CT scan
CT scan | |
---|---|
Other names | X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT), computerized axial tomography scan (CAT scan),[1] computer aided tomography, computed tomography scan |
ICD-10-PCS | B?2 |
ICD-9-CM | 88.38 |
MeSH | D014057 |
OPS-301 code | 3–20...3–26 |
MedlinePlus | 003330 |
A computed tomography scan (CT scan; formerly called computed axial tomography scan or CAT scan) is a medical imaging technique used to obtain detailed internal images of the body.[2] The personnel that perform CT scans are called radiographers or radiology technologists.[3][4]
CT scanners use a rotating X-ray tube and a row of detectors placed in a gantry to measure X-ray attenuations by different tissues inside the body. The multiple X-ray measurements taken from different angles are then processed on a computer using tomographic reconstruction algorithms to produce tomographic (cross-sectional) images (virtual "slices") of a body. CT scan can be used in patients with metallic implants or pacemakers, for whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is contraindicated.
Since its development in the 1970s, CT scanning has proven to be a versatile imaging technique. While CT is most prominently used in medical diagnosis, it can also be used to form images of non-living objects. The 1979 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded jointly to South African-American physicist Allan MacLeod Cormack and British electrical engineer Godfrey Hounsfield "for the development of computer-assisted tomography".[5][6]
Types
On the basis of image acquisition and procedures various type of scanners are available in the market.
Sequential CT
Sequential CT also known as step-and-shoot CT is a type of scanning method in which the CT table moves stepwise. The table increments to a particular location and then stops which is followed by the X-ray tube rotation and acquisition of a slice. The table then increments again, and another slice is taken. The table has to make a stop in taking slices. This results in an increased time of scanning.[7]
Spiral CT
Spinning tube, commonly called
Electron beam tomography
Dual Energy CT
Dual Energy CT, also known as Spectral CT, is an advancement of Computed Tomography in which two energies are used to create two sets of data.[13] A Dual Energy CT may employ Dual source, Single source with dual detector layer, Single source with energy switching methods to get two different sets of data.[14]
- Dual source CT is an advanced scanner with a two X-ray tube detector system, unlike conventional single tube systems.[15][16] These two detector systems are mounted on a single gantry at 90° in the same plane.[17] Dual Source CT scanners allow fast scanning with higher temporal resolution by acquiring a full CT slice in only half a rotation. Fast imaging reduces motion blurring at high heart rates and potentially allowing for shorter breath-hold time. This is particularly useful for ill patients having difficulty holding their breath or unable to take heart-rate lowering medication.[17][18]
- Single Source with Energy switching is another mode of Dual energy CT in which a single tube is operated at two different energies by switching the energies frequently.[19][20]
CT perfusion imaging
CT perfusion imaging is a specific form of CT to assess flow through blood vessels whilst injecting a contrast agent.[21] Blood flow, blood transit time, and organ blood volume, can all be calculated with reasonable sensitivity and specificity.[21] This type of CT may be used on the heart, although sensitivity and specificity for detecting abnormalities are still lower than for other forms of CT.[22] This may also be used on the brain, where CT perfusion imaging can often detect poor brain perfusion well before it is detected using a conventional spiral CT scan.[21][23] This is better for stroke diagnosis than other CT types.[23]
PET CT
Positron emission tomography–computed tomography is a hybrid CT modality which combines, in a single gantry, a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner and an X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanner, to acquire sequential images from both devices in the same session, which are combined into a single superposed (co-registered) image. Thus, functional imaging obtained by PET, which depicts the spatial distribution of metabolic or biochemical activity in the body can be more precisely aligned or correlated with anatomic imaging obtained by CT scanning.[24]
PET-CT gives both anatomical and functional details of an organ under examination and is helpful in detecting different type of cancers.[25][26]
Medical use
Since its introduction in the 1970s,
The use of CT scans has increased dramatically over the last two decades in many countries.[29] An estimated 72 million scans were performed in the United States in 2007 and more than 80 million in 2015.[30][31]
Head
CT scanning of the head is typically used to detect
Neck
Contrast CT is generally the initial study of choice for neck masses in adults.[39] CT of the thyroid plays an important role in the evaluation of thyroid cancer.[40] CT scan often incidentally finds thyroid abnormalities, and so is often the preferred investigation modality for thyroid abnormalities.[40]
Lungs
A CT scan can be used for detecting both acute and chronic changes in the
Bronchial wall thickening can be seen on lung CTs and generally (but not always) implies inflammation of the bronchi.[44]
An
Angiography
Cardiac
A CT scan of the heart is performed to gain knowledge about cardiac or coronary anatomy.[51] Traditionally, cardiac CT scans are used to detect, diagnose, or follow up coronary artery disease.[52] More recently CT has played a key role in the fast-evolving field of transcatheter structural heart interventions, more specifically in the transcatheter repair and replacement of heart valves.[53][54][55]
The main forms of cardiac CT scanning are:
- Coronary CT calcium scan: also used for the assessment of severity of coronary artery disease. Specifically, it looks for calcium deposits in the coronary arteries that can narrow arteries and increase the risk of a heart attack.[58] A typical coronary CT calcium scan is done without the use of radiocontrast, but it can possibly be done from contrast-enhanced images as well.[59]
To better visualize the anatomy, post-processing of the images is common.[52] Most common are multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) and volume rendering. For more complex anatomies and procedures, such as heart valve interventions, a true 3D reconstruction or a 3D print is created based on these CT images to gain a deeper understanding.[60][61][62][63]
Abdomen and pelvis
CT is an accurate technique for diagnosis of
Non-enhanced computed tomography is today the gold standard for diagnosing urinary stones.[67] The size, volume and density of stones can be estimated to help clinicians guide further treatment; size is especially important in predicting spontaneous passage of a stone.[68]
Axial skeleton and extremities
For the
Biomechanical use
CT is used in
Other uses
Industrial use
Aviation security
CT scanning has also found an application in transport security (predominantly airport security) where it is currently used in a materials analysis context for explosives detection CTX (explosive-detection device)[76][77][78][79] and is also under consideration for automated baggage/parcel security scanning using computer vision based object recognition algorithms that target the detection of specific threat items based on 3D appearance (e.g. guns, knives, liquid containers).[80][81][82] Its usage in airport security pioneered at Shannon Airport in March 2022 has ended the ban on liquids over 100 ml there, a move that Heathrow Airport plans for a full roll-out on 1 December 2022 and the TSA spent $781.2 million on an order for over 1,000 scanners, ready to go live in the summer.
