Denisovan
The Denisovans or Denisova hominins (
The first identification of a Denisovan individual occurred in 2010, based on
Denisovans apparently interbred with modern humans, with a high percentage (roughly 5%) occurring in Melanesians, Aboriginal Australians, and Filipino Negritos. This distribution suggests that there were Denisovan populations across Asia. There is also evidence of interbreeding with the Altai Neanderthal population, with about 17% of the Denisovan genome from Denisova Cave deriving from them. A first-generation hybrid nicknamed "Denny" was discovered with a Denisovan father and a Neanderthal mother. Additionally, 4% of the Denisovan genome comes from an unknown archaic human species, which diverged from modern humans over one million years ago.
Taxonomy
Denisovans may represent a new species of
Discovery
In 2008,
In 2019, Greek archaeologist Katerina Douka and colleagues radiocarbon dated specimens from Denisova Cave, and estimated that Denisova 2 (the oldest specimen) lived 195,000–122,700 years ago.[8] Older Denisovan DNA collected from sediments in the East Chamber dates to 217,000 years ago. Based on artifacts also discovered in the cave, hominin occupation (most likely by Denisovans) began 287±41 or 203±14 ka. Neanderthals were also present 193±12 ka and 97±11 ka, possibly concurrently with Denisovans.[9]
Specimens
The fossils of five distinct Denisovan individuals from Denisova Cave have been identified through their ancient DNA (aDNA): Denisova 2, 3, 4, 8, and 11. An mtDNA-based phylogenetic analysis of these individuals suggests that Denisova 2 is the oldest, followed by Denisova 8, while Denisova 3 and Denisova 4 were roughly contemporaneous.[10] During DNA sequencing, a low proportion of the Denisova 2, Denisova 4 and Denisova 8 genomes were found to have survived, but a high proportion of the Denisova 3 genome was intact.[10][11] The Denisova 3 sample was cut into two, and the initial DNA sequencing of one fragment was later independently confirmed by sequencing the mtDNA from the second.[12]
These specimens remained the only known examples of Denisovans until 2019, when a research group led by
In 2018, a team of Laotian, French, and American anthropologists, who had been excavating caves in the Laotian jungle of the
Some older findings may or may not belong to the Denisovan line, but Asia is not well mapped in regards to
Name | Fossil elements | Age | Discovery | Place | Sex and age | Publication | Image | GenBank accession |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Denisova 3 (also known as X Woman)[22][12][2] |
Distal fifth finger |
76.2–51.6 ka[8] | 2008 | Denisova cave (Russia) | 13.5-year-old adolescent female | 2010 | NC013993 | |
Denisova 4[22][17] | Permanent upper 2nd or 3rd molar | 84.1–55.2 ka[8] | 2000 | Denisova cave (Russia) | Adult male | 2010 | FR695060 | |
Denisova 8[11] | Permanent upper 3rd molar | 136.4–105.6 ka[8] | 2010 | Denisova cave (Russia) | Adult male | 2015 | KT780370 | |
Denisova 2[10] | Deciduous 2nd lower molar
|
194.4–122.7 ka[8] | 1984 | Denisova cave (Russia) | Adolescent female | 2017 | KX663333 | |
Xiahe mandible[14] | Partial mandible | > 160 ka | 1980 | Baishiya Cave (China) |
2019 | |||
Denisova 11 (also known as Denny, Denisovan x Neanderthal hybrid) [23] |
Arm or leg bone fragment | 118.1–79.3 ka[8] | 2012 | Denisova cave (Russia) | 13 year old adolescent female | 2016 | ||
Denisova 13[24] | Parietal bone fragment | Found in layer 22[24] which dates to ~285±39 ka[9] | 2019 | Denisova cave (Russia) | pending | |||
TNH2-1[16] | Permanent lower left 1st or 2nd molar | 164–131 ka | 2018 | Tam Ngu Hao 2 cave (Laos) | 3.5 to 8.5 year old female | 2022 |
Evolution
However, according to the
The more divergent Denisovan mtDNA has been interpreted as evidence of admixture between Denisovans and an unknown archaic human population,[28] possibly a relict H. erectus or H. erectus-like population about 53,000 years ago.[25] Alternatively, divergent mtDNA could have also resulted from the persistence of an ancient mtDNA lineage which only went extinct in modern humans and Neanderthals through genetic drift.[22] Modern humans contributed mtDNA to the Neanderthal lineage, but not to the Denisovan mitochondrial genomes yet sequenced.[29][30][31][32] The mtDNA sequence from the femur of a 400,000-year-old H. heidelbergensis from the Sima de los Huesos Cave in Spain was found to be related to those of Neanderthals and Denisovans, but closer to Denisovans,[33][34] and the authors posited that this mtDNA represents an archaic sequence which was subsequently lost in Neanderthals due to replacement by a modern-human-related sequence.[35]
Demographics
Denisovans are known to have lived in Siberia, Tibet, and Laos.[16] The Xiahe mandible is the earliest recorded human presence on the Tibetan Plateau.[14] Though their remains have been identified in only these three locations, traces of Denisovan DNA in modern humans suggest they ranged across East Asia,[36][37] and potentially western Eurasia.[38] In 2019, geneticist Guy Jacobs and colleagues identified three distinct populations of Denisovans responsible for the introgression into modern populations now native to, respectively: Siberia and East Asia; New Guinea and nearby islands; and Oceania and, to a lesser extent, across Asia. Using coalescent modeling, the Denisova Cave Denisovans split from the second population about 283,000 years ago; and from the third population about 363,000 years ago. This indicates that there was considerable reproductive isolation between Denisovan populations.[39]
