Chaos theory
Chaos theory is an
Small differences in initial conditions, such as those due to errors in measurements or due to rounding errors in
Chaos: When the present determines the future but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future.
Chaotic behavior exists in many natural systems, including fluid flow, heartbeat irregularities, weather and climate.
Introduction
Chaos theory concerns deterministic systems whose behavior can, in principle, be predicted. Chaotic systems are predictable for a while and then 'appear' to become random. The amount of time for which the behavior of a chaotic system can be effectively predicted depends on three things: how much uncertainty can be tolerated in the forecast, how accurately its current state can be measured, and a time scale depending on the dynamics of the system, called the Lyapunov time. Some examples of Lyapunov times are: chaotic electrical circuits, about 1 millisecond; weather systems, a few days (unproven); the inner solar system, 4 to 5 million years.[18] In chaotic systems, the uncertainty in a forecast increases exponentially with elapsed time. Hence, mathematically, doubling the forecast time more than squares the proportional uncertainty in the forecast. This means, in practice, a meaningful prediction cannot be made over an interval of more than two or three times the Lyapunov time. When meaningful predictions cannot be made, the system appears random.[19]
Chaos theory is a method of qualitative and quantitative analysis to investigate the behavior of dynamic systems that cannot be explained and predicted by single data relationships, but must be explained and predicted by whole, continuous data relationships.
Chaotic dynamics
In common usage, "chaos" means "a state of disorder".[20][21] However, in chaos theory, the term is defined more precisely. Although no universally accepted mathematical definition of chaos exists, a commonly used definition, originally formulated by Robert L. Devaney, says that to classify a dynamical system as chaotic, it must have these properties:[22]
- it must be sensitive to initial conditions,
- it must be topologically transitive,
- it must have periodic orbits.
In some cases, the last two properties above have been shown to actually imply sensitivity to initial conditions.[23][24] In the discrete-time case, this is true for all continuous maps on metric spaces.[25] In these cases, while it is often the most practically significant property, "sensitivity to initial conditions" need not be stated in the definition.
If attention is restricted to intervals, the second property implies the other two.[26] An alternative and a generally weaker definition of chaos uses only the first two properties in the above list.[27]
Sensitivity to initial conditions
Sensitivity to initial conditions means that each point in a chaotic system is arbitrarily closely approximated by other points that have significantly different future paths or trajectories. Thus, an arbitrarily small change or perturbation of the current trajectory may lead to significantly different future behavior.[2]
Sensitivity to initial conditions is popularly known as the "
As suggested in Lorenz's book entitled The Essence of Chaos, published in 1993,[5] "sensitive dependence can serve as an acceptable definition of chaos". In the same book, Lorenz defined the butterfly effect as: "The phenomenon that a small alteration in the state of a dynamical system will cause subsequent states to differ greatly from the states that would have followed without the alteration." The above definition is consistent with the sensitive dependence of solutions on initial conditions (SDIC). An idealized skiing model was developed to illustrate the sensitivity of time-varying paths to initial positions.[5] A predictability horizon can be determined before the onset of SDIC (i.e., prior to significant separations of initial nearby trajectories).[29]
A consequence of sensitivity to initial conditions is that if we start with a limited amount of information about the system (as is usually the case in practice), then beyond a certain time, the system would no longer be predictable. This is most prevalent in the case of weather, which is generally predictable only about a week ahead.
In more mathematical terms, the Lyapunov exponent measures the sensitivity to initial conditions, in the form of rate of exponential divergence from the perturbed initial conditions.[31] More specifically, given two starting trajectories in the phase space that are infinitesimally close, with initial separation , the two trajectories end up diverging at a rate given by
where is the time and is the Lyapunov exponent. The rate of separation depends on the orientation of the initial separation vector, so a whole spectrum of Lyapunov exponents can exist. The number of Lyapunov exponents is equal to the number of dimensions of the phase space, though it is common to just refer to the largest one. For example, the maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE) is most often used, because it determines the overall predictability of the system. A positive MLE is usually taken as an indication that the system is chaotic.[8]
In addition to the above property, other properties related to sensitivity of initial conditions also exist. These include, for example, measure-theoretical mixing (as discussed in ergodic theory) and properties of a K-system.[11]
Non-periodicity
A chaotic system may have sequences of values for the evolving variable that exactly repeat themselves, giving periodic behavior starting from any point in that sequence. However, such periodic sequences are repelling rather than attracting, meaning that if the evolving variable is outside the sequence, however close, it will not enter the sequence and in fact, will diverge from it. Thus for almost all initial conditions, the variable evolves chaotically with non-periodic behavior.
Topological mixing
Topological mixing is often omitted from popular accounts of chaos, which equate chaos with only sensitivity to initial conditions. However, sensitive dependence on initial conditions alone does not give chaos. For example, consider the simple dynamical system produced by repeatedly doubling an initial value. This system has sensitive dependence on initial conditions everywhere, since any pair of nearby points eventually becomes widely separated. However, this example has no topological mixing, and therefore has no chaos. Indeed, it has extremely simple behavior: all points except 0 tend to positive or negative infinity.