Geological use
X-ray CT is used in geological studies to quickly reveal materials inside a drill core.[83] Dense minerals such as pyrite and barite appear brighter and less dense components such as clay appear dull in CT images.[84]
Cultural heritage use
X-ray CT and micro-CT can also be used for the conservation and preservation of objects of cultural heritage. For many fragile objects, direct research and observation can be damaging and can degrade the object over time. Using CT scans, conservators and researchers are able to determine the material composition of the objects they are exploring, such as the position of ink along the layers of a scroll, without any additional harm. These scans have been optimal for research focused on the workings of the Antikythera mechanism or the text hidden inside the charred outer layers of the En-Gedi Scroll. However, they are not optimal for every object subject to these kinds of research questions, as there are certain artifacts like the Herculaneum papyri in which the material composition has very little variation along the inside of the object. After scanning these objects, computational methods can be employed to examine the insides of these objects, as was the case with the virtual unwrapping of the En-Gedi scroll and the Herculaneum papyri.[85] Micro-CT has also proved useful for analyzing more recent artifacts such as still-sealed historic correspondence that employed the technique of letterlocking (complex folding and cuts) that provided a "tamper-evident locking mechanism".[86][87] Further examples of use cases in archaeology is imaging the contents of sarcophagi or ceramics.[88]
Recently, CWI in Amsterdam has collaborated with Rijksmuseum to investigate art object inside details in the framework called IntACT.[89]
Micro organism research
Varied types of fungus can degrade wood to different degrees, one Belgium research group has been used X-ray CT 3 dimension with sub-micron resolution unveiled fungi can penetrate micropores of 0.6 μm[90] under certain conditions.
Timber sawmill
Sawmills use industrial CT scanners to detect round defects, for instance knots, to improve total value of timber productions. Most sawmills are planning to incorporate this robust detection tool to improve productivity in the long run, however initial investment cost is high.
Microtec is one log scanner manufacturer, with headquarters in Italy.
Interpretation of results
Presentation
The result of a CT scan is a volume of voxels, which may be presented to a human observer by various methods, which broadly fit into the following categories:
- Slices (of varying thickness). Thin slice is generally regarded as planes representing a thickness of less than 3 mm.[91][92] Thick slice is generally regarded as planes representing a thickness between 3 mm and 5 mm.[92][93]
- Projection, including maximum intensity projection[94] and average intensity projection
- Volume rendering (VR)[94]
Technically, all volume renderings become projections when viewed on a 2-dimensional display, making the distinction between projections and volume renderings a bit vague. The epitomes of volume rendering models feature a mix of for example coloring and shading in order to create realistic and observable representations.[95][96]
Two-dimensional CT images are conventionally rendered so that the view is as though looking up at it from the patient's feet.[97] Hence, the left side of the image is to the patient's right and vice versa, while anterior in the image also is the patient's anterior and vice versa. This left-right interchange corresponds to the view that physicians generally have in reality when positioned in front of patients.[98]
Grayscale
Windowing
CT data sets have a very high dynamic range which must be reduced for display or printing. This is typically done via a process of "windowing", which maps a range (the "window") of pixel values to a grayscale ramp. For example, CT images of the brain are commonly viewed with a window extending from 0 HU to 80 HU. Pixel values of 0 and lower, are displayed as black; values of 80 and higher are displayed as white; values within the window are displayed as a gray intensity proportional to position within the window.[102] The window used for display must be matched to the X-ray density of the object of interest, in order to optimize the visible detail.[103] Window width and window level parameters are used to control the windowing of a scan.[104]
Multiplanar reconstruction and projections
Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) is the process of converting data from one anatomical plane (usually transverse) to other planes. It can be used for thin slices as well as projections. Multiplanar reconstruction is possible as present CT scanners provide almost isotropic resolution.[105]
MPR is used almost in every scan. The spine is frequently examined with it.[106] An image of the spine in axial plane can only show one vertebral bone at a time and cannot show its relation with other vertebral bones. By reformatting the data in other planes, visualization of the relative position can be achieved in sagittal and coronal plane.[107]
New software allows the reconstruction of data in non-orthogonal (oblique) planes, which help in the visualization of organs which are not in orthogonal planes.[108][109] It is better suited for visualization of the anatomical structure of the bronchi as they do not lie orthogonal to the direction of the scan.[110]
Curved-plane reconstruction (or curved planar reformation = CPR) is performed mainly for the evaluation of vessels. This type of reconstruction helps to straighten the bends in a vessel, thereby helping to visualize a whole vessel in a single image or in multiple images. After a vessel has been "straightened", measurements such as cross-sectional area and length can be made. This is helpful in preoperative assessment of a surgical procedure.[111]
For 2D projections used in radiation therapy for quality assurance and planning of external beam radiotherapy, including digitally reconstructed radiographs, see Beam's eye view.
