Borylation

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Metal-catalyzed C–H borylation reactions are transition metal catalyzed organic reactions that produce an

aromatic C–H bonds and are therefore useful reactions for carbon–hydrogen bond activation.[1] Metal-catalyzed C–H borylation reactions utilize transition metals to directly convert a C–H bond into a C–B bond. This route can be advantageous compared to traditional borylation reactions by making use of cheap and abundant hydrocarbon starting material, limiting prefunctionalized organic compounds, reducing toxic byproducts, and streamlining the synthesis of biologically important molecules.[2][3] Boronic acids, and boronic esters are common boryl groups incorporated into organic molecules through borylation reactions.[4] Boronic acids are trivalent boron-containing organic compounds that possess one alkyl substituent and two hydroxyl groups. Similarly, boronic esters possess one alkyl substituent and two ester groups. Boronic acids and esters are classified depending on the type of carbon group (R) directly bonded to boron, for example alkyl-, alkenyl-, alkynyl-, and aryl-boronic esters. The most common type of starting materials that incorporate boronic esters into organic compounds for transition metal catalyzed borylation reactions have the general formula (RO)2B-B(OR)2. For example, bis(pinacolato)diboron (B2Pin2), and bis(catecholato)diborane (B2Cat2) are common boron sources of this general formula.[5]

B2pin2 and B2cat2
B2pin2 and B2cat2

The boron atom of a boronic ester or acid is sp2

Lewis acids. The C–B bond of boronic acids and esters are slightly longer than typical C–C single bonds with a range of 1.55-1.59 Å. The lengthened C–B bond relative to the C–C bond results in a bond energy that is also slightly less than that of C–C bonds (323 kJ/mol for C–B vs 358 kJ/mol for C–C).[6] The carbon–hydrogen bond
has a bond length of about 1.09 Å, and a bond energy of about 413 kJ/mol. The C–B bond is therefore a useful intermediate as a bond that replaces a typically unreactive C–H bond.

Grignard reagents through hydroboration, or diboration reactions.[8]
Borylation provides an alternative.

Metal-catalyzed C–H borylation reactions

Aliphatic
C–H borylation

As first described by Hartwig, alkanes can be selectively borylated with high selectivity for the primary C–H bond using Cp*Rh(η4-C6Me6) as the catalyst.[9] Notably, selectivity for the primary C–H bond is exclusive even in the presence of heteroatoms in the carbon-hydrogen chain. The rhodium-catalyzed borylation of methyl C–H bonds occurs selectively without a dependence on the position of the heteroatom. Borylation occurs selectively at the least sterically hindered and least electron rich primary C–H bond in a range of acetals, ethers, amines, and alkyl fluorides.[10] Additionally, no reaction is shown to occur in the absence of primary C–H bonds, for example when cyclohexane is the substrate.

Aliphatic C–H borylation
Aliphatic C–H borylation


Selective functionalization of a primary alkane bond is due to the formation of a kinetically and thermodynamically favorable primary alkyl-metal complex over formation of a secondary alkyl-metal complex.[11]

Primary versus secondary metal-alkyl complex

The greater stability of primary versus secondary alkyl complexes can be attributed to several factors. First, the primary alkyl complex is favored sterically over the secondary alkyl complex. Second, partial negative charges are often present on the α-carbon of a metal-alkyl complex and a primary alkyl ligand supports a partial negative charge better than a secondary alkyl ligand. The origin of selectivity for aliphatic C–H borylation using rhodium catalysts was probed using a type of mechanistic study called hydrogen–deuterium exchange. H/D exchanged showed that regioselectivity of the overall process shown below results from selective cleavage of primary over secondary C–H bonds and selective functionalization of the primary metal-alkyl intermediate over the secondary metal-alkyl intermediate.[12]

Mechanistic pathways for aliphatic C–H borylation
Mechanistic pathways for aliphatic C–H borylation

The synthetic utility of aliphatic C–H borylation has been applied to the modification of polymers through borylation followed by oxidation to form hydroxyl-functionalized polymers.[13]

