Apraxia
Apraxia | |
---|---|
Apraxia is characterized by loss of the ability to execute or carry out learned purposeful movements. | |
Specialty | Neurology, psychiatry |
Treatment | Occupational therapy, physical therapy |
Apraxia is a
The term "apraxia" comes from the Greek ἀ- a- ("without") and πρᾶξις praxis ("action").[4]
Types
The several types of apraxia include:
- Apraxia of speech (AOS) is having difficulty planning and coordinating the movements necessary for speech (e.g. potato=totapo, topato).[5] AOS can independently occur without issues in areas such as verbal comprehension, reading comprehension, writing, articulation, or prosody.[6]
- Buccofacial or orofacial apraxia, the most common type of apraxia, is the inability to carry out facial movements on demand. For example, an inability to lick one's lips, wink, or whistle when requested to do so. This suggests an inability to carry out volitional movements of the tongue, cheeks, lips, pharynx, or larynx on command.[7][8]
- Constructional apraxia is the inability to draw, construct, or copy simple configurations, such as intersecting shapes. These patients have difficulty copying a simple diagram or drawing basic shapes.[7]
- Gait apraxia is the loss of ability to have normal function of the lower limbs such as walking. This is not due to loss of motor or sensory functions.[9]
- Ideational/conceptual apraxia is having an inability to conceptualize a task and impaired ability to complete multistep actions. This form of apraxia consists of an inability to select and carry out an appropriate motor program. For example, the patient may complete actions in incorrect orders, such as buttering bread before putting it in the toaster, or putting on shoes before putting on socks. Also, a loss occurs in the ability to voluntarily perform a learned task when given the necessary objects or tools. For instance, if given a screwdriver, these patients may try to write with it as if it were a pen, or try to comb their hair with a toothbrush.[10][11]
- Ideomotor apraxia is having deficits in the ability to plan or complete motor actions that rely on semantic memory. These patients are able to explain how to perform an action, but unable to "imagine" or act out a movement such as "pretend to brush your teeth" or "pucker as though you bit into a sour lemon." When the ability to perform an action automatically when cued remains intact, though, this is known as automatic-voluntary dissociation. For example, they may not be able to pick up a phone when asked to do so, but can perform the action without thinking when the phone rings.[10][11]
- Limb-kinetic apraxia is having the inability to perform precise, voluntary movements of extremities. For example, a person affected by limb apraxia may have difficulty waving hello, tying shoes, or typing on a computer.[12][8] This type is common in patients who have experienced a stroke, some type of brain trauma, or have Alzheimer's disease.[13]
- Oculomotor apraxia is having difficulty moving the eye on command, especially with saccade movements that direct the gaze to targets. This is one of the three major components of Balint's syndrome.[8]
Causes
Apraxia is most often due to a lesion located in the dominant (usually left) hemisphere of the brain, typically in the
Ideomotor apraxia is typically due to a decrease in blood flow to the dominant hemisphere of the brain and particularly the
Ideational apraxia has been observed in patients with lesions in the dominant hemisphere near areas associated with aphasia, but more research is needed on ideational apraxia due to brain lesions. The localization of lesions in areas of the frontal and temporal lobes would provide explanation for the difficulty in motor planning seen in ideational apraxia, as well as its difficulty to distinguish it from certain aphasias.[14]
Constructional apraxia is often caused by lesions of the inferior nondominant parietal lobe, and can be caused by brain injury, illness, tumor, or other condition that can result in a brain lesion.[14]
Diagnosis
Although qualitative and quantitative studies exist, little consensus exists on the proper method to assess for apraxia. The criticisms of past methods include failure to meet standard psychometric properties and research-specific designs that translate poorly to nonresearch use.[15]
The Test to Measure Upper Limb Apraxia (TULIA) is one method of determining upper limb apraxia through the qualitative and quantitative assessment of gesture production. In contrast to previous publications on apraxic assessment, the reliability and validity of TULIA was thoroughly investigated.[16] The TULIA consists of subtests for the imitation and pantomime of nonsymbolic ("put your index finger on top of your nose"), intransitive ("wave goodbye"), and transitive ("show me how to use a hammer") gestures.[15] Discrimination (differentiating between well- and poorly performed tasks) and recognition (indicating which object corresponds to a pantomimed gesture) tasks are also often tested for a full apraxia evaluation.[citation needed]
