Allied war crimes during World War II

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Further information: War crimes in World War II

During

courts-martial
. Some incidents alleged by historians to have been crimes under the law of war in operation at the time were, for a variety of reasons, not investigated by the Allied powers during the war, or were investigated but not prosecuted.

According to an article in

greatest generation" mythology surrounding World War II. This has started to change, with books such as The Day of Battle by Rick Atkinson, in which he describes Allied war crimes in Italy, and D-Day: The Battle for Normandy, by Antony Beevor.[1] Beevor's latest work suggests that Allied war crimes in Normandy were much more extensive "than was previously realized".[2]

Policy

The

prisoners of war, and repressing the population of conquered countries.[3]

Antony Beevor describes the Soviet rape of German women during the occupation of Germany as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has estimated that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia alone. He asserts that Soviet women and girls liberated from slave labor in Germany were also violated.[4]

Individual commentators such as the German historian and left-wing antiwar activist

Rotterdam, and British cities during the Blitz.[11]

Western Allies

Canada

Murder of POW's

According to Mitch-am and Avon Hohenstaufen, the

invasion of Sicily.[12]

Razing of Friesoythe

Main article: Razing of Friesoythe

Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada, Lieutenant Colonel Frederick E. Wigle, had been killed by a civilian sniper. This rumour resulted in the Highlanders setting fire to civilian property in the town of Friesoythe in an act of reprisal.[13] Stacey later wrote that the Canadian troops first removed German civilians from their property before setting the houses on fire; he commented that he was "glad to say that [he] never heard of another such case".[14] It was later found that German soldiers had killed the Argylls' commander.[15]

France

French Army

See also: Abbeville massacre
Some civilian victims of the Abbeville massacre, May 1940.

During the German invasion of Belgium, Belgian authorities arrested a number of suspects ("enemy Belgians and enemy foreigners") between 10 and 15 May on the orders of the auditor general Walter Ganshof van der Meersch. "It is clear that the arrests were very irresponsible and arbitrary. They just picked up some people: out of revenge, out of jealousy, because of their political beliefs, their Jewish origin or because of their foreign nationality," wrote survivor Gaby Warris.[16]

Three days later, on 19 May, 79 of these detainees were taken to Abbeville and locked up under the music kiosk on the market square. When the city of Abbeville was heavily bombed from the air by German squadrons on the night of 19 to 20 May, the French guards feared the prisoners would be released by the Germans and decided to summarily execute them.[17] Twenty-one prisoners were taken from the kiosk, placed against the wall, and shot without trial on the orders of the French Capitaine Marcel Dingeon, who was Abbeville's deputy commander. Of the dead, only four were found to have actually worked for the Germans. Dingeon killed himself several months after France surrendered. In January 1942, two French soldiers who participated in the massacre, Lieutenant René Caron and Sergeant Émile Molet, were tried by a German court-martial in wartime Paris. They were sentenced to death and executed by firing squad on 7 April 1942 at Mont-Valérien.[18]

Maquis

Following the

SS prisoners.[19]

The

prisoners of war at Saint-Julien-de-Crempse (in the Dordogne region), on 10 September 1944, 14 of whom have since been positively identified. The murders were revenge killings for German murders of 17 local inhabitants of the village of St. Julien on 3 August 1944, which were themselves reprisal killings in response to Resistance activity in the St. Julien region, which was home to an active Maquis cell.[20]

Moroccan Goumiers

See also: Marocchinate
Moroccan Goumiers at Monte Cassino, 1944.

French

Goumiers, committed mass crimes in Italy during and after the Battle of Monte Cassino[21] and in Germany.[22] According to Italian sources, more than 12,000 civilians, above all young and old women, children, were kidnapped, raped, or killed by Goumiers.[23] This is featured in the Italian film La Ciociara (Two Women) with Sophia Loren
.

French troops took part in the invasion of Germany, and France was assigned an occupation zone in Germany. Perry Biddiscombe quotes the original survey estimates that the French Goumiers for instance committed "385 rapes in the Constance area; 600 in Bruchsal; and 500 in Freudenstadt."[24] The soldiers are also alleged to have committed widespread rape in the Höfingen District near Leonberg.[25] Katz and Kaiser,[26] though they mention rape, found no specific occurrences in either Höfingen or Leonberg compared to other towns. Anthony Clayton, in his book France, Soldiers, and Africa,[27] devotes several pages to the criminal activities of the Goumiers, which he partially ascribes to typical practices in their homeland.

According to Norman Naimark, French Moroccan troops matched the behaviour of Soviet troops when it came to rape, in particular in the early occupation of Baden and Württemberg, provided the numbers are correct.[28]

United Kingdom

See also: British war crimes § World War II
The city centre of Dresden after the bombing

Looting, rape, and prisoner executions were committed by British soldiers at a similar scale compared to other armies throughout the war.[29] [page needed]

Indiscriminate bombing of cities

The British, with other allied nations (mainly the U.S.) carried out air raids against enemy cities during

bombing of the German city of Dresden, which killed around 25,000 people. While "no agreement, treaty, convention or any other instrument governing the protection of the civilian population or civilian property" from aerial attack was adopted before the war,[30] the Hague Conventions did prohibit the bombardment of undefended towns. The city, largely untouched by the war had functioning rail communications to the Eastern front and was an industrial centre. Allied forces inquiry concluded that an air attack on Dresden was militarily justified on the grounds the city was defended.[31]

Abuses against civilians and POWs

On 21 April 1945, British soldiers randomly selected and burned two cottages in Seedorf, Germany, in reprisal against local civilians who had hidden German soldiers in their cellars.[32] Historian Sean Longden claims that violence against German prisoners and civilians who refused to cooperate with the British army "could be ignored or made light of".[33]

After the end of the war in Europe, German prisoners in

minefields under British supervision. The Germans complained to British Commander, General Andrew Thorne, but he dismissed the accusations arguing that the Germans prisoners were not POWs but "disarmed forces who had surrendered unconditionally." By 1946, when the cleanup ended, 392 were injured and 275 had died; this was contrary to the terms of the Geneva Conventions.[34][page needed
]

The "London Cage", a MI19 prisoner of war facility in the UK during and immediately after the war, was subject to allegations of torture.[35] The Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre in occupied Germany, managed by the Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre, was the subject of an official inquiry in 1947, which found that there was "mental and physical torture during the interrogations" and that "personal property of the prisoners were stolen".[36]

