Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Page semi-protected
Listen to this article
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Simplified parse tree

S = sentence
NP = noun phrase
RC = relative clause
VP = verb phrase
PN = proper noun
N = noun
V = verb

"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" is a

Beyond Language: Adventures in Word and Thought
.

The sentence employs three distinct meanings of the word buffalo:

  • As an attributive noun (acting as an adjective) to refer to a specific place named Buffalo, such as the city of Buffalo, New York;
  • As the verb to buffalo, meaning (in American English[1]) "to bully, harass, or intimidate" or "to baffle"; and
  • As a noun to refer to the animal the buffalo (often called bison outside of North America). The plural is also buffalo.

A semantically equivalent form preserving the original word order is: "Buffalonian bison that other Buffalonian bison bully also bully Buffalonian bison."

Sentence construction

Reed–Kellogg diagram
of the sentence

The sentence is unpunctuated and uses three different readings of the word "buffalo". In order of their first use, these are:

  • a. a city named Buffalo. This is used as a noun adjunct in the sentence;
  • n. the noun buffalo, an animal, in the plural (equivalent to "buffaloes" or "buffalos"), in order to avoid articles.
  • v. the verb "buffalo" meaning to outwit, confuse, deceive, intimidate, or baffle.

The sentence is syntactically ambiguous; one possible parse (marking each "buffalo" with its part of speech as shown above) is as follows:

     Buffaloa buffalon Buffaloa buffalon buffalov buffalov Buffaloa buffalon.

When grouped syntactically, this is equivalent to: [(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).

Because the sentence has a

restrictive clause, there can be no commas. The relative pronouns "which" or "that" could appear between the second and third words of the sentence, as in Buffalo buffalo that Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo; when this pronoun is omitted, the relative clause becomes a reduced relative clause
.

An expanded form of the sentence that preserves the original word order is: "Buffalo bison that other Buffalo bison bully also bully Buffalo bison."

Thus, the parsed sentence claims that bison who are intimidated or bullied by bison do themselves intimidate or bully bison (at least in the city of Buffalo – implicitly, Buffalo, New York):

  1. Buffalo buffalo (animals called "buffalo" from the city of Buffalo) [that] Buffalo buffalo buffalo (that the same kind of animals from the city bully) buffalo Buffalo buffalo (bully these animals from that city).
  2. [Those] buffalo(es) from Buffalo [that are intimidated by] buffalo(es) from Buffalo intimidate buffalo(es) from Buffalo.
  3. Bison from Buffalo, New York, who are intimidated by other bison in their community in turn intimidate other bison in their community.
  4. The buffalo from Buffalo who are buffaloed by buffalo from Buffalo buffalo (verb) other buffalo from Buffalo.
  5. Buffalo buffalo (main clause subject) [that] Buffalo buffalo (
    main clause
    verb) Buffalo buffalo (main clause direct object).
  6. Buffalo from Buffalo [that] buffalo [from] Buffalo buffalo [in turn] buffalo buffalo [from] Buffalo.
A diagram explaining the sentence
Diagram using a comparison to explain the buffalo sentence

Usage

rewrite rules in linguistics.[3]
: 104–105 

Origin

The idea that one can construct a grammatically correct sentence consisting of nothing but repetitions of "buffalo" was

LINGUIST List.[6][7] A sentence with eight consecutive buffalos is featured in Steven Pinker's 1994 book The Language Instinct as an example of a sentence that is "seemingly nonsensical" but grammatical. Pinker names his student, Annie Senghas, as the inventor of the sentence.[8]
: 210 

Neither Rapaport, Pinker, nor Senghas were initially aware of the earlier coinages.[6] Pinker learned of Rapaport's earlier example only in 1994, and Rapaport was not informed of Borgmann's sentence until 2006.[6]

Versions of this linguistic oddity can be constructed with other words which similarly simultaneously serve as collective noun, adjective, and verb, some of which need no capitalization (such as "police").[9]

See also

General:

Other linguistically complex sentences:

References

  • .
  • ^ from the original on 22 April 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  • from the original on 1 November 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2014.
  • .
  • ^ a b c d Rapaport, William J. (5 October 2012). "A History of the Sentence 'Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.'". University at Buffalo Computer Science and Engineering. Archived from the original on 21 June 2008. Retrieved 7 December 2014.
  • LINGUIST List. Archived
    from the original on 19 October 2009. Retrieved 14 September 2006.
  • The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language
    . New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
  • .
  • External links