Type of projection | Schematic illustration | Examples (10 mm slabs) | Description | Uses |
---|---|---|---|---|
Average intensity projection (AIP) | The average attenuation of each voxel is displayed. The image will get smoother as slice thickness increases. It will look more and more similar to conventional projectional radiography as slice thickness increases. | Useful for identifying the internal structures of a solid organ or the walls of hollow structures, such as intestines. | ||
Maximum intensity projection (MIP) | The voxel with the highest attenuation is displayed. Therefore, high-attenuating structures such as blood vessels filled with contrast media are enhanced. | Useful for angiographic studies and identification of pulmonary nodules. | ||
Minimum intensity projection (MinIP) | The voxel with the lowest attenuation is displayed. Therefore, low-attenuating structures such as air spaces are enhanced. | Useful for assessing the lung parenchyma. |
Volume rendering
A threshold value of radiodensity is set by the operator (e.g., a level that corresponds to bone). With the help of edge detection image processing algorithms a 3D model can be constructed from the initial data and displayed on screen. Various thresholds can be used to get multiple models, each anatomical component such as muscle, bone and cartilage can be differentiated on the basis of different colours given to them. However, this mode of operation cannot show interior structures.[113]
Surface rendering is limited technique as it displays only the surfaces that meet a particular threshold density, and which are towards the viewer. However, In volume rendering, transparency, colours and shading are used which makes it easy to present a volume in a single image. For example, Pelvic bones could be displayed as semi-transparent, so that, even viewing at an oblique angle one part of the image does not hide another.[114]
Image quality
Dose versus image quality
An important issue within radiology today is how to reduce the radiation dose during CT examinations without compromising the image quality. In general, higher radiation doses result in higher-resolution images,[115] while lower doses lead to increased image noise and unsharp images. However, increased dosage raises the adverse side effects, including the risk of radiation-induced cancer – a four-phase abdominal CT gives the same radiation dose as 300 chest X-rays.[116] Several methods that can reduce the exposure to ionizing radiation during a CT scan exist.[117]
- New software technology can significantly reduce the required radiation dose. New iterative tomographic reconstruction algorithms (e.g., iterative Sparse Asymptotic Minimum Variance) could offer super-resolution without requiring higher radiation dose.[118]
- Individualize the examination and adjust the radiation dose to the body type and body organ examined. Different body types and organs require different amounts of radiation.[119]
- Higher resolution is not always suitable, such as detection of small pulmonary masses.[120]
Artifacts
Although images produced by CT are generally faithful representations of the scanned volume, the technique is susceptible to a number of artifacts, such as the following:[121][122]Chapters 3 and 5
- Streak artifact
- Streaks are often seen around materials that block most X-rays, such as metal or bone. Numerous factors contribute to these streaks: under sampling, photon starvation, motion, beam hardening, and monochromatic images with special software such as GSI (Gemstone Spectral Imaging).[126]
- Partial volume effect
- This appears as "blurring" of edges. It is due to the scanner being unable to differentiate between a small amount of high-density material (e.g., bone) and a larger amount of lower density (e.g., cartilage).anisotropic voxels, which have a much lower out-of-plane resolution, than in-plane resolution. This can be partially overcome by scanning using thinner slices, or an isotropic acquisition on a modern scanner.[128]
- Ring artifact
- Probably the most common mechanical artifact, the image of one or many "rings" appears within an image. They are usually caused by the variations in the response from individual elements in a two dimensional X-ray detector due to defect or miscalibration.[129] Ring artifacts can largely be reduced by intensity normalization, also referred to as flat field correction.[130] Remaining rings can be suppressed by a transformation to polar space, where they become linear stripes.[129] A comparative evaluation of ring artefact reduction on X-ray tomography images showed that the method of Sijbers and Postnov can effectively suppress ring artefacts.[131]
- Noise
- This appears as grain on the image and is caused by a low signal to noise ratio. This occurs more commonly when a thin slice thickness is used. It can also occur when the power supplied to the X-ray tube is insufficient to penetrate the anatomy.[132]
- Windmill
- Streaking appearances can occur when the detectors intersect the reconstruction plane. This can be reduced with filters or a reduction in pitch.[133][134]
- Beam hardening
- This can give a "cupped appearance" when grayscale is visualized as height. It occurs because conventional sources, like X-ray tubes emit a polychromatic spectrum. Photons of higher photon energy levels are typically attenuated less. Because of this, the mean energy of the spectrum increases when passing the object, often described as getting "harder". This leads to an effect increasingly underestimating material thickness, if not corrected. Many algorithms exist to correct for this artifact. They can be divided into mono- and multi-material methods.[123][135][136]
Advantages
CT scanning has several advantages over traditional two-dimensional medical radiography. First, CT eliminates the superimposition of images of structures outside the area of interest.[137] Second, CT scans have greater image resolution, enabling examination of finer details. CT can distinguish between tissues that differ in radiographic density by 1% or less.[138] Third, CT scanning enables multiplanar reformatted imaging: scan data can be visualized in the transverse (or axial), coronal, or sagittal plane, depending on the diagnostic task.[139]
The improved resolution of CT has permitted the development of new investigations. For example, CT
CT is a moderate-to-high radiation diagnostic technique. The radiation dose for a particular examination depends on multiple factors: volume scanned, patient build, number and type of scan protocol, and desired resolution and image quality.[143] Two helical CT scanning parameters, tube current and pitch, can be adjusted easily and have a profound effect on radiation. CT scanning is more accurate than two-dimensional radiographs in evaluating anterior interbody fusion, although they may still over-read the extent of fusion.[144]
Adverse effects
Cancer
The
Large scale population-based studies have consistently demonstrated that low dose radiation from CT scans has impacts on cancer incidence in a variety of cancers.[149][150][151][152] For example, in a large population-based cohort it was found that up to 4% of brain cancers were caused by CT scan radiation.[153] Some experts project that in the future, between three and five percent of all cancers would result from medical imaging.[146] An Australian study of 10.9 million people reported that the increased incidence of cancer after CT scan exposure in this cohort was mostly due to irradiation. In this group, one in every 1,800 CT scans was followed by an excess cancer. If the lifetime risk of developing cancer is 40% then the absolute risk rises to 40.05% after a CT. The risks of CT scan radiation are especially important in patients undergoing recurrent CT scans within a short time span of one to five years.[154][155][156]
Some experts note that CT scans are known to be "overused," and "there is distressingly little evidence of better health outcomes associated with the current high rate of scans."[146] On the other hand, a recent paper analyzing the data of patients who received high cumulative doses showed a high degree of appropriate use.[157] This creates an important issue of cancer risk to these patients. Moreover, a highly significant finding that was previously unreported is that some patients received >100 mSv dose from CT scans in a single day,[155] which counteracts existing criticisms some investigators may have on the effects of protracted versus acute exposure.