Rape and sexual harassment

The Italian statistics record eight

invasion of Sicily in 1943.[37]

Rape also took place during the

advance towards the Rhine,[38] especially once British forces had entered Germany.[38] During late 1944, with the army based across Belgium and the Netherlands, soldiers were billeted with local families or befriended them. In December 1944, it came to the attention of the authorities that there was a "rise of indecency with children" where abusers had exploited the "atmosphere of trust" that had been created with local families. While the army "attempted to investigate allegations, and some men were convicted, it was an issue that received little publicity."[33]

In Germany, rapes of local women were committed by British and Canadian troops.[39] Even elderly women were targeted.[39] Though the Royal Military Police tended to turn a blind eye towards abuse of German prisoners and civilians who obstructed the army, rape was considered differently. Some officers, however, treated the behaviour of their men with leniency. Some rapes were impulsively committed under the effects of alcohol or post-traumatic stress, but there were cases of premeditated attacks.[33] One such case was the rape of three German women in the town of Neustadt am Rübenberge on a single day in April 1945,[38] or the attempted rape of two local girls at gunpoint in the village of Oyle, near Nienburg, where two soldiers attempted to coerce two girls into going into a nearby wood, and, upon their refusal, one was grabbed and dragged into the woods, where, according to Longden, after she began screaming, "one of the soldiers pulled a gun to silence her. Whether intentionally or in error, the gun went off, hitting her in the throat and killing her."[39]

Unrestricted submarine warfare and shooting of shipwreck survivors

On 4 May 1940, in response to Germany's intensive

Admiralty announced that all vessels in the Skagerrak were to be sunk on sight without warning. This was contrary to the terms of the Second London Naval Treaty.[40][41]

According to

Alfred de Zayas, there are numerous documented cases of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force deliberately firing upon shipwreck survivors.[42] In July 1941, the submarine HMS Torbay (under the command of Anthony Miers) was based in the Mediterranean where it sank several German ships. On two occasions, once off the coast of Alexandria, Egypt, and the other off the coast of Crete, the crew attacked and killed dozens of shipwrecked German sailors and troops. None of the shipwrecked survivors posed a major threat to Torbay's crew. Miers made no attempt to hide his actions, and reported them in his official logs. He received a strongly worded reprimand from his superiors following the first incident. Miers' actions violated the Hague Convention of 1907, which banned the killing of shipwreck survivors under any circumstances.[43][44]

On 10 September 1942, the Italian hospital ship Arno was torpedoed and sunk by RAF torpedo bombers north-east of Ras el Tin, near Tobruk. The British claimed that a decoded German radio message intimated that the vessel was carrying supplies to the Axis troops.[45] Arno was the third Italian hospital ship sunk by British aircraft after the loss of the Po in the Adriatic Sea to aerial torpedoes on 14 March 1941[46][47] and the bombing of the California off Syracuse on 11 August 1942.[48]

On 18 November 1944, the German hospital ship Tübingen was sunk by two

Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau, identifies the sinking of Tübingen and other German hospital ships as war crimes.[50]

Looting

During

Hague Conventions.[51] On 23 May 1945, British troops in Schleswig-Holstein were alleged to have plundered Glücksburg castle, stealing jewellery, and desecrating 38 coffins from the castle's mausoleum.[52]

United States

See also:
List of war crimes committed during World War II § Crimes perpetrated by the United States, and United States war crimes § World War II
US Army photograph)[note 1]

According to an article in

greatest generation" mythology surrounding World War II. However, this has recently started to change, with books such as The Day of Battle, by Rick Atkinson, in which he describes Allied war crimes in Italy, and D-Day: The Battle for Normandy, by Antony Beevor.[1] Beevor's latest work suggests that Allied war crimes in Normandy were much more extensive "than was previously realized".[2]

Among American WWII veterans who admitted to having committed war crimes was former

1929 Geneva Convention on POWs
. In his interviews with Brandt, Sheeran divided such massacres into four different categories.

  1. Revenge killings in the heat of battle. Sheeran told Brandt that, when a German soldier had just killed his close friends and then tried to surrender, he would often "send him to hell, too." He described often witnessing similar behavior by fellow
    GIs.[80]
  2. Orders from unit commanders during a mission. When describing his first murder for organized crime, Sheeran recalled: "It was just like when an officer would tell you to take a couple of German prisoners back behind the line and for you to 'hurry back'. You did what you had to do."[81]
  3. The
    Dachau massacre and other reprisal killings of concentration camp guards and trustee inmates.[82]
  4. Calculated attempts to dehumanize and degrade German POWs. While Sheeran's unit was climbing the
    Harz Mountains, they came upon a Wehrmacht mule train carrying food and drink up the mountainside. The female cooks were first allowed to leave unmolested, then Sheeran and his fellow GIs "ate what we wanted and soiled the rest with our waste." Then the Wehrmacht mule drivers were given shovels and ordered to "dig their own shallow graves." Sheeran later joked that they did so without complaint, likely hoping that he and his buddies would change their minds. But the mule drivers were shot and buried in the holes they had dug. Sheeran explained that by then, "I had no hesitation in doing what I had to do."[83]

War rape

Secret wartime files made public only in 2006 reveal that

American GIs committed more than 400 sexual offenses in Europe, including 126 rapes in England, between 1942 and 1945.[84] A study by Robert J. Lilly estimates that a total of 14,000 civilian women in England, France and Germany were raped by American GIs during World War II.[85][86] It is estimated that there were around 3,500 rapes by American servicemen in France between June 1944 and the end of the war and one historian has claimed that sexual violence against women in liberated France was common.[87]

In

D-Day invasion, many of the American rapes in Germany in 1945 were gang rapes committed by armed soldiers at gunpoint.[89]

Although non-fraternization policies were instituted for the Americans in Germany, the phrase "copulation without conversation is not fraternization" was used as a motto by United States Army troops.[90] The journalist Osmar White, a war correspondent from Australia who served with the American troops during the war, wrote that

After the fighting moved on to German soil, there was a good deal of rape by combat troops and those immediately following them. The incidence varied between unit and unit according to the attitude of the commanding officer. In some cases offenders were identified, tried by court martial, and punished. The army legal branch was reticent, but admitted that for brutal or perverted sexual offences against German women, some soldiers had been shot – particularly if they happened to be Negroes. Yet I know for a fact that many women were raped by white Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. In one sector a report went round that a certain very distinguished army commander made the wisecrack, 'Copulation without conversation does not constitute fraternisation.'[91]

