Burmese chronicles

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The royal chronicles of Myanmar (

parabaik paper, palm leaf, and stone; they were composed in different literary styles such as prose, verse, and chronograms. Palm-leaf manuscripts written in prose are those that are commonly referred to as the chronicles. Other royal records include administrative treatises and precedents, legal treatises and precedents, and censuses.[1]

The chronicle tradition was maintained in the country's four historical polities:

Shan states. The majority of the chronicles did not survive the country's numerous wars as well as the test of time.[2]
The most complete extant chronicles are those of Upper Burma-based dynasties, with the earliest extant chronicle dating from the 1280s and the first standard national chronicle from the 1720s.

The subject matter of the chronicles is mainly about the monarchs, and the chronicles provide little information about the general situation of the kingdom. Nor were they written solely from a secular history perspective but rather at times to provide "legitimation according to religious criteria" of the monarchy.[3] Nevertheless, the chronicles' "great record of substantially accurate dates" goes back at least to the 11th century.[4] Latest research shows that even the pre-11th century narratives, dominated by legends, do provide a substantially accurate record of "social memory", going back over three millennia.[5][6]

Myanmar possesses the most extensive historical source material in Southeast Asia, and the Burmese chronicles are the most detailed historical records in the region.[4][7][8] Yet much of the extant Burmese records have not been properly maintained,[9] and many of the less well-known chronicles are yet to be studied systematically.[10][11]


Myazedi Inscription in Burmese
in Mon
in Pyu
in Pali

The Burmese royal chronicles are "detailed and continuous registers of events in chronological order", revolving "chiefly around the Burmese kings". The chronicles by themselves offer little or no commentary on the situation of the kingdom of the regular people inside or outside the capital unless the king happened to be involved in the event. Other royal records such as legal treatises and precedents (dhammathats (ဓမ္မသတ်)) and censuses (sittans (စစ်တန်း)) and the chronicles of regional courts as well as temple histories (thamaings (သမိုင်း)) need to be consulted to get a glimpse of the life outside the palace.[12]

The royal records were written on different media and in different literary styles. They can be

parabaiks (ပုရပိုက်).[note 1] They also came in different literary styles: in prose (yazawins (ရာဇဝင် and ayedawbons (အရေးတော်ပုံ); in verse (eigyins (ဧချင်း) and mawguns (မော်ကွန်း)); and as chronograms (yazawin thanbauk (ရာဇဝင် သံပေါက်)).[12]

The prose versions are those most commonly referred to as the chronicles. In general, Yazawins ("chronicle of kings" from Pali rāja-vaṃsa)[13] are a record of events in chronological order of kings organised by dynasties whereas ayedawbons ("memoirs of royal events/struggles") are more detailed records of more celebrated kings.[14][15] These definitions are loose generalisations: some ayedawbons are full-fledged chronicles of several kings (e.g., Razadarit Ayedawbon)[16] or even dynasties (e.g., Dhanyawaddy Ayedawbon)[17] while some yazawins such as Zatadawbon Yazawin and Yazawin Kyaw have narrower scopes.[note 2]


Inscriptions, most of which were set up by the kings, the royal families and their court officials as well as wealthy families, are the earliest surviving royal records. Most surviving inscriptions are from religious dedications, and contain valuable historical material; indeed, they represent the primary extant historical record down to the 16th century.[1]

Inscriptions are considered most accurate of all Burmese historiographic material because they are less susceptible to copying errors due to their longevity. A typical stone inscription lasts many centuries while the average life of a palm leaf record is only 100 to 150 years.[16] Though some stone inscriptions too were recast, and some copying errors (mostly in spelling) have been identified,[18] they do not show the same degree of copying errors of palm-leaf records, many of which were recopied many times over. The oldest extant inscriptions in Burma are dated to the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE in Pyu city-states.[19] Inscriptions were still "rare in the 5th to the 10th centuries but from the 11th, there is literally a deluge of them".[20] The earliest original inscription in Burmese is dated 1035 CE; an 18th-century recast stone inscription points to 984 CE.[21]

Inscriptions have been invaluable in verifying the events described in the chronicles written centuries later. The

Pyu language.) Likewise, King Bayinnaung's Shwezigon Pagoda Bell Inscription (1557) provides the exact dates of 17 key events of his first six years in power, enabling modern historians to check the chronicles.[22] However, not all inscriptions are reliable records of secular events. The famous Kalyani Inscriptions (1479), for example, make claims of legitimacy of the Hanthawaddy monarchy on religious grounds.[23]

Myanmar possesses the largest number of historical stone inscriptions as well as most complete historical records in all of

Yangon University's Department of Archaeology in five volumes from 1972 to 1987.[25] Aside from over 500 Pagan period inscriptions, most of the other stone inscriptions have not been studied systematically.[1]

Early chronicles

Cover of 1960 publication of Zatadawbon Yazawin Chronicle

Early chronicles on palm-leaf manuscripts are those written prior to the 18th century when national chronicles first emerged. Of the earliest chronicles, those of Pagan and early Ava (to early 15th century), whose names have been mentioned in inscriptions and later chronicles, only two supplementary chronicles from the late 13th and early 15th centuries survived. The rest of early chronicles date only from the 16th century.[note 3]

Many of the early chronicles did not survive for a number of reasons. First, the earliest manuscripts prior to the 15th century were rare and extremely costly. (A 1273 Pagan manuscript of

Konbaung forces; Arakanese records in 1785 by Konbaung; Konbaung records in 1885 by the British. Perhaps not surprisingly, the most complete surviving chronicles are those of Upper Burma-based dynasties, which often were the victors of the wars. Even for those that survived the wars, "there were no record-room methods; mildew, ants, the accident of fire prevented many manuscripts reaching a great age".[2] Those that survived did so only because private individuals outside the capital had painstakingly copied the original palm leaf manuscripts.[note 4] The survival of the manuscripts was also facilitated by the increasing literacy rates in the Irrawaddy valley. In the 15th century, when the literacy rate was still low, the scribal work was chiefly handled by monks, but by the late 18th century, it was routinely handled by commoners as adult male literacy exceeded 50 percent.[note 5]