There are contrarian views and the debate is ongoing. Some studies have shown that publications indicating an increased risk of cancer from typical doses of body CT scans are plagued with serious methodological limitations and several highly improbable results,[158] concluding that no evidence indicates such low doses cause any long-term harm.[159][160][161] One study estimated that as many as 0.4% of cancers in the United States resulted from CT scans, and that this may have increased to as much as 1.5 to 2% based on the rate of CT use in 2007.[145] Others dispute this estimate,[162] as there is no consensus that the low levels of radiation used in CT scans cause damage. Lower radiation doses are used in many cases, such as in the investigation of renal colic.[163]
A person's age plays a significant role in the subsequent risk of cancer.
Current recommendations are to inform patients of the risks of CT scanning.[168] However, employees of imaging centers tend not to communicate such risks unless patients ask.[169]
Contrast reactions
In the United States half of CT scans are
The old radiocontrast agents caused anaphylaxis in 1% of cases while the newer, low-osmolar agents cause reactions in 0.01–0.04% of cases.[171][173] Death occurs in about 2 to 30 people per 1,000,000 administrations, with newer agents being safer.[172][174] There is a higher risk of mortality in those who are female, elderly or in poor health, usually secondary to either anaphylaxis or acute kidney injury.[170]
The contrast agent may induce
In addition to the use of intravenous contrast, orally administered contrast agents are frequently used when examining the abdomen.[176] These are frequently the same as the intravenous contrast agents, merely diluted to approximately 10% of the concentration. However, oral alternatives to iodinated contrast exist, such as very dilute (0.5–1% w/v) barium sulfate suspensions. Dilute barium sulfate has the advantage that it does not cause allergic-type reactions or kidney failure, but cannot be used in patients with suspected bowel perforation or suspected bowel injury, as leakage of barium sulfate from damaged bowel can cause fatal peritonitis.[177]
Side effects from contrast agents, administered intravenously in some CT scans, might impair kidney performance in patients with kidney disease, although this risk is now believed to be lower than previously thought.[178][175]
Scan dose
Examination | Typical effective )dose (mSv to the whole body |
Typical absorbed dose (mGy) to the organ in question |
---|---|---|
Annual background radiation | 2.4[179] | 2.4[179] |
Chest X-ray | 0.02[180] | 0.01–0.15[181] |
Head CT | 1–2[164] | 56[182] |
Screening mammography | 0.4[165] | 3[145][181] |
Abdominal CT | 8[180] | 14[182] |
Chest CT | 5–7[164] | 13[182] |
CT colonography | 6–11[164] | |
Chest, abdomen and pelvis CT | 9.9[182] | 12[182] |
Cardiac CT angiogram | 9–12[164] | 40–100[181] |
Barium enema
|
15[145] | 15[181] |
Neonatal abdominal CT | 20[145] | 20[181] |
The table reports average radiation exposures; however, there can be a wide variation in radiation doses between similar scan types, where the highest dose could be as much as 22 times higher than the lowest dose.[164] A typical plain film X-ray involves radiation dose of 0.01 to 0.15 mGy, while a typical CT can involve 10–20 mGy for specific organs, and can go up to 80 mGy for certain specialized CT scans.[181]
For purposes of comparison, the world average dose rate from naturally occurring sources of
Radiation dose units
The radiation dose reported in the
The sievert unit is used in the report of the effective dose. The sievert unit, in the context of CT scans, does not correspond to the actual radiation dose that the scanned body part absorbs but to another radiation dose of another scenario, the whole body absorbing the other radiation dose and the other radiation dose being of a magnitude, estimated to have the same probability to induce cancer as the CT scan.[185] Thus, as is shown in the table above, the actual radiation that is absorbed by a scanned body part is often much larger than the effective dose suggests. A specific measure, termed the computed tomography dose index (CTDI), is commonly used as an estimate of the radiation absorbed dose for tissue within the scan region, and is automatically computed by medical CT scanners.[186]
The equivalent dose is the effective dose of a case, in which the whole body would actually absorb the same radiation dose, and the sievert unit is used in its report. In the case of non-uniform radiation, or radiation given to only part of the body, which is common for CT examinations, using the local equivalent dose alone would overstate the biological risks to the entire organism.[187][188][189]
Effects of radiation
Most adverse health effects of radiation exposure may be grouped in two general categories:
- deterministic effects (harmful tissue reactions) due in large part to the killing/malfunction of cells following high doses;[190]
- stochastic effects, i.e., cancer and heritable effects involving either cancer development in exposed individuals owing to mutation of somatic cells or heritable disease in their offspring owing to mutation of reproductive (germ) cells.[191]
The added lifetime risk of developing cancer by a single abdominal CT of 8 mSv is estimated to be 0.05%, or 1 one in 2,000.[192]
Because of increased susceptibility of fetuses to radiation exposure, the radiation dosage of a CT scan is an important consideration in the choice of medical imaging in pregnancy.[193][194]
Excess doses