Topological transitivity
A map is said to be topologically transitive if for any pair of non-empty open sets , there exists such that . Topological transitivity is a weaker version of
An important related theorem is the Birkhoff Transitivity Theorem. It is easy to see that the existence of a dense orbit implies topological transitivity. The Birkhoff Transitivity Theorem states that if X is a second countable, complete metric space, then topological transitivity implies the existence of a dense set of points in X that have dense orbits.[33]
Density of periodic orbits
For a chaotic system to have
Sharkovskii's theorem is the basis of the Li and Yorke[35] (1975) proof that any continuous one-dimensional system that exhibits a regular cycle of period three will also display regular cycles of every other length, as well as completely chaotic orbits.
Strange attractors
Some dynamical systems, like the one-dimensional logistic map defined by x → 4 x (1 – x), are chaotic everywhere, but in many cases chaotic behavior is found only in a subset of phase space. The cases of most interest arise when the chaotic behavior takes place on an attractor, since then a large set of initial conditions leads to orbits that converge to this chaotic region.[36]
An easy way to visualize a chaotic attractor is to start with a point in the
Unlike
Coexisting attractors
In contrast to single type chaotic solutions, recent studies using Lorenz models [40][41] have emphasized the importance of considering various types of solutions. For example, coexisting chaotic and non-chaotic may appear within the same model (e.g., the double pendulum system) using the same modeling configurations but different initial conditions. The findings of attractor coexistence, obtained from classical and generalized Lorenz models,[37][38][39] suggested a revised view that "the entirety of weather possesses a dual nature of chaos and order with distinct predictability", in contrast to the conventional view of "weather is chaotic".
Minimum complexity of a chaotic system
Discrete chaotic systems, such as the
The Poincaré–Bendixson theorem states that a two-dimensional differential equation has very regular behavior. The Lorenz attractor discussed below is generated by a system of three differential equations such as:
where , , and make up the
While the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem shows that a continuous dynamical system on the Euclidean plane cannot be chaotic, two-dimensional continuous systems with non-Euclidean geometry can still exhibit some chaotic properties.[45] Perhaps surprisingly, chaos may occur also in linear systems, provided they are infinite dimensional.[46] A theory of linear chaos is being developed in a branch of mathematical analysis known as functional analysis.
The above set of three ordinary differential equations has been referred to as the three-dimensional Lorenz model.[47] Since 1963, higher-dimensional Lorenz models have been developed in numerous studies[48][49][37][38] for examining the impact of an increased degree of nonlinearity, as well as its collective effect with heating and dissipations, on solution stability.
Infinite dimensional maps
The straightforward generalization of coupled discrete maps[50] is based upon convolution integral which mediates interaction between spatially distributed maps: ,
where kernel is propagator derived as Green function of a relevant physical system,[51] might be logistic map alike or
.
Jerk systems
In
are sometimes called jerk equations. It has been shown that a jerk equation, which is equivalent to a system of three first order, ordinary, non-linear differential equations, is in a certain sense the minimal setting for solutions showing chaotic behavior. This motivates mathematical interest in jerk systems. Systems involving a fourth or higher derivative are called accordingly hyperjerk systems.[54]
A jerk system's behavior is described by a jerk equation, and for certain jerk equations, simple electronic circuits can model solutions. These circuits are known as jerk circuits.
One of the most interesting properties of jerk circuits is the possibility of chaotic behavior. In fact, certain well-known chaotic systems, such as the Lorenz attractor and the
Here, A is an adjustable parameter. This equation has a chaotic solution for A=3/5 and can be implemented with the following jerk circuit; the required nonlinearity is brought about by the two diodes:
In the above circuit, all resistors are of equal value, except , and all capacitors are of equal size. The dominant frequency is . The output of op amp 0 will correspond to the x variable, the output of 1 corresponds to the first derivative of x and the output of 2 corresponds to the second derivative.
Similar circuits only require one diode[55] or no diodes at all.[56]
See also the well-known Chua's circuit, one basis for chaotic true random number generators.[57] The ease of construction of the circuit has made it a ubiquitous real-world example of a chaotic system.
Spontaneous order
Under the right conditions, chaos spontaneously evolves into a lockstep pattern. In the Kuramoto model, four conditions suffice to produce synchronization in a chaotic system. Examples include the
Moreover, from the theoretical physics standpoint, dynamical chaos itself, in its most general manifestation, is a spontaneous order. The essence here is that most orders in nature arise from the spontaneous breakdown of various symmetries. This large family of phenomena includes elasticity, superconductivity, ferromagnetism, and many others. According to the supersymmetric theory of stochastic dynamics, chaos, or more precisely, its stochastic generalization, is also part of this family. The corresponding symmetry being broken is the topological supersymmetry which is hidden in all stochastic (partial) differential equations, and the corresponding order parameter is a field-theoretic embodiment of the butterfly effect.[59]
History
Chaos theory began in the field of
Despite initial insights in the first half of the twentieth century, chaos theory became formalized as such only after mid-century, when it first became evident to some scientists that
The main catalyst for the development of chaos theory was the electronic computer. Much of the mathematics of chaos theory involves the repeated iteration of simple mathematical formulas, which would be impractical to do by hand. Electronic computers made these repeated calculations practical, while figures and images made it possible to visualize these systems. As a graduate student in Chihiro Hayashi's laboratory at Kyoto University, Yoshisuke Ueda was experimenting with analog computers and noticed, on November 27, 1961, what he called "randomly transitional phenomena". Yet his advisor did not agree with his conclusions at the time, and did not allow him to report his findings until 1970.[78][79]
In 1963,
In December 1977, the New York Academy of Sciences organized the first symposium on chaos, attended by David Ruelle, Robert May, James A. Yorke (coiner of the term "chaos" as used in mathematics), Robert Shaw, and the meteorologist Edward Lorenz. The following year Pierre Coullet and Charles Tresser published "Itérations d'endomorphismes et groupe de renormalisation", and Mitchell Feigenbaum's article "Quantitative Universality for a Class of Nonlinear Transformations" finally appeared in a journal, after 3 years of referee rejections.[87][88] Thus Feigenbaum (1975) and Coullet & Tresser (1978) discovered the universality in chaos, permitting the application of chaos theory to many different phenomena.
