Chris Argyris

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Chris Argyris
Born(1923-07-16)July 16, 1923
DiedNovember 16, 2013(2013-11-16) (aged 90)
OccupationAcademic (management)

Chris Argyris (July 16, 1923 – November 16, 2013

business theorist and professor at Yale School of Management and Harvard Business School. Argyris, like Richard Beckhard, Edgar Schein and Warren Bennis,[citation needed] is known as a co-founder of organization development, and known for seminal work on learning organizations
.

Biography

Argyris was born a twin—along with Thomas S. Argyris (1923–2001)

.

In 1951 Argyris started his academic career at Yale University as part of the Yale Labor and Management Center where he worked under its director and an early influence, E. Wight Bakke.[6] At Yale he subsequently became appointed Professor of Management science. In 1971 he moved to Harvard University, where he was Professor of Education and Organizational Behavior, until his retirement. Argyris was active as director of the consulting firm Monitor in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Argyris received an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree from the University of Toronto in 2006 and a Doctor of Science award from Yale University in 2011.[7]

Argyris died on November 16, 2013, age 90, and is buried at Linwood Cemetery in Weston, Massachusetts.[8]

Work

The ladder of inference, a metaphorical model of cognition and action created by Chris Argyris. Argyris's original ladder had fewer rungs with different names.

Argyris' early research explored the impact of formal organizational structures, control systems and management on individuals and how they responded and adapted to them. This research resulted in the books Personality and Organization (1957) and Integrating the Individual and the Organization (1964). He then shifted his focus to organizational change, in particular exploring the behaviour of senior executives in organizations, in Interpersonal Competence and Organizational Effectiveness (1962) and Organization and Innovation (1965).

From there he moved on to an inquiry into the role of the social scientist as both researcher and actor (Intervention Theory and Method (1970); Inner Contradictions of Rigorous Research (1980) and Action Science (1985) – with Robert Putnam and Diana McLain Smith). His fourth major area of research and theorizing – in significant part undertaken with Donald Schön – was in individual and organizational learning and the extent to which human reasoning, not just behavior, can become the basis for diagnosis and action (Theory in Practice (1974); Organizational Learning (1978); Organizational Learning II (1996) – all with Donald Schön). He has also developed this thinking in Overcoming Organizational Defenses (1990) and Knowledge for Action (1993).

Adult personality

Argyris believed that managers who treat people positively and as responsible adults will achieve productivity. Mature workers want additional responsibilities, variety of tasks, and the ability to participate in decisions. He also came to the conclusion that problems with employees are the result of mature personalities managed using outdated practices.

Action science

Argyris' collaborative work with Robert W. Putnam,[9] (not to be confused with Robert D. Putnam), and Diana McLain Smith[10] advocates an approach to research that focuses on generating knowledge that is useful in solving practical problems. Other key concepts developed by Argyris include ladder of inference, double-loop learning (Argyris & Schön 1974), theory of action/espoused theory/theory-in-use, high advocacy/high inquiry dialogue and actionable knowledge and the study of adult personality.

Argyris' concept of Action Science begins with the study of how human beings design their actions in difficult situations. Human actions are designed to achieve intended consequences and governed by a set of environment variables. How those governing variables are treated in designing actions are the key differences between single-loop learning and double-loop learning. When actions are designed to achieve the intended consequences and to suppress conflict about the governing variables, a single-loop learning cycle usually ensues. On the other hand, when actions are taken, not only to achieve the intended consequences, but also to openly inquire about conflict and to possibly transform the governing variables, both single-loop and double-loop learning cycles usually ensue. (Argyris applies single-loop and double-loop learning concepts not only to personal behaviors but also to organizational behaviors in his models.)

Model 1 illustrates how single-loop learning affects human actions. Model 2 describes how double-loop learning affects human actions. The following Model 1 and Model 2 tables introduce these ideas (tables are from Argyris, Putnam & Smith, 1985, Action Science, Ch. 3). Other key books conveying Argyris' approach include Argyris & Schon, 1974 and Argyris, 1970, 1980, 1994).

Table 1, Model 1: Theory-In-Use: defensive reasoning

Governing variables Action strategies Consequences for the behavioral world Consequences for learning Effectiveness
Define goals and try to achieve them Design and manage the environment unilaterally (be persuasive, appeal to larger goals) Actor seen as defensive, inconsistent, incongruent, competitive, controlling, fearful of being vulnerable, manipulative, withholding of feelings, overly concerned about self and others or under concerned about others Self-sealing Decreased effectiveness
Maximize winning and minimize losing Own and control the task (claim ownership of the task, be guardian of definition and execution of task) Defensive interpersonal and group relationship (dependence upon actor, little additivity, little helping of others) Single-loop learning
Minimize generating or expressing negative feelings Unilaterally protect yourself (speak with inferred categories accompanied by little or no directly observable behavior, be blind to impact on others and to the incongruity between rhetoric and behavior, reduce incongruity by defensive actions such as blaming, stereotyping, suppressing feelings, intellectualizing) Defensive norms (mistrust, lack of risk taking, conformitment, emphasis on diplomacy, power-centered competition, and rivalry) Little testing of theories publicly, much testing of theories privately
Be rational Unilaterally protect others from being hurt (withhold information, create rules to censor information and behavior, hold private meetings) Little freedom of choice, internal commitment, or risk taking

Table 2, Model 2: Theory-In-Use: productive reasoning

Governing variables Action strategies Consequences for the behavioral world Consequences for learning Consequences for quality of life Effectiveness
Valid information Design situations or environments where participants can be origins and can experience high personal causation (psychological success, confirmation, essentiality) Actor experienced as minimally defensive (facilitator, collaborator, choice creator) Disconfirmable processes Quality of life will be more positive than negative (high authenticity and high freedom of choice)
Free and informed choice Tasks are controlled jointly Minimally defensive interpersonal relations and group dynamics Double-loop learning effectiveness of problem solving and decision making will be great, especially for difficult problems Increase long-run effectiveness
Internal commitment to the choice and constant monitoring of its implementation Protection of self is a joint enterprise and oriented toward growth (speak in directly observable categories, seek to reduce blindness about own inconsistency and incongruity) Learning-oriented norms (trust, individuality, open confrontation on difficult issues) Public testing of theories
Bilateral protection of others
  • Reference models I and II
  • A graphical interpretation of single-loop learning
    A graphical interpretation of
    single-loop learning
  • A graphical interpretation of double-loop learning
    A graphical interpretation of double-loop learning

Selected books

Publications about Chris Argyris

See also

References

  1. ^ "Chris Argyris Obituary". The Boston Globe. 18 November 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
  2. ^ "In Memoriam". Cancer Research. 61 (24): 8930–8931. December 2001. Obituary for Thomas S. Argyris.
  3. OCLC 60408366
    .
  4. ^ "Chris Argyris: theories of action, double-loop learning and organizational learning". infed.org. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  5. ^ "Chris Argyris (1923–2013) - Article - Faculty & Research - Harvard Business School". www.hbs.edu. Retrieved 2023-08-14.
  6. ^ Miner, John B. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 567.
  7. ^ "Yale News: Citations for Recipients of Honorary Degrees at Yale University 2011". Archived from the original on 21 April 2012. Retrieved 2 March 2012.
  8. ^ "Chris Argyris Obituary – Wellesley, MA". The Boston Globe. November 20, 2013.
  9. ^ "Action Design: Robert Putnam bio". Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2009-11-19.
  10. ^ "Action Design: Diana Mclain Smith bio". Archived from the original on 2011-07-23. Retrieved 2010-11-14.

External links