A typical victimization with sexual assault by drunken American personnel marching through occupied territory involved threatening a German family with weapons, forcing one or more women to engage in sex, and putting the entire family out on the street afterward.[90]

As in the eastern sector of the occupation, the number of rapes peaked in 1945, but a high rate of violence against the German and Austrian populations by the Americans lasted at least into the first half of 1946, with five cases of dead German women found in American barracks in May and June 1946 alone.[89]

Carol Huntington writes that the American soldiers who raped German women and then left gifts of food for them may have permitted themselves to view the act as a prostitution rather than rape. Citing the work of a Japanese historian alongside this suggestion, Huntington writes that Japanese women who begged for food "were raped and soldiers sometimes left food for those they raped."[89]

The black soldiers of America's segregated occupation force were both more likely to be charged with rape and severely punished.[89] Heide Fehrenbach writes that, while the American black soldiers were in fact by no means free from indiscipline,

The point, rather, is that American officials exhibited an explicit interest in a soldier's race, and then only if he were black, when reporting behavior they feared would undermine either the status or the political aims of the U.S. Military Government in Germany.[92]

In 2015, German news magazine Der Spiegel reported that German historian Miriam Gebhardt "believes that members of the US military raped as many as 190,000 German women by the time West Germany regained sovereignty in 1955, with most of the assaults taking place in the months immediately following the US invasion of Nazi Germany. The author bases her claims in large part on reports kept by Bavarian priests in the summer of 1945."[93]

Eastern Allies

Soviet Union

Main article: Soviet war crimes § World War II

The Soviet Union had not signed the

Hague Conventions (which the 1929 Geneva Convention did not replace but only augmented, and unlike the 1929 convention, were ones that the Russian Empire had ratified) and other customary laws of war, regarding the treatment of prisoners of war, were binding on all nations in a conflict whether they were signatories to the specific treaty or not.[96][97][98]

Mass grave of the victims of the Katyn massacre after discovery in 1943

One of the Soviet Union's earliest war crimes was the

military officers and intelligentsia carried out by the Soviet Union, specifically the NKVD ("People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs", aka the Soviet secret police) in April and May 1940. Though the killings took place at several places, the massacre is named after the Katyn Forest, where some of the mass graves
were first discovered.

Battle of Budapest.[citation needed
]

The most widely-known war crimes committed by Soviet troops against citizens and soldiers are:

Late in the war, Yugoslavia's communist partisans complained about the rapes and looting committed by the Soviet Army while traversing their country. Milovan Djilas later recalled Joseph Stalin's response,

Does Djilas, who is himself a writer, not know what human suffering and the human heart are? Can't he understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometers through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle?[103]

Soviet war correspondent Natalya Gesse observed the Red Army in 1945: "The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty. It was an army of rapists". Polish women as well as Russian, Belarusian and Ukrainian slave laborers were also mass raped by the Red Army. The Soviet war correspondent Vasily Grossman described: "Liberated Soviet girls quite often complain that our soldiers rape them".[4] Soviet premier Joseph Stalin refused to punish the offenders.[104]

The

lamasery Gegenmiao/Koken-miao (葛根廟) during the Soviet invasion of Manchuria.[105]

Yugoslavia

Armed conflict Perpetrator
World War II in Yugoslavia Yugoslav Partisans
Incident Type of crime Persons
responsible		 Notes
Bleiburg repatriations Alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. The victims were mostly Yugoslav collaborationist troops (ethnic Croats, Serbs, and Slovenes), but also included a number of civilians. They were executed without trial in an act of vengeance for the genocide committed by the pro-Axis collaborationist states (in particular the Ustaše) installed by the Nazis during the German occupation of Yugoslavia.[106]
Foibe massacres War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. Ethnic cleansing. No prosecutions.[107] Following Italy's 1943 armistice with the Allied powers up to 1947,
Kvarner and Dalmatia a number between 11,000[108][109] and 20,000[110] of the local ethnic Italian population (Istrian Italians and Dalmatian Italians), as well against anti-communists in general (even Croats and Slovenes), usually associated with Fascism, Nazism and collaboration with Axis,[110][108] as well as against real, potential or presumed opponents of Tito communism.[111] The type of attack was state terrorism,[110][112] reprisal killings,[110][113] and ethnic cleansing against Italians.[110][114][115][116][117] The foibe massacres were followed by the Istrian–Dalmatian exodus.[118]
Communist purges in Serbia in 1944–45
 War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. 1944–1945 killings of ethnic Germans (Danube Swabians),
prisoners of war and civilians.[119]
Kočevski Rog massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[120]
Macelj massacre Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[121]
Tezno trench
 Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[122]
Barbara Pit
 Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[123]
Prevalje mass grave Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians. No prosecutions. Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families.[124]

Asia and the Pacific War

See also: Japanese prisoners of war in World War II and Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

Allied soldiers in the Pacific and Asian theatres sometimes killed Japanese soldiers who were attempting to surrender or after they had surrendered. A social historian of the Pacific War, John W. Dower, states that "by the final years of the war against Japan, a truly vicious cycle had developed in which the Japanese reluctance to surrender had meshed horrifically with Allied disinterest in taking prisoners".[125] Dower suggests that most Japanese personnel were told that they would be "killed or tortured" if they fell into Allied hands and, as a consequence, most of those faced with defeat on the battlefield fought to the death or committed suicide.[126] In addition, it was held to be shamefully disgraceful for a Japanese soldier to surrender, leading many to commit suicide or to fight to the death regardless of any beliefs concerning their possible treatment as POWs. In fact, the Japanese Field Service Code said that surrender was not permissible.[127]

And while it was "not official policy" for Allied personnel to take no prisoners, "over wide reaches of the Asian battleground it was everyday practice".[128]

Australia

According to historian

Mark Johnston, "the killing of unarmed Japanese was common" and Australian command tried to put pressure on troops to actually take prisoners, but the troops proved reluctant.[129] When prisoners were indeed taken "it often proved difficult to prevent them from killing captured Japanese before they could be interrogated".[130] According to Johnston, as a consequence of this type of behavior, "Some Japanese soldiers were almost certainly deterred from surrendering to Australians".[130]

Major General

Kokoda Track Campaign was not uncommon. In one instance he recalled during the battle at Gorari that "the leading platoon captured five or seven Japanese and moved on to the next battle. The next platoon came along and bayoneted these Japanese."[131]
He also stated that he found the killings understandable but that it had left him feeling guilty.