In 1979,
In 1986, the New York Academy of Sciences co-organized with the National Institute of Mental Health and the Office of Naval Research the first important conference on chaos in biology and medicine. There, Bernardo Huberman presented a mathematical model of the eye tracking dysfunction among people with schizophrenia.[90] This led to a renewal of physiology in the 1980s through the application of chaos theory, for example, in the study of pathological cardiac cycles.
In 1987,
Alongside largely lab-based approaches such as the
Also in 1987 James Gleick published Chaos: Making a New Science, which became a best-seller and introduced the general principles of chaos theory as well as its history to the broad public.[93] Initially the domain of a few, isolated individuals, chaos theory progressively emerged as a transdisciplinary and institutional discipline, mainly under the name of nonlinear systems analysis. Alluding to Thomas Kuhn's concept of a paradigm shift exposed in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), many "chaologists" (as some described themselves) claimed that this new theory was an example of such a shift, a thesis upheld by Gleick.
The availability of cheaper, more powerful computers broadens the applicability of chaos theory. Currently, chaos theory remains an active area of research, etc.
Lorenz's pioneering contributions to chaotic modeling
Throughout his career, Professor Lorenz authored a total of 61 research papers, out of which 58 were solely authored by him.[97] Commencing with the 1960 conference in Japan, Lorenz embarked on a journey of developing diverse models aimed at uncovering the SDIC and chaotic features. A recent review of Lorenz's model[98][99] progression spanning from 1960 to 2008 revealed his adeptness at employing varied physical systems to illustrate chaotic phenomena. These systems encompassed Quasi-geostrophic systems, the Conservative Vorticity Equation, the Rayleigh-Bénard Convection Equations, and the Shallow Water Equations. Moreover, Lorenz can be credited with the early application of the logistic map to explore chaotic solutions, a milestone he achieved ahead of his colleagues (e.g. Lorenz 1964[100]).
In 1972, Lorenz coined the term "butterfly effect" as a metaphor to discuss whether a small perturbation could eventually create a tornado with a three-dimensional, organized, and coherent structure. While connected to the original butterfly effect based on sensitive dependence on initial conditions, its metaphorical variant carries distinct nuances. To commemorate this milestone, a reprint book containing invited papers that deepen our understanding of both butterfly effects was officially published to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the metaphorical butterfly effect.[101]
A popular but inaccurate analogy for chaos
The sensitive dependence on initial conditions (i.e., butterfly effect) has been illustrated using the following folklore:[93]
For want of a nail, the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe, the horse was lost.
For want of a horse, the rider was lost.
For want of a rider, the battle was lost.
For want of a battle, the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.
Based on the above, many people mistakenly believe that the impact of a tiny initial perturbation monotonically increases with time and that any tiny perturbation can eventually produce a large impact on numerical integrations. However, in 2008, Lorenz stated that he did not feel that this verse described true chaos but that it better illustrated the simpler phenomenon of instability and that the verse implicitly suggests that subsequent small events will not reverse the outcome.[102] Based on the analysis, the verse only indicates divergence, not boundedness.[6] Boundedness is important for the finite size of a butterfly pattern.[6][102][103] In a recent study,[104] the characteristic of the aforementioned verse was recently denoted as "finite-time sensitive dependence".
Applications
Although chaos theory was born from observing weather patterns, it has become applicable to a variety of other situations. Some areas benefiting from chaos theory today are geology, mathematics, biology, computer science, economics,[106][107][108] engineering,[109][110] finance,[111][112][113][114][115] meteorology, philosophy, anthropology,[15] physics,[116][117][118] politics,[119][120] population dynamics,[121] and robotics. A few categories are listed below with examples, but this is by no means a comprehensive list as new applications are appearing.