As a result, the earliest surviving "chronicles" were not even the full official chronicles of their own era. The earliest extant chronicle, Zatadawbon Yazawin ("The Royal Horoscopes Chronicle") first written in the late 13th century by court astrologers was primarily a record of regnal dates of Upper Burma's kings.[28][29] Likewise, the next surviving chronicle, the Yazawin Kyaw ("The Celebrated Chronicle"), written in 1502, was mainly a religious document; only one-seventh of the treatise concerned the affairs of Burmese kings down to 1496. Indeed, it was not even meant to be an authoritative chronicle as its author stated there was already an existing chronicle of the Ava court.[1]

In general, the early chronicles can be categorised as (1) histories of the rival kingdoms of 14th to 16th centuries, (2) ancient histories of kingdoms of previous eras (pre-14th century), and (3) biographies of famous kings.[2][30]

Topic Examples
1. Histories of contemporary kingdoms
Ava Kingdom)
Ketumadi Yazawin ("Chronicle of Early Toungoo Dynasty")
Hanthawaddy Yazawin ("Chronicle of Hanthawaddy Kingdom")
Zinme Yazawin ("Chronicle of Lan Na")
Pawtugi Yazawin
("Chronicle of the Portuguese in Burma")
2. Histories of ancient kingdoms
Pagan Dynasty
3. Biographies of famous kings Razadarit Ayedawbon (of King Razadarit and his predecessors)
Hanthawaddy Hsinbyushin Ayedawbon (of King Bayinnaung)

Many of the early chronicles in some form had survived at least to the early 18th century since they were referenced by Maha Yazawin. An analysis of the passages of the chronicles directly quoted in Maha Yazawin shows that the referenced chronicles were most probably 16th century copies of the original chronicles, judging by their use of language, and most likely incomplete and partial copies, judging by their lack of specific dates, prior to the Toungoo period.[2]

National chronicles

The first comprehensive national chronicle emerged only in 1724. Subsequent chronicles were heavily influenced by the first chronicle.

Maha Yazawin

2006 reprint of Maha Yazawin


Mahavamsa and the Ayutthaya Chronicle) together to form a consistent national narrative.[note 7] Kala wrote three versions by length: Maha Yazawin Gyi (full version, 21 volumes), Yazawin Lat (medium version, 10 volumes), Yazawin Gyok (abridged version, 1 volume).[34] Since it was written in the late Toungoo period, Maha Yazawin provides its most specific information on dates and descriptions of various events Toungoo kings partook. It traces the life of each king chronologically, wherever possible, from his birth to the grave or his dethronement.[35] However, its narrative of the earlier periods is far more sketchy, offering only the year, not the specific date, in most cases. It shows that Kala did not have the full versions of earlier chronicles, and that he did not check any inscriptions, which would have yielded more specific dates and double-checked the events.[36]

Yazawin Thit

The next major chronicle, Yazawin Thit ("New Chronicle"), written in 1798,[37] was an attempt to check Maha Yazawin with epigraphic evidence. (It is the first historical document in Southeast Asia compiled in consultation with epigraphic evidence. It shows that historians in Southeast Asia were using epigraphy for sourcing and verification around the same time as the practice was first used in Europe, even if Twinthin's methods may not have "evolved into a formal method".[38]) Its author, Twinthin Taikwun Maha Sithu, consulted over 600 stone inscriptions, which he had collected and copied from around the kingdom between 1783 and 1793 per King Bodawpaya's decree, to verify the accuracy of Maha Yazawin. It was the only Burmese chronicle (other than Zatadawbon Yazawin) to organise itself by dynasties and periods whereas all others had been organised strictly along the linear order of kings, and the first to link the origins of Burmese monarchy to Buddhism.[39]

The chronicle updates the events up to 1785, and contains several corrections and critiques of earlier chronicles. However, the chronicle was not well received, and ultimately rejected by the king and the court who found the critiques of earlier chronicles excessively harsh.[40] It became known as A-pe-gan Yazawin (အပယ်ခံ ရာဇဝင်, the "Discarded Chronicle").[41]

Nonetheless, when Hmannan Yazawin, the first officially accepted chronicle of Konbaung Dynasty, appeared in 1832, it had incorporated many of Yazawin Thit's corrections, in particular regnal dates of Pagan period kings.[42] Modern scholarship notes the chronicle's innovative use of epigraphy but does not find the chronicle's criticisms harsh. Rather, scholarship maintains that for its criticisms and corrections, the chronicle largely retains traditional narratives, and "was —as elsewhere in the world —written with didactic intentions".[38][39][40]

Hmannan Yazawin

2003 three volume reprint of Hmannan Yazawin

Hmannan Yazawin, known in English as the "Glass Palace Chronicle", was compiled by the Royal Historical Commission in 1829–1832. The chronicle covers events right up to 1821, right before the

Maha Sammata.[43][44] (The head of the Royal Historical Commission, Monywe Sayadaw, also wrote a similar chronicle to Hmannan called Maha Yazawin Kyaw ("Great Celebrated Chronicle") in 1831. The learned monk had been writing the chronicle prior to his appointment, and completed his own chronicle because he did not agree with some of the points in Hmannan.[45]

The second part of Hmannan, also called the Second Chronicle, was written in 1867–1869 by another committee of scholars.

Anglo-Burmese wars.[43] The Second Chronicle's account of the two wars, according to historian Htin Aung, was "written with the objectivity of a true historian, and the great national defeats were described faithfully in detail."[47] The posthumous names of "Bodawpaya" ("Royal Lord Grandfather") and "Bagyidawpaya" ("Royal Lord Paternal Uncle") were introduced in this chronicle; the kings respectively were grandfather and paternal uncle to King Mindon
who had commissioned the chronicle.

The third instalment came in 1905, nearly twenty years after the end of Burmese monarchy, and was written by Maung Maung Tin, who had a distinguished career in the British administration. Tin updated the chronicle to 1885, to the fall of the monarchy, relying mainly on the court records obtained from several members of the royal library and also on the papers seized by the British and kept in libraries.[48] (Almost all the records of the Konbaung Dynasty had gone up in flames as drunken British soldiers burned down the royal library soon after King Thibaw's surrender in 1885.)[note 8] Tin updated the chronicle in 1921, and included the death of King Thibaw in 1916 as a postscript.[48]

List of national chronicles

Hmannan Part III or Konbaung Set Yazawin

The following is a list of standard chronicles with two notable exceptions. Though officially commissioned by King Bodawpaya, Yazawin Thit was not accepted by the Konbaung court as its official chronicle. It is included in this list because Hmannan retains many of Yazawin Thit's corrections. Likewise, Konbaung Set Yazawin or Hmannan Yazawin Part III was written after the monarchy was abolished, and thus not official.