China

Some victims of the Tongzhou massacre.

There has been relatively little research into the general treatment of Japanese prisoners of war taken by Chinese Nationalist forces, such as the National Revolutionary Army (NRA), during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–45), according to R. J. Rummel.[132] However, civilians and conscripts, as well as Japanese civilians in China, were frequently maltreated by the Chinese military. Rummel says that Chinese peasants "often had no less to fear from their own soldiers than ... from the Japanese".[133] The Nationalist military was reinforced by recruits gained through violent campaigns of conscription directed at Chinese civilians. According to Rummel:

This was a deadly affair in which men were kidnapped for the army, rounded up indiscriminately by

press-gangs or army units among those on the roads or in the towns and villages, or otherwise gathered together. Many men, some the very young and old, were killed resisting or trying to escape. Once collected, they would be roped or chained together and marched, with little food or water, long distances to camp. They often died or were killed along the way, sometimes less than 50 percent reaching camp alive. Then recruit camp was no better, with hospitals resembling Nazi concentration camps... Probably 3,081,000 died during the Sino-Japanese War; likely another 1,131,000 during the Civil War—4,212,000 dead in total. Just during conscription [emphasis added].[134]

Within some intakes of Nationalist conscripts, there was a death rate of 90% from disease, starvation or violence before they commenced training.[135]

Examples of war crimes committed by Chinese associated forces include:

United Kingdom

During the Burma campaign, there are recorded instances of British troops removing gold teeth from dead Japanese troops and displaying Japanese skulls as trophies.[138]

During the

quashed by Australian courts.[140]

United States

See also: United States war crimes § World War II

On January 26, 1943, the submarine

Vice Admiral Charles A. Lockwood asserted that the survivors were Japanese soldiers who had turned machine-gun and rifle fire on the Wahoo after she surfaced, and that such resistance was common in submarine warfare.[141] According to the submarine's executive officer, the fire was intended to force the Japanese soldiers to abandon their boats and none of them were deliberately targeted.[142] Historian Clay Blair stated that the submarine's crew fired first and the shipwrecked survivors returned fire with handguns.[143] The survivors were later determined to have included Allied POWs of the Indian 2nd Battalion, 16th Punjab Regiment, who were guarded by Japanese Army Forces from the 26th Field Ordnance Depot.[144] Of 1,126 men originally aboard Buyo Maru, 195 Indians and 87 Japanese died, some killed during the torpedoing of the ship and some killed by the shootings afterwards.[145]

On 4 March 1943, during and after the Battle of the Bismarck Sea (March 3–5, 1943), General George Kenney ordered U.S. patrol boats and Allied aircraft to attack Japanese rescue vessels, as well as the approximately 1,000 survivors from eight sunken Japanese troop transport ships on life rafts and swimming or floating in the sea.[146][147] This was later State justified on the grounds that the rescued servicemen were next to their destination, and would have been rapidly landed at their military destination and promptly returned to active service in the battle.[146][148] Many of the Allied aircrew accepted the attacks as necessary, while others were sickened.[149]

American soldiers in the Pacific often deliberately killed Japanese soldiers who had surrendered. According to Richard J. Aldrich, a professor of history at the University of Warwick, who has published a study of the diaries kept by United States and Australian soldiers, they sometimes massacred prisoners of war.[150] Dower states that in "many instances ... Japanese who did become prisoners were killed on the spot or en route to prison compounds".[128] According to Aldrich it was common practice for U.S. troops not to take prisoners.[151] This analysis is supported by British historian Niall Ferguson,[152] who also says that, in 1943, "a secret [U.S.] intelligence report noted that only the promise of ice cream and three days leave would ... induce American troops not to kill surrendering Japanese".[152]

Ferguson states such practices played a role in the ratio of Japanese prisoners to dead being 1:100 in late 1944. That same year, efforts were taken by Allied high commanders to suppress "take no prisoners" attitudes,[152] among their own personnel (as these were affecting intelligence gathering) and to encourage Japanese soldiers to surrender. Ferguson adds that measures by Allied commanders to improve the ratio of Japanese prisoners to Japanese dead, resulted in it reaching 1:7, by mid-1945. Nevertheless, taking no prisoners was still standard practice among US troops at the Battle of Okinawa, in April–June 1945.[152] Ferguson also suggests that "it was not only the fear of disciplinary action or of dishonor that deterred German and Japanese soldiers from surrendering. More important for most soldiers was the perception that prisoners would be killed by the enemy anyway, and so one might as well fight on."[153]

Hague Convention of 1907.[155][154] Therefore, according to Straus, "Senior officers opposed the taking of prisoners on the grounds that it needlessly exposed American troops to risks".[154] When prisoners nevertheless were taken at Guadalcanal, interrogator Army Captain Burden noted that many times these were shot during transport because "it was too much bother to take him in".[156]

US historian James J. Weingartner attributes the very low number of Japanese in US POW compounds to two important factors, a Japanese reluctance to surrender and a widespread American "conviction that the Japanese were "animals" or "subhuman" and unworthy of the normal treatment accorded to POWs.[157] The latter reason is supported by Ferguson, who says that "Allied troops often saw the Japanese in the same way that Germans regarded Russians—as Untermenschen".[152]

Mutilation of Japanese war dead

Main article: American mutilation of Japanese war dead
U.S. Navy Lieutenant (j.g.) E.V. McPherson with a Japanese skull on board USS PT-341

In the Pacific theater, Allied servicemen engaged in

Franklin Roosevelt himself was reportedly given a gift of a letter-opener made of a Japanese soldier's arm by U.S. Representative Francis E. Walter in 1944, which Roosevelt later ordered to be returned, calling for its proper burial.[158]: 65 [159]: 825  The news was also widely reported to the Japanese public, where the Americans were portrayed as "deranged, primitive, racist and inhuman". This, compounded by a previous Life magazine picture of a young woman with a skull trophy, was reprinted in the Japanese media and presented as a symbol of "American barbarism", causing national shock and outrage.[160][159]: 833 [159]

The collection of Japanese body parts began quite early in the war, prompting a September 1942 order for disciplinary action against such souvenir taking.

