Blue Dog Coalition
Blue Dog Coalition | |
---|---|
center-left
Historical: Center-right[4] | |
National affiliation | Democratic Party |
Colors | Blue |
Seats in the House Democratic Caucus | 10 / 213
|
Seats in the House | 10 / 435
|
Website | |
bluedogcaucus-golden | |
|
The Blue Dog Coalition, commonly known as the Blue Dogs or Blue Dog Democrats, is a
In the late 2010s and early 2020s, the Coalition's focus shifted towards ideological centrism and pragmatic, constituency-based politics;[2][1][10] however, the Coalition maintained an emphasis on fiscal responsibility.[11] The Blue Dog Coalition remains the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House.[9] As of 2023, the caucus has ten members.[12]
Electoral results
House of Representatives
Congress | Democratic seats | ± |
---|---|---|
104th (1994) | 29 / 204
|
|
105th (1996) | 28 / 207
|
1 |
106th (1998) | 34 / 211
|
6 |
107th (2000) | 35 / 212
|
1 |
108th (2002) | 38 / 205
|
3 |
109th (2004) | 38 / 202
|
|
110th (2006) | 56 / 233
|
18 |
111th (2008) | 64 / 257
|
8 |
112th (2010) | 28 / 193
|
36 |
113th (2012) | 19 / 201
|
9 |
114th (2014) | 15 / 188
|
4 |
115th (2016) | 18 / 193
|
3 |
116th (2018) | 27 / 235
|
9 |
117th (2020) | 19 / 222
|
8 |
118th (2022) | 10 / 213
|
9 |
Overview and history
The Blue Dog Coalition was formed in 1995[13][14][15] during the 104th Congress to give members from the Democratic Party representing conservative-leaning districts a unified voice after the Democrats' loss of Congress in the 1994 Republican Revolution.[16]
The term "Blue Dog Democrat" is credited to
Disputes within the Democratic Party
In 2007, 15 Blue Dogs in safe seats rebelled, and refused to contribute party dues to the
Role in the passage of the ACA
In the summer of 2009,
The Washington Post stated that the Blue Dogs, with over 50 members, were the most influential voting bloc in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010.[29]
2010s decline
The Blue Dog Coalition suffered serious losses in the 2010 midterm elections, losing over half of its seats to Republican challengers. Its members, who were roughly one quarter of the Democratic Party's caucus in the 111th Congress, accounted for half of the party's midterm election losses.[30] Including retirements, Blue Dog numbers in the House were reduced from 59 members in 2009 to 26 members in 2011.[31] Two of the Coalition's four leaders (Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Baron Hill) failed to secure re-election.[32][33]
The caucus shrank even more in the
In the 2016 elections, future Blue Dogs accounted for over half of the Democrats' gains in the House.[36] In 2018, for the first time since 2006, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee partnered with the Blue Dog PAC (the Blue Dog Coalition's political organization) to recruit candidates in competitive districts across the country.[37] After the 2018 House of Representatives elections, the caucus grew from 18 members to 24.[31] All incumbents were re-elected and Rep. Kyrsten Sinema was elected to the U.S. Senate from Arizona.[38] The caucus also added 11 new members who defeated Republican incumbents in the 2018 election in districts that had voted for Donald Trump in 2016.[39]
Biden presidency
The Democratic Party lost seats in the 2020 and 2022 House of Representatives elections, including the Blue Dog Coalition. As of July 2023, during the 118th Congress, the Coalition had 10 members.[40]
At the start of the
Ideology
The Blue Dog Coalition is the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House. It "advocates for fiscal responsibility, a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than conflict with Republicans". It acts as a check on legislation that its members perceive to be too far to the right or to the left on the political spectrum.[11] In the 2010s, the Blue Dogs became more demographically diverse and less conservative.[2]