Cryptography
Chaos theory has been used for many years in
Robotics
Robotics is another area that has recently benefited from chaos theory. Instead of robots acting in a trial-and-error type of refinement to interact with their environment, chaos theory has been used to build a predictive model.[129] Chaotic dynamics have been exhibited by passive walking biped robots.[130]
Biology
For over a hundred years, biologists have been keeping track of populations of different species with population models. Most models are continuous, but recently scientists have been able to implement chaotic models in certain populations.[131] For example, a study on models of Canadian lynx showed there was chaotic behavior in the population growth.[132] Chaos can also be found in ecological systems, such as hydrology. While a chaotic model for hydrology has its shortcomings, there is still much to learn from looking at the data through the lens of chaos theory.[133] Another biological application is found in cardiotocography. Fetal surveillance is a delicate balance of obtaining accurate information while being as noninvasive as possible. Better models of warning signs of fetal hypoxia can be obtained through chaotic modeling.[134]
As Perry points out,
Economics
It is possible that economic models can also be improved through an application of chaos theory, but predicting the health of an economic system and what factors influence it most is an extremely complex task.[138] Economic and financial systems are fundamentally different from those in the classical natural sciences since the former are inherently stochastic in nature, as they result from the interactions of people, and thus pure deterministic models are unlikely to provide accurate representations of the data. The empirical literature that tests for chaos in economics and finance presents very mixed results, in part due to confusion between specific tests for chaos and more general tests for non-linear relationships.[139]
Chaos could be found in economics by the means of recurrence quantification analysis. In fact, Orlando et al.[140] by the means of the so-called recurrence quantification correlation index were able detect hidden changes in time series. Then, the same technique was employed to detect transitions from laminar (regular) to turbulent (chaotic) phases as well as differences between macroeconomic variables and highlight hidden features of economic dynamics.[141] Finally, chaos theory could help in modeling how an economy operates as well as in embedding shocks due to external events such as COVID-19.[142]
AI-Extended Modeling Framework
In AI-driven large language models, responses can exhibit sensitivities to factors like alterations in formatting and variations in prompts. These sensitivities are akin to butterfly effects.[143] Although classifying AI-powered large language models as classical deterministic chaotic systems poses challenges, chaos-inspired approaches and techniques (such as ensemble modeling) may be employed to extract reliable information from these expansive language models (see also "Butterfly Effect in Popular Culture").
Other areas
In chemistry, predicting gas solubility is essential to manufacturing
Chaos theory can be applied outside of the natural sciences, but historically nearly all such studies have suffered from lack of reproducibility; poor external validity; and/or inattention to cross-validation, resulting in poor predictive accuracy (if out-of-sample prediction has even been attempted). Glass[148] and Mandell and Selz[149] have found that no EEG study has as yet indicated the presence of strange attractors or other signs of chaotic behavior.
Researchers have continued to apply chaos theory to psychology. For example, in modeling group behavior in which heterogeneous members may behave as if sharing to different degrees what in Wilfred Bion's theory is a basic assumption, researchers have found that the group dynamic is the result of the individual dynamics of the members: each individual reproduces the group dynamics in a different scale, and the chaotic behavior of the group is reflected in each member.[150]
Redington and Reidbord (1992) attempted to demonstrate that the human heart could display chaotic traits. They monitored the changes in between-heartbeat intervals for a single psychotherapy patient as she moved through periods of varying emotional intensity during a therapy session. Results were admittedly inconclusive. Not only were there ambiguities in the various plots the authors produced to purportedly show evidence of chaotic dynamics (spectral analysis, phase trajectory, and autocorrelation plots), but also when they attempted to compute a Lyapunov exponent as more definitive confirmation of chaotic behavior, the authors found they could not reliably do so.[151]
In their 1995 paper, Metcalf and Allen[152] maintained that they uncovered in animal behavior a pattern of period doubling leading to chaos. The authors examined a well-known response called schedule-induced polydipsia, by which an animal deprived of food for certain lengths of time will drink unusual amounts of water when the food is at last presented. The control parameter (r) operating here was the length of the interval between feedings, once resumed. The authors were careful to test a large number of animals and to include many replications, and they designed their experiment so as to rule out the likelihood that changes in response patterns were caused by different starting places for r.
Time series and first delay plots provide the best support for the claims made, showing a fairly clear march from periodicity to irregularity as the feeding times were increased. The various phase trajectory plots and spectral analyses, on the other hand, do not match up well enough with the other graphs or with the overall theory to lead inexorably to a chaotic diagnosis. For example, the phase trajectories do not show a definite progression towards greater and greater complexity (and away from periodicity); the process seems quite muddied. Also, where Metcalf and Allen saw periods of two and six in their spectral plots, there is room for alternative interpretations. All of this ambiguity necessitate some serpentine, post-hoc explanation to show that results fit a chaotic model.
