Anti-intellectualism
Part of a series on |
Discrimination |
---|
Anti-intellectualism is hostility to and mistrust of
Ideological anti-intellectualism
The new rulers of Cambodia call 1975 "Year Zero", the dawn of an age in which there will be no families, no sentiment, no expressions of love or grief, no medicines, no hospitals, no schools, no books, no learning, no holidays, no music, no song, no post, no money – only work and death.
John Pilger, Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cambodia (1979)[4]
In the 20th century, societies systematically removed intellectuals from power, to expediently end public political dissent. During the
In 1966, the anti-communist Argentine
Academic anti-intellectualism
In The Campus War (1971), the philosopher John Searle said,
[T]he two most salient traits of the radical movement are its anti-intellectualism and its hostility to the university as an institution. ... Intellectuals, by definition, are people who take ideas seriously for their own sake. Whether or not a theory is true or false is important to them, independently of any practical applications it may have. [Intellectuals] have, as Richard Hofstadter has pointed out, an attitude to ideas that is at once playful and pious. But, in the radical movement, the intellectual ideal of knowledge for its own sake is rejected. Knowledge is seen as valuable only as a basis for action, and it is not even very valuable there. Far more important than what one knows is how one feels.[8]
In Social Sciences as Sorcery (1972), the sociologist
In Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science (1990), philosopher of science and epistemologist
Distrust of intellectuals
In the U.S., the American conservative
In the book Intellectuals and Society (2009), Sowell said:[12]
By encouraging, or even requiring, students to take stands where they have neither the knowledge nor the intellectual training to seriously examine complex issues, teachers promote the expression of unsubstantiated opinions, the venting of uninformed emotions, and the habit of acting on those opinions and emotions, while ignoring or dismissing opposing views, without having either the intellectual equipment or the personal experience to weigh one view against another in any serious way.
Hence, school teachers are part of the intelligentsia who recruit children in elementary school and teach them politics—to advocate for or to advocate against public policy—as part of community-service projects; which political experience later assists them in earning admission to a university. In that manner, the intellectuals of a society intervene and participate in social arenas of which they might not possess expert knowledge, and so unduly influence the formulation and realization of public policy. In the event, teaching political advocacy in elementary school encourages students to formulate opinions "without any intellectual training or prior knowledge of those issues, making constraints against falsity few or non-existent."[13]
In Britain, the anti-intellectualism of the writer
In the United States
17th century
In The Powring Out of the Seven Vials (1642), the Puritan
In The Quest for Cosmic Justice (2001), the economist Thomas Sowell said that anti-intellectualism in the U.S. began in the early Colonial era, as an understandable wariness of the educated upper classes, because the country mostly was built by people who had fled political and religious persecution by the social system of the educated upper classes. Moreover, there were few intellectuals who possessed the practical hands-on skills required to survive in the New World of North America, which absence from society led to a deep-rooted, populist suspicion of men and women who specialize in "verbal virtuosity", rather than tangible, measurable products and services:[18]
From its colonial beginnings, American society was a "decapitated" society—largely lacking the top-most social layers of European society. The highest elites and the titled aristocracies had little reason to risk their lives crossing the Atlantic, and then face the perils of pioneering. Most of the white population of colonial America arrived as
proletarians, even when they came from Western Europe ... The rise of American society to pre-eminence, as an economic, political, and military power, was thus the triumph of the common man, and a slap across the face to the presumptions of the arrogant, whether an elite of blood or books.
19th century
In U.S. history, the advocacy and acceptability of anti-intellectualism has varied, in part because the majority of Americans lived a
We always preferred an ignorant, bad man to a talented one, and, hence, attempts were usually made to ruin the moral character of a smart candidate; since, unhappily, smartness and wickedness were supposed to be generally coupled, and [like-wise] incompetence and goodness.
Yet, the "real-life" redemption of the
20th–21st centuries
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'.
Isaac Asimov, 1980[20]
In 1912, the New Jersey governor, Woodrow Wilson, described the battle:[21]
What I fear is a government of experts. God forbid that, in a democratic country, we should resign the task and give the government over to experts. What are we for if we are to be scientifically taken care of by a small number of gentlemen who are the only men who understand the job?