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Maha Yazawin
The Great Chronicle
1724 U Kala The first major chronicle; covers Burmese monarchy from time immemorial to October 1711
Yazawin Thit
The New Chronicle
1798 Twinthin Taikwun Maha Sithu First chronicle to use epigraphy to verify prior events; covers up to 1785; rejected by the Konbaung court
Hmannan Yazawin, Part I
The Glass Palace Chronicle, Part I
1832 Royal Historical Commission Covers up to 1821[49][50]
Hmannan Yazawin Part II
The Glass Palace Chronicle, Part II
1869 Royal Historical Commission Covers up to 1854; also called the Second Chronicle
Hmannan Yazawin Part III
The Glass Palace Chronicle, Part III
1905 Maung Maung Tin Covers 1752–1885; commonly called Konbaung Set Yazawin

Biographic chronicles

1967 collection of five rare ayedawbon chronicles: Dhanyawaddy, Razadarit, Hsinbyumyashin, Nyaungyan, Alaung Mintaya

Usually named ayedawbons, biographic chronicles cover the life of more celebrated kings such as Razadarit, Bayinnaung, Nyaungyan and Alaungpaya in detail. Note: Razadarit Ayedawbon is actually the first half of the Hanthawaddy chronicle.[16][51] At least two Alaungpaya biographies by different original authors exist. Hsinbyushin Ayedawbon is actually about the reign of King Bodawpaya, not the more famous Hsinbyushin and Bodawpaya's brother, King Hsinbyushin.[52]

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Zatadawbon Yazawin
The Royal Horoscopes Chronicle
c. late 13th to 19th centuries Various court historians Earliest surviving chronicle, continuously updated and handed down by court historians from generation to generation
Mainly covers regnal dates of kings from Pagan to Konbaung periods, and horoscopes of 36 select kings from Pagan to early Restored Toungoo periods, as well as those of Konbaung kings.[28]
Razadarit Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Razadarit
c. 1550s–1565 Binnya Dala Burmese translation of first half of Hanthawaddy Yazawin (1287–1421)[16][51]
Hanthawaddy Hsinbyushin Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Bayinnaung
c. 1580 Yazataman Covers the life of King Bayinnaung to 1579[53]
Alaung Mintayagyi Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Alaungpaya
c. 1766 Letwe Nawrahta Covers the life of King Alaungpaya (1714–1760); two versions in existence, also one by Twinthin Taikwun
Alaungpaya Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Alaungpaya
c. 1760 Twinthin Taikwun Maha Sithu Covers the life of King Alaungpaya (1714–1760); two versions in existence, also one by Letwe Nawrahta
Nyaungyan Mintaya Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Nyaungyan
c. 1760 Maha Atula Dammikayaza or
Letwe Nawrahta[54]
Covers the life of King Nyaungyan; based on Minye Deibba eigyin written in 1608 by Shin Than Kho[54]
Hsinbyushin Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Bodawpaya
c. 1786–1790 Letwe Nawratha Covers the early reign of King Bodawpaya (1782–1786), despite the title; still in the original palm leaf manuscript form, never been published[52]

Regional chronicles

Regional chronicles are the histories of various small kingdoms such as (

Hsenwi and Hsipaw) which maintained their own court and court historians. The regional chronicles were most relevant during the small kingdoms (warring states) period of Burmese history (14th to 16th centuries). The tradition of local court histories vanished in the Irrawaddy valley starting in the 17th century when Restored Toungoo kings integrated the entire valley into the core administrative system. The chronicle tradition continued only in farther major tributaries such as Kengtung and Lan Na, and indeed in the independent kingdom of Mrauk-U until it was conquered by Konbaung Dynasty in 1785.[note 9]

Upper Burma

Ketumadi Toungoo Yazawin
Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Pagan Yazawin 16th century[33] Known as Pagan Yazawin Haung (Old Pagan Chronicle); One palm-leaf manuscript stored at the Universities Historical Research Center, Yangon[55]
Pagan Yazawin Thit 19th century U Bhe New Pagan Chronicle; Formally, "Yaza Wunthalini Pagan Yazawin Thit"[55]
Inwa Yazawin 14th–16th centuries Full chronicle did not survive. Extant portions referenced by Maha Yazawin.[56][57]
Toungoo Yazawin c. 1480s[58] Shin Nyana Thikhangyi[59] An 1837 version of an earlier copy survives; Covers rulers of Toungoo/Taungoo from 1279 to 1613.[60]
Detailed history begins only from 1481, from the start of the reign of Min Sithu[58]
Pyay Yazawin c. 16th century Covers rulers of Prome/Pyay 1287–1542[61]
Myauk Nan Kyaung Yazawin 1661 Myauk Nan Kyaung Sayadaw An abridged history compiled per request of King Pye[58]


The original

Pegu (Bago). Likewise, most of the records of Restored Hanthawaddy Kingdom (1740–1757) were destroyed in 1757 by Konbaung forces.[62] Therefore, the earliest extant chronicles are only parts of the original chronicles. The first half (1287–1421) of the original Hanthawaddy Yazawin had been translated into Burmese by Binnya Dala as Razadarit Ayedawbon before the 1565 rebellion, and the Burmese translation has survived. (To be precise, four oldest palm-leaf copies conjecturally dated to mid 18th century survived. In all, nine slightly different versions of existed according to a 1968 analysis by historian Nai Pan Hla.[16] Pan Hla re-translated one of the versions back to Mon in 1958. He also wrote a new (tenth) version in 1968, synthesising the Burmese versions of Razadarit, Pak Lat's version, and the accounts in Hmannan as well as modern research.[51]

Other extant chronicles are even more limited in scope: they are mainly supplementary chronicles dealing with specific topics.