However, a strong correlation may not be seen between formal test results and actual performance in everyday functioning or activities of daily living (ADLs). A comprehensive assessment of apraxia should include formal testing, standardized measurements of ADLs, observation of daily routines, self-report questionnaires, and targeted interviews with the patients and their relatives.[15]
As stated above, apraxia should not be confused with aphasia (the inability to understand language); however, they frequently occur together. Apraxia is so often accompanied by aphasia that many believe that if a person displays AOS, then the patient also having some level of aphasia should be assumed.[17]
Treatment
Treatment for individuals with apraxia includes
One method is through rehabilitative treatment, which has been found to positively impact apraxia, as well as ADLs.[22] In this review, rehabilitative treatment consisted of 12 different contextual cues, which were used to teach patients how to produce the same gesture under different contextual situations.[22] Additional studies have also recommended varying forms of gesture therapy, whereby the patient is instructed to make gestures (either using objects or symbolically meaningful and nonmeaningful gestures) with progressively less cuing from the therapist.[23] Patients with apraxia may need to use a form of alternative and augmentative communication depending on the severity of the disorder. In addition to using gestures as mentioned, patients can also use communication boards or more sophisticated electronic devices if needed.[24]
No single type of therapy or approach has been proven as the best way to treat a patient with apraxia, since each patient's case varies. One-on-one sessions usually work the best, though, with the support of family members and friends. Since everyone responds to therapy differently, some patients will make significant improvements, while others will make less progress.[25] The overall goal for treatment of apraxia is to treat the motor plans for speech, not treating at the phoneme (sound) level. Individuals with apraxia of speech should receive treatment that focuses on the repetition of target words and rate of speech. The overall goal for treatment of apraxia should be to improve speech intelligibility, rate of speech, and articulation of targeted words.[26]
Prognosis
The prognosis for individuals with apraxia varies. With therapy, some patients improve significantly, while others may show very little improvement. Some individuals with apraxia may benefit from the use of a communication aid. However, many people with apraxia are no longer able to be independent. Those with limb-kinetic and/or gait apraxia should avoid activities in which they might injure themselves or others.[citation needed]
Occupational therapy, physical therapy, and play therapy may be considered as other references to support patients with apraxia. These treatments could work along with the SLP to provide the best therapy for people with apraxia. Because people with limb apraxia may have trouble directing their motor movements, however, occupational therapy for stroke or other brain injury can be difficult.[citation needed]
See also
- Praxis (process)
- Ataxia
- Aging movement control
- Developmental coordination disorder
- Lists of language disorders
References
- ISBN 978-0-19-872863-4.
- ^ ASHA
- ^ "Apraxia: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia". medlineplus.gov. Retrieved 2019-08-07.
- ^ "Definition of APRAXIA". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2017-05-02.
- ^ Heilman KM, Watson RT, Gonzalez-Rothi LJ. Praxis. In: Goetz CG. Goetz: Textbook of Clinical Neurology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2007:chap 4.
- ISBN 978-0-323-07200-7.
- ^ a b "Apraxia". NORD (National Organization for Rare Disorders). Retrieved 2019-08-02.
- ^ a b c "Apraxia Information Page | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke". www.ninds.nih.gov. 2019. Retrieved 2019-08-01.
- S2CID 40700537.
- ^ PMID 21613535.
- ^ PMID 18957186.
- ^ Treatment Resource Manual for Speech Pathology 5th edition
- PMID 23312653, retrieved 2019-08-07
- ^ ISBN 978-0826119674.
- ^ PMID 21447909.
- S2CID 13328067.
- ^ (Manasco, 2014)
- ^ "NINDS Apraxia Information Page". Retrieved 8 March 2012.
- PMID 27314872.
- S2CID 23836106.
- PMID 18254038.
- ^ PMID 18209511.
- S2CID 4456810.
- ^ "ASHA, Apraxia of Speech in Adults".
- PMID 22215235.
- PMID 22230177.
Further reading
- Kasper, D.L.; Braunwald, E.; Fauci, A.S.; Hauser, S.L.; Longo, D.L.; Jameson, J.L.. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005. ISBN 0-07-139140-1.
- Manasco, H. (2014). Introduction to Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.