C–H borylation of polyolefins
C–H borylation of polyolefins

Aromatic C–H borylation

Steric directed C–H borylation of arenes

The first example of a catalytic C–H borylation of an unactivated hydrocarbon (benzene) was reported by Smith and Iverson using Ir(Cp*)(H)(Bpin) as the catalyst. The efficiency of this system, however, was low, providing only 3 turnovers after 120 h at 150 °C.[14] Numerous subsequent developments by Hartwig and coworkers led to efficient, practical conditions for arene borylation. Aromatic C–H borylation was developed by John F. Hartwig and Ishiyama using the diboron reagent Bis(pinacolato)diboron catalyzed by 4,4’-di-tert-butylbipyridine (dtbpy) and [Ir(COD)(OMe)]2.[15] With this catalyst system the borylation of aromatic C–H bonds occurs with regioselectivity that is controlled by steric effects of the starting arene. The selectivity for functionalization of aromatic C–H bonds is governed by the general rule that the reaction does not occur ortho to a substituent when a C–H bond lacking an ortho substituent is available.[11] When only one functional group is present borylation occurs in the meta and para position in statistical ratios of 2:1 (meta:para). The ortho isomer is not detected due to the steric effects of the substituent.[16]

Meta-para borylation
Meta-para borylation


Addition of Bpin occurs in only one position for symmetrically substituted 1,2- and 1,4-substituted arenes. Symmetrical or unsymmetrical 1,3-substituted arenes are also selectively borylated because only one C–H bond is sterically accessible.

Steric-directing iridium-catalyzed C–H borylation
Steric-directing iridium-catalyzed C–H borylation


This is in contrast to Electrophilic aromatic substitution where regioselectivity is governed by electronic effects.[17]

Regioselectivity of C–H borylation of arenes versus regioselectivity of electrophilic aromatic substitution
Regioselectivity of C–H borylation of arenes versus regioselectivity of electrophilic aromatic substitution

The synthetic importance of aromatic C–H borylation is shown below, where a 1,3-disubstituted aromatic compound can be directly converted to a 1,3,5-organoborane compound and subsequently functionalized.[15]

Meta-functionalization of arenes through C–H borylation
Meta-functionalization of arenes through C–H borylation

Aromatic C–H functionalization was successfully incorporated in the total synthesis of Complanadine A, a

Boc protecting group
.

Synthesis of complanadine A
Synthesis of complanadine A

C–H borylation of heteroarenes

Heteroarenes can also undergo borylation under iridium-catalyzed conditions, however, site-selectivity in this case is controlled by electronic effects, where furans, pyrroles, and thiophenes undergo reaction at the C–H bond alpha to the heteroatom. In this case selectivity is suggested to occur through the C–H bond alpha to the heteroatom because it is the most acidic C–H bond and therefore the most reactive.[11]

C–H borylation of heteraromatics
C–H borylation of heteraromatics

Directed ortho C–H borylation

Using the same catalyst system directing groups can be employed to achieve regioselectivity without substituents as steric mediators. For example, Boebel and Hartwig reported a method to conduct ortho-borylation where a dimethyl-hydrosilyl directing group on the arene undergoes iridium catalyzed borylation at the C–H bond ortho to the silane directing group.[19] Selectivity for the ortho position in the case of using hydrosilyl directing groups has been attributed to reversible addition of the Si-H bond to the metal center, leading to preferential cleavage of the C–H bond ortho to the hydrosilyl substituent. Several other strategies to achieve ortho-borylation of arenes have been developed using various directing groups.[20][21][22]

The use of directing groups for selective ortho borylation
The use of directing groups for selective ortho borylation

Mechanistic detail for the C–H borlyation of arenes

A trisboryl iridium complex has been proposed to facilitate the mechanism for each of these reactions that result in C–H borylation of arenes and heteroarenes.

isotopic labelling studies have revealed that an Ir(III) triboryl complex reacts with the arene in the catalytic process.[23]
A version of the catalytic cycle is shown below for the ortho borylation of hydrosilane compounds. Kinetic data show that an observed trisboryl complex coordinated to cyclooctene rapidly and reversibly dissociates cyclooctene to form a 16 electron trisboryl complex. In the case of using benzyldimethylsilane as a directing group it is proposed that benzyldimethylsilane reacts with the trisboryl iridium catalyst through reversible addition of the Si-H bond to the metal center, followed by selective ortho-C–H bond activation via oxidative addition and reductive elimination.[24]