In Anti-intellectualism in American Life (1963) the historian Richard Hofstadter said that anti-intellectualism is a social-class response, by the middle-class "mob", against the privileges of the political elites.[22] As the middle class developed political power, they exercised their belief that the ideal candidate to office was the "self-made man", not the well-educated man born to wealth. The self-made man, from the middle class, could be trusted to act in the best interest of his fellow citizens.[23] As evidence of this view, Hofstadter cited the derision of Adlai Stevenson as an "egghead". In Americans and Chinese: Passages to Differences (1980), Francis Hsu said that American egalitarianism is stronger in the U.S. than in Europe, e.g. in England,[24]
English individualism developed hand in hand with legal equality. American self-reliance, on the other hand, has been inseparable from an insistence upon economic and social as well as political equality. The result is that a qualified individualism, with a qualified equality, has prevailed in England, but what has been considered the inalienable right of every American is unrestricted self-reliance and, at least ideally, unrestricted equality. The English, therefore, tend to respect class-based distinctions in birth, wealth, status, manners, and speech, while Americans resent them.
Such social resentment characterises contemporary political discussions about the socio-political functions of mass-communication media and science; that is, scientific facts, generally accepted by educated people throughout the world, are misrepresented as opinions in the U.S., specifically about
Miami University anthropology professor Homayun Sidky has argued that 21st-century anti-scientific and pseudoscientific approaches to knowledge, particularly in the United States, are rooted in a postmodernist "decades-long academic assault on science:" "Many of those indoctrinated in postmodern anti-science went on to become conservative political and religious leaders, policymakers, journalists, journal editors, judges, lawyers, and members of city councils and school boards. Sadly, they forgot the lofty ideals of their teachers, except that science is bogus."[26]
In 2017, a
Education and knowledge
The U.S. ranks at middling quality of education compared to other countries, and Americans often lack basic knowledge and skills.
The American Council on Science and Health said that denialism of the facts of climate science and of climate change misrepresents verifiable data and information as political opinion.[37] Anti-intellectualism puts scientists in the public view and forces them to align with either a liberal or a conservative political stance. Moreover, 53% of Republican U.S. Representatives and 74% of Republican Senators deny the scientific facts of the causes of climate change.[38]
In the rural U.S., anti-intellectualism is an essential feature of the religious culture of
Corporate mass media
The reportage of corporate mass-communications media appealed to societal anti-intellectualism by misrepresenting university life in the U.S., where the students' pursuit of book learning (intellectualism) was secondary to the after-school social life. That the reactionary ideology communicated in mass-media reportage misrepresented the liberal political activism and social protest of students as frivolous, social activities thematically unrelated to the academic curriculum, which is the purpose of attending university.[42] In Anti-intellectualism in American Media (2004), Dane Claussen identified the contemporary anti-intellectualist bent of manufactured consent that is inherent to commodified information:[43][44]
The effects of mass media on attitudes toward intellect are certainly multiple and ambiguous. On the one hand, mass communications greatly expand the sheer volume of information available for public consumption. On the other hand, much of this information comes pre-interpreted for easy digestion and laden with hidden assumption, saving consumers the work of having to interpret it for themselves. Commodified information naturally tends to reflect the assumptions and interests of those who produce it, and its producers are not driven entirely by a passion to promote critical reflection.
The editorial perspective of the corporate mass-media misrepresented intellectualism as a profession that is separate and apart from the jobs and occupations of regular folk. In presenting academically successful students as social failures, an undesirable social status for the average young man and young woman, corporate media established to the U.S. mainstream their opinion that the intellectualism of book-learning is a form of mental deviancy, thus, most people would shun intellectuals as friends, lest they risk social ridicule and ostracism.[45] Hence, the popular acceptance of anti-intellectualism led to populist rejection of the intelligentsia for resolving the problems of society.[46] Moreover, in the book Inventing the Egghead: The Battle over Brainpower in American Culture (2013), Aaron Lecklider indicated that the contemporary ideological dismissal of the intelligentsia derived from the corporate media's reactionary misrepresentations of intellectual men and women as lacking the common-sense of regular folk.[47]
In Europe
Soviet Union
In the first decade after the
During the
In October 1937, there was a mass extermination of Belarusian writers, artists and statespeople by the Soviet Union occupying authorities. This event marked the peak of the Great Purge and repressions of Belarusians in the Soviet-controlled area of eastern Belarus. More than 100 notable persons were executed, most of them on the night of 29–30 October 1937. Their innocence was later admitted by the Soviet Union after Joseph Stalin's death.[48]
At the beginning of World War II, the Soviet secret police carried out mass executions of the Polish intelligentsia and military leadership in the 1940 Katyn massacre.
Fascism
Part of a series on |
Fascism |
---|
The
Fascism combats [...] not intelligence, but intellectualism, [...] which is [...] a sickness of the intellect, [...] not a consequence of its abuse, because the intellect cannot be used too much. [...] [I]t derives from the false belief that one can segregate oneself from life.
