Aitareya Brahmana
The Aitareya Brahmana (
Authorship
Mahidasa is mentioned in other works before Sayana, such as the
Identification with Asvalayana Brahmana
The Asvalayana Srautasutra and Asvalayana Grhyasutra, attributed to the sage Asvalayana, are the
The common view is that the Asvalayana Brahmana is simply another name for the Aitareya Brahmana. However, according to another theory, it might be a now-lost, similar but distinct Brahmana text.[7][8]
Date of composition
The Aitareya Brahmana with some certainty dates to the 1st millennium BCE, likely to its first half.[9] Published estimates include the following:
- The translator of the Brāhmaṇa, A. B. Keith (1920), presented detailed arguments for a date in the 6th century BCE.[10]
- H. H. Wilson (1866): "about 6 centuries B.C.".[11]
- John G. R. Forlong (1906): "not later than 700 B.C."[12]
- E. J. Rapson (1914): "possibly c. 500 B.C." for the "later books of the Aitareya Brahmana"[13]
- Franklin Southworth (2004), referencing Krishnamurti (2003): "c. 7th century BCE"[14]
- Jan N. Bremmer (2007): "c. 800 BC"[15]
Contents
Forty adhyayas (chapters) of this work are grouped under eight pañcikās (group of five). The following is an overview of its contents:
- Pañcikā I
- Pañcikā II
- Pañcikā III
- Adhyāya I: The Prauga Shastra, the Vashat call and the Nivids
- Adhyāya II: The Marutvatiya and the Nishkevalya Shastra
- Adhyāya III: The Vaishvadeva and the Agnimaruta
- Adhyāya IV: General considerations regarding the Agnishtoma
- Adhyāya V: Certain details regarding the sacrifice
- Pañcikā IV
- Adhyāya I: The Shodashin and the Atiratra sacrifices
- Adhyāya II: The Ashvina Shastra and Gavam Ayana
- Adhyāya III: The Shadahas and the Vishuvant
- Adhyāya IV: The Dvadashaha rite
- Adhyāya V: The first two days of the Dvadashaha
- Pañcikā V
- Adhyāya I: The third and fourth days of the Dvadashaha
- Adhyāya II: The fifth and sixth days of the Dvadashaha
- Adhyāya III: The seventh and eighth days of the Dvadashaha
- Adhyāya IV: The ninth and tenth days of the Dvadashaha
- Adhyāya V: The Agnihotra and the Brahmana priest
- Pañcikā VI
- Adhyāya I: The office of the Gravastut and Subrahmanya
- Adhyāya II: The Shastras of the Hotrakas at Satras and Ahinas
- Adhyāya III: Miscellaneous points as to the Hotrakas
- Adhyāya IV: The Sampata hymns, the Valakhilyas and the Durohana
- Adhyāya V: The Shilpa Shastras of the third pressing
- Pañcikā VII
- Adhyāya I: The distribution of the portions of the victim of the sacrifice
- Adhyāya II: Expiations of the errors in the sacrifice
- Adhyāya III: The narrative of Shunahshepa
- Adhyāya IV: The preparations for the royal consecretation
- Adhyāya V: The sacrificial drink of the king
- Pañcikā VIII
Cosmography
- Section 2.7
Astronomy played a significant role in Vedic rituals, which were conducted at different periods of a year. The Aitareya Brahmana (4.18) states the sun stays still for a period of 21 days, and reaches its highest point on vishuvant, the middle day of this period.[16] The gods feared that at this point, the sun would lose its balance, so they tied it with five ropes (the five "ropes" being five prayer verses). The vishuvant is mentioned as an important day for rituals.[17][18] The text also mentions that the sun burns with the greatest force after passing the meridian.[17]
The Aitareya Brahmana (2.7) states:[19]
The [sun] never really sets or rises. In that they think of him 'He is setting,' having reached the end of the day, he inverts himself; thus he makes evening below, day above. Again in that they think of him 'He is rising in the morning,' having reached the end of the night he inverts himself; thus he makes day below, night above. He never sets; indeed he never sets."
The Sun and the Earth
The Sun causes day and night on the earth,
because of revolution,
when there is night here, it is day on the other side,
the sun does not really rise or sink.