Indeed, the most complete compilation of the history of Mon kingdoms would have to wait until 1910 and 1912 when

Pak Lat, then an ethnic Mon enclave east of Bangkok. (The provenance and chronology of the manuscripts used in the publications are uncertain, and had not yet been studied by a Burma Mon scholar as of 2005.) Pak Lat weaves together all existing Mon narratives, including the history of Thaton Kingdom, Gavampati's linkage with the Buddha, the Hanthawaddy Chronicle from monarchs Wareru to Shin Sawbu (1287–1472), and Nidana's genealogy of kings.[65]

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Nidana Arambhakatha
Preface to the Legend[66]
c. 1538 Supplementary chronicle dealing with genealogy of kings[16]
Razadarit Ayedawbon
The Chronicle of Razadarit
c. 1550s–1565 Binnya Dala Burmese translation of first half of Hanthawaddy Yazawin (1287–1421)[16]
Gavampati c. 1710 to 19th century Supplementary chronicle covering legendary early history[16]
Slapat Rajawan (Bago Rajawan) 1766 Sayadaw Athwa Covers 17 dynasties from the legendary times to the Hanthawaddy period[64]
Lik Amin Asah
Account of the Founding of Pegu[66]
1825 Legendary early history[23]
Pak Lat Chronicles 1910–1912 Unknown The most complete compilation of Mon chronicles in existence; the provenance of the original manuscripts are yet to be studied.[65]


1997–1999 reprint of Rakhine Razawin Thit

Although the earliest extant work of Arakanese literature in Arakanese (Burmese) script, Rakhine Minthami Eigyin ("Lullaby for a Princess of Arakan"), was written only in 1455,[67] Arakanese chronicle tradition most likely began at least a century earlier. (The Burmese script had already been in use at the Arakanese court at least since the 1330s when the future King Swa Saw Ke of Ava was educated there.[68] According to Pamela Gutman, the use of Burmese script appeared for the first time in the Le-Mro period (11th to 15th centuries) on stone inscriptions.[69]) Much earlier Devanagari inscriptions exist (as early as c. 550 CE)[70] but it does not appear that the Arakanese chronicles consulted the inscriptions in any case because later court historians could not read the earliest inscriptions. Indeed, to date, most of the inscriptions have not been fully examined, or translated.[note 10]

Though Arakanese chronicles may have been written circa the 14th century, the earliest extant manuscripts date only from the 18th century. Most of Mrauk-U's historical works did not survive the burning of the royal library by the Konbaung forces in 1785.[71] Only portions escaped the indiscriminate destruction. An Arakanese monk tried to salvage the wreckage as much as he could by promptly compiling the Dhanyawaddy Yazawin. He completed it in 1788 but the chronicle may not be as reliable as it is "a third-hand piece of work". Colonial period scholars had to piece together the extant portions of Maha Razawin (148 angas or 1776 palm-leaves), Do We's Rakhine Razawin (48 angas / 576 leaves), Saya Mi's Maha Razawin (24 angas / 288 leaves).[4] In the late 20th century, historian San Tha Aung could confirm only eight of the supposed 48 historical works of Arakanese history. Even of the extant eight, he was unsure of the reliability of the information prior to 1000 CE.[67]

All Arakanese Arakanese chronicles remain untranslated into English. It means the Arakanese accounts have not been open to (non-Burmese reading) international scholars. According to historian Michael Charney, the Arakanese accounts need to be checked since "the references to Arakan in the chronicles of Arakan’s neighbors, such as Pegu, Ayudhya, and Ava are on the whole biased or ill-informed."[72]

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Maha Razawin [4]
Rakhine Razawin Do We [4]
Inzauk Razawin [73]
Razawin Linka [73]
Min Razagri Aredaw Sadan
Also called Razawin Haung (Old Chronicle)[73][74]
c. 1775[74]
Dhanyawaddy Ayedawbon 1788 Rakhine Sayadaw Covers history of Arakan from 825 BCE to 1785 CE[17]
Mizzimadetha Ayedawbon 1823 Ne Myo Zeya Kyawhtin History of Arakan (1785–1816) from the fall of Mrauk-U to 1816[17]
Maha Razawin (Saya Me) c. 1840 Saya Me Palm leaf manuscript collected by the British[75]
Rakhine Razawin Thit 1931 Shin Sandamala Linkara Compilation of all extant prior Arakanese chronicles in a single narrative.[76]

Shan states

The rulers of

saophas (sawbwas), held court even as they paid tribute to their larger neighbours. Some of the larger Shan states such as Lan Na (Chiang Mai), Kengtung, Hsenwi, Hsipaw and Mong Yawng also maintained their own histories down to the 19th century, similar to what other vassal states such as Prome and Toungoo did in the 14th and 16th centuries. (Lan Na was tributary to Burma from 1558 to 1775.) At any rate, only Lan Na and Kengtung, the two largest Shan states, had sizeable chronicles. Moreover, the earliest extant copies of Lan Na date only from the 18th century even though the original copy of Jinakalamali of Chiang Mai is said to have been compiled in 1527.[77] The rest of the smaller Shan state chronicles (Hsenwi, Hsipaw, etc.) date only from the 19th century.[78] Like their Burmese and Mon counterparts, various Shan chronicles also claim their sawbwas' descent from the clan of the Buddha, which British colonial period scholars took to be a sign of copying from Hmannan and as a sign of their recent nature.[79] G.E. Harvey, a colonial period scholar, found the extant Shan chronicles "consistently reckless with regard to dates, varying a couple of centuries on every other leaf", and discarded them.[24]

The Shan local histories were written in a variety of

Lan Na script, and Kengtung Yazawin in Khun script, for example. (At least six Shan scripts—Tai Long, Tai Hkamti, Tai Neu, Khun, Tai Yun (Kengwi), Tai Yun (Lan Na) were in use in Burmese Shan states.[80]) Excluding Lan Na chronicles, only Kengtung Yazawin has been fully translated into English as the Padaeng Chronicle and the Jengtung State Chronicle.[81] (Two Lan Na chronicles of the Chiang Mai Chronicle and the Nan Chronicle have also been translated into English.)[note 11]

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Jinakalamali 1527 (c. 1788) Ratanapanna Thera Mostly about religious history with a section on early Lan Na kings[77]
The original manuscript, written in Pali, did not survive. Earliest surviving version c. 1788.
Zinme Yazawin 18th century Sithu Gamani Thingyan Chronicle of Chiang Mai (Lan Na) under Burmese rule[82]
Kengtung Yazawin Formally, the Padaeng Chronicle and the Jengtung State Chronicle[81][83]
Hsenwi Yazawin c. 19th century? [78]
Hsipaw Yazawin c. 19th century? Covers from 58 BCE but likely a much recent work[78]
Mong Yawng Yazawin c. 19th century? [78]


