Ciechocinek Formation
Ciechocinek Formation | |
---|---|
Ma Tenuicostatum-Bifrons | |
Type | Geological formation |
Unit of | |
Sub-units | |
Underlies | |
Overlies |
|
Area | |
Location | |
Country |
|
Extent | Approx. 205,000 km2 (79,000 sq mi) |
Type section | |
Named for | Ciechocinek, Poland |
Named by | Stefan Zbigniew Różycki (as an informal unit)[1][2] |
Year defined | 1958 |
The Ciechocinek Formation (also known as the Gryfice Formation at
The Ciechocinek Formation is the sister unit of the
History
The clay pits of Dobbertin have been exploited in the past, being the most famous being the Schwinzer Hellberg clay pit.[13] This clay layer appear on the northeastern slope of Hellberg, and was first found and excavated out in 1879 by the Rostock geologist Eugen Geinitz, and being recognized as such.[14][15] The sediments of the Ciechocinek Fm in Grimmen where found in 1873. The first described deposit consists on several Grey, Plastic Clay from a 300 m railway cutting near the village of Schönenwalde, at 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) at the north of Grimmen.[8][16] The mined clay of Klein Lehmhagen and Dobbertin was used as an addictive for concrete production.[17] The first fossils, mostly ammonites (that allowed a more precise datation) and insects where recovered in 1894, where Geinitz related the local finds with the southern liassic shales that he studied at the same time, yet he was surprised about the abundance of phyllopods and coeloptera elytrons in the sediments, suggesting a more freshwater/terrestrial influence.[18][19] Latter, using the ammonites as a reference, it was established in 1909 that the Grimmen Pits were different, but the regional equivalent of the, present in mostly southern Germany and pelagic, Posidonia Shale (being both liassic in age).[20] Also, some of the sediments were vinculated with finds of the Lias of Bornholm (Moslty the Hasle Formation).[21] In 1954 a first drill process was done in Ciechocinek, where the geology of the zone was related to Jurassic sedimentation, although a concrete datation beyond lias was not possible.[22] That first drilled borehole would become latter the main pit of the Formation. It wasn't until 1958, when the eminent Geologist Stefan Zbigniew Różycki proposed the name Ciechocinek Series, that was left temporally as an informal unit.[2] Różycki was the first to study in-depth the strata recovering the formation, that he called "Seria Ciechocińska" (Ciechocinek Series), and report a structure based on clay rocks, represented by mudstones, claystones, and shales with the find of clays with quite a high kaolin content. It also does the first comparation with the slightly younger Seria borucicka (Borurice Beds), and estimate that the rocks were approximately of Late Liassic in age, with the possibility of finding Dogger Sediments on the uppermost parts.[2] Also, suggests that they were analogue to the Ostrowiec series of Świętokrzyskie Mountains.[2] Studies on the region found that the Clay sediments found in Grimmen had a wider distribution on the surrounding areas, which led to the opening of a Klay Pit near Klein Lehmhagen in between 1959 and 1961.[16] After that year, the pit extension grown, allowing to study it deeper and have detailed insights into its sedimentology, as well in the Dobbertin pit, being both compared in depth.[23] It was found that this strata had depth and clear glacial deformation, with several layers displaced as effect of glacial erratics.[16] Ammonites found on the layers of Dobbertin where identified as Pliensbachian in age, yet it was proven that they were Toarcian ammonites latter.[21] Later works use the name Ciechocinek Series for the Polish Basin sediments, doing studies about sedimentology on the layers already Drilled, or founding new Boreholes with similar composition of Kaolinite and related materials.[24] Was in the 1960s, when the name "Formazaja Ciechocińska" was first suggested, at the same time the stratigraphy of the formation led to exclude Middle Jurassic Strata, being linked now in first instance to the Posidonia Shale of Germany.[25] At this time, the Kaolinitic content was related to a depositional setting based on a large deltaic succession, and compared to large modern rivers, suggesting a tropical climate for the formation.[26] In the late 1970s was recovered as the Toarcian succession of the Polish Basin, linked in age to the Posidonia Shale and to the deposits of Dobbertin and Grimmen of the same age.[27] The presence of the Posidonia Shale in the German realm was quoted until the 90's, yet this deposit is dominated by siderites & mudstone and the true Posidonia Shale is limited to southern pelagic deposits.[28] The clay pits of Grimmen and Dobbertin ended with different destiny: the first one was closed in 1995, and has filled with freshwater since 2002.[16] The Dobbertin pit however, has been under protection as a geological natural monument since 1991, as the exposed layers are considered an exceptional land–sea facies distribution during the Toarcian and also its international fame, due to its wealth of fossils from the northern margin of Fennoscandia. In the 2000s the greatest part of the work on the Formation was done, studying its geology, stratigraphy and sedimentation.[29][30] The German layers where on several recent works classified as part of the Ciechocinek Formation.[31]
