Caroline Divines

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Charles II was restored as King of England in 1660.

The Caroline Divines were influential theologians and writers in the

saints
nor to Anglican figures, but is used of many writers and thinkers in the wider Christian church.

Theology and outlook

William Laud

The corpus produced by the Caroline divines is diverse. What they have in common is a commitment to the faith as conveyed by Scripture and the Book of Common Prayer, thus regarding prayer and theology in a manner akin to that of the Apostolic Fathers and other later Christian writers.[2] On the whole, the Caroline Divines view the via media of Anglicanism not as a compromise but "a positive position, witnessing to the universality of God and God's kingdom working through the fallible, earthly ecclesia Anglicana."[3] These theologians regarded Scripture as authoritative in matters concerning salvation, although they drew upon tradition and reason as well, the latter in the form of deductive logic and the former with special reference to the Church Fathers. Politically, the Caroline Divines were royalists but primarily of a constitutional, rather than absolutist, bent.

Their promotion of more elaborate ceremonial and their valuation of visual beauty in art and church architecture was variously labelled as "popish", "Romish", or “

Puritan opponents. Such embellishments, however, were not only integral to their spirituality, but were seen by the Carolines as combatting the appeal of Roman Catholicism. And, contrary to Puritan accusation, the emphasis upon beauty had nothing to do with "Arminian" influence.[4] Rather than face a choice between an austere Puritanism or an elaborate Roman ceremonial, the Caroline divines presented their countrymen with a via media in which they could remain within the established church and also participate in ancient forms of religion.[5]

Prominent exponents

Within the Anglican tradition, there have been certain theological writers whose works have been considered standards for faith, doctrine, worship, and spirituality. These are often commemorated in

lesser feasts of the Church, and their works are frequently anthologised.[6]
Among the Caroline divines of the seventeenth century, the following are prominent.

King Charles the Martyr

Calendar of Saints
. However 30 January, the date of his martyrdom, was not denoted as a feast, but as a fast intended for annual reflection and repentance.

Lancelot Andrewes

Lesser Festival. His most popular work has proven to be his Preces Privatae (Private Prayers), which was published posthumously and has remained in print since renewed interest in Andrewes developed in the 19th century. His Ninety-Six Sermons have been occasionally reprinted and are considered among the most rhetorically developed and polished sermons of the late-sixteenth and early-seventeenth centuries. Because of these, Andrewes has been commemorated by literary greats such as T. S. Eliot
.

John Cosin

High Church principles.[11] Among his writings (most of which were published posthumously) are a Historia Transubstantiationis Papalis (1675), Notes and Collections on the Book of Common Prayer (1710) and A Scholastical History of the Canon of Holy Scripture (1657). A collected edition of his works, forming 5 vols of the Oxford-based Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology, was published between 1843 and 1855; and his Correspondence (2 vols) was edited by George Ornsby for the Surtees Society (1868–1870). Cosin's most important work was his Collection of Private Devotions which was published in 1627 at the behest of King Charles I. It made use of patristic sources, Elizabethan devotional material, and Cosin's own compositions. This was the first work of royally-authorised devotional writing since the reign of Elizabeth I and was immensely popular in the seventeenth century. Cosin was exiled in Paris during the Commonwealth, but was made Bishop of Durham at the Restoration in 1660, a post he held until his death.[12]

Thomas Ken

Thomas Ken (July 1637 – 19 March 1711), English priest, was the most eminent of the English non-juring bishops, and one of the fathers of modern English hymnology. His Three Hymns (1700) contains the original version of the hymn 'Praise God from whom all blessings flow', which continues to be sung during offertories around the world, especially in Anglican churches.[13] Ken later left the Church of England during the Nonjuring schism, which developed in response to the invasion of England by the Dutch prince William III. However, as a Nonjuror, Ken remained deeply tied to the Anglican tradition. Nonjurors did not abandon Anglicanism but instead maintained allegiance to the exiled king James II of England. The political counterpart to the Nonjuror schism was Jacobitism. Both ended in the latter half of the eighteenth century with the death of Charles Edward Stuart, the last Stuart claimant to the throne. Nonjuror liturgical, theological, and devotional writing proved to have a considerable impact upon the Anglican tradition, in part due to the influence of the nineteenth-century Oxford Movement.

William Laud

Archbishop

Puritan element in the Church. Laud's aggressive high church policy was seen by many as a sinister development. He was blamed for the introduction of the 1637 Book of Common Prayer into Scotland, although a similar policy had originated with King James I. Laud's Conference with Fisher the Jesuite is a classic work of Anglican apologetics and has been called 'one of the last great works of scholastic divinity.'[14]
Like Andrewes, Laud's Private Devotions were printed posthumously, although they have never been as popular as those by Andrewes.

