Aurignacian

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Aurignacian

Lion drawings from the Chauvet Cave, 37,000 to 33,500 years old, and a map of Aurignacian sites.
Geographical rangeEurasia
PeriodUpper Paleolithic
Datesc. 43,000 – c. 28,000 BP[1][2]
Type siteAurignac
Preceded byAhmarian, Châtelperronian
Followed byGravettian, Mal'ta–Buret' culture
Defined byBreuil and Cartailhac, 1906[3]
early modern humans from the Levant where the Levantine Aurignacian
stage has been identified.

The Aurignacian (

Homo sapiens out of Africa.[4] They then migrated to Europe and created the first European culture of modern humans, the Aurignacian.[5]

The Proto-Aurignacian and the Early Aurignacian stages are dated between about 43,000 and 37,000 years ago. The Aurignacian proper lasted from about 37,000 to 33,000 years ago. A Late Aurignacian phase transitional with the Gravettian dates to about 33,000 to 26,000 years ago.[6][5] The

Neanderthals
.

One of the oldest examples of

western Germany. The German Lion-man
figure is given a similar date range.

A "Levantine Aurignacian" culture is known from the Levant, with a type of blade technology very similar to the European Aurignacian, following chronologically the Emiran and Early Ahmarian in the same area of the Near East, and also closely related to them.[7] The Levantine Aurignacian may have preceded European Aurignacian, but there is a possibility that the Levantine Aurignacian was rather the result of reverse influence from the European Aurignacian: this remains unsettled.[8]

Main characteristics

Lion-man of Hohlenstein-Stadel
, Germany, 40,000 BP

The Aurignacians are part of the wave of

Vestonice cluster.[9]

The Aurignacian tool industry is characterized by worked

Perforated rods
, thought to be spear throwers or shaft wrenches, also are found at their sites.

Art

Aurignacian figurines have been found depicting faunal representations of the time period associated with now-extinct

earliest evidence of religion
.

Many 35,000-year-old animal figurines were discovered in the Vogelherd Cave in Germany.[11] One of the horses, amongst six tiny mammoth and horse ivory figures found previously at Vogelherd, was sculpted as skillfully as any piece found throughout the Upper Paleolithic. The production of ivory beads for body ornamentation was also important during the Aurignacian. The famous paintings in Chauvet cave date from this period.

Typical statuettes consist of women that are called

Swabian Alb
and dated to 40,000 years ago, is the oldest known anthropomorphic animal figurine in the world.

Aurignacian finds include bone

Swabian Alb in 2008.[14] The flute is made from a vulture's wing bone perforated with five finger holes, and dates to approximately 35,000-40,000 years ago.[14] A flute was also found at the Abri Blanchard in southwestern France.[15]

Gallery

  • Decorated ivory pendant from Stajnia Cave, Poland, c. 41,500 BP[16]
    Decorated ivory pendant from Stajnia Cave, Poland, c. 41,500 BP[16]
  • Bone flute, 35,000-40,000 years old
    Bone flute, 35,000-40,000 years old
  • The Adorant of Geissenklösterle, Germany
  • The Adorant of Geissenklösterle, reverse side with notches
    The Adorant of Geissenklösterle, reverse side with notches
  • The Venus of Hohle Fels figurine (height 6cm), 35,000 BP
    The Venus of Hohle Fels figurine (height 6cm), 35,000 BP
  • Horse figurine from Vogelherd Cave, Germany
    Horse figurine from Vogelherd Cave, Germany
  • Animal figurine from Vogelherd Cave
    Animal figurine from Vogelherd Cave
  • Chauvet Cave painting, France
    Chauvet Cave painting, France
  • Possible musical bow from Geisenklösterle, Germany
    Possible musical bow from Geisenklösterle, Germany
  • Lion head sculpture, Vogelherd cave
    Lion head sculpture, Vogelherd cave
  • Lion sculpture, Vogelherd cave
    Lion sculpture, Vogelherd cave
  • Mammoth sculpture, Vogelherd cave
    Mammoth sculpture, Vogelherd cave
  • Venus of Galgenberg, Austria
  • Carved ivory from Brillenhöhle cave
    Carved ivory from Brillenhöhle cave
  • Engraved plaque from Abri Lartet, France
    Engraved plaque from Abri Lartet, France
  • Engraved plaque from Abri Blanchard, France
    Engraved plaque from Abri Blanchard, France
  • Aurignacian jewellery, Belgium
    Aurignacian jewellery, Belgium
  • A painting of a hand in the Cave of Aurignac, France
    A painting of a hand in the Cave of Aurignac, France
  • Jewelry, Fazael, Israel, Upper Paleolithic.
    Jewelry, Fazael, Israel, Upper Paleolithic.
  • A carving of a running horse, Hayonim Cave, Levant.
    A carving of a running horse,
    Hayonim Cave, Levant
    .