Toarcian material found in glacial Erratics in
Lithology
The Ciechocinek is composed mostly by muds and silts, along with poorly consolidated
Stratigraphy
The Dobbertin & Grimmen Clay Pits are the main ones, and are exposed lower Jurassic layers where the strata has been dislocated due to recent glacial activity.[38] The basal layers of the unit are overlaying the latest Pliensbachian local exposures, that is composed mostly by coarse to fine grey and green sands and sandstones, derived from a marginal marine setting, with echinoderms and abundance of stenohaline fauna.[18] Layers transition in the uppermost part of this level from sands to clay, indicating a change of the deposition environment, thought to be on a restricted basin. The proper layers of the unit start with a hiatus, jumping to the tenuicostum subzone of the lower Toarcian, that is built also coarse- to fine-grained sand of shallow-marine origin along carbonate concretions with the ammonite Lobolytoceras siemensi indicating its reach until the semicelatum subzone.[8][23][12] Then, layers become dominated by clay, with an initial level of layers with abundant small concretions (elegantulum subzone), rarely if sizes up to 10 cm, and that has yielded the ammonite Harpoceras exaratum, corroborating its reach into the exaratum subzone.[23][16] At the upper section, the Ciechocinek Formation clay turns into layers dominated by fine sand, indicating a reduction of the sea level due to a regression. These layers were originally dated as Falciferum subzone, but later works found them to come from the traditional late Toarcian, thus Bifrons-Thouarcense subzones.[5] These layers correlate with erratic boulders found all over North German Basin, and are called Grätensandstein layers, and are in the Ciechocinek Formation composed by light gray fine sandstones deposited on wavy layers, with fragment remnants of teleosts and shell remains of mussels (probably Pseudomytiloides sp.). These sandstones developed as carbonate-cemented concretions within the loose sands.[5] These sands are the result of the erosion of the Höör layers from Skåne and host a greater amount of wood and limonite imprints than any other layer, and as well shows the presence of flow channels, and some can be interpreted as channel fillings.[5] Overall these finds are correlated with the Great Deltaic system that developed on the North German basin, with sands and sandstones being derived on the Ciechocinek Formation as a lateral deposition of the initial extensions of the delta front, increased on the Thouarcense subzone, where rather large fluvial channels can be seen at least on Grimmen, as well the correlated evolution of the sediments is seen in the Gt Schwerin borehole.[10]
The "Estheria Series" (Polish: "Seria Esteriowa") was an informal unit named in the 1950s on the Holy Cross Mountains (
The Estheria Series was first recovered in 1951 on the vicinity of
Depositional Settings
Deposits of the Ciechocinek Formation are related to a brackish-marine origin, being deposited in an epicontinental sedimentary basin on Poland, that was the eastern arm of the Mid-European
Profile
Unit | Lithology | Thickness (metres) | Fossil Palynology/Flora | Fossil Fauna |
---|---|---|---|---|
Youngest |
Gray-green Clay and Silt, horizontal and lenticular lamination, vegetable chaff, at a depth of 0.6-1.6 m plant roots - levels of fossil soils |
767,4–773,4 m depth on the General Lithological Profile |
|
Non Reported |
N1 |
Gray, laminated mud, at a depth of 0.3 m plant roots - fossil soil levels 3.5 m - very fine-grained, gray-green sandstone, brown in some places, diagonal gutter layering, numerous plant roots in the upper part. The Core of this level is poorly preserved |
773,4–779,8 m depth |
|
|
N2 |
Undulating heterolite, dolomitic in the upper part (15 cm), with clay, gray-green mudstone in some places, lenticular lamination and lenticular layering, two levels with plant roots. |
779.8–786.5 depth |
|
Non Reported |
N3 |
Very fine-grained, gray-yellow sandstone, mudstone, subordinate gray-green clay, horizontal and lenticular lamination, layering lenticular, at a depth of 0.9 m, wavy, chaff. |
786.5–792.8 depth |
|
|
N4 |
3.5 m - green-gray, wavy and streaky heterolith, lenticular in the lower part, with two inserts of sandstones with erosive bases and dome diagonal layering (tempestites), followed by a level of horizontally, occasionally lenticular lamination. |
792.8–799.5 m depth |
|
|
N5 |
