Cryogenic electron microscopy
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a
In 2017, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank, and Richard Henderson "for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution."[4] Nature Methods also named cryo-EM as the "Method of the Year" in 2015.[5]
History
Early development
In the 1960s, the use of transmission electron microscopy for structure determination methods was limited because of the radiation damage due to high energy electron beams. Scientists hypothesized that examining specimens at low temperatures would reduce beam-induced radiation damage.[6] Both liquid helium (−269 °C or 4 K or −452.2 °F) and liquid nitrogen (−195.79 °C or 77 K or −320 °F) were considered as cryogens. In 1980, Erwin Knapek and Jacques Dubochet published comments on beam damage at cryogenic temperatures sharing observations that:
Thin crystals mounted on carbon film were found to be from 30 to 300 times more beam-resistant at 4 K than at room temperature... Most of our results can be explained by assuming that cryoprotection in the region of 4 K is strongly dependent on the temperature.[7]
However, these results were not reproducible and amendments were published in Nature just two years later informing that the beam resistance was less significant than initially anticipated. The protection gained at 4 K was closer to "tenfold for standard samples of L-valine",[8] than what was previously stated.
In 1981,
Recent advancements
The 2010s were marked with drastic advancements of electron cameras. Notably, the improvements made to direct electron detectors have led to a "resolution revolution"[11] pushing the resolution barrier beneath the crucial ~2-3 Å limit to resolve amino acid position and orientation.[12]
Henderson (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK) formed a consortium with engineers at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory and scientists at the Max Planck Society to fund and develop a first prototype. The consortium then joined forces with the electron microscope manufacturer FEI to roll out and market the new design. At about the same time, Gatan Inc. of Pleasanton, California came out with a similar detector designed by Peter Denes (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) and David Agard (University of California, San Francisco). A third type of camera was developed by Nguyen-Huu Xuong at the Direct Electron company (San Diego, California).[11]
More recently, advancements in the use of protein-based imaging scaffolds are helping to solve the problems of sample orientation bias and size limit. Proteins smaller than ~50 kDa generally have insufficient SNR to be able to resolve protein particles in the image, making 3D reconstruction difficult or impossible.[13] Imaging scaffolds boost the SNR of smaller proteins by binding them to a larger object, the scaffold. The Yeates group at UCLA were able to create a clearer image of three variants of KRAS (roughly 19 kDa in size) by utilising a rigidified imaging scaffold, and using DARPins as modular binding domain between the scaffold and the protein-of-interest.[14]
2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
In recognition of the impact cryo-EM has had on biochemistry, three scientists, Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank and Richard Henderson, were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution."[4]
Comparisons to X-ray crystallography
Traditionally, X-ray crystallography has been the most popular technique for determining the 3D structures of biological molecules.[15] However, the aforementioned improvements in cryo-EM have increased its popularity as a tool for examining the details of biological molecules. Since 2010, yearly cryo-EM structure deposits have outpaced X-ray crystallography.[16] Though X-ray crystallography has drastically more total deposits due to a decades-longer history, total deposits of the two methods are projected to eclipse around 2035.[16]
The resolution of X-ray crystallography is limited by crystal homogeneity,[17] and coaxing biological molecules with unknown ideal crystallization conditions into a crystalline state can be very time-consuming, in extreme cases taking months or even years.[18] To contrast, sample preparation in cryo-EM may require several rounds of screening and optimization to overcome issues such as protein aggregation and preferred orientations,[19][20] but it does not require the sample to form a crystal, rather samples for cryo-EM are flash-frozen and examined in their near-native states.[21]
According to Proteopedia, the median resolution achieved by X-ray crystallography (as of May 19, 2019) on the Protein Data Bank is 2.05 Å,[17] and the highest resolution achieved on record (as of September 30, 2022) is 0.48 Å.[22] As of 2020, the majority of the protein structures determined by cryo-EM are at a lower resolution of 3–4 Å.[23] However, as of 2020, the best cryo-EM resolution has been recorded at 1.22 Å,[20] making it a competitor in resolution in some cases.
Correlative light cryo-TEM and cryo-ET
In 2019, correlative light cryo-TEM and cryo-ET were used to observe tunnelling nanotubes (TNTs) in neuronal cells.[24]
Scanning electron cryomicroscopy
Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy
Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) is a transmission electron microscopy technique that is used in structural biology and materials science. Colloquially, the term "cryogenic electron microscopy" or its shortening "cryo-EM" refers to cryogenic transmission electron microscopy by default, as the vast majority of cryo-EM is done in transmission electron microscopes, rather than scanning electron microscopes.
Centers
The
The Danish National cryo-EM Facility also known as EMBION was inaugurated on December 1, 2016. EMBION is a cryo-EM consortium between Danish Universities (Aarhus University host and University of Copenhagen co-host).
Advanced methods
- Cryogenic electron tomography (cryo-ET), a specialized application where many images are taken of individual samples at various tilt angles, resulting in a 3D reconstruction of a single sample.[27]
- Electron crystallography, method to determine the arrangement of atoms in solids using a TEM
- Single particle analysis cryo-EM, an averaging method to determine protein structure from monodisperse samples.[32]
-
Cryo-EM image of GroEL suspended in amorphous iceat 50000× magnification
-
Structure ofPichia pastorisby Cryo-EM
-
Cryo-EM image of an intact ARMAN cell from an Iron Mountain biofilm. Image width is 576 nm.
-
Cryo-EM image of theCroV giant marine virus
(scale bar represents 200 nm)[33]
See also
References
- PMID 18793481.
- PMID 25910204.
- S2CID 247206999. Retrieved 25 March 2022.
- ^ a b "The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2017". NobelPrize.org. Retrieved 2022-09-30.
- S2CID 27162203.
- PMID 29672565.
- PMID 7441748.
- doi:10.1038/299386c0.
- .
- S2CID 4319199.
- ^ S2CID 35524447.
- PMID 25894612.
- PMID 30833564.
- PMID 37669364.
- PMID 10884915.
- ^ PMID 33744287.
- ^ a b "Resolution - Proteopedia, life in 3D". proteopedia.org. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
- PMID 32047310.
- PMID 30804214.
- ^ PMID 33087931.
- PMID 27543495.
- PMID 21505232.
- S2CID 224823207.
- PMID 30664666.
- ^ "Inauguration of the Dubochet Center for Imaging (DCI) on the campuses of UNIGE, UNIL and EPFL". unige.ch. 2021-11-30. Retrieved 2022-04-30.
- ^ "Scientists uncover Omicron variant mysteries using microscopes". swissinfo.ch. 2021-12-30. Retrieved 2022-04-30.
- PMID 34384780.
- PMID 25086503.
- PMID 30555912.
- PMID 28192420.
- PMID 30325568.
- PMID 30166484.
- .