Absolute music
This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2009) |
Absolute music (sometimes abstract music) is music that is not explicitly "about" anything; in contrast to
The aesthetic ideas underlying absolute music derive from debates over the relative value of what was known in the early years of
Romantic debate
A group of
Formalist debate
Formalism is the concept of music for music's sake, or that music's 'meaning' is entirely in its form. In this respect, music has no extra-musical meaning at all and is enjoyed by appreciation of its formal structure and technical construction.[8] The 19th century music critic Eduard Hanslick argued that music could be enjoyed as pure sound and form, and that it needed no connotation of extra-musical elements to warrant its existence. He argued that in fact, these extra-musical ideas and images detracted from the beauty of the music.
Music has no subject beyond the combinations of notes we hear, for music speaks not only by means of sounds, it speaks nothing but sound.
— Eduard Hanslick[9]
Formalism therefore rejected genres such as
Opposition and objections to absolute music
Contemporary views
Today, the debate continues over whether music has, or ought to have, extramusical meaning or not. However, most contemporary views[
The cultural bases of musical understanding have been highlighted in
There are those who believe that music represents nothing other than itself. I argue that we are constantly giving it new and different abilities to represent who we are.[14]
Bohlman has gone on to argue that the use of music, e.g. among the Jewish diaspora, was in fact a form of identity building.
Susan McClary has criticised the notion of 'absolute music', arguing that all music, whether explicitly programmatic or not, contains implicit programs that reflect the tastes, politics, aesthetic philosophies and social attitudes of the composer and their historical situation. Such scholars would argue that classical music is rarely about nothing, but reflects aesthetic tastes that are themselves influenced by culture, politics and philosophy. Composers are often bound up in a web of tradition and influence, in which they strive to consciously situate themselves in relation to other composers and styles.[15] Lawrence Kramer, on the other hand, believes music has no means to reserve a "specific layer or pocket for meaning. Once it has been brought into sustainable connection with a structure of prejudgment, music simply becomes meaningful."[16]
Music which appears to demand an interpretation, but is abstract enough to warrant objectivity (e.g.
Linguistic meaning
On the topic of musical meaning,
[One] can point to particular places in a tune by Schubert and say: look, that is the point of the tune, this is where the thought comes to a head.
Jerrold Levinson has drawn extensively on Wittgenstein to comment:
Intelligible music stands to literal thinking in precisely the same relation as does intelligible verbal discourse. If that relation be not exemplification but instead, say, expression, then music and language are, at any rate, in the same, and quite comfortable, boat.[19]
See also
- Abstract art § Music
- Art music
- Gebrauchsmusik
- Impressionist music
- Musique concrète ("Concrete music")
References
- ^ ISBN 0-684-31377-4, vol.1, p. 5
- ^ Dahlhaus, Carl (1991). The Idea of Absolute Music. University of Chicago Press. p. 18.
- ISBN 978-0-19-280617-8.
- .
- ISSN 0255-7614– via Sage.
- ISBN 978-0-495-57273-2.
- ISSN 0255-7614.
- ISBN 978-0-19-825048-7.
- ^ Quoted in the liner notes to the Juilliard String Quartet's Intimate Letters. Sony Classical SK 66840.
- ISBN 978-0-19-923060-0.
- ISBN 978-0-19-934365-2.
- ISBN 978-0-520-21412-5.
- ^ Béla Szabados (Fall 2004). "Wittgenstein the Musical: Notes toward an Appreciation". Canadian Aesthetics Journal. 10.
- ^ Shula Neuman (April 2, 1998). "The Meaning of Music". The University of Chicago Chronicle: Vol. 17, No. 13.
- ^ McClary, Susan (1993). "Narrative Agendas in 'Absolute' Music: Identity and Difference in Brahms's Third Symphony". In Solie, Ruth A. (ed.). Musicology and Difference. University of California Press. pp. 326-44
- ^ Kramer, Lawrence (2013). "Subjectivity Rampant!: Music, Hermeneutics, and History". In Clayton, Martin et. al. (ed.). The Cultural Study of Music: An Introduction. Routledge. p. 133.
- ISBN 0-19-823541-0.
- ^ Ludwig Wittgenstein (1944). Vermischte Bemerkungen [Culture and Value]. Translated by Peter Winch. p. 47.
- ^ Musical Thinking (Fall 2003). "Jerrold Levinson". Journal of Music and Meaning: vol. 1, section 2.
Further reading
- Chua, Daniel Absolute Music and the Construction of Meaning (Cambridge University Press, 1999)
- Cook, Nicholas Music: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 1998)
- Dahlhaus, Carl The Idea of Absolute Music trans. by Roger Lustig (Chicago/London 1989; orig. Kassel, 1978)
- Goehr, Lydia The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992)
- Kivy, Peter ‘Absolute Music’ and the ‘New Musicology’ in Musicology and Sister Disciplines. Past, Present, Future. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the International Musicological Society, London 1997 ed. D. Greer, I. Rumbold and J. King (Oxford, 2000)
- Kramer, Lawrence Subjectivity Rampant! Music, Hermeneutics, and History in The Cultural Study of Music. A Critical Introduction ed. M. Clayton, T. Herbert and R. Middleton (New York and London, 2003)
- Scruton, Roger. "Absolute music." Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online.[permanent dead link]
- Williams, Alastair Constructing Musicology (Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, Hampshire, 2001)
- Wolff, Janet The ideology of autonomous art, in: Music and Society in The Politics of Composition, Performance and Reception ed. R. Leppert and S. McClary (Cambridge, 1987)
- Young, James O. Critique of Pure Music (Oxford University Press, 2014)