4.5 m of gray-green clay, sometimes with a shade of brown (diffused siderite), laminated horizontally, occasionally lenticular lamination. Followed by 2.2 m of gray-green, lenticular and wavy heterolithic, Siderite in some places. |
799.5–806.2 m depth |
|
|
N6 |
3.8 m of gray-green, lenticular and wavy heterolithic, siderite in some places followed by three 10–20 cm sandstone inserts with a domed layering with diagonal and erosive floor (tempests). Is followed by very fine-grained gray sandstone, going downwards into mudstone/ Green Clay. |
806.2–812.6 m depth |
|
|
N7 |
Mudstone, in the middle, over a distance of 2 m, gray-green clay loaf, lenticular lamination, at a depth of 4.4 m with plant roots (fossil soil), in the lower part there is an insert of siderite clay. |
812.6–819.7 m depth |
|
|
N8 |
Gray-yellow Sandstone, horizontal layering, tabular and wrinkle diagonals, bottom 50 cm carbonate binder (dolomitic), followed by 2.0 m of gray-green mudstone, lenticular lamination, siderite concretions. |
819.7–826.1 m depth |
|
|
N9 |
Gray-green clay, laminated, muddy in some parts, reddish discoloration (siderite) at a depth of 835.0 m, a siderite insert. |
826.1–832.9 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
N10 |
Gray-green clay loaf, laminated, muddy in some places, reddish discoloration locally (siderite), followed by gray clay Silt, that on 838.0 m deep is composed by ferruginous-sandy overflows and siderite Spherulites. |
832.9–839.7 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
N11 |
Gray, sideritic, with at a depth of 843.0–846.5 m sandstone and heterolithic material. |
839.7–846.4 m depth |
|
|
Oldest (Core) |
Gray Mudstone, lenticular lamination. |
846.4–852.3 m depth |
|
|
Unit | Lithology | Thickness (metres) | Fossil Palynology/Flora | Fossil Fauna |
---|---|---|---|---|
Youngest |
Lagoon-Marsh derived claystone with varve-like laminations. Storm derived deposits on the lowermost part of the level, coeval with a temporal sea regression. Between 17 and 14 m lack of formal sediments.
|
710–715 m depth on the General Lithological Profile |
|
Non Reported |
N1 |
Barrier/Lagoon laminated claystone and Sandstone . Storm derived deposits on mostly of the level. Insertions of Silt and Lime on the lowest part.
|
715–721 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
N2 |
Hummocky cross stratified and falser bedding Sandstone with siltstone insertions. Is followed by a series of lenticular bedding and laminated mudstone. At the lower part there are developed intercalations of wavy-fleser bedding sandstones and lenticular mudstones coeval to the local maximum toarcian flooding. Lacustrine, backswamp, embayment and nearshore shoreface deposition occur in this section. |
721–725 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
N3 |
Large portion of lenticular laminated mudstones and claystones followed by a temporal intrusion of a wavy bed composed by sandstone and limestone. Next a level of lenticular laminated Mudstone, followed by a ripple-drift cross lamination section composed of sandstones, with abundant coal fragments. The lower part is composed by a great level of lenticular laminated claystone. Lacustrine, delta plain, barrier/lagoon shoreface and embayment deposition are recovered on this section. |
725–728 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
N4 |
Lenticular bedding to lenticular lamination of mudstones and claystones, deposited with siderite inserts, and kaolinite debris. Delta distributary channel and delta front sedimentation are common on this level. |
728–732 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
Oldest |
The level starts with a tiny section of disturbed bedding composed by sandstone, with silt, siderite, kaolinite, chlorite and illite. Is followed by tubular cross-bedding of sandstones and two levels, one of laminated siltstone and other of laminated mudstone. The level ends with tubular cross bedding sandstones intercalated with levels that lacks determinable structures. Channel filled bars, delta, delta plain, foreshore-lacustrine and shoreface sedimentation is found on this level. |
732–735 m depth |
|
Non Reported |
Economical Implications
Local Diagenetic processes were not sufficient to transform kaolinite, but it may have altered smectite and mixed-layers into illite and/or chlorite.[52] The levels of clay from the lower part of the Ciechocinek Formation have real economic significance because of lithologic development and lower siderite content.[52] This strata is filled with economic resources and reserves of raw materials that are good for building ceramics and some type of stoneware clays.[52] Kaolinite varieties that can be made into ceramic raw materials can only be expected locally in regions where its content was additionally increased as a result of erosion and re-sedimentation of older (Pliensbachian specially) weathered covers.[52] Due to the lower Toarcian global warming and dampening the climate enrichment with kaolinite was commonly seen in the upper part of the formation, but the periodic increase in progression had caused these deposits to left only silt and sandy heteroliths.[52]