In October, 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated an investigation of brain perfusion CT (PCT) scans, based on radiation burns caused by incorrect settings at one particular facility for this particular type of CT scan. Over 200 patients were exposed to radiation at approximately eight times the expected dose for an 18-month period; over 40% of them lost patches of hair. This event prompted a call for increased CT quality assurance programs. It was noted that "while unnecessary radiation exposure should be avoided, a medically needed CT scan obtained with appropriate acquisition parameter has benefits that outweigh the radiation risks."[164][195] Similar problems have been reported at other centers.[164] These incidents are believed to be due to human error.[164]
Procedure
CT scan procedure varies according to the type of the study and the organ being imaged. The patient is made to lie on the CT table and the centering of the table is done according to the body part. The IV line is established in case of contrast-enhanced CT. After selecting proper[clarification needed] and rate of contrast from the pressure injector, the scout is taken to localize and plan the scan. Once the plan is selected, the contrast is given. The raw data is processed according to the study and proper windowing is done to make scans easy to diagnose.[196]
Preparation
Patient preparation may vary according to the type of scan. The general patient preparation includes.[196]
- Signing the informed consent.
- Removal of metallic objects and jewelry from the region of interest.
- Changing to the hospital gown according to hospital protocol.
- Checking of KFT rate (in case of CECT).[197]
Mechanism
Computed tomography operates by using an
Pixels in an image obtained by CT scanning are displayed in terms of relative radiodensity. The pixel itself is displayed according to the mean attenuation of the tissue(s) that it corresponds to on a scale from +3,071 (most attenuating) to −1,024 (least attenuating) on the Hounsfield scale. A pixel is a two dimensional unit based on the matrix size and the field of view. When the CT slice thickness is also factored in, the unit is known as a voxel, which is a three-dimensional unit.[203]
Water has an attenuation of 0
Initially, the images generated in CT scans were in the
Contrast
History
The history of X-ray computed tomography goes back to at least 1917 with the mathematical theory of the Radon transform.[207][208] In October 1963, William H. Oldendorf received a U.S. patent for a "radiant energy apparatus for investigating selected areas of interior objects obscured by dense material".[209] The first commercially viable CT scanner was invented by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1972.[210]
It is often claimed that revenues from the sales of The Beatles' records in the 1960s helped fund the development of the first CT scanner at EMI. The first production X-ray CT machines were in fact called EMI scanners.[211]
Etymology
The word tomography is derived from the Greek tome 'slice' and graphein 'to write'.[212] Computed tomography was originally known as the "EMI scan" as it was developed in the early 1970s at a research branch of EMI, a company best known today for its music and recording business.[213] It was later known as computed axial tomography (CAT or CT scan) and body section röntgenography.[214]
The term CAT scan is no longer used because current CT scans enable for multiplanar reconstructions. This makes CT scan the most appropriate term, which is used by
In Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), computed axial tomography was used from 1977 to 1979, but the current indexing explicitly includes X-ray in the title.[218]
The term sinogram was introduced by Paul Edholm and Bertil Jacobson in 1975.[219]
Society and culture
Campaigns
In response to increased concern by the public and the ongoing progress of best practices, the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging was formed within the Society for Pediatric Radiology. In concert with the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, the American College of Radiology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Radiology developed and launched the Image Gently Campaign which is designed to maintain high-quality imaging studies while using the lowest doses and best radiation safety practices available on pediatric patients.[220] This initiative has been endorsed and applied by a growing list of various professional medical organizations around the world and has received support and assistance from companies that manufacture equipment used in Radiology.
Following upon the success of the Image Gently campaign, the American College of Radiology, the Radiological Society of North America, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine and the American Society of Radiologic Technologists have launched a similar campaign to address this issue in the adult population called Image Wisely.[221]
The World Health Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of the United Nations have also been working in this area and have ongoing projects designed to broaden best practices and lower patient radiation dose.[222][223]
Prevalence
Country | Value |
---|---|
Japan | 111.49 |
Australia | 64.35 |
Iceland | 43.68 |
United States | 42.64 |
Denmark | 39.72 |
Switzerland | 39.28 |
Latvia | 39.13 |
South Korea | 38.18 |
Germany | 35.13 |
Italy | 34.71 |
Greece | 34.22 |
Austria | 28.64 |
Finland | 24.51 |
Chile | 24.27 |
Lithuania | 23.33 |
Ireland | 19.14 |
Spain | 18.59 |
Estonia | 18.22 |
France | 17.36 |
Slovakia | 17.28 |
Poland | 16.88 |
Luxembourg | 16.77 |
New Zealand | 16.69 |
Czech Republic | 15.76 |
Canada | 15.28 |
Slovenia | 15.00 |
Turkey | 14.77 |
Netherlands | 13.48 |
Russia | 13.00 |
Israel | 9.53 |
Hungary | 9.19 |
Mexico | 5.83 |
Colombia | 1.24 |
Use of CT has increased dramatically over the last two decades.
