Armenian resistance during the Armenian genocide

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Armenian defenders during the 1915 siege of Van

Armenian resistance included military, political, and humanitarian[1] efforts to counter Ottoman forces and mitigate the Armenian genocide during the first World War. Early in World War I, the Ottoman Empire commenced efforts to eradicate Armenian culture and eliminate Armenian life, through acts of killing and death marches into uninhabitable deserts and mountain regions. The result was the homogenisation of the Ottoman Empire and elimination of 90% of the Armenian Ottoman population.[2]

Those efforts were countered by Armenian attempts to mitigate the plight through the establishment of humanitarian networks. Those provided for basic needs like food and hiding places. Several armed uprisings attempted to resist deportation are notable, namely the Defence of Van (1915), in Musa Dag and Urfa. Still, violent resistance was rare and often not effective,[2] compared to the humanitarian network which saved up to 200,000 Armenians from death.[3] Local resistance movements were notably supported by a transnational network of help, namely the ABCFM, US Armenian relief committee and missionaries.[4]

Additionally, military efforts to counter the Ottoman Army were conducted by Armenian forces, such as the Armenian Resistance Forces (called fedayeen/ fedayis) and the

Armenian irregular units. Those supported Russian efforts to advance on the Ottoman front in the Caucasus.[5]

Humanitarian resistance against the genocide

Humanitarian resistance refers to illegal conduct to mitigate the effects of deportation and prevent annihilation. Core actors of this resistance were religious and civic leaders, such as

church committees, doctors and nurses, local Muslims, and influential Armenian dignitaries and foreign missionaries. Those established a self-help network, which supplied deportees in camps with basic needs, such as food, fuelwood, and financial support through money transfer.[6] This network saved thousands of Armenians from death.[6] At the beginning of the deportations, such efforts were still legal but with increasing tensions, those efforts faced crackdowns in 1915, criminalization and forcing to move into the underground.[6]

Armenian orphanage in Aleppo Syria

From this onwards, the resistance conducted fewer public actions. Refugees were hidden in private homes, community centres, and children in orphanages.[7] Military factories and hospitals under the influence of network members served the purpose of employing Armenians, providing them with a permit to move freely in the city and integrating them successfully into their new environment. This prevented their deportation.[7]

Individual resistance

In the private sphere, resistance was present in the tiny moments of life. Family ties in the camps were attempts to create through their traditional functions a sense of normality. This social support system aimed to establish relative safety, cared for orphans, and provided health care under the given circumstances.[6]

Individuals, from the Muslim population, and officers as city authorities resisted orders of deportation and faced removal from their posts.[8]

Resistance through Information gathering

Information established an important part of the resistance and was essential for survival. Smuggled letters of information about the developments in other camps, abuses of CUP officials on deportees and advice on how to survive in the camps helped Armenians to adapt to the new life realities.[8] The full impact of the genocide was long withheld from the Ottoman and international public. Censorship of foreign embassies impeded international attention and intervention. To circumvent the Ottoman censoring, new modes of expression were employed. Such were quoting of biblical passages and literary works, which enabled a restricted spreading of the knowledge of the genocide in international media and politics.[4] Such information provoked international support systems such as the ABCFM, Armenian Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions and the founding of the US Armenian relive committee, leading to fundraising and enacting international pressure.[4]

Military resistance against the genocide

The majority of the Armenian population resented military resistance against the genocide and hoped instead for survival through displayed loyalty. Important actors of the Armenian community as the church toned down rebellious actions and emphasised patience instead.[2]

Armenian resistance in Urfa 1915

In some cases, military resistance was successful:

  • the Defence of Van 1915.[7]
  • in the village of Adana 1915. The village of Adana circumvented deportation by withdrawing to the mountains of Musa Dagh. There they withstand the Ottoman forces where they secured the survival of 4,200 villagers.

Other resistance movements were shattered and had the effect of annihilation of entire villages.[2]

Unsuccessful resistance:

  • The village of Urfa resisted deportation important the ottoman troops in August 1915 and held out 25 days only to be defeated. Most of the population was killed or conducted suicide.[2]

Previous military resistance against the Ottoman forces

Previous Armenian military resistances against forces of the Ottoman Empire were namely:

Armenian Resistance Forces

Urfa Resistance

The Armenian Resistance Forces (ARF) were established in 1890 out of Armenian volunteers called fedayis

Karekin Pastermadjian. Their main aim was to pose resistance to the Ottoman Forces and to act as the defender of the Armenian nation.[9] The ARF gained major importance during WWI on the Caucasus front, where they joined the Russian Army. Their participation contributed to the defeat of the Ottoman army in January 1916.[9] Primary legions fighting with Russia in the Caucasus were the Armenian volunteer legion, staffed by the Armenian National Bureau (ANB) and through that indirectly through the ARF, dominating the ANB. The number of the fighters reached an estimated amount 5.000.[9]

Resistance against the Ottoman Empire

Seventy-year-old priest leading Armenians

1914

1915

1916

1918

Armenian harissa
  • In September, Murad of Sebastia and his volunteers fought at Battle of Baku, where he died in the fighting.[16]

Art and culture

Armenian resistance has left a symbolic dish. The "

Harissa (dish)" (Armenian: Հարիսա): is generally served to commemorate the Musa Dagh
resistance. Current practice renamed the dish as "hreesi".

Reference list

  1. .
  2. ^ .
  3. .
  4. ^ a b c David, Monger (2018). "Networking against Genocide during the First World War: the international network behind the British Parliamentary report on the Armenian Genocide". Journal of Transatlantic Studies. 16 (3): 296.
  5. .
  6. ^ .
  7. ^ .
  8. ^ .
  9. ^ .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. ^ The Hugh Chisholm, 1920, Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Company ltd., twelve edition p.198.
  14. ^ .
  15. ^ Kurdoghlian, Mihran (1996). Hayots Badmoutioun (Armenian History) (in Armenian). Hradaragutiun Azkayin Oosoomnagan Khorhoortee, Athens Greece. pp. 92–93.
  16. ^
    Pasdermadjian, Garegin; Torossian, Aram (1918). Why Armenia Should be Free: Armenia's Role in the Present War
    . Hairenik. p. 22.
  17. ^ Hohanissian, Richard G (1997). The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times. New York: St. Martin's Press. p. 299.

Bibliography