Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America
Formation1982
FounderWinifred Meiselman
Type
52-1332702
PurposePro-Israel Media Advocacy
HeadquartersBoston, Massachusetts, U.S.
Region served
Global
National President
Andrea Levin
Volunteers
Over 65,000 (according to CAMERA)[1]
Websitecamera.org

The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) is an American

non-profit pro-Israel[2] media-monitoring, research and membership organization. According to its website, CAMERA is "devoted to promoting accurate and balanced coverage of Israel and the Middle East."[3] The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to The Washington Post's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias".[1]

CAMERA is known for its media monitoring and

anti-Jewish prejudice.[3] The group mobilizes protests against what it describes as unfair media coverage by issuing full-page ads in newspapers,[7] organizing demonstrations,[8] and encouraging sponsors to withhold funds.[8] CAMERA reports it has over 65,000 paying members[9][10] and that 46 news outlets have issued corrections based on their work.[11][self-published source
]

Critics of CAMERA claim that it is an ‘extreme Israel advocacy group’,[12] aligned with hawkish rightwing viewpoints; that it pays stipended fellows to write anti-Palestinian articles; and that it employs smear and intimidation tactics, routinely targeting media and journalists critical of Israel and pro-Palestinian activists on campuses.[13][12][14]

History

CAMERA has chapters in major US cities and Israel, including

Charles Jacobs
became deputy director of the Boston chapter.

In 1991, Levin succeeded Winifred Meiselman as executive director of CAMERA. According to the organization's website, CAMERA's membership grew from 1,000 in 1991 to 55,000 in 2007.[1] The director of the Washington office of CAMERA is Eric Rozenman.[15]

In 2002,

The Jewish Daily Forward named CAMERA executive director and regular Jerusalem Post contributor Andrea Levin America's fifth most influential Jewish citizen, saying "Media-monitoring was the great proxy war of the last year, and its general is Andrea Levin."[16][17]

In 2008 CAMERA launched a campaign to alter Wikipedia articles to support the Israeli side of the

conspiracy were banned by Wikipedia administrators.[19]

Structure, staff, and activities

On its official website, CAMERA describes itself as "a media-monitoring, research and membership organization devoted to promoting accurate and balanced coverage of Israel and the Middle East" which "fosters rigorous reporting, while educating news consumers about Middle East issues and the role of the media." CAMERA further describes itself as a "non-partisan organization" which "takes no position with regard to American or Israeli political issues or with regard to ultimate solutions to the Arab–Israeli conflict."[20] CAMERA complained in 2008 that the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (of which it is a member) did not consult it before disinviting Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin to an anti-Ahmadinejad rally.[21][22] CAMERA has also criticized the Israeli non-governmental organization B'Tselem for some of its reporting on Israel.[23]

When CAMERA perceives an inaccurate statement in the media, it says it gathers information, and sends findings asking for a printed or broadcast correction. CAMERA lists 46 news outlets which it says have issued corrections based on their work.[11] The organization also publishes monographs about topics relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict.[24] A 2005 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs interview with the director of CAMERA Andrea Levin says CAMERA has 55,000 paying members and thousands of active letter writers.[10]

CAMERA is a member of the Israel Campus Roundtable, which includes the

The David Project Center for Jewish Leadership
, and other pro-Israel organizations. As a member of this Campus Roundtable, CAMERA operates on college campuses to combat what it perceives as "propagandistic assaults on Israel ... creating harmful misperceptions of Israel" and is active on about 50 college campuses.

CAMERA runs a student-focused site containing specialized information available for countering misinformation. CAMERA also provides one-on-one assistance to students who encounter Middle East distortions in campus publications, flyers, rallies and classroom teaching. CAMERA has offered student representative positions which include compensation and training in Israel.[25]

CAMERA-UK (formerly UK Media Watch and BBC Watch) is the UK division of CAMERA.[26]

Criticism by CAMERA

See also:
National Public Radio § Criticism, Encarta, Munich (2005 film) § Controversies, and The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy § Criticism

Among the organizations and works that have been criticized by CAMERA are:

National Public Radio

CAMERA's report, "A Record of Bias: National Public Radio's Coverage of the Arab–Israeli Conflict: September 26 – November 26, 2000" (2001) asserted that

