Chicken gun
A chicken gun or flight impact simulator is a large-diameter, compressed-air gun used to fire bird carcasses at aircraft components in order to simulate high-speed
Context
Multiple measures are used to prevent bird strikes, such as the use of deterrent systems at airports to prevent birds from gathering, population control using birds of prey or firearms, and recently
Despite this, the risk of bird strikes is impossible to eliminate and therefore most government certification authorities such as the US
History
The first recorded chicken gun was built in 1942 by the US
The tests conducted with this gun were the first of their kind, and showed that the glass used in the windshields of common passenger aircraft such as the
The gun was used at the High Power Laboratory until November 1943. In early 1945, it was moved to a CAA research & development location in
The
Use in aircraft certification
Chicken guns are routinely used in the process of proving compliance with certification regulations. Given their complexity and the expertise required to operate them, an aircraft manufacturer will typically contract with a facility that operates a gun to perform a test against a given standard.[10][15] The component to be tested is mounted securely on a frame, the gun fires a bird at it, and the results are examined for compliance with the relevant standards.[16] Most tests are performed with the gun pressurized to around 35 psi (2.4 bar) – this results in a four-pound (1.8 kg) bird being launched at around 350 miles per hour (560 km/h), approximately the resultant velocity in a collision between a bird and an aircraft.[9]
The FAA do not specify the species of bird that should be used for testing, but do state that the birds should not be frozen, as this would not accurately reflect the reality of a strike. Chickens are used as they are cheap, and readily available.[16]
There have been efforts to develop artificial bird analogs for use in impact tests, to replace the use of carcasses. The motivations for this range from ensuring that results are easily reproducible across the industry, cost, and sensitivity to the views of
Notable uses
During the development of the Boeing 757 in the 1970s, the cockpit roof was subjected to a bird strike test wherein a 4-pound (1.8 kg) chicken was fired at 360 knots (410 mph; 670 km/h) into a stationary cockpit. To the surprise of the Boeing engineers, the chicken penetrated the skin of the aircraft. As a result the cockpit of the 757, and that of the 767 which shared the same design, had to be reinforced. Several 767s were already in service, and had to be recalled for retrofitting of the reinforcements. Later in the 757's development process a bird strike test was conducted on the aircraft's windows, again by firing a chicken at them. The UK Civil Aviation Authority's certification requirements at the time were more stringent than the FAA's, and required the metal around the windows to also resist a bird strike. The 757 failed this test, requiring further re-engineering.[20]
After the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster in 2003, the chicken gun at AEDC Ballistic Range S-3 was repurposed to test the resistance of various components of the Shuttle orbiter and launch fuel tanks to impacts from insulating foam.[21] The intent was to discover the exact cause of the disaster, and establish whether any modifications to the Shuttle were required.[22]
In popular culture
The comedy series Royal Canadian Air Farce has a recurring skit in which a "chicken cannon" is used to fire various objects, originally including a rubber chicken, at a picture of a well-known person, often a politician.
See also
References
- .
- ISBN 9781421410838.
- doi:10.26077/0fvy-6k61. Archived from the original(PDF) on April 2, 2015.
- ^ "Aircraft Certification for Bird Strike Risk - SKYbrary Aviation Safety". skybrary.aero. Archived from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ^ a b Morse, A. L. (July 1943). "Bird-proof windshields". Flying Magazine. pp. 40–42. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ^ Fortier, Rénald (July 3, 2018). "I want to know what snarge is, I want you to show me, or not | The Channel". ingeniumcanada.org. Archived from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ^ Kangas, Pell; George L. Pigman (February 1950). Development of Aircraft Windshields to Resist Impact with Birds in Flight Part II (Technical report). Civil Aeronautics Administration. 74. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ISBN 9781119529736.
- ^ National Research Council of Canada. January 7, 2007. Archived from the originalon June 22, 2013. Retrieved September 14, 2009.
- ^ a b Muenz, Rachel (November 10, 2016). "The National Research Council of Canada's Bird Guns Ensure Safe Air Travel". Lab Manager. Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
- ISBN 9781441993076. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ^ Caletrello, Stephan (August 1, 2005). "Something to crow about: Rooster Booster proves old-fashioned ingenuity needn't be high-tech". The Free Library. Farlex. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
- from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
- ^ "Arnold AFB test facilities capabilities, including range S3, Bird Impact Range" (PDF). Arnold Air Force Base. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 8, 2007. Retrieved October 1, 2009.
- ^ Moskvitch, Katia (March 19, 2014). "The extreme tests planes go through before taking off". bbc.com. Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
- ^ a b c Downer, John (January 2009). "Epistemological Chicken: What do we learn from aircraft 'bird-ingestion' tests?" (PDF). London School of Economics. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ^ Budgey, Richard (April 2000). The development of a substitute artificial bird by the international Bird strike Research Group for use in aircraft component testing. International Bird Strike Committee ISBC25/WP-IE3.
- ^ Mikkelson, Barbara (July 22, 2001). "The Chicken Cannon". Snopes.com. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
- ^ Langewiesche, William (May 5, 2009). "US Airways Flight 1549: Anatomy of a Miracle". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
- Seattle Times. Archived from the originalon April 30, 2019. Retrieved April 5, 2019.
- ^ Knight, Will (March 14, 2003). "New clues to plasma's flow into shuttle". New Scientist. Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
- ^ Barton, Tina (September 2, 2004). "Center's 'chicken gun' helps shuttle return to flight". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.