Tools

Stone tools from the Aurignacian culture are known as Mode 4, characterized by blades (rather than flakes, typical of mode 2 Acheulean and mode 3 Mousterian) from prepared cores. Also seen throughout the Upper Paleolithic is a greater degree of tool standardization and the use of bone and antler for tools. Based on the research of scraper reduction and paleoenvironment, the early Aurignacian group moved seasonally over greater distances to procure reindeer herds within cold and open environments than those of the earlier tool cultures.[17]

  • A bone point
    A bone point
  • A scraper from Aurignac (France)
    A scraper from Aurignac (France)
  • Aurignacian blades
    Aurignacian blades
  • Dufour bladelet
    Dufour bladelet
  • Bone tools, Hayonim Cave, 30000 BP.
    Bone tools,
    Hayonim Cave
    , 30000 BP.
  • Aurignacian microliths
    Aurignacian
    microliths

Population

M.M. Gerasimov
, Moscow State Archaeological Museum

A 2019 demographic analysis estimated a mean population of 1,500 persons (upper limit: 3,300; lower limit: 800) for western and central Europe during the Aurignacian period (~42,000 to 33,000 y cal BP).[21]

A 2005 study estimated the population of Upper Palaeolithic Europe from 40–30 thousand years ago was 1,738–28,359 (average 4,424).[22]

Association with modern humans

The sophistication and self-awareness demonstrated in the work led archaeologists to consider the makers of Aurignacian

modern humans in Europe. Human remains and Late Aurignacian artifacts found in juxtaposition support this inference. Although finds of human skeletal remains in direct association with Proto-Aurignacian technologies are scarce in Europe, the few available are also probably modern human. The best dated association between Aurignacian industries and human remains are those of at least five individuals from the Mladeč caves in the Czech Republic, dated by direct radiocarbon measurements of the skeletal remains to at least 31,000–32,000 years old.[10]

At least three robust, but typically anatomically-modern, individuals from the

Genetics

Genetic position of the Goyet cluster, corresponding to the Aurignacian, in relation to other hunter-gatherers

In a genetic study published in

The Aurignacian material culture is associated with the expansion of 'early West Eurasians' during the Upper-Paleolithic, replacing or merging with previous Initial Upper Paleolithic cultures to which possibly relates the European Châtelperronian.[29][30]

Map
selected Aurignacian sites (CC BY-SA 4.0 ROCEEH)

Location

Hayonim Cave
A map of the Mediterranean with important Aurignacian sites (clickable map).

Europe

Near-East

Asia

Lebanon/Palestine/Israel region

  • Contained within a stratigraphic column, along with other cultures.[31]

Siberia

  • Many sites in Siberia including around
    Ob River valley, and Minusinsk.[31]
  • The entrance to the Potočka Zijalka, a cave in the Eastern Karavanke, where the remains of a human residence dated to the Aurignacian (40,000 to 30,000 BP) were found.[32]
    The entrance to the
    Karavanke, where the remains of a human residence dated to the Aurignacian (40,000 to 30,000 BP) were found.[32]
  • Entrance porch of the Cave of Aurignac
    Entrance porch of the Cave of Aurignac
  • Hayonim Cave
    Hayonim Cave
  • Interior of Bacho Kiro cave
    Interior of Bacho Kiro cave

See also

Preceded by Aurignacian
43,000–26,000 BP
Succeeded by

Notes

  1. Kostenki-14 (Russia): C1b, Goyet Q116-1 (Belgium) C1a,[25] Sungir (Russia): C1a2, Ust'-Ishim and Oase-1: K2a[26]
  2. ^ Haplogroup N was found in two Gravettian-era fossils, Paglicci 52 Paglicci 12, and is widespread in Central Asia[28]