National Public Radio's "coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict has long been marred by a striking anti-Israel tilt, with severe bias, error and lack of balance commonplace."[27] CAMERA supported a boycott of NPR, and demanded the firing of NPR's foreign editor, Loren Jenkins. CAMERA said that Jenkins had a long record of partisanship in favor of Palestinian views, and let his personal views tilt NPR's coverage. CAMERA also said Jenkins compared Israel to Nazi Germany in his writings, and referred to it as a "colonizer".[28][29]

NPR's then-Ombudsman, Jeffrey Dvorkin, said in a 2002 interview that CAMERA used selective citations and subjective definitions of what it considers pro-Palestinian bias in formulating its findings, and that he felt CAMERA's campaign was "a kind of McCarthyism, frankly, that bashes us and causes people to question our commitment to doing this story fairly. And it exacerbates the legitimate anxieties of many in the Jewish community about the survival of Israel."[30]

Mearsheimer and Walt

CAMERA published Alex Safian's detailed critique of The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, a paper written by Harvard University professor Stephen Walt and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer. Safian argued that the paper is "riddled with errors of fact, logic and omission, has inaccurate citations, displays extremely poor judgement regarding sources, and, contrary to basic scholarly standards, ignores previous serious work on the subject. The bottom line: virtually every word and argument is, or ought to be, in 'serious dispute.' In other words, a student who submitted such a paper would flunk."[31]

"Israel's Jewish Defamers"

In October 2007, CAMERA organized a conference entitled "Israel's Jewish Defamers," in which a panel of discussants accused Jewish critics of Israel, as well as one of Israel's leading newspapers,

New York Review of Books contributor Henry Siegman, former New York Times columnist Anthony Lewis, Trent University professor Michael Neumann, and Tikkun magazine publisher Michael Lerner—of being guilty of "demonstrably false and baseless defaming of Israel, wildly distorted out of context accusations against Israel." Among the panelists were writer Cynthia Ozick and Harvard psychiatrist Kenneth Levin
, who likened the Jewish critics to chronically abused children.

In response, Anthony Lewis told the New York Sun that the conference was "about a nonexistent phenomenon," noting that Jewish criticism of Israeli policies was not necessarily defamatory. Haaretz's editor-in-chief, David Landau, refused to comment on the conference, citing that "it was "a matter of policy and principle" not to respond to CAMERA, which Landau described as "McCarthyite." Tikkun editor Lerner also rejected the notion that he was anti-Israel.[32][33][34]

2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict

In response to coverage of the 2008–2009

Gaza War, CAMERA criticized the reporting of the Los Angeles Times,[35] CNN,[36] Haaretz,[37] NPR,[38] the U.N. Relief and Works Agency,[38] and Norwegian doctors being funded by the Norwegian ministry who appeared on media outlets such as the BBC and CBS.[39] CAMERA said that in its view reporting from the Los Angeles Times "consistently omitted key information about Gaza Strip sites targeted by the Israeli army" and "gives the false impression that Israel doesn't aim to prevent civilian deaths."[35] CAMERA criticized Haaretz for "confusion and misinformation on the medical issue" in its "outlining what medical supplies Gaza is reportedly lacking and ignoring all incoming medical aid".[37]

Quotation misattributed to Moshe Ya'alon

In early 2009, CAMERA began investigating the dissemination of

a quotation widely misattributed to Moshe Ya'alon, "The Palestinians must be made to understand in the deepest recesses of their consciousness that they are a defeated people", after the quotation was cited by Rashid Khalidi, a Columbia University professor, in an op-ed article in The New York Times.[40] The quotation, and variants, had previously been repeated throughout the world by news broadcasts, blogs, and in reputable publications such as the Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, Toronto Star, Time, and the London Review of Books. The belief that Ya'alon, a high-ranking Israeli military official, had expressed disregard for Palestinian people in this manner reinforced an opinion among some readers and commentators that Israel was the aggressor and Palestinians its victims.[40] However, Ya'alon did not make the statement in the 2002 Haaretz interview generally cited as its source, and appears never to have made the statement at all. In part due to CAMERA's campaign, a number of international newspapers, including the New York Times, issued corrections.[40]