— Giovanni Gentile, addressing a Congress of Fascist Culture, Bologna, 30 March 1925
To counter the "passive intellectual" who used their intellect abstractly, and was therefore "decadent", he proposed the "concrete thinking" of the active intellectual who applied intellect as praxis—a "man of action", like the Fascist Benito Mussolini, versus the decadent Communist intellectual Antonio Gramsci. The passive intellectual stagnates intellect by objectifying ideas, thus establishing them as objects. Hence the Fascist rejection of materialist logic, because it relies upon a priori principles improperly counter-changed with a posteriori ones that are irrelevant to the matter-in-hand in deciding whether or not to act.
In the praxis of Gentile's concrete thinking criteria, such consideration of the a priori toward the properly a posteriori constitutes impractical, decadent intellectualism. Moreover, this fascist philosophy occurred parallel to
Related to this, is the confrontation between the Spanish
In Asia
China
Imperial China
People's Republic of China
The
Democratic Kampuchea
When the Communist Party of Kampuchea and the Khmer Rouge (1951–1981) established their regime as Democratic Kampuchea (1975–1979) in Cambodia, their anti-intellectualism which idealised the country and demonised the cities was immediately imposed on the country in order to establish agrarian socialism, thus, they emptied cities in order to purge the Khmer nation of every traitor, enemy of the state and intellectual, often symbolised by eyeglasses.
Ottoman Empire
In the early stages of the
See also
- Antiscience – attitudes that reject science and the scientific method
- Populism – when the democratic ethos moves into places it is purported not to belong; paradigmatically academic research
- Ressentiment – tendency to reflexively detract from others, e.g. as regards their greater, implicitly perceived, intelligence; as described chiefly by Nietzsche and Scheler
- Conspiracy theory – attributing events to secret plots instead of more probable explanation
- Decapitation strike and or just cultural genocidegenerally – imperial strategy, wherein destroying a society's epistemic elite makes subduing it much easier;
- Counter-Enlightenment, not to be confused with the more recent Dark Enlightenment – Various intellectual stances against mainstream attitudes of the 18th-century Enlightenment
- Noble savage – stock character
- Equality of outcome – political concept, as commonly approximated per affirmative action as opposed to an academic meritocracy
- Dumbing down – deliberate oversimplification of intellectual content
- Harrison Bergeron – 1961 short story by Kurt Vonnegut
- Philistinism – hostility to intellect, art and beauty
Footnotes
- ^ a b A Handbook to Literature (1980), Fourth Edition, C. Hugh Holman, Ed. p. 27
- ^ Courtois, Stephanie. The Black Book of Communism. p. 601.
- ^ Dictionary of Wars (2007), Third Edition, pp. 517–18.
- ^ "Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cambodia".
- ^ "Václav Havel".
- ^ Police repression at the Universidad de Buenos Aires - University of Toronto
- ^ (in Spanish) La noche de los bastones largos Archived May 14, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ John R. Searle (1971), The Campus Wars, Chapter 2: The Students, URL retrieved 14 June 2010.
- ^ Stanislav Andreski, The Social Sciences as Sorcery. 1972, The University of California Press
- ^ Larry Laudan, Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science (1990), University of Chicago Press
- ^ "Black and Conservative: A Look at Thomas Sowell". 2011-08-08.
- ]
- ^ Sowell (2009), p. 296.
- ISBN 978-0061871474. Retrieved 16 November 2013.
- ^ Wolfe, Tom. (2000). "In the Land of the Rococo Marxists", Harper's Monthly, June 2000.
- ^ Coupe, Lawrence (27 November 2000). "The Moronic Inferno". PN Review 136. Vol. 27.
- ^ a b Hofstadter, Richard Anti-intellectualism in American Life (1962), p. 46.
- ISBN 978-0-7432-1507-7, p. 187.
- S2CID 9269525.
- ^ Pyle, George (6 April 2020). "George Pyle: It can be hard to know who to trust. And easy to know who not to". The Salt Lake Tribune. Archived from the original on 13 April 2020.
- ISBN 978-1-317-25502-4.
- ISBN 978-0394415352.
- ISBN 978-0199832460.
- ISBN 978-0824807573.
- ^ Stokes, Bruce; Wike, Richard; Carle, Jill (2015-11-05). "Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- ^ Sidky, H. (2018). "The War on Science, Anti-Intellectualism, and 'Alternative Ways of Knowing' in 21st-Century America". Skeptical Inquirer. 42 (2): 38–43. Archived from the original on 2018-06-06. Retrieved 6 June 2018.
- ^ "America hits peak anti-intellectualism: Majority of Republicans now think college is bad". Salon. 2017-07-11. Retrieved 2019-09-18.
- ^ "Is Anti-Intellectualism Ever Good for Democracy?". Dissent. Winter 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-18.