By adapting a model of career counseling to include a chaotic interpretation of the relationship between employees and the job market, Amundson and Bright found that better suggestions can be made to people struggling with career decisions.[153] Modern organizations are increasingly seen as open complex adaptive systems with fundamental natural nonlinear structures, subject to internal and external forces that may contribute chaos. For instance, team building and group development is increasingly being researched as an inherently unpredictable system, as the uncertainty of different individuals meeting for the first time makes the trajectory of the team unknowable.[154]
Some say the chaos metaphor—used in verbal theories—grounded on mathematical models and psychological aspects of human behavior provides helpful insights to describing the complexity of small work groups, that go beyond the metaphor itself.[155]
Traffic forecasting may benefit from applications of chaos theory. Better predictions of when a congestion will occur would allow measures to be taken to disperse it before it would have occurred. Combining chaos theory principles with a few other methods has led to a more accurate short-term prediction model (see the plot of the
Chaos theory has been applied to environmental
In art (predominately art theory) a possible postpostmodern era has been outlined with emphasis on multiple narratives and the notion that every fictional angle is a possibility. In part this is therefor of a bisociate (trissociative) discourse and can be explained within emphasis on an institutional interchange of subjectivistic agents.[159]
See also
Examples of chaotic systems
- Advected contours
- Arnold's cat map
- Bifurcation theory
- Bouncing ball dynamics
- Chua's circuit
- Cliodynamics
- Coupled map lattice
- Double pendulum
- Duffing equation
- Dynamical billiards
- Economic bubble
- Gaspard-Rice system
- Hénon map
- Horseshoe map
- List of chaotic maps
- Rössler attractor
- Standard map
- Swinging Atwood's machine
- Tilt A Whirl
Other related topics
- Amplitude death
- Anosov diffeomorphism
- Catastrophe theory
- Causality
- Chaos as topological supersymmetry breaking
- Chaos machine
- Chaotic mixing
- Chaotic scattering
- Control of chaos
- Determinism
- Edge of chaos
- Emergence
- Mandelbrot set
- Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem
- Ill-conditioning
- Ill-posedness
- Nonlinear system
- Patterns in nature
- Predictability
- Quantum chaos
- Santa Fe Institute
- Shadowing lemma
- Synchronization of chaos
- Unintended consequence
People
- Ralph Abraham
- Michael Berry
- Leon O. Chua
- Ivar Ekeland
- Doyne Farmer
- Martin Gutzwiller
- Brosl Hasslacher
- Michel Hénon
- Aleksandr Lyapunov
- Norman Packard
- Otto Rössler
- David Ruelle
- Oleksandr Mikolaiovich Sharkovsky
- Robert Shaw
- Floris Takens
- James A. Yorke
- George M. Zaslavsky
References
- ^ "chaos theory | Definition & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2019-11-24.
- ^ a b c "What is Chaos Theory? – Fractal Foundation". Retrieved 2019-11-24.
- ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Chaos". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2019-11-24.
- ^ Boeing, Geoff (26 March 2015). "Chaos Theory and the Logistic Map". Retrieved 2020-05-17.
- ^ a b c Lorenz, Edward (1993). The Essence of Chaos. University of Washington Press. pp. 181–206.
- ^ ISSN 2673-8392. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- ISBN 978-0-226-42976-2.
- ^ a b c d Bishop, Robert (2017), "Chaos", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2019-11-24
- ^ Kellert 1993, p. 56
- ^ Kellert 1993, p. 62
- ^ S2CID 354849.
- ^ Danforth, Christopher M. (April 2013). "Chaos in an Atmosphere Hanging on a Wall". Mathematics of Planet Earth 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
- ^ .
- ISBN 978-3-540-79356-4.
- ^ a b Mosko M.S., Damon F.H. (Eds.) (2005). On the order of chaos. Social anthropology and the science of chaos. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
- ^ a b Piotrowski, Chris. "Covid-19 Pandemic and Chaos Theory: Applications based on a Bibliometric Analysis". researchgate.net. Retrieved 2020-05-13.
- ^ ISBN 9781633693968.
- S2CID 12209977.
- ^ Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Steven Strogatz, Hyperion, New York, 2003, pages 189–190.
- ^ Definition of chaos at Wiktionary;
- ^ "Definition of chaos | Dictionary.com". www.dictionary.com. Retrieved 2019-11-24.
- ISBN 978-0-521-58750-1.
- ISBN 978-1-58488-002-8.
- ISBN 978-0-471-68755-9.
- .
- JSTOR 2975629.
- ISBN 978-0-521-55874-7.
- ^ "Edward Lorenz, father of chaos theory and butterfly effect, dies at 90". MIT News. 16 April 2008. Retrieved 2019-11-24.
- ISSN 2073-4433.
- ^ Watts, Robert G. (2007). Global Warming and the Future of the Earth. Morgan & Claypool. p. 17.
- ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Lyapunov Characteristic Exponent". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2019-11-24.
- ^ a b Devaney 2003
- ^ Robinson 1995
- ^ Alligood, Sauer & Yorke 1997
- JSTOR 2318254. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2009-12-29.
- PMID 16486826.
- ^ S2CID 132494234.
- ^ S2CID 208369617.
- ^ ISSN 2073-4433.
- S2CID 12172750.
- S2CID 245197840.
- .
- S2CID 250757113.
- S2CID 250853499.
- ISSN 1972-6724.
- S2CID 121429354.
- S2CID 123683839.
- ISSN 0218-348X.
- ISSN 0960-0779.
- doi:10.1063/1.528136.
- LCCN 88174540.
- S2CID 122790937.
- S2CID 118828500.
- ^ K. E. Chlouverakis and J. C. Sprott, Chaos Solitons & Fractals 28, 739–746 (2005), Chaotic Hyperjerk Systems, http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pubs/paper297.htm
- ^ "A New Chaotic Jerk Circuit", J. C. Sprott, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems,2011.
- ^ "Simple Autonomous Chaotic Circuits", J. C. Sprott, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Express Briefs, 2010.
- ^ "Secure Image Encryption Based On a Chua Chaotic Noise Generator", A. S. Andreatos*, and A. P. Leros, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2013.
- ^ Steven Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Hyperion, 2003.
- ISSN 0960-0779.