The New York Times' coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

In a 2012 monograph of its study of The New York Times, CAMERA asserted that the newspaper shows a clear preference for the Palestinian narrative. It further says that The New York Times treats Israel with a harsher standard and omits context.[41] The study called "Indicting Israel: New York Times Coverage of the Palestinian–Israeli Conflict – A July 1 – December 31, 2011 Study" is part of the Monograph Series. In the executive summary senior CAMERA research analysts Ricki Hollander and Gilead Ini, say that the dominant finding of the study was a disproportionate, continuous, embedded indictment of Israel that dominated both news and commentary sections. It further states that "Israeli views are downplayed while Palestinian perspectives, especially criticism of Israel, are amplified and even promoted."[42] According to Rick Richman, writing in Commentary magazine, the CAMERA study examines all news and editorial sections in the print version of the newspaper directly relating to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict (July 1 – December 31, 2011).[43]

Reception to CAMERA

CAMERA has attracted both critics and supporters. Gershom Gorenberg, a journalist for The American Prospect, has written that CAMERA is "Orwellian-named"[44] and that "like others engaged in the narrative wars, it does not understand the difference between advocacy and accuracy".[45] Other critics have described CAMERA as a special interest group[46] fighting for a pro-Israeli bias.[47][48] Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, US Senator Joe Lieberman, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, and former Israeli cabinet minister Natan Sharansky have assisted CAMERA in its fundraising efforts, by speaking at its national conference.[49][50] US Representative Tom Lantos was previously on CAMERA's advisory board.[51]

In a 2003 profile of the organization in The Boston Globe, Mark Jurkowitz observed that "its detractors see CAMERA as a

myopic and vindictive special interest group trying to muscle its views into media coverage. ... To many in the media CAMERA is ... an advocacy group trying to impose its pro-Israeli views on mainstream journalism."[46] Mitchell Kaidy, writing in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, criticized CAMERA's efforts to pressure university libraries to remove books that the organization finds offensive.[48]

Journalists

  • Writing in The Nation in 1987, journalist and author Robert I. Friedman described CAMERA as having been formed in the wake of Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon "to keep the U.S. press in line," observing that the organization's activities at the time included publishing a newsletter and placing advertisements in The Christian Science Monitor and The New Republic in support of Israel's West Bank settlement policies.[47] According to Friedman, "CAMERA, the A.D.L., AIPAC and the rest of the lobby don't want fairness, but bias in their favor. And they are prepared to use McCarthyite tactics, as well as the power and money of pro-Israel PACs, to get whatever Israel wants."[47]
  • In his 2006 book Public Editor #1, former New York Times public editor Daniel Okrent expressed gratitude to CAMERA as a notable example of organizations that "maintained an evenness of tone and an openness of communication no matter how much they disagreed" with his columns.[52]
  • Writing about criticisms from CAMERA he and his colleagues have received, Jerusalem-based journalist Gershom Gorenberg wrote "It is not the press's job to provide
    PR for any government. Until CAMERA gets this straight, self-respecting journalists will regard an occasional snarl from the watchdog as proof that they're doing their job."[53]
  • National Public Radio, in which he says CAMERA had attempted to influence NPR's supporters to withhold funds.[8]
  • Jonathan Cook lists CAMERA among "Zionist watchdogs" that "created what the late Edward Said called 'the last taboo in American public life', moving rapidly to shut down any signs of critical debate about Israeli policies or US support for such policies either in the American media or in Washington's corridors of power".[54]

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution described the place CAMERA took in a debate among various Jewish groups about statements made by former U.S. President Jimmy Carter. Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said it was not right to outright dismiss his apology. CAMERA said true repentance required Carter to reverse any of the perceived harm he caused, and called on the president to take "concrete actions to redress troubling false statements" the group said he made about the war Israel waged in Gaza. Ira Forman, chief executive of the Washington-based National Jewish Democratic Council, said it was "mensch-like" to accept and encourage Carter's remarks.[55]

Academia

In 1986,

Cheryl A. Rubenberg noted CAMERA was "Another pro-Israeli organization that was formed after 1982 to monitor the media..."[56] She further stated that CAMERA was one of several 'new groups' which constituted the "Israeli lobby" at the time.[57]

In 1988,

Israeli government has ventured arguments as extreme as CAMERA, and that "surely, the Israeli lobby can find better propaganda methods than this!"[58]