- ^ Rummler, Jacob Knutson,Orion (23 September 2020). "Trump pushes to expand ban against anti-racism training to federal contractors". Axios. Retrieved 2020-09-25.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "LDF Issues Statement in Response to President Trump's Executive Order". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved 2020-09-25.
- ^ Wise, Alana (17 September 2020). "Trump Announces 'Patriotic Education' Commission, A Largely Political Move". NPR.org. Retrieved 2020-09-25.
- ^ "Trump pushes for 'patriotic education' in schools". NBC4 WCMH-TV. 2020-09-02. Retrieved 2020-09-25.
- ^ DeSilver, Drew (2020-08-21). "U.S. students' academic achievement still lags that of their peers in many other countries". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2023-04-02.
- ^ "Education Rankings by Country 2023". 2023 World Population by Country (Live). Retrieved 2023-04-02.
- ^ a b "Anti-Intellectualism and the "Dumbing Down" of America: The rise of "alternative facts," and opinions replacing science and real facts". Archived from the original on 2015-09-19. Retrieved 2016-09-19.
- S2CID 144064671.
- ^ "Anti-Intellectualism Is Biggest Threat to Modern Society | American Council on Science and Health". acsh.org. 2016-06-27. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- ^ "Anti-Intellectualism and the "Dumbing Down" of America". Psychology Today. Archived from the original on 2015-09-19. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- ^ "Anti-intellectualism Is Killing America". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- S2CID 145477853.
- ^ "cultural cognition project – Cultural Cognition Blog – MAPKIA! "answer" episode 1: The interaction effect of religion & science comprehension on perceptions of climate change risk". www.culturalcognition.net. Retrieved 2017-03-01.
- ISBN 978-0-8204-5721-5.
- .
- ISBN 978-0-8204-5721-5.
- ISBN 978-0-8204-5721-5.
- ^ Claussen, Danes. "A Brief History of Anti-Intellectualism in American Media". Academe. 97.
- ^ Lecklider, Aaron (2013). Inventing the Egghead: The Battle over Brainpower in American Culture.
- ISBN 978-985-6783-38-1
- ^ Gentile, Giovanni, Origins and Doctrine of Fascism (with selections from other works), A. James Gregor, ed., pp. 22–23, 33, 65–66
- ^ The Oxford Guide to Philosophy (2005), Ted Honderich, ed., p. 332.
- ^ Beevor, Antony. The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936-1939. Hachette UK, 2012.
- ISBN 978-1-57181-666-5.
- ^ Blinka, David S. (2008). Re-creating Armenia: America and the memory of the Armenian genocide. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 31.
In what scholars commonly refer to as the decapitation strike on April 24, 1915...
- ^ Bloxham, Donald (2005). The Great Game of Genocide: Imperialism, Nationalism, and the Destruction of the Ottoman Armenians. Oxford University Press. p. 70.
...the decapitation of the Armenian nation with the series of mass arrests that began on 24 April...
- ^ Sahаkian, T. A. (2002). "Արևմտահայ մտավորականության սպանդի արտացոլումը հայ մամուլում 1915–1916 թթ. [The interpretation of the fact of extermination of the Armenian intelligentsia in the Armenian press in 1915–1916]". Lraber Hasarakakan Gitutyunneri (in Armenian). 1 (1): 89–97.
Դրանով թուրքական կառավարությունը ձգտում էր արևմտահայությանը գլխատել, նրան զրկել ղեկավար ուժից, բողոքի հնարավորությունից:
Further reading
- Dane S. Claussen (2004). Anti-Intellectualism in American Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing. ISBN 978-0820457215.
- Liza Featherstone, Doug Henwood, and Christian Parenti, "'Action Will be Taken': Left Anti-Intellectualism and its Discontents," Left Business Observer.
- William Hinton, Hundred Day War: The Cultural Revolution at Tsinghua University. New York: New York University Press, 1972.
- Richard Hofstadter, Anti-intellectualism in American Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963.
- Susan Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason. New York: Pantheon Books, 2008.
- Aaron Lecklider (2013). Inventing the Egghead: The Battle over Brainpower in American Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-4486-1.
- Elvin T. Lim (2008). The Anti-Intellectual Presidency: The Decline of Presidential Rhetoric from George Washington to George W. Bush. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199898091.
- "Anti-Intellectualism and the "Dumbing Down" of America". psychology today. 2014.
There is a growing and disturbing trend of anti-intellectual elitism in American culture. It's the dismissal of science, the arts, and humanities and their replacement by entertainment, self-righteousness, ignorance, and deliberate gullibility.
External links
- Media related to Anti-intellectualism at Wikimedia Commons