Batesian mimicry
Batesian mimicry is a form of
Batesian mimicry is the most commonly known and widely studied of mimicry complexes, such that the word mimicry is often treated as synonymous with Batesian mimicry. There are many other forms however, some very similar in principle, others far separated. It is often contrasted with Müllerian mimicry, a form of mutually beneficial convergence between two or more harmful species. However, because the mimic may have a degree of protection itself, the distinction is not absolute. It can also be contrasted with functionally different forms of mimicry. Perhaps the sharpest contrast here is with aggressive mimicry where a predator or parasite mimics a harmless species, avoiding detection and improving its foraging success.
The imitating species is called the mimic, while the imitated species (protected by its toxicity, foul taste or other defenses) is known as the model. The predatory species mediating indirect interactions between the mimic and the model is variously known as the [signal] receiver, dupe or operator. By parasitising the honest warning signal of the model, the Batesian mimic gains an advantage, without having to go to the expense of arming itself. The model, on the other hand, is disadvantaged, along with the dupe. If impostors appear in high numbers, positive experiences with the mimic may result in the model being treated as harmless. At higher frequency there is also a stronger selective advantage for the predator to distinguish mimic from model. For this reason, mimics are usually less numerous than models, an instance of frequency-dependent selection. Some mimetic populations have evolved multiple forms (polymorphism), enabling them to mimic several different models and thereby to gain greater protection. Batesian mimicry is not always perfect. A variety of explanations have been proposed for this, including limitations in predators' cognition.
While visual signals have attracted most study, Batesian mimicry can employ
Historical background
Bates put forward the hypothesis that the close resemblance between unrelated species was an
This
Aposematism
Most living things have predators and therefore are in a constant
In Batesian mimicry, the mimic effectively copies the coloration of an aposematic animal, known as the model, to deceive predators into behaving as if it were distasteful.
Classification and comparisons
Batesian mimicry is a case of protective or defensive mimicry, where the mimic does best by avoiding confrontations with the signal receiver. It is a disjunct system, which means that all three parties are from different species.[11] An example would be the robber fly Mallophora bomboides, which is a Batesian mimic of its bumblebee model and prey, B. americanorum (now more commonly known as Bombus pensylvanicus), which is noxious to predators due to its sting.[12]
Batesian mimicry stands in contrast to other forms such as
A case somewhat similar to Batesian mimicry is that of mimetic weeds, which imitate agricultural crops. In weed or Vavilovian mimicry, the weed survives by having seeds which winnowing machinery identifies as belonging to the crop. Vavilovian mimicry is not Batesian, because man and crop are not enemies.[3] By contrast, a leaf-mimicking plant, the chameleon vine, employs Batesian mimicry by adapting its leaf shape and colour to match that of its host to deter herbivores from eating its edible leaves.[13]
Another analogous case within a single species has been termed Browerian mimicry
Another important form of protective mimicry is Müllerian mimicry, discovered by and named after the naturalist Fritz Müller.[17][18] In Müllerian mimicry, both model and mimic are aposematic, so mimicry may be mutual, does not necessarily[b] constitute a bluff or deception and as in the wasps and bees may involve many species in a mimicry ring.[19][20]
Imperfect Batesian mimicry
In imperfect Batesian mimicry, the mimics do not exactly resemble their models. An example of this is the fly
Only certain traits may be required to deceive predators; for example, tests on the
Plants mimicking ants
Batesian mimicry of ants appears to have evolved in certain plants, as a visual anti-herbivory strategy, analogous to a herbivorous insect's mimicking a well-defended insect to deter predators.[30] Passiflora flowers of at least 22 species, such as P. incarnata, have dark dots and stripes on their flowers thought to serve this purpose.[29]
Acoustic mimicry
Predators may identify their prey by sound as well as sight; mimics have accordingly evolved to deceive the
Electrical mimicry
The
See also
- Phylogenetics of mimicry
- Papilio dardanus (females mimic multiple model species)
- Locomotor mimicry
Notes
References
- ^ .
- ^ a b Bates, Henry Walter (1863). The Naturalist on the River Amazons. John Murray.
- ^ .
- PMID 11934367.
- PMID 20539774.
- .
- PMID 19955153.
- PMID 24919704.
- PMID 21238394.
- PMID 37503654.
- ^ .
- S2CID 83531239.
- PMID 24768053.
- ^ a b Brower, L. P. (1970) Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain and implications for mimicry theory. In K. L. Chambers (ed) Biochemical Coevolution Corvallis, OR: Oregon State Univ. pp. 69-82.
- PMID 5231352.
- ISBN 978-1-4899-3368-3.
[Consider the case where one monarch caterpillar is feeding on cardenolide-containing milkweed, the other not], with one being completely potent with regard to cardiac glycoside toxicity, the second not. The first will fit all of the characteristics for warning coloration, the second not. In fact, the second butterfly is a harmless Batesian mimic of the first, even though both belong to the same species. L. Brower, J. Brower, and Corvino (1967) have termed this phenomenon automimicry, though others have suggested that Browerian mimicry would be a better term (Pasteur, 1972; Bees, 1977; Rothschild, 1979). Note that all of the antagonisms raised by Batesian mimicry will arise, but now the model and the mimic are conspecific.
- ^ Müller, Fritz (1878). "Ueber die Vortheile der Mimicry bei Schmetterlingen". Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1: 54–55.
- ^ Müller, F. (1879). "Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. (R. Meldola translation)". Proclamations of the Entomological Society of London. 1879: 20–29.
- ^ S2CID 45185502.
- PMID 19487663.
- ^ Curran, C. H. (1951). Synopsis of the North American species of Spilomyia (Syrphidae, Diptera). American Museum Novitates. http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/bitstream/handle/2246/2364//v2/dspace/ingest/pdfSource/nov/N1492.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
- PMID 11886630.
- .
- S2CID 84467142.
- S2CID 84458742.
- S2CID 4424680.
- PMID 17567563.
- S2CID 35411437.
- ^ a b Lev-Yadun, Simcha (2009). "Ant mimicry by Passiflora Flowers?". Israel Journal of Entomology. 39: 159–163.
- ^ Weins, D. (1978). "Mimicry in plants". Evolutionary Biology. 11: 365–403.
- ^ PMID 17517637.
- ISBN 978-0-393-31570-7.
- S2CID 204994529.
Further reading
- ISBN 0-416-30050-2Provides many examples of Batesian Mimicry.
- Evans, M. A. (1965). "Mimicry and the Darwinian Heritage". Journal of the History of Ideas. 26 (2): 211–220. JSTOR 2708228. For a historical perspective.
- ISBN 0-07-070100-8Especially the first two chapters.
- Edmunds, M. 1974. Defence in Animals: A Survey of Anti-Predator Defences. Harlow, Essex & NY: Longman 357 p. ISBN 0-582-44132-3Chapter 4 discusses this phenomenon.
- Pasteur, Georges (1982). "A classificatory review of mimicry systems". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 13: 169–199. . A detailed discussion of the different forms of mimicry.
- ISBN 978-0-19-852859-3.. Chapters 10 and 11 provide an up-to-date synopsis.