CAMERA campaign at Wikipedia

In an April 2008 article, online publication

Google group set up by CAMERA. The stated purpose of the group was "help[ing] us keep Israel-related entries on Wikipedia from becoming tainted by anti-Israel editors".[59] The Electronic Intifada accused CAMERA of "orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged".[60] Andre Oboler, a Legacy Heritage Fellow at the Israeli non-governmental organization NGO Monitor, responded that "Electronic Intifada is manufacturing a story."[61]

Excerpts of some of the e-mails were published in the July 2008 issue of Harper's Magazine under the title of "Candid camera."[62] In April 2008, CAMERA's "Senior Research Analyst" Gilead Ini would not confirm that the messages were genuine but maintained that there was a CAMERA email campaign which adhered to Wikipedia's rules.[63] In August 2008, Ini argued the excerpts published in Harper's Magazine were unrepresentative and that CAMERA had campaigned "toward encouraging people to learn about and edit the online encyclopedia for accuracy".[64]

A group of Wikipedia administrators strongly believed an editor on Wikipedia to be Gilead Ini and blocked that user account indefinitely.[61] In April 2008, Gilead refused to say whether he was behind the Gni account,[63] and in mid-May 2008 he denied that the account belonged to him, by which time he had deleted the Google group.[61] Andre Oboler alleged that groups such as "Wikipedians for Palestine", established in January 2006 and by then also no longer online, had engaged in similar practices.[61] Electronic Intifada co-founder Ali Abunimah insisted that his group would never encourage a similar e-mail campaign.[65]

Commenting on the incident, Gershom Gorenberg, of the liberal magazine The American Prospect, stated "CAMERA is ready to exempt itself from the demands for accuracy that it aims at the media. And like others engaged in the narrative wars, it does not understand the difference between advocacy and accuracy." Gorenberg criticized CAMERA for telling members not to share information about the campaign with media, and he also argued Ini's definition of accuracy "only means not printing anything embarrassing to his own side".[45] David Shamah, of The Jerusalem Post, stated that "the vast anti-Israel lobby that haters of our country have managed to pull together" hate it when groups like CAMERA mess up "their anti-Israel propaganda with (gasp!) facts".[66]

Five editors involved in the campaign were sanctioned by Wikipedia administrators, who wrote that Wikipedia's open nature "is fundamentally incompatible with the creation of a private group to surreptitiously coordinate editing".[60][67][59]

See also

Wikinews has related news:

References

  1. ^ a b c "Welcome to CAMERA". Camera.org. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  2. ^
    • Zara Myers. The Name of the Game? Advocacy for Israel. Jewish Exponent. Philadelphia: November 25, 2004.

      To encourage effective advocacy on behalf of Israel, the Center for Israel and Overseas of the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia will host a daylong program -- its inaugural advocacy event -- on Sunday, Dec. 5, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., at Hillel at the University of Pennsylvania, Steinhardt Hall, 215 S. 39th St. in Philadelphia. In the morning will be a panel featuring representatives from the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America and the

      American Israel Public Affairs Committee
      , all of which will discuss "Methodologies on How to Advocate for Israel...Dr. John Cohn, a local physician named Camera's "No. 1 Letter-Writer" in 2004, will serve as moderator of the panel.

    • CAMERA Articles For Students. Apply Now to Be A CAMERA Student Representative—Earn a Free Trip to Israel and $1000! Archived May 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine Posted on CAMERA website, September 25, 2007.

      CAMERA is looking for fifteen passionately committed undergraduate students with excellent communication skills who can organize pro-Israel events on campus. Students earn $1000 and a free exclusive trip to Israel in June by becoming a CAMERA Fellows Representative.

    • Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. CAMERA: Fighting Distorted Media Coverage of Israel and the Middle East: An Interview with Andrea Levin. Posted on JCPA website, June 1, 2005.

      Their work undoubtedly has impact, but the non-Israel-related groups do not have the same activist focus. They produce studies and polls. It is for this reason that I think pro-Israeli media watching has an importance beyond the cause of Israel. Efforts that induce better adherence to ethical journalism in one subject area are positive generally in helping to strengthen American democracy, especially, again, as there are no enforceable codes of professional conduct in the media. – CAMERA Executive Director Andrea Levin.

    • The New York Times. Mideast Turmoil: The News Outlets – Some U.S. Backers of Israel Boycott Dailies Over Mideast Coverage That They Deplore. Posted on NYTimes website, May 23, 2002.