There are also chronicles that fall outside of general categorisation. Pawtugi Yazawin covers the history of the Portuguese, especially their rule at

Myeik (Mergui), compiled after the Burmese conquest of Tenasserim in 1765.[75]

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Dawei Yazawin
The Chronicle of Tavoy
1795 [75]
1795? Translated into English by J.S. Furnivall[75]
Pawtugi Yazawin early 19th century[84] Ignacio de Brito and Johannes Moses[84] Covers the Portuguese of Burma and their rule at Syriam (Thanlyin)

Supplementary sources

Chronicles in verse

1967 copy of Minye Deibba Eigyin

The chronicles were also written in verse, chiefly in eigyin or mawgun forms, and secondarily in the form of yazawin thanbauk. Eigyins are elaborate lullabies for young princes and princesses, written to inform the royal children of their genealogy and the achievements of their forebears. Since the antiquity of the royal family's genealogy mattered greatly, the poets did their best to trace the ancestors as far back as they could, with considerable use of their own imagination. The earliest eigyin (Mauktaw Eigyin, or more commonly known as Rakhine Minthami Eigyin) dates from 1455, and is also the earliest extant Burmese poetry on palm-leaf. Over 40 royal eigyins are on record. Mawguns are panegyric poems, composed as a rule to commemorate an important event. The subjects range from the arrival of a white elephant at the court to the conquest of Siam, from the completion of a canal to an essay on cosmology. The earliest mawgun dates from 1472. The poet's duty was to glorify the event in an ornate language in verse. There are more than 60 extant mawguns. Both eigyin and mawgun were composed in four-syllable lines, albeit in different styles. A few yazawin thanbauks, or historical epigrams or chronograms, from the 18th and 19th centuries have also survived. The often lengthy thanbauks list the pairings of year dates to historical events.[85]

With their poetical imagery and excessive glorification, eigyins, mawguns and thanbauks are of high literary value but of limited historical value.[85] Some of the more well known chronicles in verse are:

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Rakhine Minthami Eigyin 1455 Adu Min Nyo Earliest extant Arakanese literature as well as Burmese poetry on palm-leaf manuscripts; about Princess Saw Shwe Kra, favourite daughter of King
Ba Saw Pru[85]
Pyay Zon Mawgun 1472 Shin Htwe Nyo Earliest mawgun; composed by an army officer about suppression of a rebellion at Prome (Pyay)[86]
Thakin Htwe Eigyin 1476 Shin Thuye Earliest eigyin outside of Arakan; about Thakin Htwe, daughter of Thado Kyaw, Lord of Salin[86]
Shwe Sa-daing Hsindaw 1510 Shin Htwe Nyo About a royal elephant of King Shwenankyawshin[86]
Minye Deibba Eigyin 1608 Shin Than Kho Basis for Nyaungyan Mintayagyi Ayedawbon[87]
Yodaya Naing Mawgun 1767 Letwe Nawrahta Covers the Siege of Ayutthaya (1766–1767); Original manuscript rediscovered in 2003.[88]
Dhanyawaddy Naing Mawgun 1785 Letwe Nawrahta Covers the Konbaung conquest of Arakan[89]
Minzet Yazawin Thanbauk early 19th century Monywe Sayadaw Covers 14 dynasties up to 1782[85]

Administrative treatises and precedents

Court scholars also wrote administrative treatises and precedents. The two most well known, Zabu Kun-Cha Po Yaza Mu Haung (ဇမ္ဗူကွန်ချ ဖိုးရာဇာ မူဟောင်း) (c. early 15th century)[90] and Mani Yadanabon (မဏိရတနာပုံ) (1781) are compilations of precedents but also provide an outline of the prior dynasties down to the era in which they were written.[91] Mani Yadanabon, for example, is "a repository of historical examples illustrating pragmatic political principles worthy of Machiavelli".[38] Furthermore, many of these treatises—expositions on institutions, royal insignia, ranks and technical terms—help interpret the chronicles since many of the terms are obsolete.[92]

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Zabu Kun-Cha c. 1410s Min Yaza of Wun Zin Precedents and judgments during the reigns of Swa Saw Ke, Tarabya and Minkhaung I; Only an 1825 copy of the original survives. Later incorporated into Mani Yadanabon.
Lawka Byuha 1755 Inyon Mingyi Oldest extant work on the protocols of Burmese royalty[92]
Mani Yadanabon 1781 Shin Sandalinka Updates the precedents and judgments of the early Ava period as reported by Zabu Kun-Cha with later period judgments those by including Binnya Dala (the author of Razadarit Ayedawbon)[85][91]
Wawhara Linathta Dipani 1830 Hlethin Atwinwun Exposition on administrative terms of Konbaung Dynasty, on titles of kings and officials[92]
Yazawwada 1831 A treatise on advice to kings[85]
Shwebon Nidan 1878 Zeya Thinkhaya Explanatory work on technical terms re: the palace and the royal paraphernalia[92]
Myanmar Min Okchokpon Sa-dan 1931–1933 U Tin of Pagan Five volume work on the administrative machinery and personnel from top-to-bottom.[92]
Shwenanthon Wawhara Abhidan ? U Tin of Mandalay Contains valuable information on institutions, insignia, ranks of the royal administration[92]

Law treatises and precedents

Dhammathats are treatises on law used by Burmese royal courts. Hpyat-htons (also spelled pyattons) are legal precedents by earlier kings. The earliest extant legal treatise Dhammavisala Dhammathat dates from the 12th century[93] while the more well known Mon language Wareru Dhammathat dates from the 1290s. The earliest dhammathats were mainly written in Pali, and were accessible only to the court elite and clergy. Though modeled after the Hindu legal treatise Manusmriti in terms of organization, the content of Burmese dhammathats is mostly Burmese customary law[94] with early dhammathats containing "between 4% and 5%" of the Hindu legal treatise Manusmriti.[95] The Wareru was translated into Burmese, Pali and Siamese, and was the basic law of the First Toungoo Empire.[96][97] After the empire's fall in 1599, the Code lived on—albeit in adapted forms—in the main successor states. In Siam, it coexisted with other legal codes until King Rama I compiled a new legal code in 1805.[98] The new Siamese law's core 18 chapters share "substantial similarities to King Wareru's code", and the new code adds 21 more chapters.[99] In Burma, the Code morphed into a more Buddhist-centric version by 1640. The new treatise often supports Burmese customary law "with explicitly Buddhist scriptural justifications".[96][100]