Battle of Guadalcanal), "clearly, the collection of body parts on a scale large enough to concern the military authorities had started as soon as the first living or dead Japanese bodies were encountered".[159]

When Japanese remains were repatriated from the Mariana Islands after the war, roughly 60 percent were missing their skulls.[159]

In a 13 June 1944 memorandum, the US Army

Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armies in the Field, which stated that: "After each engagement, the occupant of the field of battle shall take measures to search for the wounded and dead, and to protect them against pillage and maltreatment."[161] Cramer recommended the distribution to all commanders of a directive ordering them to prohibit the misuse of enemy body parts.[157]

These practices were also in violation of the unwritten customary rules of land warfare and could lead to the death penalty.[157] The US Navy JAG mirrored that opinion one week later, and also added that "the atrocious conduct of which some US personnel were guilty could lead to retaliation by the Japanese which would be justified under international law".[157]

Okinawa

U.S. military personnel raped Okinawan women during the Battle of Okinawa in 1945.[162]

Okinawan historian Oshiro Masayasu (former director of the Okinawa Prefectural Historical Archives) writes based on several years of research:

Soon after the U.S. Marines landed, all the women of a village on Motobu Peninsula fell into the hands of American soldiers. At the time, there were only women, children, and old people in the village, as all the young men had been mobilized for the war. Soon after landing, the Marines "mopped up" the entire village, but found no signs of Japanese forces. Taking advantage of the situation, they started 'hunting for women' in broad daylight, and those women who were hiding in the village or nearby air raid shelters were dragged out one after another.[163]

According to interviews carried out by The New York Times and published by them in 2000, several elderly people from an Okinawan village confessed that after the United States had won the Battle of Okinawa, three armed Marines kept coming to the village every week to force the villagers to gather all the local women, who were then carried off into the hills and raped. The article goes deeper into the matter and claims that the villagers' tale—true or not—is part of a "dark, long-kept secret" the unraveling of which "refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war": 'the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen."[164] Although Japanese reports of rape were largely ignored at the time, academic estimates have been that as many as 10,000 Okinawan women may have been raped. It has been claimed that the rape was so prevalent that most Okinawans over age 65 around the year 2000 either knew or had heard of a woman who was raped in the aftermath of the war. Military officials denied the mass rapings, and all surviving veterans refused The New York Times' request for an interview.[165]

Professor of East Asian Studies and expert on Okinawa, Steve Rabson, said: "I have read many accounts of such rapes in Okinawan newspapers and books, but few people know about them or are willing to talk about them."[165] He notes that plenty of old local books, diaries, articles and other documents refer to rapes by American soldiers of various races and backgrounds.

An explanation given for why the US military has no record of any rapes is that few—if any—Okinawan women reported abuse, mostly out of fear and embarrassment. According to

Nago, Okinawan police spokesman: "Victimized women feel too ashamed to make it public."[165] Those who did report them are believed by historians to have been ignored by the U.S. military police. A large scale effort to determine the extent of such crimes has also never been called for. Over five decades after the war has ended the women who were believed to have been raped still refused to give a public statement, with friends, local historians and university professors who had spoken with the women instead saying they preferred not to discuss it publicly. Many people wondered why it never came to light after the inevitable American-Japanese babies the many women must have given birth to. In interviews, historians and Okinawan elders said that some of those Okinawan women who were raped and did not commit suicide did give birth to biracial children, but that many of them were immediately killed or left behind out of shame, disgust or fearful trauma. More often, however, rape victims underwent crude abortions with the help of village midwives. A large scale effort to determine the possible extent of these crimes has never been conducted. Over five decades after the war had ended, in the late 1990s, the women who were believed to have been raped still overwhelmingly refused to give public statements, instead speaking through relatives and a number of historians and scholars.[165]

There is substantial evidence that the U.S. had at least some knowledge of what was going on. Samuel Saxton, a retired captain, explained that the American veterans and witnesses may have intentionally kept the rape a secret, largely out of shame: "It would be unfair for the public to get the impression that we were all a bunch of rapists after we worked so hard to serve our country."[165] Military officials formally denied the mass rapes, and all surviving related veterans refused request for interviews from The New York Times. Masaie Ishihara, a sociology professor, supports this: "There is a lot of historical amnesia out there, many people don't want to acknowledge what really happened."[165] Author George Feifer in his book Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb, noted that by 1946 there had been fewer than 10 reported cases of rape in Okinawa. He explained that it was "partly because of shame and disgrace, partly because Americans were victors and occupiers". Feifer claimed: "In all there were probably thousands of incidents, but the victims' silence kept rape another dirty secret of the campaign."[166]

However, American professor of Japanese studies Michael S. Molasky and some other authors have argued that they noted that Okinawan civilians "were often surprised at the comparatively humane treatment they received from the American enemy."[167][168] According to Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power by the American Mark Selden, the Americans "did not pursue a policy of torture, rape, and murder of civilians as Japanese military officials had warned."[169]

Post-war
Main article: Rape during the occupation of Japan

According to some authors, there were 1,336 reported rapes during the first 10 days of the occupation of Kanagawa Prefecture after the Japanese surrender,[162] however author Brian Walsh states that this claim originates from a misreading of Japanese Government crime figures that had actually reported 1,326 criminal incidents of all types involving American forces, including an unspecified number of rapes.[170]

Comparative death rates of POWs

According to James D. Morrow, "Death rates of POWs held is one measure of adherence to the standards of the treaties because substandard treatment leads to death of prisoners". The "democratic states generally provide good treatment of POWs".[171]

Killed by the Allied powers

  • German POWs in East European (not including the Soviet Union) hands 32.9%[152]
  • German soldiers held by Soviet Union: 15–33% (14.7% in The Dictators by Richard Overy, 35.8% in Ferguson)[152]
  • Italian soldiers held by the Soviet Union: 79%[172]
  • Japanese POWs held by Soviet Union: 10% [citation needed]
  • German POWs in British hands 0.03%[152]
  • German POWs in American hands 0.15%[152]
  • German POWs in French hands 2.58%[152]
  • Japanese POWs held by U.S.: relatively low[clarification needed], mainly suicides according to James D. Morrow.[173]
  • Japanese POWs in Chinese hands: 24% [citation needed]

Killed by Axis powers

  • US and British Commonwealth POWs held by Germany: ≈4%[171]
  • Soviet POWs held by Germany: 57.5%[152]
  • Italian POWs and
    military internees held by Germany: between 6% and 8.4%[note 2]
  • Western Allied POWs held by Japan: 27%[174] (Figures for Japan may be misleading, as sources indicate that either 10,800[175] or 19,000[176] of 35,756 fatalities among Allied POW's were from "friendly fire" at sea when their transport ships were sunk. The Geneva convention required the labelling of hospital ships as such, but had no provision for the labelling of such craft as POW ships. All sides killed many of their own POWs when sinking enemy ships.)