References

  1. .
  2. .
  3. .(subscription required)
  4. ^ .
  5. ^ .
  6. .. Jacobi, R.M.; Higham, T.F.G.; Haesaerts, P.; Jadin, I.; Basell, L.S. (2010). "Radiocarbon chronology for the Early Gravettian of northern Europe: new AMS determinations for Maisières-Canal, Belgium". Antiquity. 84 (323): 26–40. .
  7. .
  8. ^ Williams, John K. (2006). "The Levantine Aurignacian: a closer look" (PDF). Lisbon: Instituto Português de Arqueologia (Trabalhos de Arqueologia Bar-Yosef O, Zilhão J, Editors. Towards a Definition of the Aurignacian. 45): 317–352.
  9. ^ Fu 2016: "GoyetQ116-1 is chronologically associated with the Aurignacian cultural complex. Thus, the subsequent spread of the Vestonice Cluster, which is associated with the Gravettian cultural complex, shows that the spread of the latter culture was mediated at least in part by population movements."
  10. ^
    S2CID 85316570
    .
  11. ^ Finds from the Vogelherd cave Archived 2007-09-30 at the Wayback Machine
  12. S2CID 205216692
    .
  13. ^ Henderson, Mark (2009-05-14). "Prehistoric female figure 'earliest piece of erotic art uncovered'". The Times. London.
  14. ^
    S2CID 4336590
    .
  15. ^ Richard Leakey & Roger Lewin, Origins Reconsidered: In Search of What Makes Us Human (1992)
  16. S2CID 244699451
    . Here, we report the discovery of the oldest known human-modified punctate ornament, a decorated ivory pendant from the Paleolithic layers at Stajnia Cave in Poland. ... The punctate decorative motif is one of the artistic innovations that developed during the Early Aurignacian in Europe and the Eurasian Upper Paleolithic in the Russian Plains. Thus far, these marks on mobile objects have been interpreted as hunting tallies, arithmetic counting systems, or lunar notation, whereas others have suggested aesthetic purposes. The looping curve represented on the Stajnia pendant is similar to the engraved patterns of the Blanchard plaque. Whether these marks indicate cyclic notations or kill scores remain an open question, although the resemblance with the lunar analemma is striking.
  17. .
  18. . The few AMH fossils associated with these initial UP industries are morphologically variable. In western Eurasia, the distinctive Aurignacian toolkit, first observed at Willendorf (Austria) by 43.5 ka, became predominant across the earlier range by 39 ka. Although analyses of ancient human genomes have advanced our understanding of the European past, revealing contributions from Paleolithic Siberians, European Mesolithic, and Near Eastern Neolithic groups to the European gene pool, the possible contribution of the earliest Eurasians to these later cultures and to contemporary human populations remains unknown. To investigate this, we sequenced the genome of Kostenki 14 (K14, Markina Gora)
  19. . The determination of a complete genome from ancient mtDNA extracted from a skeleton associated with Layer III at Kostenki 14 indicates that mtDNA subgroup U2 is represented among the people who occupied the central East European Plain at ca. 35,000 cal BP. This subgroup is widely distributed today in southern and central Asia, the Near East, and Europe, and is linked to one of the oldest genetic markers in Europe, mtDNA haplogroup U. At Kostenki 14, this subgroup is associated with artifacts assigned to the Gorodtsovan Culture but reinterpreted here as an Eastern Aurignacian assemblage.
  20. . The newly obtained dates make it possible to state that the burial in Markina Gora, according to calibrated data, is dated to within 38700-36200 years ago [8]. By the European scale, these dates synchronized it with the earliest Aurignacian complexes, among which the burial under study has a unique preservation
  21. . Demographic estimates are presented for the Aurignacian techno-complex (~42,000 to 33,000 y calBP) and discussed in the context of socio-spatial organization of hunter-gatherer populations. Results of the analytical approach applied estimate a mean of 1,500 persons (upper limit: 3,300; lower limit: 800) for western and central Europe.
  22. .
  23. ., "Sequencing of 81 entire human mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNAs) belonging to haplogroups M1 and U6 reveals that these predominantly North African clades arose in southwestern Asia and moved together to Africa about 40,000 to 45,000 years ago. Their arrival temporally overlaps with the event(s) that led to the peopling of Europe by modern humans and was most likely the result of the same change in climate conditions that allowed humans to enter the Levant, opening the way to the colonization of both Europe and North Africa. Thus, the early Upper Palaeolithic population(s) carrying M1 and U6 did not return to Africa along the southern coastal route of the "out of Africa" exit, but from the Mediterranean area; and the North African Dabban and European Aurignacian industries derived from a common Levantine source."
  24. ^ Fu 2016.
  25. PMID 27135931
    .
  26. .
  27. .
  28. .
  29. . The UP branch would have then emerged from a putative OoA population Hub well after 45 ka, a scenario that finds support in previous hypotheses on the appearance of UP techno-complexes (e.g. Aurignacian) in Europe, although the role of migrations and exchange between Europe, Western Asia, and the Levant is still debated (Conard 2002; Mellars 2006; Teyssandier 2006; Davies 2007; Hoffecker 2009; Le Brun-Ricalens et al. 2009; Nigst et al. 2014; Zilhão 2014; Hublin 2015; Bataille et al. 2020; Falcucci et al. 2020).
  30. .
  31. ^ .
  32. ^ Debeljak, Irena; Turk, Matija. "Potočka zijalka". In Šmid Hribar, Mateja; Torkar, Gregor; Golež, Mateja; et al. (eds.). Enciklopedija naravne in kulturne dediščine na Slovenskem – DEDI (in Slovenian). Archived from the original on 2012-05-15. Retrieved 12 March 2012.

Sources

External links