved Oct 18, 2020.
- ^ Julie Steinberg (June 11, 2019). "Placing Knife on Counter During Bank Robbery Not 'Use' of Weapon". Bloomberg Law.
- ^ A. B. A. Journal. "In ruling with 'sweeping implications,' 9th Circuit rules asylum-seeker is entitled to habeas review". ABA Journal. Retrieved Oct 18, 2020.
- ^ Josh Gerstein (Dec. 4, 2018). "Federal appeals court rules against another immigration crackdown attempt". Politico.
- ^ Greenlaw v. United States. US Supreme Court
- ^ Maggie Astor (Aug. 23, 2017). "Tucson’s Mexican Studies Program Was a Victim of 'Racial Animus,' Judge Says". The New York Times.
- ^ "Conference review by Greg Robinson on IsThatLegal.org - 11/9/04". Archived from the original on 2008-03-17.
- ^ Tashima resume Archived August 28, 2008, at the Wayback Machine on ISDLS website
Sources
- A. Wallace Tashima profile on metnews.com
- A. Wallace Tashima at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges, a publication of the Federal Judicial Center.