      While the the [sic] pro-Israeli Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, or Camera, studies newspapers for evidence of bias, Palestine Media Watch has been monitoring the coverage of newspapers like The Philadelphia Inquirer, The New York Times and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

  3. ^ a b "About". Camera.org. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  4. ^ Manfred Gerstenfeld and Ben Green. Watching the Pro-Israeli Media Watchers. Jewish Political Studies Review. 16:3-4 (Fall 2004).
  5. ^ Lando, Michal (November 4, 2007). "Israel critique on campus". Jerusalem: Jerusalem Post.[permanent dead link]
  6. ^ Rob Eshman (January 25, 2008). "Butt out". Los Angeles: Jewish Journal. Archived from the original on April 30, 2008. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
  7. ^ U.S. newspapers catching flak for Mideast war coverage: Media caught in the cross fire as both sides complain of bias

    He said the network has been targeted by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, which ran a full-page New York Times ad calling NPR's coverage "false" and "skewed" against Israel. The advertisement also urged NPR's financial backers to stop supporting the network.
  8. ^ a b c Mayes, Ian (October 30, 2006). "Open door: The readers' editor on ... a ruling in favour of freedom of expression". The Guardian. Retrieved October 23, 2015. In general, the methods employed by Camera seem to me to go beyond a reasonable call for accountability. It has, for instance, been involved in a long-running battle with NPR, National Public Radio, in Washington, over its Middle East coverage, organising demonstrations outside NPR stations across the US and seeking to persuade NPR's supporters to withhold funds.
  9. ^ "Welcome to CAMERA". Camera.org. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  10. ^ a b "CAMERA: Fighting Distorted Media Coverage of Israel and the Middle East - An Interview with Andrea Levin". Jcpa.org. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  11. ^ a b [Corrections. http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=10 Archived November 25, 2009, at the Wayback Machine]
  12. ^ a b Ian Lustick, 'The Trump Administration is Using Accusations of Anti-Semitism to Silence Critics,' The Forward 29 November 2019.
  13. ^ Yves Engler, 'US student, Israel lobby groups behind McGill lawsuit,'Mondoweiss 9 August 2022.
  14. ^ Uri Blau, 'Times of Israel Cofounder Gave $1.5 Million to Right-wing Media Watchdog That Routinely Goes After News Outlets,' Haaretz 5 September 2016
  15. ^ "JIRS: CAMERA-Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America". Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved August 11, 2006.
  16. ^ "Looking for a Guardian article?". San Francisco Bay Guardian. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  17. ^ "PJA: Progressive Jewish Alliance". Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
  18. ^ "The Mideast Editing Wars". The American Prospect. May 1, 2008.
  19. ^ Shabi, Rachel; Kiss, Jemima (August 18, 2010). "Wikipedia editing courses launched by Zionist groups". The Guardian.
  20. ^ See "About CAMERA" and "Our Mission" as featured on the official website.
  21. ^ Contact Editor Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu (September 25, 2008). "Anti-Palin Jews Shunned Anti-Iran Rally". Israel National News. Retrieved April 6, 2017. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  22. ^ Perelman, Marc (September 24, 2008). "Sparks Fly Over Decision To Exclude Palin – The Forward". Forward.com. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  23. ^ Gedalyahu, Tzvi Ben (September 25, 2008). "B'Tselem Tries to Steer United States to the Left". Israel National News. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  24. ^ "Monograph". Camera.org. Archived from the original on February 19, 2017. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  25. ^ "Fellowship". Cameraoncampus.org. Archived from the original on April 7, 2017. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  26. ^ "About Us", camera-uk.org.
  27. ^ "A Record of Bias: National Public Radio's Coverage of the Arab-Israeli Conflict". Camera.org. Archived from the original on March 31, 2017. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  28. ^ "Why War?". Why-war.com. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  29. ^ Andrea Levin. Just Say No to NPR. The Jerusalem Post, September 27, 2002.
  30. ^ Camille T. Taiara. All bias considered: Bizarre attack on NPR as "anti-Israel" shows how fringe groups are pushing Mideast debate. San Francisco Bay Guardian. May 28, 2003. See also Jeffrey A. Dvorkin, "NPR's Middle East 'Problem,'" Archived June 21, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, NPR: Archive of Ombudsman Columns February 22, 2002, accessed July 21, 2006. [In June 2006 Dvorkin left the position of NPR Ombudsman to become the executive director of the Committee of Concerned Journalists (CCJ), an organization founded by Bill Kovach as part of the Project for Excellence in Journalism (CEJ), effective July 1, 2006; see Dvorkin's last column as NPR Ombudsman, "Dear Listeners: Thanks and Farewell,"