The Blue Dog Coalition is often involved in searching for a compromise between liberal and conservative positions, including classically liberal policies. Most of its members represent competitive swing districts, and are thus inclined to appeal to swing voters.[43] Though its members have evolved on social issues over time,[31] the group has never taken a position on social issues as a caucus.[2] As of 2014, there was no mention of social issues in the official Blue Dog materials.[44]
Membership
In the early years of the caucus, the Blue Dogs were viewed by some as the political successors to Southern Democratic groups known such as the
In January 2019, McClatchy reported a transformation of the Blue Dogs from a coalition of 'southern white men' to 'a multi-regional, multicultural group.' At that time, the coalition included two African-American members, one Vietnamese-American, one Mexican-American, and only five members from Southern states.[31]
As of July 2023, the Coalition included 10 members. At that point, the Coalition's membership was smaller than it had ever been since its formation.[12][43]
Co-chairs
The co-chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition for the 118th Congress are U.S. Representatives
Term start | Term end | Chair for Administration | Chair for Communications | Chair for Policy |
---|---|---|---|---|
February 1995 | April 1995 | Gary Condit | John S. Tanner
|
Nathan Deal |
April 1995 | January 1999 | Collin Peterson | ||
January 1999 | January 2001 | Robert E. Cramer
|
Chris John | Charles Stenholm |
January 2001 | January 2003 | Chris John | Jim Turner | Allen Boyd |
January 2003 | January 2005 | Jim Turner | Baron Hill | Charles Stenholm |
January 2005 | January 2007 | Jim Matheson | Dennis Cardoza | Jim Cooper |
January 2007 | January 2009 | Allen Boyd | Mike Ross | Dennis Moore |
January 2009 | October 2009 | Stephanie Herseth Sandlin | Charlie Melancon
|
Baron Hill |
October 2009 | January 2011 | Jim Matheson | ||
January 2011 | January 2013 | Heath Shuler | Mike Ross | John Barrow
|
January 2013 | January 2015 | John Barrow
|
Kurt Schrader | Jim Cooper |
January 2015 | January 2017 | Kurt Schrader | Jim Costa | |
January 2017 | January 2019 | Jim Costa | Henry Cuellar | Dan Lipinski |
January 2019 | January 2021 | Stephanie Murphy | Lou Correa | Tom O'Halleran |
January 2021 | January 2023 | Tom O'Halleran | Ed Case | |
January 2023 | May 2023 | Jared Golden | Jim Costa | |
May 2023 | present | Jared Golden | Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez | Mary Peltola |
Current members
Alaska
- Mary Peltola, Representative from AK-AL
California
Georgia
- Sanford Bishop, Representative from GA-02
Maine
- Jared Golden, Representative from ME-02
New Jersey
- Josh Gottheimer, Representative from NJ-05
North Carolina
- Wiley Nickel, Representative from NC-13 (retiring at the end of the 118th congress)
Texas
- TX-28
- TX-34
Washington
- Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, Representative from WA-03
See also
- Congressional Progressive Caucus
- Factions in the Democratic Party
- New Democrat Coalition
- Republican Main Street Partnership
- Republican Governance Group
- Problem Solvers Caucus
References
- ^ a b c "Dwindling Blue Dog Democrats look to stage a comeback for moderates". The Washington Post. August 8, 2023.
- ^ Christian Science Monitor.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (April 25, 2012). "Why the Blue Dogs' decline was inevitable". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
- ^ ISBN 9780872897694. Retrieved August 14, 2014.
- ^ Davis, Susan. "U.S. House has fewer moderate Democrats". USA Today. Archived from the original on December 4, 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2014.
- ^ "Lobbying from the center". The Hill. January 26, 2021.
- ISBN 9781568024714.
- ^ Solomon, Norman (May 24, 2010). "When the Leaders Lead, the People Have Sorrow". HuffPost. Retrieved January 13, 2023.
- ^ a b Miller, Jonathan (May 23, 2018). "The Blue Dogs Are Barking Again". Roll Call. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
- ISBN 9781316510421.
In contrast to the halting mobilization of Insurgent Republicans and southern Democrats, the Blue Dogs' adoption of ... ideological bonafides, the Coalition worked to establish a Blue Dog brand and associate it with support for centrist policies.