Summary table

Percent killed
Origin
Soviet Union United States
and United Kingdom		 China Western Allies Germany Japan
Held by Soviet Union – – – – 14.70
–35.80		 10.00
United Kingdom – – – – 0.03
United States – – – – 0.15 varying
France – – – – 2.58
East European
 – – – – 32.90
Germany 57.50 4.00 – –
Japan included in Western Allies (27) not documented 27.00 – –

Portrayal

Holocaust denial literature

The focus on Allied atrocities during the war has been a theme of

Holocaust denial; phenomenon she calls "immoral equivalencies".[178]

Japanese neo-nationalists

Japanese neo-nationalists argue that Allied war crimes and the shortcomings of the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal were equivalent to the war crimes committed by Japanese forces during the war.[citation needed] American historian John W. Dower has written that this position is "a kind of historiographic cancellation of immorality—as if the transgressions of others exonerate one's own crimes".[179] While right-wing forces in Japan have tried to push for their perspective on war-time history, they have been unsuccessful due to opposition both within and outside Japan.[180]

See also

War crimes committed by the Axis powers and their collaborators
Allied war crimes
Other

Notes

  1. ^ The caption for the photograph in the US National Archives reads, "SC208765, Soldiers of the 42nd Infantry Division, US Seventh Army, order SS men to come forward when one of their number tried to escape from the Dachau, Germany, concentration camp after it was captured by US forces. Men on the ground in background feign death by falling as the guards fired a volley at the fleeing SS men. (157th Regt. 4/29/45)."[53]
    Lt. Colonel Felix L. Sparks disputed this and thought that it "represented the initial step in the cover-up of the execution of German guards".[53]
  2. ^ About 43,600 deaths on a total of approx 730,000 POWs and military internees. Another 13,269 were killed between September 1943 and February 1944 in the sinking of seven ships carrying them from Greece to German-controlled ports. A further 5,000 to 6,000 Italian POW were murdered by the Germans after they had surrendered in the Massacre of the Acqui Division.

