Dei Filius

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Dei Filius is the

Catholic faith, which was adopted unanimously, and issued by Pope Pius IX
on 24 April 1870.

The constitution set forth the teaching of "the holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church" on God, revelation and faith.[1]

Content

The dogmatic constitution "deals with faith, reason, and their interrelations."[2]

The document begins by observing that "God, the principle and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of human reason from created things".

divine revelation.[4]

Faith and reason are seen as complementary. Following Aquinas, whose guiding thought Egan A. Philip paraphrases as that "it is the same God who grounds all truth, whether secular or divine, and the truth is ultimately one,"[5] Dei Filius said

there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason, since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind; and God can not deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth. The false appearance of such a contradiction is mainly due, either to the dogmas of faith not having been understood and expounded according to the mind of the Church, or to the inventions of opinion having been taken for the verdicts of reason. [6]

Name used for the church

The draft presented to the council on 8 March 1870 drew no serious criticism. But a group of 35 English-speaking bishops, who feared that the opening phrase "Sancta Romana Catholica Ecclesia" might be construed as favouring the Anglican branch theory, raised objections to this expression, "Holy Roman Catholic Church". They proposed that the word "Roman" be omitted out of concern that use of the term "Roman Catholic" would lend support to proponents of branch theory. While the council overwhelmingly rejected this proposal, the text was finally modified to read "The Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church".[7]

The words "Sancta Romana Catholica Ecclesia" were voted on three separate dates. On the first occasion, when this chapter alone was considered, two votes concerned the opening words. The first was on a proposal by a few English-speaking bishops to delete the word "Romana", thus changing "Sancta Romana Catholica Ecclesia" (The Holy Roman Catholic Church) to "Sancta Catholica Ecclesia" (The Holy Catholic Church). This was overwhelmingly defeated.[8][9]

The second vote, held immediately afterwards, was on a proposal to insert a comma, so that "Sancta Romana Catholica Ecclesia" (The Holy Roman Catholic Church) would become "Sancta Romana, Catholica Ecclesia" (The Holy Roman, Catholic Church). This too was defeated, though not as overwhelmingly as the first proposal.

In a later vote, held on 12 April 1870, the text as a whole, which preserved the same opening words, was approved with 515 affirmative votes (placet) and no opposing votes (non placet); but there were 83 placet iuxta modum votes, asking for retouches, many of them regarding the opening words of chapter I.[10][11]

In view of the reservations thus expressed, the text presented for a final vote and approved unanimously on 24 April changed the order of the words and added "Apostolica", so that "Sancta Romana Catholica Ecclesia" became "Sancta Catholica Apostolica Romana Ecclesia" (The Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church).[11][12][13]

See also

References

  1. ^ Roberto De Mattei, John Laughland, Pius IX, p. 137
  2. ^ "First Vatican Council | Description, Doctrine, & Legacy". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-02-19.
  3. ^ Pope Pius IX, Dei Filius, Chapter II
  4. ^ Vidani, Peter. "Vatican I and God's natural knowability". Philosophy at AMU. Retrieved 2020-02-19.
  5. ^ Dei Filius, 1870, Chapter IV
  6. ^ Richard Faber. Katholizismus in Geschichte und Gegenwart. 2005, p. 42
  7. ^ Theodorus Granderath. Constitutiones Dogmaticae Sancrosancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani. (Herder 1892), p. 5 indicates that the vote was overwhelming. Granderath's book was called "one of the most important contributions to the literature of dogmatic theology in our day" in a review in the American Ecclesiastical Review.[1]
  8. ^ Granderath, p. 27
  9. ^ ), p. 1666
  10. ^ Granderath, pp. 29-32
  11. .

External links