  31. ^ Alex Safian, "Study Decrying 'Israel Lobby' Marred by Numerous Errors" ("Updated April 6: Rebutting charges of expulsion and massacre"), CAMERA March 20, 2006, accessed March 24, 2006. Cf. "Reply to the Mearsheimer-Walt 'Working Paper'" by Alan Dershowitz of the Harvard Law School, in his essay "Debunking the Newest–and Oldest–Jewish Conspiracy," April 5, 2006, online posting, FrontPage Magazine, n.d., accessed July 29, 2006 (pdf file); in posting an excerpt from Dershowitz's "reply" in "Dershowitz Responds to Walt and Mearsheimer Paper", CAMERA observes that Dershowitz cites "CAMERA's detailed refutation of Walt and Mearsheimer's claims" (hyperlinking to Safian). See also Glenn Frankel, "A Beautiful Friendship? In Search of the Truth about the Israel Lobby's Influence on Washington," The Washington Post, July 16, 2006: W13.
  32. ^ Elliot Resnick. Conference Focuses On Israel's Jewish Defamers. Archived July 4, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Jewish Press, October 24, 2007.
  33. ^ Gabrielle Birkner. Conference Focuses On Israel's Jewish Defamers. Archived December 23, 2007, at the Wayback Machine The New York Sun. October 19, 2007.
  34. ^ Ben Harris. Media watchdog blasts 'Israel's Jewish defamers'; Michael Lerner, Ha'aretz editor reject charges. The Jewish Review, Vol. 50, No. 8, October 2007.
  35. ^ a b Sternthal, Tamar. "At LA Times, Obscured Targets". CAMERA. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  36. ^ Safian, Alex. "Who Broke the Ceasefire? CNN's "Fact Check" Falls Short". CAMERA. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  37. ^ a b Sternthal, Tamar (December 30, 2008). "Pulse on Gaza's Medical Situation". CAMERA. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  38. ^ a b Sternthal, Tamar. "Palestinian Spokesmen Rely on Time-Tested Tactic". CAMERA. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  39. ^ Hollander, Ricki (September 30, 2001). "Norwegian Doctors in Gaza: Objective Observers or Partisan Propagandists?". CAMERA. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  40. ^ a b c Oakland Ross (August 8, 2009). "Damaging Israeli misquote finally corrected: Record set straight seven years after Israel's top soldier was accused of trashing Palestinians". Toronto Star.
  41. ^ "CAMERA Monograph: Indicting Israel: New York Times Coverage of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict". Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America 2012. Retrieved December 19, 2012.
  42. ^ "Indicting Israel New York Times Coverage of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict A July 1 – December 31, 2011 Study" (PDF). Monograph Series. Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America 2012. Retrieved December 19, 2012.
  43. ^ "The New York Times, Leon Wieseltier, and Cartographic Literacy". Commentary Magazine. December 11, 2012. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  44. ^ "J Street on the Map". The American Prospect. April 15, 2008. Archived from the original on August 10, 2011. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  45. ^ a b Gorenberg, Gershom. The Mideast Editing Wars. Archived August 10, 2011, at the Wayback Machine The American Prospect, May 1, 2008.
  46. ^ a b Mark Jurkowitz (February 9, 2003). "Blaming the Messenger: When the Pro-Israeli Group CAMERA Sees News from the Middle East That It Deems Unfair Or Wrong, It Targets the Media-And Doesn't Let Go". Boston Globe Magazine. Archived from the original on February 13, 2009 – via History News Network (George Mason University.
  47. ^ a b c Robert I. Friedman. "The lobby: Jewish political power and American foreign policy", The Nation 244 (June 6, 1987).
  48. ^ a b Mitchell Kaidy, "CAMERA and Facts and Logic About the Middle East FLAME: Pressuring U.S. Media", Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, July/August 1993: 29, WRMEA Archive of Back Issues April 10, 2006; cf. CAMERA on Washington Report on Middle East Affairs Archived October 1, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, accessed August 13, 2006.
  49. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved May 22, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  50. ^ "Alan M. Dershowitz: Obama's Legacy and the Iranian Bomb - WSJ". Archived from the original on May 16, 2017. Retrieved August 3, 2017.
  51. ^ "National Media Resource Center Letter" (PDF). Camera.org. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  52. ^ Daniel Okrent, Public Editor #1, pp. 20–21.
  53. ^ Gershom Gorenberg. "Uncandid CAMERA" Archived April 30, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Moment Magazine. Washington: Oct/Nov 2007. Vol. 32, Iss. 5; p. 14.
  54. ISBN 978-1848130319
    .
  55. ^ "Jewish advocacy group questions Carter's apology | ajc.com". Archived from the original on December 31, 2009. Retrieved January 6, 2010.
  56. ISBN 0-252-06074-1
    , p. 339.