References

Citations

  1. ^ a b c The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied War Crimes in WWII, Spiegel Online, 05/04/2010, (part 2), accessed 2010-07-08 (Archive)
  2. ^ a b c "The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied War Crimes in WWII", Der Spiegel, 4 May 2010, (part 1), accessed 8 July 2010 (Archive)
  3. ISBN 978-0-19-280670-3
    .
  4. ^ a b c Beevor, Antony (1 May 2002), "They raped every German female from eight to 80", The Guardian, archived from the original on 25 May 2023
  5. ^ Kershaw, Alex, "Monte Cassino, Ten Armies in Hell", World War II Magazine, September/October 2013, p. 73
  6. ^ Harding, Luke (22 October 2003). "Germany's forgotten victims". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 9 May 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  7. ISBN 1-84413-928-X
    . Chapter 9 p. 180
  8. ISBN 978-0-19-280670-3
    .
  9. ^ Stanson, Gregory. "Dr". Genocide Watch. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  10. ^ Javier Guisández Gómez (30 June 1998). "The Law of Air Warfare". International Review of the Red Cross (323): 347–363. Archived from the original on 25 April 2013.
  11. ISBN 978-1-8454-5844-7
    .
  12. ISBN 9780811734035
    .
  13. ^ Stacey (1960), p. 558
  14. ^ Stacey (1982), pp. 163–164
  15. ^ Stacey (1960), pp. 558
  16. ISBN 9789052402505
    .
  17. ISBN 9789089240255
    .
  18. ISBN 9789061522928
    .
  19. ^ Beevor, Antony, D-Day, Viking, 2009 p 447
  20. ^ After the Battle Magazine, Issue 143
  21. ^ http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9705&L=twatch-l&D=1&O=D&F=P&P=1025"LISTSERV 16.5 – Archives – Error". Archived from the original on 15 July 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) Italian women win cash for wartime rapes
  22. ^ Volker Koop: Besetzt: französische Besatzungspolitik in Deutschland, Berlin 2005
  23. ^ "1952: Il caso delle "marocchinate" al Parlamento". Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  24. S2CID 145470893
    .
  25. ISBN 1-85285-442-1
    .
  26. ^ Katz, Kaiser "[Chaos, Angst und leise Hoffnung. Kriegsende und französische Besatzung, in: Cornelia Kaiser, Ingrid Katz, Zwischen Hunger und Hoffnung. Nachkriegsalltag in Leonberg, Leonberg 1998, S. 7–12]
  27. ISBN 978-0080347486
    .
  28. ^ Naimark 1995, pp. 106–107.
  29. ISBN 0-7110-2167-8
    .
  30. doi:10.1017/S0020860400091075. Archived from the original
    on 25 April 2013.
  31. ^ USAF Historical Division [verification needed]
  32. ISBN 978-0-8020-0862-6
    .
  33. ^ a b c Longden, p. 195
  34. ISBN 9780750958073
    .
  35. ^ Cobain, Ian (12 November 2005). "The secrets of the London Cage". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 17 July 2009.
  36. ISBN 1-903365-08-2
    .
  37. ISBN 0199653712
  38. ^ a b c Emsley, p. 128
  39. ^
    ISBN 1844370380
  40. ISBN 978-1-8460-3007-9
    .
  41. ISBN 978-0-4721-1889-2
    .
  42. ^ de Zayas (1990), pp. 245–260.
  43. ^ HMS Torbay (N79) Archived 23 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  44. ISBN 0-7735-1282-9
    .
  45. ISBN 1-59114-119-2
    .
  46. ^ "Italian hospital ship Po sunk by British". marpubs. 14 March 2017. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  47. ^ "Wien SS (1911~1919) Po SS (+1941)". Wrecksite.eu.
  48. ^ "SS California [+1941]". Wrecksite.eu.
  49. ^ "Lazarettschiffe Tübingen". Feldgrau.com. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  50. ^ "Alfred M. de Zayas, Die Wehrmacht-Untersuchungsstelle für Verletzungen des Völkerrechts". Lazarettschiffe Tübingen. Lindenbaum Verlag. Archived from the original on 6 January 2015. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  51. ^ Flint, p. 354
  52. ^ Castle looted by British troops AAP, 23 August 1947
  53. ^ a b Moody 2003
  54. ^ Giovanni Bartolone, Le altre stragi: Le stragi alleate e tedesche nella Sicilia del 1943–1944
  55. ^ George Duncan, Massacres and Atrocities of World War II in the Axis Countries Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  56. ISBN 0-8147-9366-5
  57. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1989.tb00772.x
    .
  58. ^ "Anniversario. Milano, Gorla e la strage dei 184 innocenti" (in Italian). 20 October 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  59. ^ "20 ottobre 1944: in memoria dei Martiri di Gorla". Associazione Memento (in Italian). Retrieved 2 March 2017.
  60. ^ "Gorla Domani - I Piccoli Martiri". Retrieved 2 March 2017.
  61. ^ "MUSEO DELLA PACE". Retrieved 2 March 2017.
  62. AP News
    . 20 October 2019.
  63. ^ Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.186
  64. ^ Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.189
  65. ^ Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.190
  66. Center for Investigative Reporting, archived from the original
    on 9 February 2019, retrieved 3 March 2019
  67. ISBN 978-0-313-25293-8
    .
  68. ^ Patton, George (4 January 1945). "George S. Patton Papers: Diaries, 1910–1945; Original; 1944, Oct. 3 – 1945, Feb. 5". Library of Congress. Retrieved 31 December 2018.
  69. ^ Zigan, Harald (16 April 2015). "Kriegsende 1945 (Teil 10): US-Soldaten nehmen blutige Rache in Jungholzhausen und Ilshofen". swp.de (in German). Südwest Presse. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2019.
  70. ^ Falkner, Burkhard (2 October 2010). "Es geht nicht um Rache, wir mahnen". volksstimme.de (in German). Volksstimme. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
  71. ISBN 0-8131-2325-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )
  72. ^ Albert Panebianco (ed). Dachau its liberation Archived 28 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine 57th Infantry Association, Felix L. Sparks, Secretary 15 June 1989. (backup site)
  73. ^ Sparks, Felix L. "Dachau and Liberation". Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  74. ^ Perez, R.H. (2002). "Dachau Concentration Camp – Liberation". Archived from the original on 10 October 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
  75. ISBN 0913159042
    .
  76. ISBN 0-8133-8815-5
    .
  77. ISBN 0-679-64033-9
    .
  78. ^ Carloni, Fabrizio (April 2009). Le atrocità alleate in Sicilia. Storia e battaglie. p. 13.
  79. ^ "I CRIMINI DEGLI ALLEATI IN SICILIA E A NAPOLI NELLA SECONDA GUERRA MONDIALE – IL RUOLO DELLA MAFIA E QUELLO DELLA MASSONERIA".
  80. ^ Brandt (2004), I Heard You Paint Houses, p. 50
  81. ^ Brandt (2004), p. 84.
  82. ^ Brandt (2004), p. 52.
  83. ^ Brandt (2004), p. 51.
  84. ^ Wilson, David (27 March 2007). "The secret war". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 4 April 2023. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  85. ISBN 978-0-230-50647-3
    .
  86. S2CID 162399427
    .
  87. ^ Schofield, Hugh (5 June 2009). "Revisionists challenge D-Day story". BBC News. Archived from the original on 18 November 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  88. ISBN 978-0-230-50647-3
    p.12
  89. ^
    ISBN 0-7546-7458-4
    .
  90. ^
    ISBN 0-8147-8089-X
    .
  91. ISBN 0-521-83051-6
    .
  92. ISBN 978-0-691-11906-9
    .
  93. ^ "Were Americans As Bad as the Soviets?". Der Spiegel. 2 March 2015. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023.
  94. ^ Study: Soviet Prisoners-of-War (POWs), 1941–42[unreliable source?] website of Gendercide Watch
  95. ^ Matthew White, Source List and Detailed Death Tolls for the Twentieth Century Hemoclysm: Stalin
  96. ^ POWs and the laws of war: World War II legacy 2003 Educational Broadcasting Corporation
  97. ^ Jennifer K. Elsea (Legislative Attorney American Law Division) Federation of American Scientists CRS Report for Congress Lawfulness of Interrogation Techniques under the Geneva Conventions (PDF) 8 September 2004. Page 24 first paragraph see also footnotes 93 and 87
  98. German High Command Trial 30 December 1947 – 28 October 1948, PartVIII Archived 2 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  99. S2CID 162539651
    .
  100. ISBN 0-385-49798-9
    . Retrieved 18 March 2006.
  101. ISBN 0-312-12159-8
    .
  102. ISBN 0-9657793-0-0