An 1899 analysis by historian U Gaung lists a total of 36 dhammathats that had survived in some form.[101] Some of the more well known law treatises and precedents are:

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Alaungsithu Hpyat-hton c. 1174–1211 Court of Sithu II Compilation of legal rulings by King Sithu I; commissioned by his grandson, King Sithu II[102]
Wareru Dhammathat c. 1290/91 Court of Wareru Used to be known as the earliest extant law treatise[103]
Dhammathat Kyaw 1580 Court of Bayinnaung Update of Wareru Dhammathat[104]
Hanthawaddy Hsinbyumyashin Hpyat-hton 1580 Court of Bayinnaung Rulings of King Bayinnaung[104]
Manu Thara Shwe Myin Dhammathat 1630s Kaingsa Mingyi Burmese customary law "with explicitly Buddhist scriptural justifications[100]
Manu Kye Dhammathat 1755 Maha Thiri Ottma Zeya Compilation of previous law books; extremely popular because it was in vernacular Burmese, and not Pali[105]
Manu Wunnana Shwe Myin Dhammathat 1771 Wunna Kyawhtin Compilation of earlier law books in Burmese; also updated it in 1772 in Burmese and in Pali with the help of the monk Taungdwin Sayadaw[106]


Sittans, or censuses/revenue inquests, were used by the kings to determine their tax collection and military manpower base. The censuses collected data on the size of population, number and description of villages, arable land, products and taxes. Kings since Pagan times had graded each town and village by the taxes and levy it could raise. The first known instance of a sittan was ordered per the royal decree dated 12 March 1359 while the first nationwide census was commissioned in 1638.[107] The next two national censuses were commissioned in 1784 and 1803.[108] The 1784 census shows the kingdom had a population of 1,831,487, excluding "wild tribes" and the recently conquered Arakan.[109]

Name Date(s) Commissioned by Brief
Thalun Min Sittan 1638 King Thalun First nationwide revenue inquest[107]
Bodawpaya Sittan, Part I 1784 King Bodawpaya Second national revenue inquest[108]
Bodawpaya Sittan, Part II 1803 King Bodawpaya Third national revenue inquest[108]

Histories of religion and religious monuments

The country's many pagodas and temples also maintain a historical record, usually a stone and/or bell inscription, called thamaing. They furnish important historical information about the religious dedications by the royalty and the wealthy donors. Each thamaing purports to give the history of the founder of the building and of its subsequent benefactors. Such documents include notices of secular events.[7] In addition, some learned monks also wrote chronicles on the history of Buddhism from the time of the Buddha to their present day. The two well known religious chronicles are:

Name Date(s) Author(s) Brief
Yazawin Kyaw
The Celebrated Chronicle
1502, 1520[note 12]
Shin Maha Thilawuntha
Mostly covers religious history
Only 1/7th concerns Burmese history since it was meant to be supplementary to the official chronicle of the Ava court, which did not survive.
1861 Pannasami Sasanavamsa, Chronicle of the Religion; written by a monk, tutor of King Mindon[63]



The general fullness of the national historical records of the countries which comprised the Burmese empire is remarkable. They represent a marked contrast to the scantiness, or total absence of such writings, among the ancient Hindu kingdoms. The annals of Siam do not appear to have been kept with the same regularity and fullness as those of Burma, though they furnish an outline of prominent events.

The overall number of the chronicles outside the inscriptions is "modest" due to their destruction in the country's repeated bouts of warfare. Most of the extant material is that of Upper Burmese dynasties, which by the virtue of winning the majority of the wars "possessed an abiding palace and a continuous tradition". The sparseness of the chronicles of Ramanya (Lower Burma), Arakan and Shan states belies the long histories of these former sovereign states, which for centuries were important polities in their own right.[4] Even the Upper Burmese chronicles still have many gaps and lack specificity, especially with regard to pre-Toungoo (pre-16th century) eras.[33]

Still, Myanmar has the highest amount of historical source material in all of

D.G.E. Hall summarises that "Burma is not the only Southeast Asian country to have large collections of this indispensable source material and precious heritage of the past; no other country surpasses her."[8]


The scope of the chronicles is rather narrow. The coverage mostly revolves around the activities of the monarch and the royal family, and offers little perspective on the general situation of the kingdom outside the palace unless the monarch happened to be involved in the event.[12] Remote regions would make an appearance only if they were part of the king's itinerary, or were involved in rebellions or military campaigns. Other records—legal and administrative treatises, censuses and regional chronicles—do provide valuable complementary views. On balance, however, the royal records overall remain heavily monarch-centered: they "tell little of general conditions, and their story is not of the people of Burma but simply that of the dynasties of Upper Burma."[4]


The earliest chronicles, such as Yazawin Kyaw and Maha Yazawin were modelled after

Ava period.[111]

The Burmese chronicles have been used in Thai historians' effort to reconstruct the Thai history before 1767 for the original Siamese chronicles were destroyed during the sack of Ayutthaya by the Burmese army. In particular, the pre-1767 chronology of Thai history follows that of Burmese chronicles. (The prior reconstructed dates of the 19th century Siamese chronicles had been off by nearly two decades before historians realised it in 1914.)[112]

Historicity and accuracy

It is impossible to study these, especially in conjunction with other native records, without acquiring considerable respect for them. No other country in Indo-China can show so impressive a continuity. The great record of substantially accurate dates goes back for no less than nine centuries, and even earlier legends have a substratum of truth.

