Copper Hoard culture

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Copper Hoard Culture
)
1500 BCE. Provenance: Bisauli (212 km from New Delhi), Badaun district, Uttar Pradesh

Copper Hoard culture describes find-complexes which mainly occur in the western Ganges–Yamuna

Indo-Aryan of the second millennium BCE have also been proposed,[3][4] though association with the Vedic Aryans is problematic, since the hoards are found east of the territory of the Vedic Aryans.[2][5]

Artefacts

Historical finds

The Copper Hoard finds occur mainly in Yamuna–Ganges

Gangetic basin, from the central peninsula and the eastern part of India.[6] In 1985 Paul Alan Yule published 1083 examples from 'Copper Hoards' but also other peninsular prehistoric metal finds.[7] These added a new group: those from southern Haryana and northern Rajasthan
. By 1992 284 further examples followed specifically of the Copper Hoard types.

Several hoard artifacts have turned up without an archaeological context, which raises doubts about their authenticity.[8] Although on their discovery frequently questioned, today few voice doubts about the four Daimabad copper finds.[9]

The different assemblages are known mostly by only their metallic artifacts, and thus the term 'culture' is misleading.[citation needed] Many finds are deposited in the Kanya Gurukul museum in Narela/Haryana.[7]

  • Selected hoard artifacts from 1-2 South Haryana, 3-4 Uttar Pradesh, 5 Madhya Pradesh, 6-8 South Bihar-North Orissa-Bengalen.[10]
    Selected hoard artifacts from 1-2 South Haryana, 3-4 Uttar Pradesh, 5 Madhya Pradesh, 6-8 South Bihar-North Orissa-Bengalen.[10]
  • Indian Copper hoard artifact from Rewari, Haryana is probably not a use-object but more likely had a religious function.
    Indian Copper hoard artifact from Rewari, Haryana is probably not a use-object but more likely had a religious function.
  • Recorded Indian Copper hoards objects, statistic.
    Recorded Indian Copper hoards objects, statistic.

Regional find-groups

Four regional find-groups are identifiable with their characteristic find-types:

  • Characteristic hoard-finds from South Haryana/North Rajasthan (recorded: 383) include flat axes, harpoons, double axes, swords with so-called antenna grips and others.
  • In the
    Ganges-Yamuna Doab
    (235) related types occur.
  • Those from Chota Nagpur differ (235) entirely from these. They include finely worked pieces, and mostly look at first like axe-heads but are probably ingots.
  • Fewer are those known from Madhya Pradesh (120), although originally there were some 424 from the Ghangharia hoard alone.

Of the four find groups, the largest number derives from southern Haryana, especially from Hansi, 120 km west of Delhi [11] These are purchases and are not excavated. R.A.E. Coningham believes that one of the largest hoards is that from Daimabad with 60 kg.[12] It is an isolated contemporary phenomenon with little to do with the four main find-groups. Several writers do not distinguish between any early copper-based artefacts and the more narrowly defined Copper Hoards.

Artifacts from Al-Aqir, Oman, Lothal, Gujarat and Kallur, Karnataka also comprise other finding spots of the copper hoard culture.

Characteristics of the artefacts

The

copper ore used derives from different ore ranges in Rajasthan (Khetri), southern Haryana, Bihar/West Bengal/Orissa (especially Singhbhum) as well as Madhya Pradesh (Malaj Khand
), to judge from the proximity to the find spots.

Hoard objects contain from 78-99% copper. Six contain up to 32.9% iron.[13] Artefacts from Haryana show the greatest chemical variation. Those from Ghangharia are chemically the most homogeneous. Variations in the amount of different constituent metals are considered to be unintentional. Harappan metallurgists seem better able to produce usable alloys.

Certain copper artifacts from the late 3rd millennium contexts in Oman resemble the anthropomorphs of the Indian Copper Hoards.[14][note 1]

Interpretations of the artefacts

Late Harappan, OCP, Copper Hoard and Painted Grey ware
sites.
Indus Valley Civilization, Late Phase (1900-1300 BCE)
BMAC and Yaz cultures have often been associated with Indo-Iranian
migrations. Some connection with the Copper Hoard culture is possible.

The copper hoards are associated with the

BMAC, from where the Indo-Aryans came into India.[3] The association with the Vedic Indo-Aryans is problematic, since the hoards are mostly found east of the territory of the Vedic Indo-Aryans.[2][5] Falk proposes an association with the middle Vedic period and the realm of the Kuru-Pancalas, who had expanded eastwards.[2] Asko Parpola associates the copper hoards with a first wave of Indo-Iranian migration into the Indian subcontinent, who reached farther east than the later Vedic Aryans.[4]

Considering the find circumstances and constituent hoard patterns, Yule found no evidence for a functional use, but interprets them as ritualistic objects.

D.P. Agrawal of the anthropomorphs as throwing weapons [16] ignore the find circumstances of associated hoard objects, not to mention the weight (up to 7 kg) of certain examples.[citation needed
]

The anthropomorphs have been explained by Das Gupta as a vajra, a divine weapon with Indo-European origins, fashioned for the Vedic and later Hindu deity Indra.[17] P. Kuznetsov also associates this artefact with the vajra of Indra, noting similarities with a symbolic cudgel-scepter found in a burial of the Yamnaya culture of the Eurasian steppes.[18] Harry Falk associated the bar celts with the vajra.[19][2][20]

Zin acknowledges the possibility that CHC-objects may be related to Indo-European culture, stating "Falk’s identification of the vajra as a bar-celt seems to be the right one; the Avestan word vazra means a ‘hammer’."[20] She disputes the association with Indra's vajra, noting that when in the 1st century BCE the iconography of Indra took form, the memory of Vedic weapons had since vanished. Thus the vajra of Hindu art corresponds to the keraunos (thunderbolt) of the Greek deity Zeus, and "[t]he iconography may have been transported via coins and small objects of art."[21]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c Also published as Yule (2004) and Yule (2014).

References

  1. ^ a b Yule 2003, p. 541.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 126.
  3. ^ a b Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 125.
  4. ^ a b Parpola 2020.
  5. ^ a b Yule 2002, p. 118.
  6. ^ Lal 1951, p. 20–39.
  7. ^ a b Yule 1985.
  8. ^ cf. http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2014/02/a-ligatured-metal-artifact-found-in.html : implausible combination of motifs of different periods raise doubt about a well-known anthropomorph
  9. ^ Yule 1985, p. 10-12, Pl 2-4.
  10. ^ Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 310.
  11. ^ Yule 2002.
  12. ^ in: F.R. Allchin (ed.), The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia (Cambridge 1995) 72.
  13. ^ P. Yule/A. Hauptmann/M. Hughes, The Copper Hoards of the Indian Subcontinent: Preliminaries for an Interpretation,Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 36, 1989 [1992] 262-263 Tab. 4 & 5 http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/savifadok/volltexte/2009/509/.
  14. ^ Yule 2003.
  15. ^ Yule 2014.
  16. ^ Kuznetsov, Pavel (2005). "An Indo-Iranian Symbol of Power in the Earliest Steppe Kurgans". Journal of Indo-European Studies. 33 (3): 12.
  17. ^ Falk 1993.
  18. ^ a b Zin 2005, p. 81.
  19. ^ Zin 2005, p. 82.

Sources

Further reading

External links