Armillaria luteobubalina
Armillaria luteobubalina | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Fungi |
Division: | Basidiomycota |
Class: | Agaricomycetes |
Order: | Agaricales |
Family: | Physalacriaceae |
Genus: | Armillaria |
Species: | A. luteobubalina
|
Binomial name | |
Armillaria luteobubalina Watling & Kile (1978)
|
Armillaria luteobubalina | |
---|---|
Gills on hymenium | |
Cap is convex or flat | |
parasitic | |
Edibility is edible |
Armillaria luteobubalina,
Armillaria luteobubalina was first described in 1978, after having been discovered several years earlier growing in a Eucalyptus plantation in southeastern Australia. It distinguished itself from other known Australian Armillaria species by its aggressive pathogenicity. It may take years for infected trees to show signs of disease, leading to an underestimation of disease prevalence. Studies show that the spread of disease in eucalypt forests is associated with infected stumps left following
History and phylogeny
Armillaria luteobubalina was first described in 1978 by mycologists
Watling and Kile compared the macroscopic and microscopic characters of the pathogenic Armillaria with A. polymyces (now known as
A
Description
Up to 10 cm (4 in) in diameter, the cap is convex to flattened in shape with a central umbo (a rounded elevation) and is various shades of cream, yellow and tan. The cap surface is covered with darker scales and feels rough to the touch. The cap edge, or margin, is rolled inward in young specimens. The crowded gills are sinuate and white to cream in colour initially, brownish-cream or pinkish brown in maturity, and sometimes with yellow or rust-coloured marks close to the margins.[14] The stem is central (that is, it joins the cap in the centre) and is up to 20 cm (8 in) long by 1.5 cm (1 in) thick. It is slightly thicker at its base than its apex, sometimes almost bulb-like. The stem surface is streaked with fibrils that run up and down its length. It has a floppy yellow wool-like ring which may develop irregular, jagged edges with time. The flesh is white, and in the stem has a woolly or stringy consistency.[1] Although it has a hot-bitter taste, Armillaria luteobubalina is edible, and cooking removes the bitterness.[15]
Microscopic characteristics
The
Similar species
Five other Armillaria species are found in Australia.[16] Within the range of A. luteobubalina, A. hinnulea is restricted to gully habitats. A. fumosa is a rarer species found only in poorly drained or seasonally wet locations.[17] A. luteobubalina and A. montagnei share cap features and a similar unpleasant flavour, but the latter species has an olive-tinged cap, larger spores (9.5–11 by 5.5–7 μm compared to 6.5–7.5 by 4.5–5.5 μm) and a more conspicuous annulus than those found in A. luteobubalina.[9] The morphology of the vegetative structures of A. limonea is distinctly different than A. luteobubalina, and can be used to distinguish the two species.[18] A. novae-zelandiae has a sticky more flattened cap and stem below the ring and is found in wet forests, and A. pallidula is a species with cream gills maturing to pale pink found in tropical Australia arising from dead tree stumps or the roots of dead or living trees.[19] A. luteobubalina is the only Armillaria species which occurs in Western Australia.[15] Distinguishing Australian species is economically important, because A. luteobubalina is more pathogenic than the other members of the genus. A molecular diagnostic test, developed in 2002, can accurately identify each species using DNA extracted from its mycelia. Before this, species identification was limited to times when fruit bodies were in season. This technology also revealed a variation in the molecular material of A. luteobubalina that suggested sexual reproduction.[20]
Habitat and distribution
Armillaria luteobubalina has been recorded in southeastern Australia, from the southeastern corner of
Root rot
Appearance of infected trees
Trees that are infected by A. luteobubalina show characteristic symptoms both above and below ground. Above the ground, the base of the tree develops inverted V-shaped lesions, and the infected wood undergoes
Occurrence
In selectively logged eucalypt forests in the central highlands of Victoria, it has been estimated that about 3–5% of the forest area is "moderately to severely affected" by Armillaria root rot caused by A. luteobubalina.[25] A review of eucalypt plantations planted in New South Wales from 1994 to 2005 found that infection by A. luteobubalina was rare, and only accounted for 1% of mortality in total. In this instance, the cases had been restricted to Eucalyptus nitens on the Dorrigo Plateau.[26] Unlike other Armillaria species found in Australia's native forests, which require a host tree to become weakened by prior infection by a different species, A. luteobubalina is a primary pathogen, and can infect healthy trees.[25][27] Tree roots may be infected for years before showing above-ground symptoms, making it difficult to accurately assess the true extent of disease in a forest stand.[28] Surveys are usually conducted in autumn, to coincide with the appearance of fruit bodies; infection is assessed by the presence of basal scars on the trees, and the appearance of fruit bodies. Several factors, however—such as cost, variable on-site conditions, and non-symptomatic diseased trees—make it difficult for such surveys to reliably detect all infections. One study showed that above-ground examinations detected only 50% of the trees actually infected, leading to underestimation of the incidence of true infection by 20–40%. The study used more intensive surveying methods to determine that 25- to 30-year-old karri regrowth forests in western Australia showed an average of 40–45% incidence of infection.[16]
Disease spread
Several studies have shown that the spread of Armillaria root rot in eucalypt forests is associated with infected
Control
Methods for controlling the spread of Armillaria root rot include physical removal of infected trees, stumps and large roots;
See also
References
- ^ .
- ISBN 978-1-898298-64-9.
- .
- .
- .
- JSTOR 3759160.
- ^ S2CID 24112504.
- PMID 18692378.
- ^ S2CID 40869544.
- ^ Coetzee MP, Maphosa L, Mwenje E, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2009). "Characterisation of Armillaria species based on pectic isozyme analyses" (PDF). Fungal Diversity. 36: 9–16.
- ^ PMID 21156614.
- S2CID 25188074.
- S2CID 36960183.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-646-44674-5.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-875560-80-6.
- ^ S2CID 55363942.
- ISSN 0007-1536.
- ^ Shaw CG, MacKenzie M, Toes EH, Hood IA (1981). "Cultural characteristics and pathogenicity to Pinus radiata of Armillaria novae-zelandiae and A. limonea". New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 11: 65–70.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-876473-51-8.
- S2CID 24274086.
- ^ .
- S2CID 7757884.
- S2CID 46318969.
- ^ JSTOR 2557060.
- ^ ISSN 0030-8870.
- S2CID 23376623.
- ^ ISSN 0004-914X.
- ^ .
- ^ Pearce MH, Malajczuk N, Kile GA (1986). "The occurrence and effects of Armillaria luteobubalina in the karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) forests of Western Australia". Australian Forest Research. 16 (3): 243–59.
- ^ Kellas JD, Kile GA, Jerrett RG, Morgan BJ (1987). "The occurrence and effects of Armillaria luteobubalina following partial cutting in mixed eucalypt stands in the Wombat Forest, Victoria". Australian Forest Research. 17 (3): 263–76.
- .
- ^ A forest stand may be defined as: "A group of trees occupying a given area and sufficiently uniform in species composition, age, structure, site quality, and condition so as to be distinguishable from the forest on adjoining areas." From "Glossary – SFMRP – Division of Forestry: Minnesota DNR". Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
- ISSN 0004-9158.
- doi:10.1071/BT96084.
- .
- doi:10.1071/BT95083.
- .
- ^ PMID 16376531.
- .
- .
- .
- ^ S2CID 85224336. Archived from the original(PDF) on April 27, 2013.
- .
- ISSN 0953-7562.