Sediments belonging to the formation on
Paleoenvironment
Polish Coastal-Marine Basin
The Ciechocinek Formation on the Polish Basin mainly represents a large and shallow brackish embayment, with a lower part deposited in a restricted offshore environment, with lagoonal, deltaic and other seashore deposits, that translates to a deeper, nearly fully-marine environment in the
In the Polish basin, it has recently been found (based on studies of phytoclasts in terrigenous material) sharp negative anomalies (CIE) on the 13C curves, attesting to further episodes of gradually increasing warming.[56] The presence of abundant clay on the marine deposits suggest a great flux of terrestrial facies.[54] There is a significant diagenetic overprint (especially illitization of smectite), with burial depths up to 2000 m, with most of the studied sediments not been buried more than 1500–2000 m, which indicates that the Toarcian sediments weren't modified on a visible scale by thermal diagenesis.[54] The kaolinite content of the strata on the formation is important, due to its resistance to diagenetic conditions, while on the Ciechocinek Deposits is observed that there wasn't enough diagenesis to transform the kaolinite into illite, with the clay minerals are detrital and the organic matter is very immature, as palynomorphs show low thermal action.[54][57] This kaolinite was recovered mostly on the Brody-Lubenia borehole, set on the end of a large river system.[58] On the Epicontinental Polish Basin, the Total organic carbon from the Toarcian Deposits lack connection with the Climate changes observed worldwide, with the organic carbon associated with the burial of terrestrial matter.[54] The lower part of the Ciechocinek Formation show conditions of sediment burial, typical under moderate climate conditions, reflected by the reduction of carbon content due to the onset of warming, maybe related with the marine flooding due to the Early Toarcian transgression, reworking the swampy lowland deposits.[57][54] During this stage there was a clear time of enhanced erosion and runoff, showed on surrounding landmasses, that result in the delivery of sediments with diverse mineralogies to the marine basin.[57][54]
The presence of green facies in the modern Polish Realm is related to an ancient ironstone paleoenvironment, with shallow marine facies that show a decreasing presence of iron.
The high presence of kaolinite on the strata of the formation suggest a biochemical weathering in tropical or humid-subtropical climate with perennial rainfall, as modern kaolinite deposits are typically present in humid jungle settings.[60][57][54] Finds across Europe on Toarcian strata suggest that the formation of kaolinite in tropical soils and its deposition in marine sediments could be almost contemporaneous during the Early Jurassic in the Peritethyan Domain.[54][60] On the Suliszowice borehole was recorded a gradual mineralogical change, while on the Mechowo borehole there is a clear oscillation of the kaolinite content, where is also recovered Milankovitch cycles, short climate variations due to the deposition of the kaolinite on sea facies, where a change on climate conditions led to increase locally erosion and rework of pre-Jurassic kaolinitic rocks.[60] Decreasing kaolinite in the strata can suggest a hot but less humid climate.[60] In the middle part of the Ciechocinek Formation, as exposure of the abundant amount of saolinite shows that was developed as a result of intense humidity of the environments, with the increasing presence of several fossils and minerals on the strata outside the measurements of the iron precipitation.[60][54] Organic matter is of type III kerogen, with fragments of microscopic plants and several traces of organic matter. Fungal material is present, where is shown how an increase on the number of specimens can be linked to the climate change on the lower Toarcian.[61] Beyond that, by the use of clay mineral data was possible to establish how the changes on the early Toarcian affected the Polish Basin: the increasing warming temperatures were measured by changes in the Kaolinite deposition on the Polish margin of the Formation, where is exposed that the subtropical climate of the region was affected by runoffs from the Tethyan realms, with the super-greenhouse/anoxic event linked to methane expulsion.[60] There was a decline in rainfalls towards the Tenuicostatum-Falciferum boundary, exposing a transition to less humid conditions, noted by the decreasing amount of kaolinite.[60][54]
Biota and wildfires
The Lublin Coal Basin Flora is the main discovery on the formation. Found on the