    Another pro-Israeli organization that was formed after 1982 to monitor the media is the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting (CAMERA).

  57. ^ Rubenberg, pp. 353–54,

    The term "Israeli lobby" loosely refers to the approximately thirty-eight major Jewish groups that concern themselves with Israel and with influencing US Middle East policy to serve the interests of the Jewish state. (Since the 1982 war in Lebanon, there has been a proliferation of new groups, in addition to the thirty-eight, such as ASFI, CAMERA, and others.)

  58. ^ "How Great Were the Injustices of Arabs to Jews - 'Pacification' of Gaza - NYTimes.com". The New York Times. Gaza Strip; Israel, State Of. February 5, 1988. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  59. ^ a b Benjakob, Omer (October 4, 2020). "The Second Intifada Still Rages on Wikipedia". Haaretz. Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
  60. ^ a b McElroy, Damien (May 7, 2008). "Israeli battles rage on Wikipedia". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on May 9, 2008. Retrieved April 5, 2021.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  61. ^
    Jewish Week. Archived from the original
    on August 3, 2016. Retrieved October 27, 2021.
  62. ^ "Candid camera". Harper's Magazine. July 2008.
  63. ^ a b Metz, Cade (April 29, 2008). "US Department of Justice banned from Wikipedia". The Register. Retrieved May 9, 2008.
  64. ^ "Letter in Harper's Magazine About Wikipedia Issues". Camera.org. August 14, 2008. Retrieved April 6, 2017.
  65. ^ Beam, Alex (May 6, 2008). "War of the virtual Wiki-worlds". The New York Times. The International Herald Tribune. Archived from the original on August 23, 2021. Retrieved May 4, 2008. In what was probably not a very smart idea, Gilead Ini, a senior research analyst for Camera, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, put out an e-mail call for 10 volunteers "to help us keep Israel-related entries on Wikipedia from becoming tainted by anti-Israel editors." (Basically, anyone with a Web browser can edit articles on Wikipedia, which wreaks havoc with the site's treatment of controversial topics like ... the Middle East.) More than 50 sympathizers answered the call, and Ini put his campaign into motion.
    In follow-up e-mails to his recruits, Ini emphasized the secrecy of the campaign: "There is no need to advertise the fact that we have these group discussions," he wrote. "Anti-Israel editors will seize on anything to try to discredit people who attempt to challenge their problematic assertions, and will be all too happy to pretend, and announce, that a 'Zionist' cabal . . . is trying to hijack Wikipedia."
    That is certainly what the campaign looked like to the Electronic Intifada, a parallel-universe, pro-Palestinian news organization operating out of Chicago. Someone leaked four weeks' worth of communications from within Ini's organization, and the quotes weren't pretty. Describing the Wiki-campaign, a member of Ini's corps writes: "We will go to war after we have built an army, equiped [sic] it, trained." There is also some back-and-forth about the need to become Wikipedia administrators, to better influence the encyclopedia's articles.
  66. ^ Shamah, David. "Digital World: Internet Independence Day", The Jerusalem Post, May 6, 2008.
  67. ^ Monica G. Prieto (April 23, 2008). "¿Se puede reescribir la historia?" [Is it possible to re-write history?]. El Mundo (in Spanish). Retrieved April 29, 2008.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America&oldid=1217141284"