The increased use of CT scans has been the greatest in two fields: screening of adults (screening CT of the lung in smokers, virtual colonoscopy, CT cardiac screening, and whole-body CT in asymptomatic patients) and CT imaging of children. Shortening of the scanning time to around 1 second, eliminating the strict need for the subject to remain still or be sedated, is one of the main reasons for the large increase in the pediatric population (especially for the diagnosis of
Manufacturers
Major manufacturers of CT scanning devices and equipment are:[228]
- GE Healthcare
- Siemens Healthineers
- Canon Medical Systems Corporation (formerly Toshiba Medical Systems)
- Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- Fujifilm Healthcare (formerly Hitachi Medical Systems)
- Neusoft Medical Systems
- United Imaging Healthcare
Research
Photon-counting computed tomography is a CT technique currently under development.[as of?] Typical CT scanners use energy integrating detectors; photons are measured as a voltage on a capacitor which is proportional to the X-rays detected. However, this technique is susceptible to noise and other factors which can affect the linearity of the voltage to X-ray intensity relationship.[229] Photon counting detectors (PCDs) are still affected by noise but it does not change the measured counts of photons. PCDs have several potential advantages, including improving signal (and contrast) to noise ratios, reducing doses, improving spatial resolution, and through use of several energies, distinguishing multiple contrast agents.[230][231] PCDs have only recently become feasible in CT scanners due to improvements in detector technologies that can cope with the volume and rate of data required. As of February 2016, photon counting CT is in use at three sites.[232] Some early research has found the dose reduction potential of photon counting CT for breast imaging to be very promising.[233] In view of recent findings of high cumulative doses to patients from recurrent CT scans, there has been a push for scanning technologies and techniques that reduce ionising radiation doses to patients to sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv in the literature) levels during the CT scan process, a goal that has been lingering.[234][155][156][157]
See also
References
- ^ "CT scan – Mayo Clinic". mayoclinic.org. Archived from the original on 15 October 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
- PMID 34662062, retrieved 2023-11-24
- ^ "Patient Page". ARRT – The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists. Archived from the original on 9 November 2014.
- ^ "Individual State Licensure Information". American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Archived from the original on 18 July 2013. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
- ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1979". NobelPrize.org. Retrieved 2019-08-10.
- ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1979". NobelPrize.org. Retrieved 2023-10-28.
- ISBN 978-3-642-56976-0.
- ISBN 978-0-7817-0218-8.
- ISBN 978-0-8194-4425-7.
- ISBN 978-0-19-880927-2.
- PMID 15616951.
- .
- ISBN 978-3-642-01740-7.
- ISBN 978-3-642-01740-7.
- ISBN 978-3-319-21227-2.
- S2CID 226056088.
- ^ ISBN 978-3-540-77602-4.
- S2CID 226056088.
- PMID 29685522.
- PMID 23097165.
- ^ PMID 18029143.
- PMID 27091433.
- ^ PMID 25636991.
- PMID 17255408.
- PMID 14529793.
- PMID 22930885.
- ISBN 978-0-8121-1310-5.
- ^ "CT Screening" (PDF). hps.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
- ^ PMID 20008690.
- ^ PMID 20008689.
- ^ "Dangers of CT Scans and X-Rays – Consumer Reports". Retrieved 16 May 2018.
- ISBN 978-1-284-04099-9.
- ISBN 978-0-12-800870-6.
- ISBN 978-0-387-71070-9.
- ISBN 978-1-4398-4198-3.
- PMID 24112882.
- ISBN 978-3-540-69959-0.
- S2CID 36350612.
- ^ Daniel G Deschler, Joseph Zenga. "Evaluation of a neck mass in adults". UpToDate. This topic last updated: Dec 04, 2017.
- ^ PMID 27271508.
- ISBN 978-3-642-39518-5.
- ISBN 978-0-7817-6909-9.
- ISBN 978-0-323-52495-7.
- ^ Yuranga Weerakkody. "Bronchial wall thickening". Radiopaedia. Archived from the original on 2018-01-06. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
- PMID 22814873.
- ^ a b c American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society (September 2013), "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question", Choosing Wisely, American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society, archived from the original on 3 November 2013, retrieved 6 January 2013, which cites
- MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF, Swensen SJ (2005). "Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society1". Radiology. 237 (2): 395–400. S2CID 14498160.
- Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, Lynch WR, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, Ost DE (2007). "Evaluation of Patients with Pulmonary Nodules: When is It Lung Cancer?*". Chest. 132 (3_suppl): 108S–130S. S2CID 16449420.
- Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de González A, PMID 20008690.
- Wiener RS, Gould MK, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Clark JA (2012). ""What do you mean, a spot?": A qualitative analysis of patients' reactions to discussions with their doctors about pulmonary nodules". Chest. 143 (3): 672–677. PMID 22814873.
- MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF, Swensen SJ (2005). "Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society1". Radiology. 237 (2): 395–400.
- PMID 28187798
- ^ "Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)". www.hopkinsmedicine.org. 19 November 2019. Retrieved 2021-03-21.
- PMID 7572481.
- ISBN 978-1-118-18875-0.
- ^ "Cardiac CT Scan – NHLBI, NIH". www.nhlbi.nih.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
- ^ a b Wichmann JL. "Cardiac CT | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org". radiopaedia.org. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
- S2CID 41535442.
- PMID 27843568.
- PMID 29588693.
- ISBN 978-3-540-26984-7.