The organic matter found includes the oldest known biomolecules (labdanoic acid, ferruginol, sugiol and 7-oxototarol) from the "Blanowice brown coals", which probe the presence of abundant wildfires and/or peat fires on the formation, with the Cupressaceae and/or Podocarpaceae families the main peat-forming plant species.[64] Posterior revision of the lignites of the brown coals had revealed a major distribution of benzohopane derivatives in these coals and surrounding sandstones, that implicate probable differences in the degree of biodegradation, and also a low coalification range, typical of lignites.[65] Later larger studies show a really big influence of the fires on the region.[48] After the Toarcian Anoxic Event on the called "Kaszewy-1" (where the Toarcian makes about 150 m of the strata) the wildfire activity was widely recorded.[48] The great abundance of charcoal is the main indicator of the fire activity locally, but also the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, whose abundance reflects an increase in wildfire activity.[48] Coarse charcoal particle abundance is low, while the fine charcoal particles are more abundant on nearly all the measured samples, vinculated[clarification needed] to small reductions of the sea level locally.[48] The most abundant polycyclic hydrocarbon found locally is phenanthrene, and the charcoal data shows how the fires locally increased around the Carbon Isotope Excursion on the Toarcian Anoxic Event Worldwide.[48] During this period, mostly of the strata of the region show at least six periods of fire intensification, that are coeval to others found in Yorkshire, Wales and Peniche.[48]
Marine-Deltaic German realm
The setting of the Ciechocinek Formation jumps from a marginal marine deposition on th older sediments to a delta front on its younger layers.
The large Toarcian–Bajocian deltaic systems locally meet the shoreline here, influenced by the vicinity between brackish to freshwater and continental biofacies.[10] The North German Basin shows that on approximately 14.4 m.a, four third-order relative sea-level fluctuations led the subsequent formation of four individual delta generations in the Bifrons-Thouarsense (Toarcian), Murchisonae-Bradfordensis (Aalenian) and Humpresianum-Garatiana (Bajocian).[10] The Toarcian section was dominated by regressive elongated river-dominated deltas, were due to the fall of the sea level the south to southwest directed delta progradation between the Lower-Upper Toarcian, that was deposited as 40 m of deltaic successions, found on places like Prignitz (East) and Brandenburg (North).[10] On the Bifrons zone (180.36-178.24 m.a) to the Thouarense zone (176.23-174.97 m.a) there was the final outbuilding of the local delta plains, where there was a stretching of about 200 km from the northern margins of the basin to the center.[10] The Toarcian local deltas are mostly regressive or constructive, with a characterised elongate morphology, covering with its plains approximately 15,000 km2 (5,800 sq mi) (Bifrons) to 20,000 km2 (7,700 sq mi) (Thouarsense).[10] The Upper deltaic plains lack any marine influence, with biofacies composed mostly by palynomorphs, where in the southwest the lower part of the plains shows the influence of temporal marine incursions. The lower plain of the delta covered approx. 10,000 km2 (Bifrons).[10] The deltas were connected with several networks of delatic channel belts, where on zones like Usedom (northeast) there is a clear path with bifurcations and reunification of the channel belts.[10] On the lower delta plain lithofacies plant detritus and wood debris are very common, deposited probably on interdistributary bays formed embayments, thanks to overbank flooding from near distributaries, that covered approx. 2000 km2 (Bifrons).[10] Then, on the Thouarsense, resulted in the final outbuilding of delta plains stretching about 200 km from northern basin margins to the basin centre, with lower delta plains reaching 14,000 km2 (5,400 sq mi). Detritus was introduced to these bays from neighbouring distributaries due to overbank flooding, crevassing and/or avulsion.[10]
Paleofauna
Insects are abundant on the German realm, including collections of up to 3000 specimens.
On the Polish realm the fauna is represented by
See also
- List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Germany
- List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Poland
- Toarcian turnover
- Toarcian formations
- Marne di Monte Serrone, Italy
- Calcare di Sogno, Italy
- Mizur Formation, North Caucasus
- Irlbach Sandstone, Germany
- Sachrang Formation, Austria
- Saubach Formation, Austria
- Blanowice Formation, Southern Poland
- Krempachy Marl Formation, Poland and Slovakia
- Djupadal Formation, Central Skane
- Lava Formation, Lithuania
- Azilal Group, North Africa
- Whitby Mudstone, England
- Poker Chip Shale, Alberta and British Columbia
- Whiteaves Formation, British Columbia
- Navajo Sandstone, Utah
- Los Molles Formation, Argentina
- Mawson Formation, Antarctica
- Kandreho Formation, Madagascar
- Kota Formation, India
- Cattamarra Coal Measures, Australia
References
- ^ S2CID 128922070.