- ^ Hunt, Brian R.; Yorke, James A. (1993). "Maxwell on Chaos" (PDF). Nonlinear Science Today. 3 (1).
- ^ Everitt, Francis (2006-12-01). "James Clerk Maxwell: a force for physics". Physics World. Retrieved 2023-11-03.
- S2CID 225246631.
- .
- OCLC 987302273.
- ^ Diacu, Florin; Holmes, Philip (1996). Celestial Encounters: The Origins of Chaos and Stability. Princeton University Press.
- ^ Hadamard, Jacques (1898). "Les surfaces à courbures opposées et leurs lignes géodesiques". Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées. 4: 27–73.
- ^ George D. Birkhoff, Dynamical Systems, vol. 9 of the American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications (Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1927)
- S2CID 123612939.
- S2CID 122060992.
- ISBN 978-3-540-09120-2.
{{cite book}}
:|journal=
ignored (help) See also Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem - doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-20.3.180. See also: Van der Pol oscillator
- .
- ^ Chirikov, Boris. "РЕЗОНАНСНЫЕ ПРОЦЕССЫ В МАГНИТНЫХ ЛОВУШКАХ" (PDF). Атомная энергия. 6.
- S2CID 59483478.
- ^ Jean, Bellissard; Dima, Shepelyansky (27 February 1998). "Boris Chirikov, a pioneer in classical and quantum chaos" (PDF). Annales Henri Poincaré. 68 (4): 379.
- S2CID 119107150.
- OCLC 859751750.
- ^ Abraham & Ueda 2000, See Chapters 3 and 4
- ^ Sprott 2003, p. 89
- ^ Sokol, Joshua (May 20, 2019). "The Hidden Heroines of Chaos". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
- ISBN 978-0-434-29554-8.
- .
- ^ Mandelbrot, B. (1977). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Freeman. p. 248.
- ISBN 9780465043552.
- S2CID 15662830. Archived from the originalon 19 October 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
- ISBN 978-0716711865.
- S2CID 124498882.
- ^ Coullet, Pierre, and Charles Tresser. "Iterations d'endomorphismes et groupe de renormalisation." Le Journal de Physique Colloques 39.C5 (1978): C5-25
- ^ "The Wolf Prize in Physics in 1986". Archived from the original on 2012-02-05. Retrieved 2008-01-17.
- S2CID 42733652.
- S2CID 7674321. However, the conclusions of this article have been subject to dispute. "?". Archived from the originalon 2007-12-14.. See especially: Laurson, Lasse; Alava, Mikko J.; Zapperi, Stefano (15 September 2005). "Letter: Power spectra of self-organized critical sand piles". Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 0511. L001.
- ^ Omori, F. (1894). "On the aftershocks of earthquakes". Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo. 7: 111–200.
- ^ ISBN 978-0143113454.
- S2CID 54005470.
- .
- ISBN 9780472106387.
- ^ Chen, G.-R. (2020-01-01). "Butterfly Effect and Chaos" (PDF). Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- .
- S2CID 261548506.
- .
- ISBN 978-3-0365-8911-4.
- ^ a b Lorenz, E. N. (December 2008). "The butterfly effect. In Premio Felice Pietro Chisesi E Caterina Tomassoni Award Lecture; University of Rome: Rome, Italy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 10, 2023. Retrieved January 29, 2023.
- ^ Shen, Bo-Wen. "A Popular but Inaccurate Analogy for Chaos and Butterfly Effect". YouTube. Retrieved 2023-02-21.
- ISSN 2073-4433.
- ^ Stephen Coombes (February 2009). "The Geometry and Pigmentation of Seashells" (PDF). www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk. University of Nottingham. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-11-05. Retrieved 2013-04-10.
- .
- .
- ^ Kyrtsou, C.; Vorlow, C. (2005). "Complex dynamics in macroeconomics: A novel approach". In Diebolt, C.; Kyrtsou, C. (eds.). New Trends in Macroeconomics. Springer Verlag.
- ISSN 1367-2630.
- ^ "Applying Chaos Theory to Embedded Applications". Archived from the original on 9 August 2011.
- . 138547.
- S2CID 154202123.
- ISBN 9780471463085.
- ISBN 978-0471585244.
- ISBN 978-0471139386.
- .
- S2CID 45804559.
- PMID 19072712.
- .
- ISBN 978-3-030-27672-0.
- S2CID 697164.
- ^ .
- .
- .
- S2CID 18407251.
- .
- S2CID 125169427.
- S2CID 18740000.
- doi:10.1016/j.robot.2005.09.009. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2017-08-12. Retrieved 2017-10-25.
- S2CID 1283494.
- .
- .
- .
- PMID 9138960.
- ^ S2CID 37855255.
- ^ a b c
Thompson, John; Burdon, Jeremy (1992). "Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites". Review Article. S2CID 4346920.
- ^
Jones, Gareth (1998). Jones, D. Gareth (ed.). The Epidemiology of Plant Diseases (1 ed.). S2CID 1793087.
- .
- (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09.
- .
- S2CID 85526993.
- S2CID 235909725.
- arXiv:2401.03729 [cs.CL].
- .
- .
- ^ Steven Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Hyperion, 2003
- .
