Castlefield corridor
Castlefield corridor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Castlefield corridor (also known as the Deansgate corridor[1][2]) is a railway corridor between Castlefield junction and Fairfield Street junction in Greater Manchester, England. The corridor forms the eastern end of the southerly Liverpool–Manchester line.
The route is recognised as a significant bottleneck, magnified further by the opening of the Ordsall Chord in 2017 and timetable change in May 2018 which increased the number of services through Manchester city centre from 12 to 15 trains per hour.[3] This uplift in services had a detrimental impact on punctuality and reliability, ultimately playing a major factor in the failure of the Arriva Rail North franchise in 2020. As of August 2021, 12 trains per hour pass through the Castlefield corridor.
Route
The twin-track corridor converge at the east.
The corridor is on a 1.5-mile-long (2.4 km)
The route carries a mixture of local and long-distance passenger trains, as well as intermodal freight from the Trafford Park container terminal.[5][8]
Current congestion
The corridor is a significant bottleneck to rail traffic;[9] it is one of three officially recognised congested infrastructure rail hotspots in the United Kingdom, and is uniquely still in need of major investment.[10] In an attempt to obligate the Department for Transport to provide funding for the Oxford Road upgrade to improve punctuality, Network Rail declared the Castlefield corridor 'congested' in September 2019.[11][12]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, services on the line were scaled back in line with a 90% reduction in demand,[2] as the United Kingdom went into a lockdown in March 2020. Since the partial return from that lockdown, services were steadily increased. However, the phased recovery process enabled both Northern and TransPennine Express to achieve a higher percentage of reliability and service than in the period immediately before the lockdown. Throughout 2020, there was a limit of 12 trains per hour (12 tph) rather than the previous 15 tph.[13]
Proposed improvements
As a trade-off, a temporary reduction in the number of passenger services using the corridor has been suggested, as a short-term measure to improve service reliability.[14]
In 2010, a study for the
UK rail advocacy group Railfuture has noted that the reinstatement of the Glazebrook East Junction–Skelton Junction line, along with its former branch to Carrington Power Station and an extension of the branch to Flixton, would help to relieve the Castlefield corridor of freight traffic.[15]
A conceptual proposal by un-funded think tank NorthOnTrack was put forward to solve the issue, along with a re-imagining of the integration of Northern Powerhouse Rail, opening up the possibility for the Castlefield Corridor to be freed of long-distance services to transform from a Mixed traffic corridor into an S-Bahn-style core for Manchester's commuter services.[16][17]
References
- ^ "Grayling seeks Piccadilly solution". Modern Railways. 25 October 2018. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ a b "The Long History and Exciting Future of Railway Systems Thinking". Rail Engineer. 16 October 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ "Castlefield Corridor Congested Infrastructure" (PDF). Network Rail. February 2021. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
- ^ "Alternative proposals for Manchester congestion". Railfreight.com. 12 November 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ a b Shirres, David (January 2018). "Manchester United by Ordsall Chord". Rail Engineer. No. 159. p. 27. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ "Manchester South Junction and Altrincham Railway Viaduct". Historic England. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ "Northern Hub Ordsall Chord - 3.1 Stage A: Castlefield Viaduct and Water Street" (PDF). Northern Hub Alliance. January 2016. p. 46. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
- ^ "Clearing congestion from Castlefield Corridor". Rail. No. 895. 2 January 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ a b c Abell, Paul (April 2020). "New tunnel and/or new platforms". Railwatch. p. 5. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ "Northern leaders call for urgent 'Thameslink-level' of commitment for top congestion hotspot". Transport for the North. 28 February 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ "Castlefield Corridor - Congested Infrastructure Report: Capacity Analysis – System Operator" (PDF). Network Rail. 6 September 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 April 2022. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ "Twenty Fourth Supplemental Agreement to the Track Access Contract" (PDF). ORR. 24 June 2019. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
It noted that Network Rail had highlighted that the Corridor has congestion issues between 0700 and 2000 and would be more than happy to contractually agree to the additional rights being confined to the proposed hours of operation.
- ISSN 0026-8356.
- ^ "Castlefield Corridor: trade-off plan for fewer trains". Rail. 17 February 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
- ^ Smart, Phil (7 April 2020). "Relieving Castlefield". Railfuture. Archived from the original on 25 September 2020.
- ^ Smalls, Jemma (12 December 2022). "Sustainable Transport Midlands Announces its Support for Ambitious CrossNorth Programme". Rail Forum. Retrieved 15 February 2024.
- ^ Booth, David (15 December 2022). "The Subplot | Liverpool planning, Places for Everyone, new rail plans". Place North West. Retrieved 15 February 2024.