- ^ a b c d Rózycki, S.Z. (1958). "Dolna jura poludniowych Kujaw". Biul. Inst. Geol. 133 (1): 1–99.
- . Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ S2CID 134043668. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f Stumpf, Sebastian; Ansorge, Jörg; Grimmberger, Gunther (2016). "Grätensandsteine und andere Geschiebe des oberen Lias (Toarcium) aus Norddeutschland [Upper Liassic sandstones with fish remains (so-called Grätensandsteine) and other Toarcian glacial erratics from northern Germany]". Geschiebekunde Aktuell. 32 (4): 121–141. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- . Retrieved 3 June 2023.
- ^ . Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ a b c d Ernst, W. (1967). "Die Liastongrube Grimmen. Sediment, Makrofauna und Stratigraphie". Ein Überblick Geologie. 16 (1): 550–569.
- ^ a b Ansorge, J. (2003). "Insects from the Lower Toarcian of Middle Europe and England". Proceedings of the Second Palaeoentomological Congress, Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia. 46 (1): 291–310. Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ S2CID 134553951. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ a b Petzka, M.; Rusbült, J.; Reich, M. (1966). "Lias". Geologie von Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. 1 (1): 151–156.
- ^ a b Tessin, R. (2010). "Lias: Mächtigkeit und Fazies". Atlas zur Geologie von Brandenburg, Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe Brandenburg. 1 (1): 72–73.
- ^ Zessin, W. (2010). "The Dobbertine Jura (Lias ε, Mecklenburg) and its importance for paleoentomology" (PDF). Virgo, Newsletter of the Entomological Association Mecklenburg. 13 (1): 4–9. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ Geinitz, F.E. (1880). "Der Jura von Dobbertin in Mecklenburg und seine Versteinerungen" (PDF). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft. 32 (2): 510–535. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 14 November 2021.
- ^ Geinitz, E. (1879). "Beitrag zur Geologie Mecklenburgs". Arch. Nat. Meckl. 33 (1): 209–305.
- ^ a b c d e Ansorge, J. (2007). "Lower Jurassic clay pit of Klein Lehmhagen near Grimmen. The Central European Basin System–from the Bottom to the Top". Geo-Pomerania, Szczechin. 23 (1): 37–41. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ Geinitz, F. E. (1904). "Die Entwicklung der mecklenburgischen Geologie: Rede zur Feier des 28". Druck der Ratsbuchdruckerei von C. Michaal. 1 (1): 12–57.
- ^ a b Geinitz, F. E. (1884). "Ueber die Fauna des Dobbertiner Lias" (PDF). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft Band. 36 (3): 566–583. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ Geinitz, F. E. (1894). "Die Käferreste des Dobbertiner Lias". Archiv des Vereins der Freunde der Naturgeschichte in Mecklenburg. 48 (1): 71–78.
- ^ Geinitz, E. (1915). "Die Namen der mecklenburgischen Solle". Mecklenburg-Zeitschrift des Heimatbundes Mecklenburg. 10 (1): 14–28.
- ^ a b Stolley, E. (1909). "Über den oberen Lias und den unteren Dogger Norddeutschlands". Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie. 28 (1): 286–334.
- ^ Samsonowicz, J. (1954). "Wyniki hydrogeologiczne dwu głebokich wierceń w Ciechocinku: Hydrogeologic results of two deep drillings in Ciechocinek (North-West Poland)". Biul. Inst..Geol. 91 (1): 121–301.
- ^ a b c d e f Ernst, W. (1992). "Der Lias der Scholle von Dobbertin (Mecklenburg)". Fundgrube. 28 (1): 56–70.
- ^ Znosko, J. (1959). "Wstępny zarys stratygrafii utworów jurajskich w południowo-zachodniej części Niżu polskiego". Geological Quarterly. 3 (3): 501–528.
- ^ Deczkowski, Z. (1962). "Stratygrafia i litologia liasu na obszarze kalisko-częstochowskim". Geological Quarterly. 6 (1): 50–71. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ Żelichowski, A. M. (1966). "sedymentologicznych materiału rdzeniowego na przykładzie utworów karbońskich z Ostrzeszowa". Kwartalnik Geologiczny. 10 (3): 742.