Mechanism of hydrosilane
Mechanism of hydrosilane

Meta-selective borylation: Meta-selective C–H borylation is an important synthetic transformation, which was discovered in 2002 by Smith III from Michigan State University, USA. However, this meta borylation was completely sterically directed and was limited to only 1,3-disubstituted benzenes. Around 12 years later, Dr. Chattopadhyay and his team from Centre of Biomedical Research, U.P, India discovered an elegant technology for the meta-selective C–H bond activation and borylation. The team had shown that using the same substrate, one can switch the other positional selectivity just changing the ligand. The origin of the meta-selectivity was defined by the two parameter, such as: 1) electrostatic interaction, 2) a secondary B-N interaction.[25]

At the same time, a team from Japan, Dr. Kanai reported an amazing concept for the meta-selective borylation based on the secondary interaction. This method covers various carbonyl compounds borylation.[26]

Reduction reactions with organoboron compounds

Corey–Bakshi–Shibata reduction (CBS reduction)

In 1981, Hirao and co-workers have found that asymmetric reduction of prochiral aromatic ketones with

amino alcohols and borane afforded the corresponding secondary alcohols with 60% ee. They found out that the chiral amino alcohols would react with borane to form aloxyl-amine-borane complexes. The complexes are proposed to contain a relatively rigid five member-ring system which makes them thermal and hydrolytic stable and soluble in a wide variety of protic and aprotic solvents.[27]

Corey–Bakshi–Shibata reduction (CBS reduction)-1
Corey–Bakshi–Shibata reduction (CBS reduction)-1

In 1987, Elias James Corey and co-workers found out that the formation of oxazaborolidines from borane and chiral amino alcohols. And the oxazaborolidines were found to catalyze the rapid and highly enantioselective reduction of prochiral ketones in the presence of BH3THF. This enantioselective reduction of achiral ketones with catalytic oxazaborolidine is called Corey–Bakshi–Shibata reduction or CBS reduction.[28][29]

Corey-Bakshi-Shibata Reduction (CBS Reduction)-2
Corey-Bakshi-Shibata Reduction (CBS Reduction)-2

Midland Alpine-borane reduction (Midland reduction)

In 1977, M. M. Midland and co-workers reported a surprising observation that B-3-alpha-Pinanyl-9-borabicyclo [3,3,1] nonane, readily prepared by hydroboration of (+)-alpha-pinene with 9-borobicyclo[3,3,1] nonane, rapidly reduces benzaldehyde-alpha-d to (S)-(+)-benzyl-alpha-d alcohol with an essentially quantitative asymmetric induction.[30]

Midland Alpine-Borane Reduction (Midland Reduction)
Midland Alpine-Borane Reduction (Midland Reduction)

In the same year, M. M. Midland discovered B-3-alpha-pinanyl-9-BBN as the reducing agent, which could be easily available by reacting (+)-alpha-pinene with 9-BBN. The new reducing agent was later commercialized by Aldrich Co. under the name Alpine Borane and the asymmetric reduction of carbonyl groups with either enantiomer of Alpine-Borane is known as Midland Alpine-Borane reduction.[31]

In 2012, U. R. Y. Venkateswarlu and co-workers have reported a stereoselective method to synthesize pectinolide H. Midland reduction and Sharpless dihydroxylation reaction are involved in generating the three chiral centers at C–4’, C–5 and C–1’.[32]

Application of Midland Alpine-Borane Reduction
Application of Midland Alpine-Borane Reduction

Coupling reactions with organoboron compounds

Petasis boronic acid-Mannich reaction

In 1993, N. A. Petasis and I. Akrltopoulou reported an efficient synthesis of allylic amines with a modified Mannich reaction. In this modified Mannich reaction, they have found that vinyl boronic acids can participate as nucleophiles to give geometrically pure allylamines. This modified Mannich reaction was known as Petasis boronic acid-Mannich Reaction.[33][34]

