Borodino-class battleship
Oblique view of Oryol at anchor
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Builders |
|
Operators | |
Preceded by | Tsesarevich |
Succeeded by | Evstafi class |
Built | 1899–1905 |
In service | 1904–1922 |
In commission | 1904–1922 |
Completed | 5 |
Lost | 4 |
Scrapped | 1 |
General characteristics | |
Type | Pre-dreadnought battleship |
Displacement | 14,091–14,415 long tons (14,317–14,646 t) |
Length | 397 ft (121.0 m) |
Beam | 76 ft 1 in (23.2 m) |
Draft | 29 ft (8.84 m) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion | 2 shafts, 2 Triple-expansion steam engines |
Speed | 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph) |
Range | 2,590 nmi (4,800 km; 2,980 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph) |
Complement | 28 officers, 826 enlisted men |
Armament |
|
Armor |
The Borodino-class battleships were a group of five
Design and description
The Borodinos were the most numerous class of battleships ever built by Russia. Although they were intended to be near duplicates of Tsesarevich, as soon as the contracts were signed, it became clear that they would be quite different from the French-built ship. The basic problem facing the navy was that the Borodinos would have heavier engines and larger turrets which would require a designer to build a ship which had the same speed, draft, guns and armor as Tsesarevich, but a greater displacement. The new design was drawn up by D. V. Skvortsov of the Naval Technical Committee (NTC). He completed his new design in July/August 1898, one month after the original contract had been signed. The new concept was roughly 1,000 long tons (1,016 t) tons heavier and slightly larger and wider than the Tsesarevich.[2]
As might be expected, the Borodinos greatly resembled Tsesarevich, although Skvortsov added two more casemates, each containing four 75-millimeter (3.0 in) guns, one at the bow and the other aft. These guns were added to the already existing dozen 75 mm guns emplaced along the sides above the armor belt. This caused the tumblehome used on the rest of the hull to be deleted over the twelve guns and flat-sided armor was used in its place. Thus the five Borodino-class battleships had tumblehome hulls only fore and aft of their 75 mm guns emplaced along their sides.[3] The centreline bulkhead between the engine and boiler rooms caused a danger of capsizing if one side flooded and the narrow belt armor became submerged when overloaded. As such, naval historian Antony Preston regarded these as some of the worst battleships ever built.[4]
The ships were 389 feet 5 inches (118.7 m)
The Borodino-class ships were powered by two 4-cylinder
Because the ships were being prepared to go to the
Armament and fire control
The
The secondary armament of the ships consisted of a dozen 45-caliber
A number of smaller guns were carried for defense against
The ships carried four 381-millimetre (15 in) torpedo tubes, two of which were mounted above water in the bow and stern while the two broadside underwater tubes were located near the forward 12-inch magazine. Four torpedoes were carried for the above-water tubes and six for the submerged tubes. They also carried 50 mines to be laid to protect their anchorage in remote areas.[8]
The Borodino class were originally fitted with Liuzhol stadiametric rangefinders that used the angle between two vertical points on an enemy ship, usually the waterline and the crow's nest, to estimate the range. The gunnery officer consulted his references to get the range and calculated the proper elevation and deflection required to hit the target. He then transmitted his commands via a Geisler electro-mechanical fire-control transmission system to each gun or turret. While fitting out, these rangefinders were replaced on the first four ships by two Barr and Stroud coincidence rangefinders that used two images that had to be superimposed to derive the range. Perepelkin telescopic sights were also installed for their guns, but their crews were not trained in how to use them.[8][16]