- ^ Dadlez, R. (1978). "Stan litostratygrafii epikontynentalnej dolnej jury w Polsce i propozycje jej usystematyzowania". Geological Quarterly. 22 (4): 12–67. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ . Retrieved 30 July 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Leonowicz, P. (2005). "The Ciechocinek Formation (Lower Jurassic) of SW Poland: petrology of green clastic rocks". Geological Quarterly. 49 (3): 317–330. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ a b c Leonowicz, P. (2007). "Origin of siderites from the Lower Jurassic Ciechocinek Formation from SW Poland". Geological Quarterly. 51 (1): 67–78. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- S2CID 135104883.
- ^ S2CID 130195351.
- ^ Lierl, H.J. (1990). "Die Ahrensburger Geschiebesippe". Fossilien. 7 (1): 256–267.
- ^ Wyrwicki, R. (1964). "Sferolity retyku i liasu świętokrzyskiego". Przegląd Geologiczny. 12 (3): 134. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ a b Schlünz, F.K. (1935). "Eine mikroskopische, röntgenographische und chemische Untersuchung des Liastons von Dobbertin". Chemie der Erde. 10 (1): 116–125.
- ^ S2CID 128811834.
- . Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ a b Obst, Karsten; Ansorge, Jörg; Buddenbohm, Andreas; Kalbe, Johannes (2015). "Exkursionsführer zur 79. Tagung Norddeutscher Geologen. Exkursion E2: Präquartäre Schollen und Lokalgeschiebe zwischen Malchow, Dobbertin und Sternberg". Tagung Norddeutscher Geologen. 79 (1): 217–267. Retrieved 8 September 2021.
- ^ a b c d e Jurkiewiczowa, I. (1967). "Lias zachodniego obrzeżenia Gór Świętokrzyskich i jego paralelizacja z liasem Wyżyny Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej" (PDF). Biul. Inst. Geol. 200 (1): 5–132. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
- ^ Dembowska, J. (1959). "Zarys stratygrafii liasu i doggeru w okolicy Szubina". Przegląd Geologiczny. 7 (6): 265. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
- ^ Stemulak, J. (1957). "Komunikat o wierceniu Płońsk 1". Geological Quarterly. 1 (2): 268–274. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ Jurkiewicz, H. (1965). "Profil wiercenia w Bożej Woli". Przegląd Geologiczny. 13 (9): 378. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ a b c Znosko, J. (1962). "W sprawie stratygrafii otworów w Lidzbarku Warmińskim i Labiawie". Przegląd Geologiczny. 10 (6): 280. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ Areń, B. (1965). "Wyniki wiercenia Warszawa IG-1". Przegląd Geologiczny. 13 (9): 369. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ a b Kozydra, Z. (1960). "Zarys wykształcenia litologicznego serii "ciechocińskiej" liasu w rejonie Przysuchej". Przegląd Geologiczny. 8 (9): 456. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ Heliasz, Z.; Ostaficzuk, S. (2020). "Historical residues of iron ore mining in environs of the Holy Cross Mountains (the Góry Świętokrzyskie) are recognizable on the Digital Terrain Elevation Model (DEM) derived from the LIDAR data". Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi. 36 (4): 161–186. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ Osika, R. (1958). "Profil górnego liasu i doggeru okolic Złotowa". Geological Quarterly. 2 (4): 765–784. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Pointer, R. (2019). "Fire & Global Change During Key Intervals of the Late Triassic & Early Jurassic with a Focus on the Central Polish Basin" (PDF). University of Exeter. Retrieved 12 October 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f Leonowicz, P. M. (2016). "Tubular tempestites from Jurassic mudstones of southern Poland". Geological Quarterly. 60 (2): 385–394. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g Leonowicz, P. (2011). "Sedimentation of Lower Toarcian (Lower Jurassic) brackish deposits from the Częstochowa-Wieluń region (SW Poland)". Acta Geologica Polonica. 61 (2): 215–241. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ Czapowski, G.; Dadlez, R.; Feldman-Olszewska, A.; Gortyńska, S.; Jaskowiak-Schoeneichowa, M.; Kasiński, J.R.; Znosko, J. (2014). "Szczegółowy profil litologiczno-stratygraficzny: Gorzów Wielkopolski IG" (PDF). Polska Bibliografia Naukowa. 144 (1): 1–378. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ a b c d e Brański, P. (2010). "Geneza osadów ilastych formacji ciechocińskiej (jura dolna, toark) w południowej Polsce a ich znaczenie gospodarcze". Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego. 439 (2): 249–258. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ a b c d e Feldman-Olszewska, Anna; Adamczak-Biały, Teresa; Becker, Anna (2012). "Charakterystyka poziomów zbiornikowych i uszczelniających formacji jury i triasu północnego Mazowsza pod kątem geologicznego składowania CO2 na podstawie danych z głębokich otworów wiertniczych". Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego. 448 (1): 27–46. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Brański, P. (2012). "The mineralogical record of the Early Toarcian stepwise climate changes and other environmental variations (Ciechocinek Formation, Polish Basin)". Volumina Jurassica. 10 (10): 1–24. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ S2CID 224911816. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