- ^ Radiological Society of North America, American College of Radiology. "Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)". www.radiologyinfo.org. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
- ^ "Heart scan (coronary calcium scan)". Mayo Clinic. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 9 August 2015.
- PMID 21098187.
- PMID 28183437.
- PMID 27209112. Archived from the originalon 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2017-11-22.
- PMID 27209112.
- PMID 17925319.
- PMID 15143222.
- ISBN 978-3-540-89232-8.
- ISBN 978-88-470-5659-6.
- ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5.
- PMID 10458343.
- ^ "Ankle Fractures". orthoinfo.aaos.org. American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. Archived from the original on 30 May 2010. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- PMID 11264094.
- S2CID 3686099.
- S2CID 24132358.
- ISBN 978-2-88945-780-9.
- hdl:10871/17772. Archivedfrom the original on 2015-10-16.
- .
- S2CID 65469251.
- ^ P. Jin, E. Haneda, K. D. Sauer, C. A. Bouman (June 2012). "A model-based 3D multi-slice helical CT reconstruction algorithm for transportation security application" (PDF). Second International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-11. Retrieved 2015-04-05.
- ^ P. Jin, E. Haneda, C. A. Bouman (November 2012). "Implicit Gibbs prior models for tomographic reconstruction" (PDF). Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on. IEEE. pp. 613–636. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-11. Retrieved 2015-04-05.
- ^ S. J. Kisner, P. Jin, C. A. Bouman, K. D. Sauer, W. Garms, T. Gable, S. Oh, M. Merzbacher, S. Skatter (October 2013). "Innovative data weighting for iterative reconstruction in a helical CT security baggage scanner" (PDF). Security Technology (ICCST), 2013 47th International Carnahan Conference on. IEEE. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-10. Retrieved 2015-04-05.
- ]
- ]
- ]
- ^ "Laboratory | About Chikyu | The Deep-sea Scientific Drilling Vessel CHIKYU". www.jamstec.go.jp. Retrieved 2019-10-24.
- S2CID 171394807.
- PMID 27679821.
- ^ Castellanos S (2 March 2021). "A Letter Sealed for Centuries Has Been Read—Without Even Opening It". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2 March 2021.
- PMID 33654094.
- Graz University. The video was rendered using the GigaMesh Software Framework, cf. doi:10.11588/heidok.00025189. Karl S, Bayer P,ISBN 978-3-200-06576-5, retrieved 2020-01-09
- ^ "CT FOR ART". NICAS. Retrieved 2023-07-04.
- S2CID 15637414.
- PMID 18483143.
- ^ .
- S2CID 215751181.
- ^ PMID 16702462.
- PMID 18430609.
- ISBN 978-3-89838-081-2.
- ^ University of Connecticut Health Center.
- S2CID 22320649.
- ISBN 978-1-4963-6738-9. Retrieved 24 January 2019.
- OCLC 52594824.
- OCLC 47177732.
- PMID 27432657.
- ISBN 978-0-19-880927-2.
- ISBN 978-0-398-08511-7.
- ISBN 978-0-8493-3179-4.
- ISSN 1898-2395.
- PMID 22347928.
- ^ "CT imaging: Where are we going? (Proceedings)". DVM 360. April 2010. Retrieved 2021-03-21.
- ISBN 978-3-662-48950-5.
- PMID 21160663.
- PMID 15222042.
- PMID 16160120.
- PMID 10336201.
- PMID 12490509.
- S2CID 122980366.
- PMID 11461846.
- ^ Barkan, O; Weill, J; Averbuch, A; Dekel, S. "Adaptive Compressed Tomography Sensing" Archived 2016-03-13 at the Wayback Machine. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2013 (pp. 2195–2202).
- ISBN 978-0-7803-2498-5.
- ^ "Radiation – Effects on organs of the body (somatic effects)". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2021-03-21.
- .
- ^ ISBN 978-0-8194-4425-7.
- .
- ^ a b P. Jin, C. A. Bouman, K. D. Sauer (2013). "A Method for Simultaneous Image Reconstruction and Beam Hardening Correction" (PDF). IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. & Medical Imaging Conf., Seoul, Korea, 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-06-06. Retrieved 2014-04-23.
- PMID 21357521.
- PMID 23694911.[permanent dead link]
- PMID 23479714.
- PMID 12494949.
- ISBN 978-0-12-077790-7.
- ^ .
- PMID 26480456.
- S2CID 12744174.
- ISBN 978-0-8016-3662-2.
- ISBN 978-3-540-27273-1.
- ISBN 978-3-319-53496-1.
- CiteSeerX 10.1.1.460.6487.
- PMID 21978116.
- ISBN 978-0-12-417036-0.
- ISBN 978-0-323-03071-7.
- ISBN 978-1-60795-033-2.
- PMID 16361129.
- S2CID 22167728.
- ^ "CT Colonography". Radiologyinfo.org.
- PMID 23464282.
- ^ Brian R. Subach M.D., F.A.C.S et al."Reliability and accuracy of fine-cut computed tomography scans to determine the status of anterior interbody fusions with metallic cages" Archived 2012-12-08 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-04.
- ^ a b c Redberg, Rita F., and Smith-Bindman, Rebecca. "We Are Giving Ourselves Cancer" Archived 2017-07-06 at the Wayback Machine, New York Times, January 30, 2014
- ^ Health Cf. "Medical X-ray Imaging – What are the Radiation Risks from CT?". www.fda.gov. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
- ^ Radiological Society of North America, American College of Radiology (February 2021). "Patient Safety – Radiation Dose in X-Ray and CT Exams" (PDF). acr.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 January 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
- PMID 23694687.
- PMID 22681860.