The chronicles can be divided in two parts: the early mythical origin legends and later factual history. The chronicle narratives start out with early origin myths, and eventually, they slowly change from being mythical to largely factual. Historians treat the Pagan Empire period (1044–1287) as the dividing period between mythical legends and the factual history. The Pagan period narratives still contain a number of legends—according to Harvey, "half the narrative told as historical down to the 13th century is probably folklore"—but the period's "deluge" of inscriptions provide a wealth of information to check the veracity of these narratives.[113] Even the later portions of the chronicles, which have been shown to be largely factual, still were not written purely from a secular history perspective but rather also achieve what Aung-Thwin calls "legitimation according to religious criteria" of the Burmese monarchy.[3]

Early history (pre-11th century)

Reconstruction of this part of the early Burmese history has been ongoing, and the views of the scholarship evolving. European scholars of the colonial period saw in the narratives mostly the "legends" and "fairly tales", and outright dismissed all of early history as "copies of Indian legends taken from Sanskrit or Pali originals".[114] They highly doubted the antiquity of the chronicle tradition, and dismissed the possibility that any sort of civilisation in Burma could be much older than 500 CE.[5][115] This assessment was the mainstream view at least to the 1960s. Some did vigorously challenge the views but the dismantling of the views would have to wait until more archaeological evidence came in.[note 14]

Modern scholarship, with the benefit of latest research, now holds a far more nuanced view. Latest research shows that when stripped of the legendary elements, which are now viewed as allegories, the chronicle narratives largely conform to the evidence. Archaeological evidence shows that many of the places mentioned in the royal records have indeed been inhabited continuously for at least 3500 years.[5] For example, at Tagaung, the site of the first Burmese kingdom according to the chronicles, the latest evidence supports the existence of both Tagaung eras (c. 9th century BCE to 1st century CE) reported in the chronicles.[6] On the other hand, evidence suggests many of the early "kingdoms" (Tagaung, Sri Ksetra and Pagan) were contemporary to each other for long periods, and did not exist in a serial fashion as reported in the chronicles.[116] The chronicle narratives of the pre-11th century history are social memory of the times.[6]


The royal records become increasingly more factual where "after the 11th century, the chronology of Burmese chronicles is reliable."[20] One major reason is that Burmese chroniclers could read the inscriptions of the previous eras. It was not the case in Champa, Cambodia and Siam, where "scripts have in the course of centuries undergone such profound changes that the compilers of later chronicles could not read the earlier inscriptions".[20] Likewise, a 1986 study of Maha Yazawin by Lieberman finds much of the history for the 16th century, which was also witnessed by many Europeans, largely factual.[117] To be sure, the post-Pagan narratives are not without issue. According to Harvey, "the chronicles abound in anachronisms, and in stock situations which recur regularly"; the chroniclers regarded "general conditions in early times being the same as those in their own day, the 18th century".[4] Moreover, the troop figures reported in the chronicles for the various military campaigns are at least an order of magnitude higher than the actual number possible given the size of the population and transportation mechanisms of the era.[118]

Current status

Despite Myanmar's possession of large amounts of historical material, many of the records have not been properly maintained, or used for research. The National Library of Myanmar holds 10,000 bundles of palm-leaf manuscripts, which have been collected from private donations and monasteries. Many more rolls of palm-leaf manuscripts remain uncollected, and are moldering in monasteries across the country without proper care as well as under attack by unscrupulous treasure hunters. Efforts to digitise the manuscripts have not materialised.[9] Few have been studied systematically since the Burma Research Society closed the doors in 1980. The society had published the Journal of the Burma Research Society (JBRS) over (1300 articles in 59 volumes) between 1910 and 1980.[119]

See also


  1. ^ (Raghavan 1979: 6): Parabaiks are thick sheets of paper that are blackened, glued and folded together. In general, parabaiks contain non-religious matter such as medicine, mathematics, astronomy, astrology, history, social and economic matters, poetry, etc., and are much more important to the study of Burmese history.
  2. ^ (Aung-Thwin 2005: 121–124): Zatadawbon covers regnal dates of kings from Pagan to Konbaung periods while Yazawin Kyaw covers religious history.
  3. ^ (Aung-Thwin 2005: 121–124, 358): Zatadawbon is the earliest surviving chronicle, whose first portions may have been written circa 1285. The next extant chronicle is Yazawin Kyaw (1502 and 1520). (Harvey 1925: xvi-xvii): the rest of them do not date before the 16th century.
  4. ^ See (Thaw Kaung 2010: 13–37) on the chronicle writers and copiers, many of whom were monks and hailed from outside Ava (the capital). Copying the manuscripts was a painstaking and at times error-prone process. See (Pan Hla 1968: 3–4) and (Sein Myint 2007: 30–34) on copying errors. For a more detailed analysis on how chronicles were changed or altered, see (Aung-Thwin 2005: 121–153) which covers all the standard chronicles and all known Mon chronicles.
  5. ^ See (Lieberman 2003: 188–190) on the literacy rates of pre-colonial Burma. The first British censuses find that adult male literacy, defined as the ability to read and write simple materials, exceeded 50 percent. The 1891 census, conducted five years after the last Anglo-Burmese War, finds 62.5% of all adult males (age 25 and over) in Upper Burma were literate. Excluding non-Burmans would have raised this figure even higher. Female literacy was very low. A mere 1.5% of girls over age five were in school compared to 53.2% of boys who were. A 1901 census finds only 5.5% of the females in all of Burma were literate although the rate for Burman women was higher. (Steinberg 2009: 23–24): According to early British observers, "Burma was the most literate state between Suez and Japan", and one early 19th-century British observer "believed that Burmese women had a higher percentage of literacy than British women."
  6. ^ Formerly romanized as the Maha-Radza Weng.[31]
  7. ^ (Aung-Thwin 2005: 136–139): Kala also referenced Zinme Yazawin (Chiang Mai Chronicle). It would not have been considered a foreign chronicle because at that time, Chiang Mai or Lan Na was another Burmese Shan State, albeit the largest and most important one.
  8. ^ (Myint-U 2006: 30); The wanton destruction of the buildings of the palace ended only in 1901 when Viceroy Lord Curzon issued an order to preserve what was left of the palace.
  9. ^ See (Lieberman 2003: 158–202) for administrative and economic reforms begun by Restored Toungoo kings and continued by Konbaung Dynasty. Regional courts in the Irrawaddy valley were vanquished, and the number and power of Shan courts greatly reduced.
  10. ^ (Singer 2008: 16–17); only a portion of the Ananda Chandra inscriptions was translated into English in 1930, and into Burmese in 1975.
  11. ^ See (Wyatt 1998: Chiang Mai Chronicle) and (Ratchasomphan and Wyatt 1994: The Nan Chronicle)
  12. ^ (Aung-Thwin 2005: 124, 358): The first part finished in 1502; the second part in 1520.
  13. Royal Burmese Army
    . As a result, the reconstructed chronicle of Siam was an outline of prominent events, and its chronology off by decades.
  14. G.H. Luce
    ; (Aung-Thwin 2005: 295) however finds some of Htin Aung's "refutation, especially of Luce's arguments quite convincing"; overall, Aung-Thwin calls Htin Aung's Defence of the Chronicles "a reasonable critique" of then prevailing views but "not one that advanced the field in a substantive way with regard to hard data."


