Art finance

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Art finance and Art finance advisory are terms referring to a set of financial services provided by some auction houses, banks, and consulting firms, and marketed to such firms' clients who are art collectors or artists.

Generally

Art finance can refer to both

  • acquiring art works by financing them rather than buying them outright, and
  • collateralizing a loan with art works and related property.

Firms offering such services differ in the range of services provided, but can include art purchase financing, art secured lending, art insurance,

art appraisal, provenance verification, market research, curatorial services, art investment advice, and personal shopping services.[1]

Art loans

Art loans may be made for many reasons, some of which may include advances against art not yet produced (usually made to artists of some repute), advances against items to be auctioned or otherwise sold (known as a bridge loan to sale, a type of bridge loan), to finance new purchases (known as acquisition financing and similar to a mortgage), and loans to assist dealers amass inventory (known as a working capital line of credit).[2]

In the difficult economic climate of 2009, some banks previously offering such services discontinued them.

ArtAssure Ltd. in 2010 to provide liquidity to the art market in the form of non-recourse art loans and unique and legally-untested methods of auction guarantees.[4]

In September 2008 the Museum of American Finance held a panel discussion on financing to support art acquisitions.[5]

In April 2012, the art lending market was roughly US $7 billion.[6]

High-profile art finance

In late July 2009,

Colony Capital concluded a new financing and marketing agreement with Leibovitz, paying off Art Capital and removing or reducing the risks of Leibovitz losing her artistic and real estate assets.[9]

Criticism

It has been noted that art lending practices can contribute to and enable art crime by acting as a form of private banking for the art world and as such, suffer from a lack of transparency and encourage high risk borrowing behavior, as occurred with Leibovitz.[10] Iain Robertson of Sotheby's Institute wrote "the art market's often covert and secretive buying and selling practices do encourage or at least permit high levels of criminal behavior."[11]

See also

References

  1. ^ Thompson and McAndrew, The Collateral Value of Fine Art, Journal of Banking and Finance, Jan 2006.[1]
  2. ^ Art Radar Asia, "Art loans can offer liquidity to your collection", 11/4/2009 blog post.
  3. ^ Bandel, UBS, Art Basel Sponsor, Will Close Swiss Art Division, Bloomberg, April 1, 2009.[2]
  4. ^ Crow, The Art World's Gordon Gekko, The Wall Street Journal, February 5, 2010.
  5. ^ Banking on Art, MOAF, September 24, 2008. 54 minute Video available online Archived July 26, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Ferro, Shane (April 4, 2012). "Navigating the Art Loan Biz, A Surging Industry Attracting Both Big Banks and "Loan-to-Own" Sharks". Blouin ArtInfo. Archived from the original on 26 February 2014.
  7. ^ Salkin, Allen, Lender Sues Annie Leibovitz, The New York Times, July 30, 2009.[3]
  8. ^ Salkin, Allen, For Annie Leibovitz, a Fuzzy Financial Picture, The New York Times, July 31, 2009.[4]
  9. ^ "Private equity firm snaps up chance to help Leibovitz put house in order" by Henny Sender, Financial Times, March 9, 2010 02:00, Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  10. ^ Sebesky, Elizabeth, The Art Market: How Lending Fuels Art Crime, ARCA, June 2, 2009.
  11. .