- PMID 30020493.
- PMID 26882064.
- PMID 36638155.
- PMID 21772332.
- ^ S2CID 208520824.
- ^ S2CID 208520544.
- ^ S2CID 208520463.
- PMID 26434964.
- ^ "Expert opinion: Are CT scans safe?". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
- PMID 26434964.
- ^ "No evidence that CT scans, X-rays cause cancer". Medical News Today. 4 February 2016. Retrieved 2019-03-14.
- PMID 15082885.
- PMID 27810168.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-7020-4799-2.
- ^ S2CID 206894472.
- PMID 22130615.
- ^ S2CID 5788891.
- S2CID 25020619.
- PMID 33620790, retrieved 2023-11-24
- ^ S2CID 28223134.
- ^ PMID 15767033.
- ^ S2CID 19001357.
- S2CID 24840296.
- ISBN 978-1-60327-950-5.
- ^ S2CID 72557671.
- PMID 24010394.
- ISBN 978-3-642-59814-2.
- PMID 31961246.
- ^ PMID 19343116.
- ^ a b "What are the Radiation Risks from CT?". Food and Drug Administration. 2009. Archived from the original on 2013-11-05.
- ^ S2CID 23348032.
- ^ a b c d e Shrimpton, P.C; Miller, H.C; Lewis, M.A; Dunn, M. Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) examinations in the UK – 2003 Review Archived 2011-09-22 at the Wayback Machine
- ISBN 978-0-7817-6934-1.
- PMID 21363960.
- ^ The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT Archived 2017-06-23 at the Wayback Machine "It is a single dose parameter that reflects the risk of a nonuniform exposure in terms of an equivalent whole-body exposure."
- PMID 16013718.
- ISBN 978-0-323-52356-1.
- ^ "Absorbed, Equivalent, and Effective Dose – ICRPaedia". icrpaedia.org. Retrieved 2021-03-21.
- ^ Materials NR (1999). Radiation Quantities and Units, Definitions, Acronyms. National Academies Press (US).
- ISBN 978-0-19-027624-9.
- ^ Paragraph 55 in: "The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection". International Commission on Radiological Protection. Archived from the original on 2012-11-16. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4)
- ^ "Do CT scans cause cancer?". Harvard Medical School. March 2013. Archived from the original on 2017-12-09. Retrieved 2017-12-09.
- ^ CDC (2020-06-05). "Radiation and pregnancy: A fact sheet for clinicians". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2021-03-21.
- PMID 31869154, retrieved 2021-03-21
- PMID 19892810.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-4987-1552-2.
- PMID 10924574.
- PMID 28120881.
- ^ "Computed Tomography (CT)". www.nibib.nih.gov. Retrieved 2021-03-20.
- ISBN 978-3-642-11241-6.
- ISBN 978-0-599-63374-2.
- ^ Themes UF (2018-10-07). "CT Image Reconstruction Basics". Radiology Key. Retrieved 2021-03-20.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-19-880927-2.
- ^ "computed tomography – Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary". Archived from the original on 19 September 2011. Retrieved 18 August 2009.
- ISBN 978-0-323-26358-0.
- ISBN 978-1-4160-0030-3.
- ISBN 978-3-540-26988-5.
- S2CID 26553287.
- S2CID 42007208.
- PMC 517662.
- ^ Pietzsch J. "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1979". NobelPrize.org.
- ISBN 978-0-89871-493-7.
- ISBN 978-1-4408-0383-3.
- S2CID 34734270.
- ^ Miñano G (3 November 2015). "What's the difference between a CAT-Scan and a CT-Scan? - Cincinnati Children's Blog". blog.cincinnatichildrens.org. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
- ^ "Difference Between CT Scan and CAT Scan | Difference Between". 28 January 2010. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
- ISBN 978-0-9636292-5-8.
- ^ "MeSH Browser". meshb.nlm.nih.gov.
- S2CID 20832295.
- ^ "Image Gently". The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. Archived from the original on 9 June 2013. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
- ^ "Image Wisely". Joint Task Force on Adult Radiation Protection. Archived from the original on 21 July 2013. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
- ^ "Optimal levels of radiation for patients". World Health Organization. Archived from the original on 25 May 2013. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
- ^ "Global Initiative on Radiation Safety in Healthcare Settings" (PDF). World Health Organization. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
- ^ "Computed tomography (CT) scanners". OECD.
- PMID 19789227.
- ^ Andrew Skelly (Aug 3, 2010). "CT ordering all over the map". The Medical Post.
- PMID 20924012.
- ^ "Global Computed Tomography (CT) Scanners Devices and Equipment Market Report 2020: Major Players are GE Healthcare, Koninklijke Philips, Hitachi, Siemens and Canon Medical Systems – ResearchAndMarkets.com". Business Wire. November 7, 2019.
- ISBN 978-0-8247-9554-2.
- PMID 15789589.
- PMID 24089889.
- ^ "NIH uses photon-counting CT scanner in patients for the first time". National Institutes of Health. 24 February 2016. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
- ^ "Photon-counting breast CT measures up". medicalphysicsweb. Archived from the original on 2016-07-27. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
- S2CID 212692606– via www.physicamedica.com.
External links
- Development of CT imaging
- CT Artefacts—PPT by David Platten
- Filler A (2009-06-30). "The History, Development and Impact of Computed Imaging in Neurological Diagnosis and Neurosurgery: CT, MRI, and DTI". Nature Precedings: 1. ISSN 1756-0357.
- Boone JM, McCollough CH (2021). "Computed tomography turns 50". Physics Today. 74 (9): 34–40. S2CID 239718717.