Analytical Thomism

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Analytical Thomism is a

philosophical movement which promotes the interchange of ideas between the thought of Thomas Aquinas (including the philosophy carried on in relation to his thinking, called 'Thomism'), and modern analytic philosophy
.

Scottish philosopher

John Haldane first coined the term in the early 1990s and has since been one of the movement's leading proponents. According to Haldane, "analytical Thomism involves the bringing into mutual relationship of the styles and preoccupations of recent English-speaking philosophy and the ideas and concerns shared by St Thomas and his followers".[1]

History 19th century—World War

The modern revival of Aquinas's thought can be traced to the work of mid-19th Century thomists, such as

Edouard Hugon, Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, Étienne Gilson, and Jacques Maritain, among others, carried on Leo's call for a Thomist revival.[2] Gilson and Maritain in particular taught and lectured throughout Europe and North America, influencing a generation of English-speaking Catholic philosophers
. Some of the latter then began to harmonize Thomism with broader contemporary philosophical trends.

Similarly, the Kraków Circle in Poland used mathematical logic in presenting Thomism, which the Circle judged to have "a structured body of propositions connected in meaning and subject matter, and linked by logical relations of compatibility and incompatibility, entailment, etc."[3] The Circle has been said to be "the most significant expression of Catholic thought between the two World Wars".[4]

Postwar philosophical reception of Aquinas

By the middle of the 20th century Aquinas's thought came into dialogue with the analytical tradition through the work of

philosopher of religion. Geach had converted to Roman Catholicism while studying at Oxford, Anscombe had converted before she came up, and both were instructed in the Faith in Oxford by the Dominican Richard Kehoe, who received them both into the Church before they met one another. Kenny, an erstwhile priest and former Catholic, became a prominent philosopher at the University of Oxford
and an editor and executor of Wittgenstein's literary estate, and is still portrayed by some as a promoter of Aquinas (Paterson & Pugh, xiii-xxiii), though his denial of some basic Thomist doctrines (e.g. divine timelessness) casts doubt on this.

Anscombe, and other

. Both movements draw significantly upon Aquinas.

Notable analytical Thomists

Philosophers and theologians working in the intersection of Thomism and analytic philosophy include:

  • Michael Staron (Saint Anselm's Abbey School)
  • Mortimer Adler
    (1902-2001)
  • David Braine
  • John C. Cahalan (independent scholar)
  • Brian Davies (Fordham)
  • Gabriele De Anna (Udine) (Bamberg)
  • Edward Feser
  • John Finnis (Oxford)
  • Peter Geach (Deceased)
  • John Haldane
    (St Andrews) (Baylor University)
  • Simon Hewitt (Leeds)
  • Jonathan Jacobs (Colgate)
  • Anthony Kenny (Oxford)
  • Fergus Kerr (Oxford)
  • Gyula Klima (Fordham)
  • Norman Kretzmann
  • John Lamont
  • Elizabeth Anscombe
    (Deceased)
  • Anthony J. Lisska (Denison)
  • Alasdair MacIntyre (Notre Dame)
  • Bruce D. Marshall (Southern Methodist Univ)
  • William Marshner (Christendom)
  • Christopher Martin (St Thomas, Houston)
  • Cyrille Michon (Nantes, France)
  • Mark Murphy (Georgetown)
  • Herbert McCabe (Deceased)
  • John P. O'Callaghan (Notre Dame)
  • Robert Pasnau (CU Boulder)
  • Craig Paterson (Independent Scholar)
  • Roger Pouivet (Nancy, France)
  • Alexander Pruss (Baylor University)
  • Matthew S. Pugh (Providence College)
  • Eleonore Stump (Saint Louis)
  • Thomas Sullivan and Sandra Menssen (University of St. Thomas, MN)
  • Stephen Theron, Denys Turner (Yale), Michael Thompson (Pittsburgh)
  • Giovanni Ventimiglia
    (Lugano, Switzerland)
  • James Madden (Benedictine College)
  • Jeffrey Brower (Purdue University)
  • Andrew Jaeger (Benedictine College)
  • Robert Alspaugh (St. Anselm's Abbey School)
  • Christopher Bobier (St. Mary's University of Minnesota)
  • T. Adam Van Wart (Ave Maria University)
  • David Burrell
  • Michał Głowala (University of Wroclaw)

See also

References

Citations

  1. ^ Haldane 2004, p. xii.
  2. ^ Paterson & Pugh 2006, pp. xiii–xxiii.
  3. ^ Simons 2003, pp. 281–297.
  4. ^ Murawski 2014, pp. 359–376.

Sources

  • Haldane, John (2004). Faithful Reason: essays Catholic and Philosophical. London and New York: Routledge.

Further reading

  • John C. Cahalan, Causal Realism: An Essay on Philosophical Method and the Foundations of Knowledge (Routledge, 1985)
  • John Finnis, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (Oxford, 1998).
  • John Haldane (ed.), "Analytical Thomism" volume of Monist 80 (4) October, 1997.
  • Haldane, John (1999). "Thomism and the Future of Catholic Philosophy". New Blackfriars. 80 (938): 158–169.
    ISSN 0028-4289
    .
  • Anthony J Lisska,Aquinas's Theory of Natural Law: An Analytic Reconstruction (Oxford: New York, 1996).
  • Pérez de Laborda, Miguel, "El tomismo analítico", Philosophica: Enciclopedia filosófica on line 2007
  • Bruce D. Marshall, Trinity and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
  • Roger Pouivet, Après Wittgenstein, saint Thomas (PUF, 1997).
  • T. Adam Van Wart, Neither Nature nor Grace: Aquinas, Barth, and Garrigou-Lagrange on the Epistemic Use of God's Effects (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2020).
  • Michał Głowała, Możności i ich akty. Studium z tomizmu analitycznego (Oficyna Wydawnicza Atut - Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe, 2016).