Cold ironing
Cold ironing,
Cold ironing is a
Shutting down main engines while in port continues as a majority practice. However, auxiliary diesel generators that power cargo handling equipment and other ship's services while in port are the primary source of air emissions from ships in ports today, because the auxiliaries run on heavy fuel oil or bunkers. Cold ironing mitigates harmful emissions from diesel engines by connecting a ship's load to a more environmentally friendly, shore-based source of electrical power. An alternative is to run auxiliary diesels either on gas (LNG or LPG) or extra low sulphur distillate fuels, however if noise pollution is a problem, then cold ironing becomes the only option.
A ship can cold iron by simply connecting to another ship's power supply. Naval ships have standardized processes and equipment for this procedure. However, this does not change the power source type nor does it eliminate the source of air pollution.
The source for land-based power may be grid power from an electric utility company, but also possibly an external remote generator. These generators may be powered by diesel or renewable energy sources such as wind, water or solar.
Shore power saves consumption of fuel that would otherwise be used to power vessels while in port, and eliminates the air pollution associated with consumption of that fuel. Use of shore power facilitates maintenance of the ship's engines and generators, and reduces noise.
Background
Unlike navies, whose ships can berth for extended periods at their bases,
Further research
For every 1 kWh (3.6 MJ) of electricity, about 200 g of
Keeping these reports in mind, new regulatory norms have been mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The level of sulphur is one of the benchmarks in measuring quality of fuel and Marpol Annex VI requires use of <4.5% sulphur fuel, effective 2010. The target is to reduce world maritime sulphur output to <0.5% by 2020. Some regions (e.g., California) already require ships switch to cleaner fuel when in their local waters.
Cold ironing does away with the need to burn
Concerns and problems
- Incompatibility of electricity parameters: ships, having been built in diverse international yards, have no uniform voltage and frequency requirement.[1] Some ships use 220 volts at 50 Hz, some at 60 Hz, some others use 110 volts. Primary distribution voltage can vary from 440 volts to 11 kilovolts.
- Wide variations in load requirements, from a few hundred kW in case of car carriers to a dozen or more MW in case of passenger ships or reefer ships.
- Connectors and cables are not internationally standardised, though work has progressed in this direction.
- There are other legal implications to outsourcing primary power source[vague].[1] The legal implications stem from possible impact levels in international trade, commercial responsibilities of stakeholders and other risk as assessed.
- Some ports have glass fiber data communication systems installed. The standard for data communication via glass fiber should be as set in the IEC/IEEE 80005 par 2 standard, published in 2016.
All these problems are addressable and work has already begun in reducing ship emissions by cold ironing.[4]
Various studies[5][6] are being conducted to fully implement a viable, controllable and monitored method of powering the most important arm of modern-day logistics, the merchant ships.
The U.S. State of California is requiring a percentage of ships calling there to use shore power by 2014. The Port of Oakland is implementing a High Voltage Shore Connection (HVSC) at 6,600 volts. The first Hapag-Lloyd vessel to use the system, Dallas Express, docked there in December 2012. The electrical and mechanical equipment to interface the ship's electrical load with the shore power is in a 40-foot container at the vessel's stern. Initially 15 Hapag-Lloyd ships will receive the system.[7]
The Massachusetts Port Authority carried out a study of cold ironing and alternatives in 2016 that pointed out a number of problems, including the high peak power demand (13 MW for a cruise ship, 3 MW for a container ship) and the high cost of providing the necessary equipment and upgraded electrical power infrastructure for Boston Harbor. It also expressed concern about loss of competitiveness without a U.S. East Coast regional agreement to install such systems. The ports of Halifax and Brooklyn have installed cold ironing at one cruise-ship berth each at a cost of $10 and $20 million, respectively, mostly paid by government grants.[8]
See also
- Shorepower– for electrical supply of planes, trucks, etc.
References
- ^ a b c [1] Article: Cold-Iron the Ships by Capt. Pawanexh Kohli
- PMID 18200887.
- ^ News: San Diego approves funds for cold-ironing
- ^ Thesis on Energy Efficiency & Environment Sustainability (Maritime)
- ^ "Key Factors and Barriers to Adoption of Cold Ironing in Europe" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-09-07. Retrieved 2012-05-18.
- ^ Hapag-Lloyd connects first ship to shore power Archived 2013-01-21 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-16.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
External links
- Thesis Papoutsoglou – A Cold Ironing Study on Modern Ports, Implementation and Benefits Thriving for Worldwide Ports
- Thesis by Pamela Brieske – Cold Ironing (Externe Stromversorgung für Schiffe im Hafen, German, 2007)
- Key Factors and Barriers to Adoption of Cold Ironing in Europe
- Evaluation of cold ironing and speed reduction policies to reduce ship emissions near and at ports