- ^ Branski, P. (2012). "Mineralogiczny Zapis Efektu Cieplarnianego W osadach dolnego Toarku W Basenie Polskim". Jurassica X Conference. Pañstwowy Instytut Geologiczny – Pañstwowy Instytut Badawczy, ul. Rakowiecka 4, 00-975 Warszawa. 1 (1): 46.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Brański, P. (2011). "Clay mineral composition in the Triassic and Jurassic deposits from the Polish Basin–a record of palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental changes". Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego. 444 (1): 15–32. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ Brański, P. (2008). "Epizody kaolinitowe w profilu Brody--Lubienia-zapis efektu cieplarnianego (?) we wczesnym toarku" (PDF). Geologia/Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie. 34 (1): 165–166. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ Pieńkowski, G.; Brański, P. (2019). "Palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental significance of the clay minerals from the Lower Jurassic (and Rhaetian) in Kaszewy 1 borehole (central part of the Mid-Polish Trough)". JURASSICA XIII. Abstract Volume. 1 (1): 122.
- ^ a b c d e f g Brański, P. (2010). "Kaolinite peaks in early Toarcian profiles from the Polish Basin–an inferred record of global warming". Geological Quarterly. 54 (1): 15–24. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- PMID 27554210.
- ^ a b Migier, T. (1978). "Nowe stanowiska flory jurajskiej w Lubelskim Zagłębiu Węglowym". Materiały III Naukowej Konferencji Paleontologów poświęconej badaniom regionu górnośląskiego oraz karbonu LZW i GZW. Streszczenia komunikatówUniwersytet Śląski, Katowice. 78: 33–34.
- ^ a b Szydeł, Z.; Szydeł, R. (1981). "Profil utworów liasu na obszarze Lubelskiego Zagłębia Węglowego". Przegląd Geologiczny. 29 (11): 568–571. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
- . Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- . Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ S2CID 131735991. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
- ^ . Retrieved 9 September 2021.
- ^ Stumpf, Sebastian (2017). A synoptic review of the vertebrate fauna from the "Green Series"(Toarcian) of northeastern Germany with descriptions of new taxa: A contribution to the knowledge of Early Jurassic vertebrate palaeobiodiversity patterns (PDF) (PhD Thesis). Greifswald University. pp. 1–47. Retrieved 9 September 2021.
- ^ Marcinkiewicz, T.; Fijałkowska-Mader, A.; Pieńkowski, G. (2014). "Megaspore zones of the epicontinental Triassic and Jurassic deposits in Poland–overview. Biuletyn Państwowego". Instytutu Geologicznego. 457 (7): 15–42.
- ^ Wade-Murphy, J.; Kuerschner, W. M (2006). "A new technique to infer the botanical affinity of palynomorphs, and its application on Spheripollenites psilatus from the Toarcian of Bornholm, Denmark" (PDF). In 7 Th European Palaeobotany Palynology Conference (1–2): 153–154. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2021. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
- ^ a b c Haubold, H. (1990). "Ein neuer Dinosaurier (Ornithischia, Thyreophora) aus dem Unteren Jura des nördlichen Mitteleuropa". Revue de Paléobiologie. 9 (1): 149–177. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- . Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- S2CID 90344418. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- PMID 29170576.
- ^ Stumpf, Sebastian (2017). "A synoptic review of the vertebrate fauna from the "Green Series"(Toarcian) of northeastern Germany with descriptions of new taxa: A contribution to the knowledge of Early Jurassic vertebrate palaeobiodiversity patterns" (PDF) (PhD Thesis). Greifswald University: 1–47. Retrieved 9 September 2021.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Kopik, J. (1998). "Lower and Middle Jurassic of the north-eastern margin of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin". Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego. 378 (1): 67–129.
- ^ Leonowicz, P. (2008). "Trace fossils from the Lower Jurassic Ciechocinek Formation, SW Poland". Volumina Jurassica. 6 (6): 89–98. Retrieved 21 December 2021.