- ^ Glass, L (1997). "Dynamical disease: The impact of nonlinear dynamics and chaos on cardiology and medicine". In Grebogi, C; Yorke, J. A. (eds.). The impact of chaos on science and society. United Nations University Press.
- ^ Mandell, A. J.; Selz, K. A. (1997). "Is the EEG a strange attractor?". In Grebogi, C; Yorke, J. A. (eds.). The impact of chaos on science and society. United Nations University Press.
- PMID 23517610.
- S2CID 214722.
- ^ Metcalf, B. R.; Allen, J. D. (1995). "In search of chaos in schedule-induced polydipsia". In Abraham, F. D.; Gilgen, A. R. (eds.). Chaos theory in psychology. Greenwood Press.
- .
- S2CID 149352680.
- ISBN 978-3-642-29503-4.
- .
- ^ "Dr. Gregory B. Pasternack – Watershed Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Ecohydraulics :: Chaos in Hydrology". pasternack.ucdavis.edu. Retrieved 2017-06-12.
- .
- ^ Thomas III, Fred Charles (July 1990). "Design of a Sinusoidally-Force Pendulum for the Demonstration of Chaotic Phenomena". Bucknell University MS Engineering Thesis – via Bucknell University.
Further reading
Articles
- Sharkovskii, A.N.(1964). "Co-existence of cycles of a continuous mapping of the line into itself". Ukrainian Math. J. 16: 61–71.
- JSTOR 2318254. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2009-12-29. Retrieved 2009-08-12.
- Alemansour, Hamed; Miandoab, Ehsan Maani; Pishkenari, Hossein Nejat (March 2017). "Effect of size on the chaotic behavior of nano resonators". Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 44: 495–505. .
- (Note: the volume and page citation cited for the online text differ from that cited here. The citation here is from a photocopy, which is consistent with other citations found online that don't provide article views. The online content is identical to the hardcopy text. Citation variations are related to country of publication).
- Kolyada, S.F. (2004). "Li-Yorke sensitivity and other concepts of chaos". Ukrainian Math. J. 56 (8): 1242–57. S2CID 207251437.
- Day, R.H.; Pavlov, O.V. (2004). "Computing Economic Chaos". Computational Economics. 23 (4): 289–301. SSRN 806124.
- Strelioff, C.; Hübler, A. (2006). "Medium-Term Prediction of Chaos" (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (4): 044101. PMID 16486826. 044101. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2013-04-26.
- Hübler, A.; Foster, G.; Phelps, K. (2007). "Managing Chaos: Thinking out of the Box" (PDF). Complexity. 12 (3): 10–13. doi:10.1002/cplx.20159. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2012-10-30. Retrieved 2011-07-17.
- Motter, Adilson E.; Campbell, David K. (2013). "Chaos at 50". Physics Today. 66 (5): 27. S2CID 54005470.
Textbooks
- Alligood, K.T.; Sauer, T.; Yorke, J.A. (1997). Chaos: an introduction to dynamical systems. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-94677-1.
- Baker, G. L. (1996). Chaos, Scattering and Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39511-3.
- Badii, R.; Politi A. (1997). Complexity: hierarchical structures and scaling in physics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66385-4.
- Collet, Pierre; ISBN 978-0-8176-4926-5.
- ]
- Robinson, Clark (1995). Dynamical systems: Stability, symbolic dynamics, and chaos. CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-8493-1.
- Feldman, D. P. (2012). Chaos and Fractals: An Elementary Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-956644-0. Archived from the originalon 2019-12-31. Retrieved 2016-12-29.
- Gollub, J. P.; Baker, G. L. (1996). Chaotic dynamics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47685-0.
- ISBN 978-0-387-90819-9.
- Gulick, Denny (1992). Encounters with Chaos. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-025203-5.
- Gutzwiller, Martin (1990). Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-97173-5.
- ISBN 978-981-02-4073-8.
- Kautz, Richard (2011). Chaos: The Science of Predictable Random Motion. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-959458-0.
- Kiel, L. Douglas; Elliott, Euel W. (1997). Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences. Perseus Publishing. ISBN 978-0-472-08472-2.
- Moon, Francis (1990). Chaotic and Fractal Dynamics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-471-54571-2.
- S2CID 239756912.
- Ott, Edward (2002). Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01084-9.
- ISBN 978-0-7382-0453-6.
- Sprott, Julien Clinton (2003). Chaos and Time-Series Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-850840-3.
- Tél, Tamás; Gruiz, Márton (2006). Chaotic dynamics: An introduction based on classical mechanics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83912-9.
- ISBN 978-0-8218-8328-0.
- Thompson JM, Stewart HB (2001). Nonlinear Dynamics And Chaos. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. ISBN 978-0-471-87645-8.
- ISBN 978-0-201-55441-0.
- Wiggins, Stephen (2003). Introduction to Applied Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-00177-7.
- Zaslavsky, George M. (2005). Hamiltonian Chaos and Fractional Dynamics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-852604-9.
Semitechnical and popular works
- ISBN 978-981-4374-42-2.
- Abraham, Ralph H.; Ueda, Yoshisuke, eds. (2000). The Chaos Avant-Garde: Memoirs of the Early Days of Chaos Theory. World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science Series A. Vol. 39. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-238-647-2.
- ISBN 978-0-12-079069-2.