  1. ^ a b c d Hla Pe 1985: 36–37
  2. ^ a b c d e f Harvey 1925: xvi–xvii
  3. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 144–145
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Harvey 1925: xviii–xix
  5. ^ a b c Myint-U 2006: 44–45
  6. ^ a b c Moore 2011: 4–5
  7. ^ a b c d Phayre 1883: viii-ix
  8. ^ a b c d Hall 1968: 909–910
  9. ^ a b Zon Pann Pwint May 2011: Uphill fight to preserve palm leaf texts
  10. ^ Aung-Thwin 1996: 895–896
  11. ^ Goh 2009: 115
  12. ^ a b c Hla Pe 1985: 37
  13. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 45
  14. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 42
  15. ^ Thaw Kaung 2010: 14–17
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i Aung-Thwin 2005: 133–135
  17. ^ a b c Thaw Kaung 2010: 28–29
  18. ^ a b Sein Myint 2007: 30–34
  19. ^ Aung-Thwin 2005: 35–36
  20. ^ a b c d Harvey 1925: xvi
  21. ^ Aung-Thwin 2005: 172, 185
  22. ^ Thaw Kaung 2010: 106–109
  23. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 99–100
  24. ^ a b Harvey 1925: xix
  25. ^ Aung-Thwin 1996: 900
  26. ^ Lieberman 2003: 118
  27. ^ Lieberman 2003: 131
  28. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 121–123
  29. ^ Htin Aung 1970: 41
  30. ^ Aung-Thwin 2005: 137
  31. ^ "Burmah", Encyclopædia Britannica, 9th ed., 1878.
  32. ^ Wade 2012: 125
  33. ^ a b c Lieberman 1986: 236
  34. ^ Kala Vol. 1 2006: 30–31; in Preface by Kyaw Nyein, Director of the Universities History Research
  35. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 38
  36. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 46–47
  37. ^ Hall 1961: 88
  38. ^ a b c Woolf 2011: 416
  39. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 142–144
  40. ^ a b Thaw Kaung 2010: 50–51
  41. ^ Hsan Tun in preface of (Hmannan Yazawin 2003: xxxv)
  42. ^ Maha Yazawin Vol. 1 2006: 346–349
  43. ^ a b Hla Pe 1985: 39–40
  44. ^ Lieberman 2003: 196
  45. ^ Thaw Kaung 2010: 53–55
  46. ^ Allot et al 1989: 13–14
  47. ^ Htin Aung 1967: 254
  48. ^ a b Hla Pe 1985: 41
  49. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 40
  50. ^ Hmannan 2003: vi
  51. ^ a b c Pan Hla 1968: 3–4
  52. ^ a b Thaw Kaung 2010: 27, 33
  53. ^ Thaw Kaung 2010: 21
  54. ^ a b Thaw Kaung 2010: 22
  55. ^ a b Goh 2009: 131
  56. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 46
  57. ^ Kala Vol. 1 2006: 29
  58. ^ a b c Hmannan Vol. 1 2003: xxx–xxxii
  59. ^ Than Htut and Thaw Kaung 2003: 106
  60. ^ Sein Lwin Lay 2006: 16
  61. ^ Hmannan Vol. 2 2003: 214–216
  62. ^ Harvey 1925: xviii
  63. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 145
  64. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 139–141
  65. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 148–149
  66. ^ a b Wade 2012: 126
  67. ^ a b Singer 2008: 16–17
  68. ^ Htin Aung 1967: 86
  69. ^ Gutman 2001: 61
  70. ^ Than Tun 1964: 65–66
  71. ^ Myint-U 2006: 110
  72. ^ Charney 2005: 978
  73. ^ a b c Sandamala Linkara Vol. 2 1931: 13
  74. ^ a b Charney 2004:7-8
  75. ^ a b c d Charney 2002: 8
  76. ^ Sandamala Linkara Vol. 1 1931: 12–13
  77. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 125
  78. ^ a b c d Cochrane 1915: 51–52
  79. ^ Hardiman 1901: 216–217
  80. ^ Aung Tun 2009: 27
  81. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 1996: 884
  82. ^ Aung-Thwin 2005: 137, 360
  83. ^ Mangrai 1981: entire book
  84. ^ a b Than Htut and Thaw Kaung 2003: 105
  85. ^ a b c d e f Hla Pe 1985: 42–43
  86. ^ a b c Burma Press Summary from Working People's Daily 1987: 12–13
  87. ^ Thaw Kaung 2010: 22–23
  88. ^ Zon Pann Pwint August 2011: Scholar updates 200-year-old poem
  89. ^ Thaw Kaung 2010: 73
  90. ^ Hudson 2004: 29
  91. ^ a b Aung-Thwin 2005: 123–124, 141–142
  92. ^ a b c d e f Hla Pe 1985: 44–45
  93. ^ Huxley 2005: 62
  94. ^ Huxley 2005: 64–66
  95. ^ Huxley 2005: 63
  96. ^ a b Abbott 2000: 297
  97. ^ Htin Aung 1967: 127
  98. ^ Lingat 1950: 23, 28
  99. ^ Lingat 1950: 24–25
  100. ^ a b Lieberman 1993: 248
  101. ^ Charney 2002: 4
  102. ^ Harvey 1925: 49
  103. ^ Hall 1960: 34
  104. ^ a b Harvey 1925: 171
  105. ^ Harvey 1925: 238
  106. ^ Harvey 1925: 249
  107. ^ a b Harvey 1925: 194
  108. ^ a b c Harvey 1925: 269–270
  109. ^ Harvey 1925: 333
  110. ^ Hla Pe 1985: 37–38
  111. ^ Aung-Thwin 1996: 890–891
  112. ^ Harvey 1925: 343
  113. ^ Harvey 1925: xvii
  114. ^ Hall 1960: 7
  115. ^ Harvey 1925: 307–309
  116. ^ Harvey 1925: 364
  117. ^ Lieberman 1986: 236–255
  118. ^ Harvey 1925: 333–336
  119. ^ IG Publishing: JBRS