The
Ships
Ship | Namesake | Builder[5] | Cost[8] | Laid down[5]
|
Launched[5] | Entered service[5] | Fate[18] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Borodino (Бородино) | Battle of Borodino[19] | New Admiralty Shipyard, Saint Petersburg
|
14.572 million rubles | 23 May 1900[Note 1] | 8 September 1901 | August 1904 | Sunk at the Battle of Tsushima, 27 May 1905 |
Imperator Aleksandr III (Император Александр III) | Tsar Alexander III of Russia[20] | Baltic Works , Saint Petersburg
|
13.979 million rubles | 3 August 1902 | November 1903 | ||
Knyaz Suvorov (Князь Суворов) | Alexander Suvorov[21] | 13.841 million rubles | 8 September 1901 | 25 September 1902 | September 1904 | ||
Oryol (Орёл) | Eagle[22] | Galernyi Island Shipyard , Saint Petersburg
|
13.404 million rubles | 1 June 1900 | 19 July 1902 | October 1904 | Surrendered at the Battle of Tsushima, 28 May 1905, renamed Iwami by the Japanese, and scrapped or sunk as target, 1924–1925 |
Slava (Слава) | Glory[23] | Baltic Works, Saint Petersburg | 13.841 million rubles | 1 November 1902 | 29 August 1903 | October 1905 | Scuttled during the Battle of Moon Sound, 17 October 1917 |
Service history
On 15 October 1904, Knyaz Suvorov,
Rozhestvensky led his ships down the Atlantic coast of Africa, rounding the
Battle of Tsushima
Before the battle Rozhestvensky grouped the four Borodinos into one division and retained personal command of the division. Oryol, the last ship in the division, fired the first shots of the Battle of Tsushima when the ship's
Imperator Aleksandr III and the other ships of the division briefly followed Knyaz Suvorov until it became clear that the latter ship was out of control and then turned north in an effort to get behind Tōgō's ships. Knyaz Suvorov never regained her position in the battle line and became the primary target of the Japanese for a time. Around 16:00 the captain of Imperator Alexandr III, Nikolai Bukhvostov, decided to duplicate Retvizan's maneuver at the Battle of the Yellow Sea by charging straight for the Japanese battleline in an attempt to focus their attention on his ship rather than Knyaz Suvorov. He was successful, but Imperator Aleksandr III was badly damaged in the process. Borodino now assumed the lead position and turned the fleet to the south where they temporarily managed to disengage in the mist and fog.[32]
Knyaz Suvorov was badly damaged by repeated attacks after she separated from the main body although she was initially in no danger of sinking. The Russian
When the shooting between the battle lines resumed around 18:00, the Japanese concentrated their fire upon Imperator Aleksandr III and Borodino. Imperator Alexandr III sheered out of line to port around 18:30 and
Oryol took the lead after Borodino was sunk; she was joined by Nebogatov's Second Division after Tōgō ordered the Japanese battleships to disengage in the gathering darkness. Nebogatov assumed command of the remains of the fleet and they continued towards Vladivostok. The ships were discovered by the Japanese early the following morning and attacked by Tōgō's battleships around 10:00. The faster Japanese ships stayed beyond the range at which Nebogatov's ships could effectively reply and he decided to surrender his ships at 10:30 as he could neither return fire nor close the range.[36]
Post-Tsushima careers
The Japanese substantially rebuilt Oryol and recommissioned her in June 1907 with the name of Iwami.[37] To reduce her top weight, they cut down her superstructure and repositioned her guns. In addition, her boilers were replaced by an unknown number of Japanese-built Miyabara boilers and she was rearmed with Japanese-made guns. These changes reduced her displacement to approximately 13,500 long tons (13,717 t) and her crew now totaled 750 officers and crewmen.[38]