Petasis boronic acid-Mannich reaction
Petasis boronic acid-Mannich reaction

Roush asymmetric allylation

In 1978, R. W. Hoffmann and T. Herold reported on the enantioselective synthesis of secondary homoallyl alcohols via chiral non-racemic allylboronic esters. The homoallylic alcohols were formed with excellent yield and moderate enantioselectivity.[35]

Roush Asymmetric Allylation-1
Roush Asymmetric Allylation-1

In 1985, W. R. Roush and co-workers found out that tartrate modified allylic boronates offer a simple, highly attractive approach to the control of facial selectivity in reactions with chiral and achiral aldehydes. In the following years, W.R. Roush and co-workers extended this strategy to the synthesis of

but-2-ene-1,4-diols and anti-diols. This kind of reaction is known as Rouch asymmetric allylation.[36][37][38][39]

Roush asymmetric allylation-2
Roush asymmetric allylation-2

In 2011, R. A. Fernandes and P. Kattanguru have completed an improved total synthesis of (8S, 11R, 12R)- and (8R, 11R, 12R)-topsentolide B2 diastereomers in eight steps. In the paper, diastereoselective Roush allylation reaction was used as a key reaction in the total synthesis to introduce two chiral intermediate. And then the authors synthesized the two diastereomers through these two chiral intermediates.[40]

Application of Roush allylation reaction
Application of Roush allylation reaction

Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling

In 1979, N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki reported the synthesis of arylated (E)-alkenes in high yield from

triflate. The palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction organoboron compounds and these organic halides to form carbon-carbon bonds are known as Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling.[41][42]

Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling
Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling

In 2013, Joachim Podlech and co-workers determined the structure of Alternaria mycotoxin altenuic acid III by NMR spectroscopic analysis and completed its total synthesis. In the synthetic strategy, Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling reaction was used with a highly functionalized boronate and butenolides to synthesize a precursor of the natural product in high yield.[43]

Application of Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction
Application of Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction

Modified Ullmann biaryl ether and biaryl amine synthesis

In 1904, Fritz Ullmann found out that copper powder could significantly improve the reaction of aryl halides with phenols to give biaryl ethers. This reaction is known as Ullmann condensation. In 1906, I. Goldberg extended this reaction to synthesize an arylamine by reacting aryl halides with an amide in the presence of Potassium Carbonate and CuI. This reaction is known as Goldberg modified Ullmann condensation.[44] In 2003, R. A. Batey and T. D. Quach have modified this kind of reactions by using potassium organotrifluoroborates salts to react with aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic amines or anilines to synthesize aryl ethers or aryl amines.[45][46]

Modified Ullmann biaryl ether and biaryl amine synthesis
Modified Ullmann biaryl ether and biaryl amine synthesis

See also

References

  1. PMID 22075137
    .
  2. .
  3. ^ Ishiyama, T.; Nobuta, Y.; Hartwig, J. F.; Miyaura, N. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2924.
  4. ^ Brown, H. C.; Kramer, G. W.; Levy, A. B.; Midland, M. M. Organic Synthesis via Boranes; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1975; Vol. 1.
  5. PMID 22057739
    .
  6. .
  7. ^ Wade, L. G., Organic Chemistry. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., 2010.
  8. PMID 10720320
    .
  9. .
  10. ^ .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. .
  14. ^ .
  15. .
  16. ^ Liskey, C. Iridium-Catalyzed Borylation of Aromatic and Aliphatic C–H bonds: Methodology and Mechanism. Dissertation, University of Illinois. Urbanan-Champaign. 2013.
  17. PMID 20387895
    .
  18. .
  19. .
  20. .
  21. ^ Ros, A.; Estepa, B.; Lopez-Rodriquez, R.; Alvarez, E.; Fernandez, R.; Lassaletta, J.M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50, 1.
  22. ^ Boller, T.M.; Murphy, J. M.; Hapke, M.; Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N.; Hartwig, J.F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;, 127, 14263.
  23. PMID 18494474
    .
  24. .
  25. .
  26. .
  27. .
  28. .
  29. .
  30. .
  31. .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. .
  35. .
  36. .
  37. .
  38. .
  39. .
  40. .
  41. .
  42. .
  43. .
  44. .
  45. .