Bilateria

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Bilaterian
)

Bilaterians
Temporal range:
Ma[1]
PhoronidaRotiferMolluscaEchinodermArthropodFlatwormTardigradeChordate
Bilaterian diversity
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Subkingdom: Eumetazoa
Clade: ParaHoxozoa
Clade: Bilateria
Hatschek, 1888
Subdivisions
Synonyms

Triploblasts
Lankester, 1873

Bilateria (

ganglia
become concentrated at the front/rostral end.

Bilaterians constitute one of the five main

coelom
).

Body plan

Idealised wormlike nephrozoan body plan. With a cylindrical body and a direction of movement the animal has head and tail ends. Sense organs and mouth form the basis of the head. Opposed circular and longitudinal muscles enable peristaltic motion.

Some of the earliest bilaterians were wormlike, and a bilaterian body can be conceptualized as a cylinder with a gut running between two openings, the mouth and the anus. Around the gut it has an internal body cavity, a coelom or pseudocoelom.[a] Animals with this bilaterally symmetric body plan have a head (anterior) end and a tail (posterior) end as well as a back (dorsal) and a belly (ventral); therefore they also have a left side and a right side.[4][2]

Having a front end means that this part of the body encounters stimuli, such as food, favouring

plesiomorphic body structures.[4][2]

Evolution

Ikaria wariootia, living 571–539 million years ago, is one of the oldest bilaterians identified.[7]

The hypothetical

Elie Metchnikoff, Libbie Hyman, or Luitfried von Salvini-Plawen [nl]), while the other poses that the first bilaterian was a coelomate organism and the main acoelomate phyla (flatworms and gastrotrichs) have lost body cavities secondarily (the Archicoelomata hypothesis and its variations such as the Gastrea by Haeckel or Sedgwick, the Bilaterosgastrea by Gösta Jägersten [sv
], or the Trochaea by Nielsen).

One hypothesis is that the original bilaterian was a bottom dwelling worm with a single body opening, similar to Xenoturbella.[3] Alternatively, it may have resembled the planula larvae of some cnidaria, which have some bilateral symmetry.[10] However, there is evidence that it was segmented, as the mechanism for creating segments is shared between vertebrates (deuterostomes) and arthropods (protostomes).[11]

Fossil record

The first evidence of bilateria in the fossil record comes from trace fossils in

Fossil embryos are known from around the time of Vernanimalcula (580 million years ago), but none of these have bilaterian affinities.[15] Burrows believed to have been created by bilaterian life forms have been found in the Tacuarí Formation of Uruguay, and were believed to be at least 585 million years old.[16] However, more recent evidence shows these fossils are actually late Paleozoic instead of Ediacaran.[17]

Phylogeny

The Bilateria has traditionally been divided into two main lineages or

mollusks, flatworms, and so forth. There are several differences, most notably in how the embryo develops. In particular, the first opening of the embryo becomes the mouth in protostomes, and the anus in deuterostomes. Many taxonomists now recognize at least two more superphyla among the protostomes, Ecdysozoa[19] (molting animals) and Spiralia.[19][20][21][22] The arrow worms (Chaetognatha) have proven difficult to classify; recent studies place them in the gnathifera.[23][24][25]

The traditional division of Bilateria into

xenoturbellids, and the sister relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Nephrozoa confirmed in phylogenomic analyses.[26]

A modern consensus phylogenetic tree for Bilateria is shown below, although the positions of certain clades are still controversial (dashed lines) and the tree has changed considerably since 2000.[27][25][28][29][30]

ParaHoxozoa

Cnidaria

Placozoa

Bilateria

Proarticulata?

Xenacoelomorpha

Xenoturbellida

Acoelomorpha
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
Ambulacraria

Echinodermata

Hemichordata

Cambroernida

Chordata

Cephalochordata

Olfactores

Tunicata

Vertebrata

Saccorhytus coronarius

Vetulocystids

Vetulicolians

Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Nematoida

Nematoda

Nematomorpha

Loricifera

Panarthropoda

Onychophora

Tactopoda

Tardigrada

Arthropoda

Scalidophora
> 539 Mya
Spiralia
Gnathifera

Rotifera and allies

Chaetognatha

Platytrochozoa

Platyhelminthes and allies

Lophotrochozoa

Mollusca

Annelida and allies

¿†Kimberella?

550 mya
580 Mya

Kimberella?

610 mya
650 Mya

A different hypothesis is that the Ambulacraria are sister to Xenacoelomorpha together forming the

Protostomia according to analyses by Philippe et al., the authors nonetheless caution that "the support values are very low, meaning there is no solid evidence to refute the traditional protostome and deuterostome dichotomy".[33]

ParaHoxozoa

Cnidaria

Placozoa

Bilateria

Proarticulata

Xenambulacraria
Xenacoelomorpha

Xenoturbellida

Acoelomorpha
Ambulacraria

Echinodermata

Hemichordata

Cambroernida

Centroneuralia
Chordata

Cephalochordata

Olfactores

Urochordata

Vertebrata

Saccorhytus coronarius

Vetulocystids

Vetulicolians

Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Nematoida

Nematoda

Nematomorpha

Loricifera

Panarthropoda

Onychophora

Tactopoda

Tardigrada

Arthropoda

Scalidophora
> 539 Mya
Spiralia
Gnathifera

Rotifera and allies

Chaetognatha

Platytrochozoa

Platyhelminthes and allies

Lophotrochozoa

Mollusca

Annelida and allies

¿†Kimberella?

550 Mya
580 Mya

¿†Kimberella?

610 Mya
650 Mya

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The earliest Bilateria may have had only a single opening, and no coelom.[3]

References

External links