His views towards the Presbyterians extended to

Tower Hill
, notwithstanding being granted a royal pardon.

Thomas Sprat

Thomas Sprat (1635 – 20 May 1713), was an English priest. Having taken orders he became a prebendary of Lincoln Cathedral in 1660. In the preceding year he had gained a reputation by his poem To the Happie Memory of the most Renowned Prince Oliver, Lord Protector (London, 1659), and he was afterwards well known as a wit, preacher, and man of letters.

His chief prose works are the Observations upon Monsieur de Sorbier's Voyage into England (London, 1665), a satirical reply to the strictures on Englishmen in

Samuel de Sorbière
's book of that name, and a History of the Royal Society of London (London, 1667), which Sprat had helped to found. The History of the Royal Society elaborates the scientific purposes of the academy and outlines some of the strictures of scientific writing that set the modern standards for clarity and conciseness. The work also contains theological defences of scientific study.

Jeremy Taylor

Jeremy Taylor (1613 – 13 August 1667) was a priest in the Church of England who achieved fame as an author during the Protectorate of Oliver Cromwell. He is sometimes known as the "Shakespeare of Divines" for his poetic style of writing.

Taylor was educated at

Puritan Parliament during the English Civil War
. After the Parliamentary victory over the King, he was briefly imprisoned several times.

Eventually, he was allowed to retire to Wales, where he became the private chaplain of the Earl of Carbery. Upon the

vice-chancellor of the University of Dublin
.

Herbert Thorndike

Anglican Church who was well respected during the reigns of King Charles I and, after the Restoration, King Charles II. His work had little influence, however, and it was not until the Oxford Movement of the 19th century that he came to be widely read again.[15]

George Herbert

George Herbert (1593–1633) was a Welsh-born priest who served at the rural parish of Fugglestone St Peter near Salisbury, but is primarily known as a skilled orator and poet. He attended Trinity College, Cambridge in 1609 with the intention of becoming a priest, but instead he became the university's Public Orator and attracted the attention of James I. He served in the Parliament of England in 1624 and briefly in 1625. After the death of James I, Herbert renewed his interest in ordination. He gave up his secular ambitions in his mid-thirties and took holy orders in the Church of England, spending the rest of his life as rector at Fugglestone St Peter. He died at age 39 of consumption in 1633 during the reign of Charles I.

Although he is generally considered a poet rather than a divine, he was a devoted priest and his thought is palpably in line with that of the Caroline divines. His poetry was championed by the later Oxford Movement and notably influenced the piety of the movement through his influence on figures like John Keble.[16]

References

  1. ^ Guyer, Benjamin (2012). The Beauty of Holiness: The Caroline Divines and Their Writings. Norwich (UK): Canterbury Press. pp. 11–14, 26.
  2. ^ Booty, John. "Standard Divines". The Study of Anglicanism. p. 163.
  3. ^ Booty, John. "Standard Divines". The Study of Anglicanism. p. 164.
  4. ^ Guyer, Benjamin. The Beauty of Holiness: The Caroline Divines and Their Writings. pp. 7–11, 22–23.
  5. ^ K. A. Newman, "Holiness in Beauty?: Roman Catholics, Arminians, and the Aesthetics of Religion in Early Caroline England". in D. Wood (ed.) The Church and the Arts. (Oxford, 1992), pp. 303–312
  6. ^ Booty, John. "Standard Divines". The Study of Anglicanism. pp. 163 ff.
  7. ^ Lacey, Andrew. The Cult of King Charles the Martyr. p. 81.
  8. ^ O’Donovan, Oliver (1 January 2014). "Thirty-Nine Articles Revived". The Living Church. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  9. ^ Guyer, Benjamin. The Beauty of Holiness: The Caroline Divines and Their Writings. pp. 58–59, 70–73.
  10. ^ Cust, Richard. Charles I: A Political Life. p. 15.
  11. p. 424.
  12. ^ "John Cosin". Encyclopedia Britannica. January 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2020.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  13. ^ Guyer, Benjamin. The Beauty of Holiness: The Caroline Divines and Their Writings. pp. 147–152.
  14. ^ Davies, Julian. The Caroline Captivity of the Church. p. 58.
  15. ^ "Anglican Eucharistic theology welcome N philosophy pages about me publications LINKS News". web.mac.com. Archived from the original on 12 August 2011. Retrieved 27 January 2022.
  16. ^ Chadwick, Owen (1990). The Spirit of the Oxford Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 8–9, 53.