- Bird, Richard J. (2003). Chaos and Life: Complexity and Order in Evolution and Thought. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-12662-5.
- John Briggs and David Peat, Turbulent Mirror: : An Illustrated Guide to Chaos Theory and the Science of Wholeness, Harper Perennial 1990, 224 pp.
- John Briggs and David Peat, Seven Life Lessons of Chaos: Spiritual Wisdom from the Science of Change, Harper Perennial 2000, 224 pp.
- Cunningham, Lawrence A. (1994). "From Random Walks to Chaotic Crashes: The Linear Genealogy of the Efficient Capital Market Hypothesis". George Washington Law Review. 62: 546.
- Predrag Cvitanović, Universality in Chaos, Adam Hilger 1989, 648 pp.
- Leon Glass and Michael C. Mackey, From Clocks to Chaos: The Rhythms of Life, Princeton University Press 1988, 272 pp.
- James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science, New York: Penguin, 1988. 368 pp.
- John Gribbin. Deep Simplicity. Penguin Press Science. Penguin Books.
- L Douglas Kiel, Euel W Elliott (ed.), Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications, University of Michigan Press, 1997, 360 pp.
- Arvind Kumar, Chaos, Fractals and Self-Organisation; New Perspectives on Complexity in Nature , National Book Trust, 2003.
- Hans Lauwerier, Fractals, Princeton University Press, 1991.
- Edward Lorenz, The Essence of Chaos, University of Washington Press, 1996.
- Marshall, Alan (2002). The Unity of Nature - Wholeness and Disintegration in Ecology and Science. ISBN 9781860949548.
- David Peak and Michael Frame, Chaos Under Control: The Art and Science of Complexity, Freeman, 1994.
- Heinz-Otto Peitgen and Dietmar Saupe (Eds.), The Science of Fractal Images, Springer 1988, 312 pp.
- Nuria Perpinya, Caos, virus, calma. La Teoría del Caos aplicada al desórden artístico, social y político, Páginas de Espuma, 2021.
- Clifford A. Pickover, Computers, Pattern, Chaos, and Beauty: Graphics from an Unseen World , St Martins Pr 1991.
- Clifford A. Pickover, Chaos in Wonderland: Visual Adventures in a Fractal World, St Martins Pr 1994.
- Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, Order Out of Chaos, Bantam 1984.
- Peitgen, Heinz-Otto; Richter, Peter H. (1986). The Beauty of Fractals. ISBN 978-3-642-61719-5.
- David Ruelle, Chance and Chaos, Princeton University Press 1993.
- Ivars Peterson, Newton's Clock: Chaos in the Solar System, Freeman, 1993.
- Ian Roulstone; John Norbury (2013). Invisible in the Storm: the role of mathematics in understanding weather. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691152721.
- Ruelle, D. (1989). Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors. ISBN 9780521362726.
- Manfred Schroeder, Fractals, Chaos, and Power Laws, Freeman, 1991.
- Smith, Peter (1998). Explaining Chaos. ISBN 9780511554544.
- Ian Stewart, Does God Play Dice?: The Mathematics of Chaos , Blackwell Publishers, 1990.
- Steven Strogatz, Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order, Hyperion, 2003.
- Yoshisuke Ueda, The Road To Chaos, Aerial Pr, 1993.
- M. Mitchell Waldrop, Complexity : The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Simon & Schuster, 1992.
- Antonio Sawaya, Financial Time Series Analysis : Chaos and Neurodynamics Approach, Lambert, 2012.
External links
- "Chaos", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
- Nonlinear Dynamics Research Group with Animations in Flash
- The Chaos group at the University of Maryland
- The Chaos Hypertextbook. An introductory primer on chaos and fractals
- ChaosBook.org An advanced graduate textbook on chaos (no fractals)
- Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology & Life Sciences
- Nonlinear Dynamics Research Group at CSDC, Florence, Italy
- Nonlinear dynamics: how science comprehends chaos, talk presented by Sunny Auyang, 1998.
- Nonlinear Dynamics. Models of bifurcation and chaos by Elmer G. Wiens
- Gleick's Chaos (excerpt) Archived 2007-02-02 at the Wayback Machine
- Systems Analysis, Modelling and Prediction Group at the University of Oxford
- A page about the Mackey-Glass equation
- High Anxieties — The Mathematics of Chaos (2008) BBC documentary directed by David Malone
- The chaos theory of evolution – article published in Newscientist featuring similarities of evolution and non-linear systems including fractal nature of life and chaos.
- Jos Leys, Étienne Ghys et Aurélien Alvarez, Chaos, A Mathematical Adventure. Nine films about dynamical systems, the butterfly effect and chaos theory, intended for a wide audience.
- "Chaos Theory", BBC Radio 4 discussion with Susan Greenfield, David Papineau & Neil Johnson (In Our Time, May 16, 2002)
- Chaos: The Science of the Butterfly Effect (2019) an explanation presented by Derek Muller
Copyright note
- This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC-BY (license statement/permission). Text taken from Three Kinds of Butterfly Effects within Lorenz Models, Bo-Wen Shen, Roger A. Pielke, Sr., Xubin Zeng, Jialin Cui, Sara Faghih-Naini, Wei Paxson, and Robert Atlas, MDPI. Encyclopedia.