Senescence

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Biological aging
)

Senescence (

accelerated aging diseases
.

Environmental factors may affect

skin aging. Different parts of the body may age at different rates and distinctly, including the brain, the cardiovascular system, and muscle. Similarly, functions may distinctly decline with aging, including movement control and memory
. Two organisms of the same species can also age at different rates, making biological aging and chronological aging distinct concepts.

Definition and characteristics

Organismal senescence is the aging of whole organisms. Actuarial senescence can be defined as an increase in mortality and/or a decrease in fecundity with age. The Gompertz–Makeham law of mortality says that the age-dependent component of the mortality rate increases exponentially with age.

heart disease. Aging has been defined as "a progressive deterioration of physiological function, an intrinsic age-related process of loss of viability and increase in vulnerability."[3]

In 2013, a group of scientists defined nine hallmarks of aging that are common between organisms with emphasis on mammals:

  • genomic instability
    ,
  • telomere attrition,
  • epigenetic
    alterations,
  • loss of proteostasis,
  • deregulated nutrient sensing,
  • mitochondrial dysfunction,
  • cellular senescence,
  • stem cell exhaustion,
  • altered intercellular communication[4]

In a decadal update, three hallmarks have been added, totaling 12 proposed hallmarks:

The environment induces damage at various levels, e.g.

Dolly the sheep died young from a contagious lung disease, but data on an entire population of cloned individuals would be necessary to measure mortality rates and quantify aging.[citation needed
]

The evolutionary theorist George Williams wrote, "It is remarkable that after a seemingly miraculous feat of

metazoan should be unable to perform the much simpler task of merely maintaining what is already formed."[7]

Variation among species

Different speeds with which mortality increases with age correspond to different maximum life span among species. For example, a mouse is elderly at 3 years, a human is elderly at 80 years,[8] and ginkgo trees show little effect of age even at 667 years.[9]

Almost all organisms senesce, including bacteria which have asymmetries between "mother" and "daughter" cells upon cell division, with the mother cell experiencing aging, while the daughter is rejuvenated.[10][11] There is negligible senescence in some groups, such as the genus Hydra.[12] Planarian flatworms have "apparently limitless telomere regenerative capacity fueled by a population of highly proliferative adult stem cells."[13] These planarians are not biologically immortal, but rather their death rate slowly increases with age. Organisms that are thought to be biologically immortal would, in one instance, be Turritopsis dohrnii, also known as the "immortal jellyfish", due to its ability to revert to its youth when it undergoes stress during adulthood.[14] The reproductive system is observed to remain intact, and even the gonads of Turritopsis dohrnii are existing.[15]

Some species exhibit "negative senescence", in which reproduction capability increases or is stable, and mortality falls with age, resulting from the advantages of increased body size during aging.[16]

Theories of aging

More than 300 different theories have been posited to explain the nature (mechanisms) and causes (reasons for natural emergence or factors) of aging.[17][additional citation(s) needed] Good theories would both explain past observations and predict the results of future experiments. Some of the theories may complement each other, overlap, contradict, or may not preclude various other theories.[citation needed]

Theories of aging fall into two broad categories, evolutionary theories of aging and mechanistic theories of aging. Evolutionary theories of aging primarily explain why aging happens,[18] but do not concern themselves with the molecular mechanism(s) that drive the process. All evolutionary theories of aging rest on the basic mechanisms that the force of natural selection declines with age.[19][20] Mechanistic theories of aging can be divided into theories that propose aging is programmed, and damage accumulation theories, i.e. those that propose aging to be caused by specific molecular changes occurring over time.

The aging process can be explained with different theories. These are evolutionary theories, molecular theories, system theories and cellular theories. The evolutionary theory of ageing was first proposed in the late 1940s and can be explained briefly by the accumulation of mutations (evolution of ageing), disposable soma and antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis. The molecular theories of ageing include phenomena such as gene regulation (gene expression), codon restriction, error catastrophe, somatic mutation, accumulation of genetic material (DNA) damage (DNA damage theory of aging) and dysdifferentiation. The system theories include the immunologic approach to ageing, rate-of-living and the alterations in neuroendocrinal control mechanisms. (See homeostasis). Cellular theory of ageing can be categorized as telomere theory, free radical theory (free-radical theory of aging) and apoptosis. The stem cell theory of aging is also a sub-category of cellular theories.