- ^ a b Weiner, Mark (February 1, 2019). "Anthony Brindisi to co-chair Blue Dogs, caucus of moderate House Democrats". syracuse.com.
- ^ POLITICO. Retrieved January 24, 2023.
- ^ Dumain, Emma (May 12, 2015). "20 years in, Blue Dogs not ready to roll over". rollcall.com.
- ^ "History". BlueDogCaucus-Schrader.house.gov. Blue Dog Coalition. Retrieved November 15, 2016.
- ^ "History". ross.house.gov/BlueDog/. Blue Dog Coalition. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
- ^ Bendavid, Naftali (July 28, 2009). "'Blue Dog' Democrats hold health care overhaul at bay". The Wall Street Journal.
- ^ "Wordcraft Archives, November 2004". Wordcraft.infopop.cc. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
- ^ a b Suddath, Claire (July 28, 2009). "A Brief History of Blue Dog Democrats". Time. Archived from the original on July 31, 2009. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
- ^ Safire, William (April 23, 1995). "On Language; Blue Dog Demo". The New York Times. Retrieved September 7, 2009.
- ^ "Blue Dog Democrats". Bluedogs.us. November 4, 2008. Archived from the original on July 14, 2009. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
- The Politico. Archived from the originalon October 26, 2007. Retrieved November 1, 2007.
- ^ "The Democratic Party's centrists: Blue Dog days". The Economist. July 30, 2009.
- ^ "Are the Blue Dogs really working for you?". Silverbuzzcafe.com. Silver Buzz Cafe. August 20, 2009. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
- ^ "Two House Committees Approve Health Reform Bill". Child Welfare League of America. July 27, 2009. Archived from the original on June 16, 2010. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
- ^ Wallace, Gregory (June 25, 2012). "'Obamacare': The word that defined the health care debate". CNN. Archived from the original on July 12, 2012. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
- ^ Ball, Molly (November 16, 2012). "Blue Dogs are dwindling". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on April 13, 2013. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
- ^ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (August 17, 2009). "'Public Option' in Health Plan may be dropped". The New York Times. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
- ^ "Blue Dogs And The Health Care Debate" NPR: Talk of the Nation, August 4, 2009.
- ^ Kane, Paul (January 15, 2014). "Blue Dog Democrats, whittled down in number, are trying to regroup". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2014.
Four years ago, they were the most influential voting bloc on Capitol Hill, more than 50 House Democrats pulling their liberal colleagues to a more centrist, fiscally conservative vision on issues such as health care and Wall Street reforms.
- ^ "Blue Dogs shaved in half – Blue Dog Democrats". Fox Nation. Fox News. November 3, 2010. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011.
- ^ a b c d "Shutdown, health care, budget: How moderate House Democrats will influence the party". mcclatchydc.
- ^ Allen, Jonathan (November 3, 2010). "Blue Dog wipeout: Half of caucus gone". Politico. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
- ^ "A vanishing breed: Blue Dogs". Los Angeles Times. November 3, 2010.
- ^ "New Dems hope to be a force in 113th Congress". The Hill. November 17, 2012.
- ^ "Why the Blue Dogs' decline was inevitable". The Washington Post. April 25, 2012.
- The Politico. 2017.
- The Politico. 2017.
- ^ "House Democratic Factions All See Gains After Midterms". Roll Call. November 13, 2018.
- ^ Rogin, Josh (December 13, 2018). "Blue Dog Democrats are poised to play a crucial role in the next Congress". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 17, 2020.
- ^ POLITICO.
- Washington Post.
- ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
- ^ Washington Post.
- ^ Parton, Heather Digby (November 12, 2014). "Bye-bye, blue dog "Democrats": What the end of conservative Dems means for America". Salon. Retrieved December 24, 2016.
- ^ Parties, Rules, and the Evolution of Congressional Budgeting, Lance T. LeLoup, 2005, pp. 185
- ^ Encyclopedia of American Parties, Campaigns, and Elections, William C. Binning et al, 1999, pp. 307.
- ISBN 978-0-8047-5730-0.