    .
  103. ^ Milovan Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, p. 95.
  104. ^ Service 2004, p. 473.
  105. ISBN 978-0-230-10636-9
    .
  106. ^ Yalta and the Bleiburg Tragedy Archived 16 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  107. ^ "Foibe: pm Pititto, su quell'inferno di pietra non e' stata fatta giustizia" (in Italian). Retrieved 18 December 2002.
  108. ^
    ISBN 9788842529996
    .
  109. ^ Micol Sarfatti (11 February 2013). "Perché quasi nessuno ricorda le foibe?". huffingtonpost.it (in Italian).
  110. ^
    ISBN 9783030783860
    .
  111. ^ "Relazione della Commissione storico-culturale italo-slovena - V Periodo 1941-1945". Archived from the original on 16 January 2009. Retrieved 11 January 2009.
  112. ^ Il tempo e la storia: Le Foibe, Rai TV, Raoul Pupo
  113. ISBN 9780241962220.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )
  114. ISBN 9781107005037
    .
  115. ^ Silvia Ferreto Clementi. "La pulizia etnica e il manuale Cubrilovic" (in Italian). Retrieved 15 February 2015.
  116. ^ «....Già nello scatenarsi della prima ondata di cieca violenza in quelle terre, nell'autunno del 1943, si intrecciarono giustizialismo sommario e tumultuoso, parossismo nazionalista, rivalse sociali e un disegno di sradicamento della presenza italiana da quella che era, e cessò di essere, la Venezia Giulia. Vi fu dunque un moto di odio e di furia sanguinaria, e un disegno annessionistico slavo, che prevalse innanzitutto nel Trattato di pace del 1947, e che assunse i sinistri contorni di una "pulizia etnica". Quel che si può dire di certo è che si consumò - nel modo più evidente con la disumana ferocia delle foibe - una delle barbarie del secolo scorso.» from the official website of The Presidency of the Italian Republic, Giorgio Napolitano, official speech for the celebration of "Giorno del Ricordo" Quirinal, Rome, 10 February 2007.
  117. ^ "Il giorno del Ricordo - Croce Rossa Italiana" (in Italian). Archived from the original on 28 January 2022. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  118. ISBN 9781845452704
    .
  119. ^ Janjetović, Zoran (2006). "Proterivanje nemačkog i mađarskog življa iz Vojvodine na kraju drugog svetskog rata". Hereticus (in Serbian). 1. Archived from the original on 6 October 2011. Retrieved 6 May 2011.
  120. ^ Slovenia 1945: Memories of Death and Survival after World War II by John Corsellis & Marcus Ferrar. Pages 87, 204 & 250.
  121. ^ "Macelj – gora zločina!". Večernji list (in Croatian). 16 May 2012. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
  122. ^ "Tezno je najveća masovna grobnica Hrvata". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 11 September 2007. Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 15 May 2010.
  123. ^ "Stratišta: "U iskapanju Hude jame Hrvati nam moraju pomoći, tamo su oni ubijali svoje"". Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). 7 November 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
  124. ^ Mass grave of 700 people found in Slovenia, The Daily Telegraph
  125. ISBN 0-394-75172-8
    ), p.35.
  126. ^ John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.68.
  127. ^ Ulrich Strauss, 2003, The Anguish of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II[page needed]
  128. ^ a b John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.69.
  129. ^ Mark Johnston, Fighting the enemy: Australian soldiers and their adversaries in World War II pp. 80–81
  130. ^ a b Mark Johnston, Fighting the enemy: Australian soldiers and their adversaries in World War II p. 81
  131. ^ Kevin Baker, Paul Cullen, citizen and soldier: the life and times of Major-General Paul Cullen AC, CBE, DSC and Bar, ED, FCA p. 146
  132. ^ a b Rummel 1991, p. 112
  133. ^ a b Rummel 1991, p. 113
  134. ^ Rummel, R.J. "CHINA'S BLOODY CENTURY".
  135. ISBN 0-88738-417-X
    ) Transaction Publishers, p. 115.
  136. ^ Tom Mintier, "Photos document brutality in Shanghai" CNN, 23 September 1996. Retrieved: 25 August 2007.
  137. ^ 中村粲. 『大東亜戦争への道』. 展々社, 1990年.
  138. ^ T. R. Moreman "The jungle, the Japanese and the British Commonwealth armies at war, 1941–45", p. 205
  139. ^ Gerster 2008, pp. 112–3.
  140. ^ Gerster 2008, p. [page needed].
  141. ISBN 978-0-553-23919-5
    .
  142. ISBN 978-0-89141-301-1
    .
  143. ISBN 978-1-55750-217-9
    .
  144. ^ Holwitt 2005, p. 288; DeRose 2000, pp. 287–288.
  145. ^ Holwitt 2005, p. 289; DeRose 2000, pp. 77, 94.
  146. ^ a b Gillison, Douglas (1962). Royal Australian Air Force 1939–1942. Canberra: Australian War Memorial.
  147. ^ Ken Dooley, 2015, The Untold Story of the U.S. 5th Air Force's 39th Fighter Squadron Relentless Pursuit, p.63.
  148. ^ "Anniversary talks—Battle of the Bismarck Sea, 2–4 March 1943". Australian War Memorial. 3 March 2003. Archived from the original on 24 August 2003. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
  149. ISBN 978-1-74175-901-3
    .
  150. ^ Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily Telegraph (UK), 8 June 2005), accessed 26 May 2007. (Adrich is a professor of history at the University of Nottingham.)
  151. ^ Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily Telegraph (UK), 8 June 2005), accessed 26 May 2007
  152. ^
    S2CID 159610355
    .
  153. ^ Niall Ferguson, "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat", War in History, 2004, 11 (2): p.176.
  154. ^
    ISBN 978-0-295-98336-3
    , p.116
  155. ^ Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907
  156. ISBN 978-0-295-98336-3
    , p. 117
  157. ^
    JSTOR 3640788
    .
  158. JSTOR 3640788. Archived
    from the original on 11 August 2011. Retrieved 11 August 2011. U.S. Marines on their way to Guadalcanal relished the prospect of making necklaces of Japanese gold teeth and "pickling" Japanese ears" as keepsakes.
  159. ^
    doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00365.x. Archived from the original
    on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
  160. ISBN 9781609530723
    .
  161. ^ Cited in Weingartner, 1992.
  162. ^
    ISBN 978-0-8147-9816-4
    .
  163. ISBN 0-203-30275-3
  164. ^ Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime Okinawa". The New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015. Still, the villagers' tale of a dark, long-kept secret has refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war, the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen.
  165. ^ a b c d e f Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime Okinawa". The New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  166. ISBN 9780395599242
    .
  167. ISBN 978-0-415-19194-4
    .
  168. ISBN 978-0-8248-2300-9
    .
  169. ^ Sheehan, Susan D; Elizabeth, Laura; Selden, Hein Mark. "Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power": 18. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  170. ^ Walsh, Brian (October 2018). "Sexual Violence During the Occupation of Japan". The Journal of Military History. 82 (4): 1217–1219.
  171. ^ a b James D. Morrow. The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties, Center for Political Studies at The University of Michigan
  172. ISBN 978-88-420-7981-1
    , page 153
  173. ^ James D. Morrow The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties, Center for Political Studies at The University of Michigan, p. 22
  174. ISBN 0-8133-2718-0
    ) pp. 2–3.
  175. ^ Gavan Daws, "Prisoners of the Japanese: POWs of World War II in the Pacific", p. 297.
  176. ^ Donald L. Miller, "D-Days in the Pacific", p. 317.
  177. ^ Stephen E. Atkins, "Holocaust denial as an international movement", ABC-CLIO, 2009, pg. 105
  178. ^ Debrah Lipstadt, "Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory", Bt Bound, 1999, pg. 41
  179. ISBN 1-56584-654-0
    .
  180. ^ Sharalyn Orbaugh, "Japanese fiction of the Allied occupation" p.179

Sources

Further reading

  • Harris, Justin Michael. "American Soldiers and POW Killing in the European Theater of World War II" [1] Archived 18 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II&oldid=1218212474"