Evolutionary aging theories

Antagonistic pleiotropy

One theory was proposed by

Fisher's reproductive value
is high and relatively low when Fisher's reproductive value is low.

Cancer versus cellular senescence tradeoff theory of aging

Senescent cells within a multicellular organism can be purged by competition between cells, but this increases the risk of cancer. This leads to an inescapable dilemma between two possibilities—the accumulation of physiologically useless senescent cells, and cancer—both of which lead to increasing rates of mortality with age.[2]

Disposable soma

The disposable soma theory of aging was proposed by

germline cells, in order to focus on reproduction and species survival.[23]

Programmed aging theories

Programmed theories of aging posit that aging is adaptive, normally invoking selection for evolvability or group selection.

The reproductive-cell cycle theory suggests that aging is regulated by changes in hormonal signaling over the lifespan.[24]

Damage accumulation theories

The free radical theory of aging

One of the most prominent theories of aging was first proposed by Harman in 1956.[25] It posits that free radicals produced by dissolved oxygen, radiation, cellular respiration and other sources cause damage to the molecular machines in the cell and gradually wear them down. This is also known as oxidative stress.

There is substantial evidence to back up this theory. Old animals have larger amounts of oxidized proteins, DNA and lipids than their younger counterparts.[26][27]

Chemical damage

Elderly Klamath woman photographed by Edward S. Curtis in 1924

One of the earliest aging theories was the Rate of Living Hypothesis described by Raymond Pearl in 1928[28] (based on earlier work by Max Rubner), which states that fast basal metabolic rate corresponds to short maximum life span.

While there may be some validity to the idea that for various types of specific damage detailed below that are by-products of metabolism, all other things being equal, a fast metabolism may reduce lifespan, in general this theory does not adequately explain the differences in lifespan either within, or between, species. Calorically restricted animals process as much, or more, calories per gram of body mass, as their ad libitum fed counterparts, yet exhibit substantially longer lifespans.[citation needed] Similarly, metabolic rate is a poor predictor of lifespan for birds, bats and other species that, it is presumed, have reduced mortality from predation, and therefore have evolved long lifespans even in the presence of very high metabolic rates.[29] In a 2007 analysis it was shown that, when modern statistical methods for correcting for the effects of body size and phylogeny are employed, metabolic rate does not correlate with longevity in mammals or birds.[30]

With respect to specific types of chemical damage caused by metabolism, it is suggested that damage to long-lived biopolymers, such as structural proteins or DNA, caused by ubiquitous chemical agents in the body such as oxygen and sugars, are in part responsible for aging. The damage can include breakage of biopolymer chains, cross-linking of biopolymers, or chemical attachment of unnatural substituents (haptens) to biopolymers.[citation needed] Under normal

glucose metabolism[37] and AMPK.[38]

glycoxidation
.

accelerated aging diseases" are due to defective DNA repair enzymes.[39][40]

DNA damage was proposed in a 2021 review to be the underlying cause of aging because of the mechanistic link of DNA damage to nearly every aspect of the aging phenotype.[41] DNA damage-induced epigenetic alterations, such as DNA methylation and many histone modifications, appear to be of particular importance to the aging process.[41] Evidence for the theory that DNA damage is the fundamental cause of aging was first reviewed in 1981.[42]

It is believed that the

HPA axis, which stimulates glucocorticoid secretion, long-term exposure to which produces symptoms of aging.[43]

Mutation accumulation

Natural selection can support lethal and harmful alleles, if their effects are felt after reproduction. The geneticist J. B. S. Haldane wondered why the dominant mutation that causes Huntington's disease remained in the population, and why natural selection had not eliminated it. The onset of this neurological disease is (on average) at age 45 and is invariably fatal within 10–20 years. Haldane assumed that, in human prehistory, few survived until age 45. Since few were alive at older ages and their contribution to the next generation was therefore small relative to the large cohorts of younger age groups, the force of selection against such late-acting deleterious mutations was correspondingly small. Therefore, a genetic load of late-acting deleterious mutations could be substantial at mutation–selection balance. This concept came to be known as the selection shadow.[44]

Peter Medawar formalised this observation in his mutation accumulation theory of aging.[45][46] "The force of natural selection weakens with increasing age—even in a theoretically immortal population, provided only that it is exposed to real hazards of mortality. If a genetic disaster... happens late enough in individual life, its consequences may be completely unimportant". Age-independent hazards such as predation, disease, and accidents, called 'extrinsic mortality', mean that even a population with negligible senescence will have fewer individuals alive in older age groups.

