Basal West African
Basal West African is a hypothetical line of descent[1][2] that is no longer extant.[3]
History
Utilizing Western Africans (e.g.,
Even before 300,000 BP to 200,000 BP, when the ancestors of the modern
West African Hunter-Gatherers, Khoisan, and Taforalts
While a less simpler modeling (without Basal West Africans) for the ancestry of the
The peoples of southern Africa (e.g.,
In addition to having similarity with the remnant of a more
Descendants
Yoruba and Mende peoples descend from Basal West Africans and another set of ancestors akin to East Africans and Non-Africans, which is indicative of migration from East Africa.[10] Yoruba people have less ancestry from Basal West Africans than Mende people do,[10] which have a large amount of ancestry.[13] More specifically, Yoruba people have 9% Basal West African ancestry and Mende people have 13% Basal West African ancestry.[3]
References
- ^ S2CID 134983982.
- ^ S2CID 54483869.
- ^ S2CID 108974583.
- ^ S2CID 211472946.
- ^ Sirak, Kendra A.; Sawchuk, Elizabeth A.; Prendergast, Mary E. (18 May 2022). "Ancient Human DNA and African Population History" (PDF). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. Oxford University Press. pp. 10–11.
- PMID 32095519. "Non-African populations (Han Chinese in Beijing and Utah residents with northern and western European ancestry) also show analogous patterns in the CSFS, suggesting that a component of archaic ancestry was shared before the split of African and non-African populations...One interpretation of the recent time of introgression that we document is that archaic forms persisted in Africa until fairly recently. Alternately, the archaic population could have introgressed earlier into a modern human population, which then subsequently interbred with the ancestors of the populations that we have analyzed here. The models that we have explored here are not mutually exclusive, and it is plausible that the history of African populations includes genetic contributions from multiple divergent populations, as evidenced by the large effective population size associated with the introgressing archaic population...Given the uncertainty in our estimates of the time of introgression, we wondered whether jointly analyzing the CSFS from both the CEU (Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry) and YRI genomes could provide additional resolution. Under model C, we simulated introgression before and after the split between African and non-African populations and observed qualitative differences between the two models in the high-frequency–derived allele bins of the CSFS in African and non-African populations (fig. S40). Using ABC to jointly fit the high-frequency–derived allele bins of the CSFS in CEU and YRI (defined as greater than 50% frequency), we find that the lower limit on the 95% credible interval of the introgression time is older than the simulated split between CEU and YRI (2800 versus 2155 generations B.P.), indicating that at least part of the archaic lineages seen in the YRI are also shared with the CEU..."
- ^ [1] Archived 7 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine Supplementary Materials for Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations", section "S8.2" "We simulated data using the same priors in Section S5.2, but computed the spectrum for both YRI [West African Yoruba] and CEU [a population of European origin] . We found that the best fitting parameters were an archaic split time of 27,000 generations ago (95% HPD: 26,000-28,000), admixture fraction of 0.09 (95% HPD: 0.04-0.17), admixture time of 3,000 generations ago (95% HPD: 2,800-3,400), and an effective population size of 19,700 individuals (95% HPD: 19,300-20,200). We find that the lower bound of the admixture time is further back than the simulated split between CEU and YRI (2155 generations ago), providing some evidence in favor of a pre-Out-of-Africa event. This model suggests that many populations outside of Africa should also contain haplotypes from this introgression event, though detection is difficult because many methods use unadmixed outgroups to detect introgressed haplotypes [Browning et al., 2018, Skov et al., 2018, Durvasula and Sankararaman, 2019] (5, 53, 22). It is also possible that some of these haplotypes were lost during the Out-of-Africa bottleneck."
- PMID 32095519.
- S2CID 210955842.
- ^ S2CID 1257429.
- ^ S2CID 210862788.
- ^ S2CID 226555687.
- S2CID 248264573.