During World War I, the ship participated in the
Serving in the
Notes
Footnotes
- ^ McLaughlin, pp. 100–103
- ^ McLaughlin, p. 137
- ^ McLaughlin, p. 138
- ^ Preston 2002, pp. 50, 55
- ^ a b c d e f McLaughlin, p. 136
- ^ a b c Campbell 1978, p. 187
- ^ a b McLaughlin, pp. 137, 144
- ^ a b c d e f g McLaughlin, p. 142
- ^ Forczyk, p. 29
- ^ Friedman, pp. 251–252
- ^ Forczyk, p. 28
- ^ a b c Forczyk, p. 30
- ^ Friedman, pp. 260–261
- ^ Friedman, p. 264
- ^ Smigielski, p. 160
- ^ Forczyk, pp. 27–28, 57
- ^ McLaughlin, pp. 136–137
- ^ McLaughlin, pp. 145–146
- ^ Silverstone, p. 373
- ^ Silverstone, p. 376
- ^ Silverstone, p. 378
- ^ Silverstone, p. 380
- ^ Silverstone, p. 385
- ^ Forczyk, p. 9
- ^ Pleshakov, pp. 91–97
- ^ Hough, pp. 42–44
- ^ Pleshakov, pp. 98–109
- ^ McLaughlin, pp. 141, 167
- ^ Forczyk, pp. 56, 58
- ^ a b McLaughlin, p. 169
- ^ Campbell 1978, p. 129
- ^ Forczyk, pp. 25, 63, 66–67
- ^ a b Forczyk, p. 67
- ^ Campbell 1978, p. 135
- ^ Forczyk, pp. 67, 70
- ^ Forczyk, pp. 70–71
- ^ Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 21
- ^ McLaughlin, pp. 452–453
- ^ McLaughlin, p. 146
- ^ Preston 1972, p. 193
- ^ Nekrasov, pp. 52, 59–64
- ^ Staff, pp. 113–117
- ^ Campbell 1979, p. 294
References
- Arbuzov, Vladimir V. (1993). Borodino Class Armored Ships. Armored Ships of the World. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg: Interpoisk. OCLC 43727130.
- Budzbon, Przemysław (1985). "Russia". In Gray, Randal (ed.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. pp. 291–325. ISBN 0-85177-245-5.
- Campbell, N. J. M. (1978). "The Battle of Tsu-Shima, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4". In ISBN 0-87021-976-6.
- Campbell, N. J. M. (1979). "Russia". In Chesneau, Roger & Kolesnik, Eugene M. (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. New York: Mayflower Books. pp. 170–217. ISBN 0-8317-0302-4.
- Forczyk, Robert (2009). Russian Battleship vs Japanese Battleship, Yellow Sea 1904–05. Oxford, UK: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84603-330-8.
- ISBN 978-1-84832-100-7.
- Hough, Richard (1958). The Fleet That Had To Die. New York: Viking Press. OCLC 832919.
- Jentschura, Hansgeorg; Jung, Dieter & Mickel, Peter (1977). Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869–1945. Annapolis, Maryland: United States Naval Institute. ISBN 0-87021-893-X.
- McLaughlin, Stephen (2003). Russian & Soviet Battleships. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-481-4.
- Nekrasov, George M. (2004). Expendable Glory: A Russian Battleship in the Baltic, 1915–1917. East European Monographs. Vol. 636. Boulder, Colorado: East European Monographs. ISBN 0-88033-534-3.
- Pleshakov, Constantine (2002). The Tsar's Last Armada: The Epic Voyage to the Battle of Tsushima. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-05791-8.
- Preston, Antony (1972). Battleships of World War I: An Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Battleships of All Nations 1914–1918. New York: Galahad Books. ISBN 0-88365-300-1.
- Preston, Antony (2002). The World's Worst Warships. London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-85177-754-6.
- Silverstone, Paul H. (1984). Directory of the World's Capital Ships. New York: Hippocrene Books. ISBN 0-88254-979-0.
- Smigielski, Adam (1979). "Imperial Russian Navy Cruiser Varyag". In Roberts, John (ed.). Warship III. London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-85177-204-8.
- Staff, Gary (2008). Battle for the Baltic Islands 1917: Triumph of the Imperial German Navy. Barnsley, England: Pen & Sword Maritime. ISBN 978-1-84415-787-7.
- Westwood, J. N. (1986). Russia Against Japan, 1904–1905: A New Look at the Russo-Japanese War. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-88706-191-2.
External links
- Media related to Borodino class battleship at Wikimedia Commons
- Russian navy site (in Russian)
- photo.starnet.ru – photo album site
- steelnavy.com – site aimed at model builders