Other damage

A study concluded that retroviruses in the human genomes can become awakened from dormant states and contribute to aging which can be blocked by neutralizing antibodies, alleviating "cellular senescence and tissue degeneration and, to some extent, organismal aging".[47]

Stem cell theories of aging

The

myeloid
lineages.

Maintaining the dynamic balance of stem cell pools requires several conditions. Balancing

hematopoietic stem cells are favoring elements of stem cell pool maintenance while differentiation, mobilization and senescence are detrimental elements. These detrimental effects will eventually cause apoptosis
.

There are also several challenges when it comes to therapeutic use of stem cells and their ability to replenish organs and tissues. First, different cells may have different lifespans even though they originate from the same stem cells (See
erythrocytes), meaning that aging can occur differently in cells that have longer lifespans as opposed to the ones with shorter lifespans. Also, continual effort to replace the somatic cells may cause exhaustion of stem cells.[48]
Hematopoietic stem cell aging
Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) regenerate the blood system throughout life and maintain homeostasis.[49] DNA strand breaks accumulate in long term HSCs during aging.[50][51] This accumulation is associated with a broad attenuation of DNA repair and response pathways that depends on HSC quiescence.[51] DNA ligase 4 (Lig4) has a highly specific role in the repair of double-strand breaks by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Lig4 deficiency in the mouse causes a progressive loss of HSCs during aging.[52] These findings suggest that NHEJ is a key determinant of the ability of HSCs to maintain themselves over time.[52]
Hematopoietic stem cell diversity aging
A study showed that the clonal diversity of stem cells that produce blood cells gets drastically reduced around age 70 to a faster-growing few, substantiating a novel theory of ageing which could enable healthy aging.[53][54]
Hematopoietic mosaic loss of chromosome Y
A 2022 study showed that
heart risks, and mortality in a causal way.[55][56]

Biomarkers of aging

If different individuals age at different rates, then fecundity, mortality, and functional capacity might be better predicted by biomarkers than by chronological age.[57][58] However, graying of hair,[59] face aging, skin wrinkles and other common changes seen with aging are not better indicators of future functionality than chronological age. Biogerontologists have continued efforts to find and validate biomarkers of aging, but success thus far has been limited.

Levels of CD4 and CD8 memory T cells and naive T cells have been used to give good predictions of the expected lifespan of middle-aged mice.[60]

Aging clocks

There is interest in an epigenetic clock as a biomarker of aging, based on its ability to predict human chronological age.[61] Basic blood biochemistry and cell counts can also be used to accurately predict the chronological age.[62] It is also possible to predict the human chronological age using the transcriptomic aging clocks.[63]

There is research and development of further biomarkers, detection systems and software systems to measure biological age of different tissues or systems or overall. For example, a

neuroanatomical patterns of neurological aging,[64] and a DL tool was reported as to calculate a person's inflammatory age based on patterns of systemic age-related inflammation.[65]

Aging clocks have been used to evaluate impacts of interventions on humans, including combination therapies.[66][additional citation(s) needed]

Genetic determinants of aging

A number of genetic components of aging have been identified using model organisms, ranging from the simple budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to worms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). Study of these organisms has revealed the presence of at least two conserved aging pathways.

Gene expression is imperfectly controlled, and it is possible that random fluctuations in the expression levels of many genes contribute to the aging process as suggested by a study of such genes in yeast.

epigenetics of aging
.

The ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks declines with aging in mice[68] and humans.[69]

A set of rare hereditary (

accelerated aging, including wrinkled skin. The cause of Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome was reported in the journal Nature in May 2003.[70]
This report suggests that , is the cause of this form of accelerated aging.