According to Subhash Kak, this implies that according to the author of the verse, the sun does not move and it is the earth that moves, suggesting heliocentrism and rotation of a spherical Earth.[19] According to Jyoti Bhusan Das Gupta, this verse implies that the author "clearly understood that days and nights were local rather than a global phenomenon". Das Gupta adds that the text's interest in the sun's position appears to be "purely ritualistic", and the verse cannot be conclusively taken as an evidence of the author's recognition of the earth as a sphere.[22] According to K. C. Chattopadhyaya, the verse simply implies that the sun has two sides: one bright and the other dark.[23]
- Section 3.44
In section 3.44, among other things, the Aitareya Brahmana states (translation by Haug):[24][25]
The sun does never rise or set. When people think the sun is setting (it is not so). For after having arrived at the end of the day it makes itself produce two opposite effects, making night to what is below and day to what is on the other side.
When they believe it rises in the morning (this supposed rising is thus to be explained for). Having reached the end of the night, it makes itself produce two opposite effects, making night to what is below and day to what is on the other side."
Aitareya Brahmana being a Vedic corpus text and scripture in Hinduism, and the lack of any Mount Meru theories in that text, the medieval era commentators such as Sayana had significant difficulty in reconciling the Vedic era and medieval era cosmographic theories.[24] The medieval era Indian scholars kept the spherical and disc shape cosmography in the Puranas, while the astronomy (Siddhanta) texts for time keeping assumed the spherical assumptions.[26][27]
In linguistics
The king and the god is a text based on the "king Harishcandra" episode (7.14 … 33.2) of Aitareya Brahmana. It has been used to compare different reconstructions of Proto-Indo-European language.
References
- ISBN 81-208-1359-6.
- ^ Roman alphabet transliteration Archived 2008-02-15 at the Wayback Machine, TITUS
- ^ ISBN 978-81-208-1359-5.
- ^ a b Friedrich Max Müller (1860). A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature. Williams and Norgate. pp. 336–337.
- ISBN 978-0-19-989643-1.
- ^ Indian Studies. Ramakrishna Maitra. 1962. p. 252.
- ^ Summaries of Papers. Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan. 1981. p. 16.
The existence of an Asvalayana Brahmana is, though less certain, also very probable, because none of the available Rgvedic Brahmanas can satisfactorily serve as the basis of the Asvalayana Srautasutra.
- ^ Proceedings of the ... World Sanskrit Conference. Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan. 1985. pp. 117–119.
That the Asvalayana School had its own Samhita, makes it more probable that it had also its own Brahmana. [...] The Asvalayana Brahmana was therefore very similar to the AB on one hand and to the Taittiriya texts on the other.
- ^ N.R.V. Prasad, ed. (1995). The Andhra Pradesh Journal of Archaeology. Director of Archaeology and Museums, Government of Andhra Pradesh. p. 3.
- OCLC 611413511.
- ^ cited after Monier Monier-Williams (1875). Indian Wisdom. W.H. Allen. p. 28.
- ISBN 978-1-60520-489-5.
- ISBN 978-81-206-1107-8.
- ISBN 978-1-134-31776-9.
- ISBN 978-90-429-1843-6., referencing Michael Witzel(1989).
- ISBN 978-0-7007-1463-6.
- ^ a b Charlotte Manning (1869). Ancient and Mediaeval India. Wm. H. Allen. pp. 360–.
- ^ Martin Haug (1863). The Aitareya Brahmanam of the Rigveda: Translation, with notes. Government Central Book Depot. pp. 290–291.
- ^ ISBN 978-94-011-4179-6.
- ISBN 978-81-206-0530-5. Archivedfrom the original on 8 December 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
- ^ Martin Haug (1922), The Aitareya Brahmana of the Rigveda, Chapter 3, Verse 44, Editor: BD Basu, The Sacred Books of the Hindus Series, pages 163-164
- ISBN 978-81-317-0851-4.
- ^ Kshetresh Chandra Chattopadhyay (1978). Studies in Vedic and Indo-Iranian Religion and Literature. Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan. p. 90.
- ^ .
- , pages 163-164
- ISBN 978-1-4443-1566-0.
- ISBN 978-0-231-53147-4., Quote: "[...] the Siddhantas (a group of astronomical texts from the fifth century that argued for a spherical earth)..."