Barry George

Barry Michael George (born 15 April 1960)^[1] is an English man who was found guilty of the murder of English television presenter Jill Dando and whose conviction was overturned on appeal.

Dando's profile and popularity ensured high public interest in the case. When no motive could be found and no evidence emerged from criminals or British intelligence of a contract or conspiracy to kill Dando, police began to reassess evidence that had been set aside at the start of the inquiry. The only non-circumstantial evidence was a single particle of firearm discharge residue—a speck that matched the ammunition used in the killing.

George was convicted of murder but the forensic evidence was later discounted and his conviction was judged unsafe by the Court of Appeal and quashed in 2007. After a retrial, he was acquitted on 1 August 2008. His claims for compensation for wrongful imprisonment have been dismissed, on the grounds that a reasonable first trial had occurred, with the successful appeal having been on legitimate technical issues rather than due to an overt "miscarriage of justice".

Early life

Barry George was born in Hammersmith Hospital, London. He is the youngest of three children.^[2][3]

At 14, George attended the publicly funded Heathermount boarding school in

In 1980, George joined the

Jill Dando was shot dead outside her home on 26 April 1999. George (who at the time of the murder lived in a ground floor flat in Crookham Road, Fulham)^[3] was arrested for her murder on 25 May 2000, and charged on 29 May 2000.^[1]

Before his trial for the Dando murder, George was diagnosed with

He was convicted by a majority of 10 to one, and was sentenced to life imprisonment on 2 July 2001.^[16] This verdict was considered unsafe by some observers at the time.^[17]

Appeals

In 2002, George appealed his conviction, with his legal team disputing his identification as Dando's killer and the reliability of forensic evidence used in the trial.

In March 2006, George's lawyers sought an appeal on fresh evidence based on medical examinations suggesting he was not capable of committing the crime because of his mental disabilities. The defence brought in neuropsychiatrist Michael Kopelman to dispute the prosecution's claim that George showed signs of "histrionics, paranoia and narcissism" and had a personality disorder. Kopelman testified that "[He] described to me that he can be aware of what's going on around him but he just can't respond", and concluded that George was not calculating enough to have committed the crime.^[20]

A second defence argument was that two new witnesses say they saw armed police at the scene when George was arrested, contrary to official reports about the circumstances of his arrest – the Metropolitan Police maintain there were no armed officers present during the arrest of George. There was scientific evidence alleged to link George to the murder in the form of a single microscopic particle of what was said to have been gunshot residue, together with evidence as to the character of a fibre found on his clothing. It was argued by the defence that the presence of armed officers and their involvement in his arrest might have been responsible for the gunshot residue.

In September 2006, following investigations by George's campaigners and a BBC

1. One witness who had identified him as being in Jill Dando's street four and a half hours before the murder and other witnesses who, although they could not pick George out at an identity parade, saw a man in the street in the two hours before the murder who might have been George;
2. Alleged lies told by George in interview;
3. An alleged attempt to create a false alibi;
4. The single particle of firearm discharge residue (FDR) found, about a year after the murder, in George's overcoat.

The prosecution had called expert witnesses at the trial whose evidence suggested that it was likely that the particle of FDR came from a gun fired by George rather than from some other source. A forensic scientist, interviewed in a 2019 BBC documentary on the case, stated that potentially one in a hundred people could have gunshot residue on their clothing, picked up from someone else, possibly a hobby shooter or armed police officer. Those witnesses and other witnesses from the Forensic Science Service told the Court of Appeal that this was not the right conclusion to draw from the discovery of the particle of FDR. It was instead no more likely that the particle had come from a gun fired by George than that it had come from some other source. The Court of Appeal concluded that, if this evidence had been given to the jury at the trial, there was no certainty that the jury would have found George guilty. For this reason his conviction had to be quashed.^[23] A retrial was ordered and George was remanded in custody, making no application for bail.^[1]

Retrial

George appeared before the Old Bailey on 14 December 2007 and again pleaded not guilty to the murder.^[16] His retrial began on 9 June 2008.^[10] Initially there was a large amount of coverage in the press, especially of the prosecution portrayal of the defendant as being highly obsessive, lacking in social skills and a danger to women. The prosecution case differed from that of the first trial in that there was practically no scientific evidence as the evidence relating to the FDR was ruled inadmissible by the trial judge, Mr Justice Griffith Williams. There was much evidence of George's bad character which was admitted in the re-trial at the discretion of the trial judge, as a result of the enactment of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 since the original trial. There were delays due to legal arguments and to the illnesses of the defendant and one of the jurors.

For the defence William Clegg QC reminded the jury that evidence from three women from HAFAD (Hammersmith and Fulham Action on Disability) placed the defendant's arrival at their offices at 11:50 or 12:00, which, according to Clegg's argument, would have made it impossible for him to have committed a murder at Dando's house at 11:30 and then gone home (in the wrong direction) to change. Two neighbours who almost certainly saw the murderer immediately after the shooting had seen him go off in this direction, and later failed to identify George at an identification parade. The trial ended with George's acquittal on 1 August 2008.^[24]

Life after Dando acquittal

George has won damages from

In April 2010 it emerged that the Ministry of Justice had denied a claim of £1.4 million compensation made by George in respect of his wrongful imprisonment for Jill Dando's murder.[27] The decision was made by Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary and in August 2010 the High Court ruled that George was entitled to a judicial review of the matter.^[28]

On 11 May 2011, the Supreme Court defined "miscarriage of justice" as evidence "so undermined that no conviction could possibly be based upon it". This decision cleared the way for George's solicitor, Nicholas Baird, to request that the Justice Secretary

• List of miscarriage of justice cases
• Colin Stagg

References

• ISBN 978-0-14-029468-2
  .
• ISBN 978-0-7552-0503-5
  .
• ISBN 978-1-84454-404-2
  .
• Turney, Bob (May 2005). Wanted!. Waterside Press.
  ISBN 978-1-90653-464-6
  .

• BBC News Jill Dando Trial in Depth
• innocent.org — First Interview with Barry George in prison
• Article by Scott Lomax questioning Barry George's conviction Archived 12 April 2005 at the Wayback Machine