A study indicates that aging may shift activity toward short genes or shorter transcript length and that this can be countered by interventions.[71]

Healthspans and aging in society

Past and projected age of the human world population through time as of 2021[72]
Healthspan-lifespan gap (LHG)[72]
Healthspan extension relies on the unison of social, clinical and scientific programs or domains of work.[72]

Healthspan can broadly be defined as the period of one's life that one is

healthy, such as free of significant diseases[73] or declines of capacities (e.g. of senses, muscle, endurance and cognition
).

wellbeing, highlight the importance of extending healthspans.[72]

Many measures that may extend lifespans may simultaneously also extend healthspans, albeit that is not necessarily the case, indicating that "lifespan can no longer be the sole parameter of interest" in related research.[77] While recent life expectancy increases were not followed by "parallel" healthspan expansion,[72] awareness of the concept and issues of healthspan lags as of 2017.[73] Scientists have noted that "[c]hronic diseases of aging are increasing and are inflicting untold costs on human quality of life".[76]

Interventions

bioethicists
.

The sale of purported anti-aging products such as supplements and hormone replacement is a lucrative global industry. For example, the industry that promotes the use of hormones as a treatment for consumers to slow or reverse the
aging process in the US market generated about $50 billion of revenue a year in 2009.[80] The use of such hormone products has not been proven to be effective or safe.[80][81][82][83]

See also

References

  1. ^ from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
  2. ^ .
  3. ^ "Aging and Gerontology Glossary". Archived from the original on 19 October 2019. Retrieved 26 February 2011.
  4. PMID 23746838
    .
  5. from the original on 17 February 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
  6. ^ .
  7. ^ .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. .
  17. .
  18. from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
  19. OCLC 869293719. Archived from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2022.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  20. from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
  21. from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
  22. .
  23. .
  24. .
  25. .
  26. from the original on 31 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  27. .
  28. ^ Pearl R (1928). The Rate of Living, Being an Account of Some Experimental Studies on the Biology of Life Duration. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.[page needed]
  29. S2CID 22755811
    .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. .
  35. .
  36. .
  37. .
  38. .
  39. from the original on 15 November 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2016.
  40. .
  41. ^ .
  42. .
  43. PMID 10890824. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 11 December 2018. Retrieved 8 April 2008.
  44. from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  45. ^ Medawar PB (1946). "Old age and natural death". Modern Quarterly. 1: 30–56.
  46. ^ Medawar PB (1952). An Unsolved Problem of Biology. London: H. K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.[page needed]
  47. S2CID 232060038
    .
  48. ^ Smith J., A., Daniel R. "Stem Cells and Aging: A Chicken-Or-Egg Issue?". Aging and Disease. 2012 Jun, Vol. 3, Number 3; 260–268.
  49. ^ Mahla RS (2016). "Stem cells application in regenerative medicine and disease threpeutics". International Journal of Cell Biology. 2016 (7): 19.
    PMID 27516776
    .
  50. .
  51. ^ .
  52. ^ .
  53. ^ "Research may reveal why people can suddenly become frail in their 70s". The Guardian. 1 June 2022. Retrieved 18 July 2022.
  54. PMID 35650442
    .
  55. ^ Kolata, Gina (14 July 2022). "As Y Chromosomes Vanish With Age, Heart Risks May Grow". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  56. PMID 35857592
    .
  57. .
  58. from the original on 24 October 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2019.
  59. .
  60. .
  61. .
  62. .
  63. .
  64. .
  65. PMID 34888528
    .
  66. from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  67. .
  68. .
  69. .
  70. from the original on 30 May 2022. Retrieved 21 July 2021 – via Zenodo.
  71. .
  72. ^
    PMID 34556664
    .
  73. ^ a b Peterson, Tim (30 May 2017). "Healthspan is more important than lifespan, so why don't more people know about it?". Institute for Public Health | Washington University in St. Louis. Harvey A. Friedman Center for Aging. Archived from the original on 1 March 2023. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
  74. PMID 34556664
    .
  75. .
  76. ^ .
  77. .
  78. ^ Turner BS (2009). Can We Live Forever? A Sociological and Moral Inquiry. Anthem Press. p. 3.
  79. ^ "agerasia". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  80. ^
    The Chicago Tribune
    . Retrieved 17 July 2009.
  81. S2CID 764136
    .
  82. .
  83. .

External links