Based on the high percentages of Denisovan DNA in modern Papuans and Australians, Denisovans may have crossed the Wallace Line into these regions (with little back-migration west), the second known human species to do so,[19] along with earlier Homo floresiensis. By this logic, they may have also entered the Philippines, living alongside H. luzonensis which, if this is the case, may represent the same or a closely related species.[40] These Denisovans may have needed to cross large bodies of water.[39] Alternately, high Denisovan DNA admixture in modern Papuan populations may simply represent higher mixing among the original ancestors of Papuans prior to crossing the Wallace line. Icelanders also have an anomalously high Denisovan heritage, which could have stemmed from a Denisovan population far west of the Altai mountains. Genetic data suggests Neanderthals were frequently making long crossings between Europe and the Altai mountains especially towards the date of their extinction.[38]
Using exponential distribution analysis on haplotype lengths, Jacobs calculated introgression into modern humans occurred about 29,900 years ago with the Denisovan population ancestral to New Guineans; and 45,700 years ago with the population ancestral to both New Guineans and Oceanians. Such a late date for the New Guinean group could indicate Denisovan survival as late as 14,500 years ago, which would make them the latest surviving archaic human species. A third wave appears to have introgressed into East Asia, but there is not enough DNA evidence to pinpoint a solid timeframe.[39]
The mtDNA from Denisova 4 bore a high similarity to that of Denisova 3, indicating that they belonged to the same population.[22] The genetic diversity among the Denisovans from Denisova Cave is on the lower range of what is seen in modern humans, and is comparable to that of Neanderthals. However, it is possible that the inhabitants of Denisova Cave were more or less reproductively isolated from other Denisovans, and that, across their entire range, Denisovan genetic diversity may have been much higher.[10]
Denisova Cave, over time of habitation, continually swung from a fairly warm and moderately humid pine and birch forest to tundra or forest-tundra landscape.[9] Conversely, Baishiya Karst Cave is situated at a high elevation, an area characterized by low temperature, low oxygen, and poor resource availability. Colonization of high-altitude regions, due to such harsh conditions, was previously assumed to have only been accomplished by modern humans.[14] Denisovans seem to have also inhabited the jungles of Southeast Asia.[37] The Tam Ngu Hao 2 site might have been a closed forest environment.[16]
Anatomy
Little is known of the precise anatomical features of the Denisovans since the only physical remains discovered so far are a finger bone, four teeth, long bone fragments, a partial jawbone,[13][16] and a parietal bone skull fragment.[24] The finger bone is within the modern human range of variation for women,[12] which is in contrast to the large, robust molars which are more similar to those of Middle to Late Pleistocene archaic humans. The third molar is outside the range of any Homo species except H. habilis and H. rudolfensis, and is more like those of australopithecines. The second molar is larger than those of modern humans and Neanderthals, and is more similar to those of H. erectus and H. habilis.[22] Like Neanderthals, the mandible had a gap behind the molars, and the front teeth were flattened; but Denisovans lacked a high mandibular body, and the mandibular symphysis at the midline of the jaw was more receding.[14][20] The parietal is reminiscent of that of H. erectus.[41]
A facial reconstruction has been generated by comparing methylation at individual genetic loci associated with facial structure.[42] This analysis suggested that Denisovans, much like Neanderthals, had a long, broad, and projecting face; large nose; sloping forehead; protruding jaw; elongated and flattened skull; and wide chest and hips. The Denisovan tooth row was longer than that of Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans.[43]
Middle-to-Late Pleistocene East Asian archaic human skullcaps typically share features with Neanderthals. The skullcaps from Xuchang feature prominent brow ridges like Neanderthals, though the nuchal and angular tori near the base of the skull are either reduced or absent, and the back of the skull is rounded off like in early modern humans. Xuchang 1 had a large brain volume of approximately 1800 cc, on the high end for Neanderthals and early modern humans, and well beyond the present-day human average.[44]
The Denisovan genome from Denisova Cave has variants of genes which, in modern humans, are associated with dark skin, brown hair, and brown eyes.
Culture
Denisova Cave
Early Middle Paleolithic stone tools from Denisova Cave were characterized by discoidal (disk-like) cores and Kombewa cores, but Levallois cores and flakes were also present. There were scrapers, denticulate tools, and notched tools, deposited about 287±41 thousand years ago in the Main Chamber of the cave; and about 269±97 thousand years ago in the South Chamber; up to 170±19 thousand and 187±14 thousand years ago in the Main and East Chambers, respectively.[9]
Middle Paleolithic assemblages were dominated by flat, discoidal, and Levallois cores, and there were some isolated sub-prismatic cores. There were predominantly side scrapers (a scraper with only the sides used to scrape), but also notched-denticulate tools, end-scrapers (a scraper with only the ends used to scrape), burins, chisel-like tools, and truncated flakes. These dated to 156±15 thousand years ago in the Main Chamber, 58±6 thousand years ago in the East Chamber, and 136±26–47±8 thousand years ago in the South Chamber.[9]
Early Upper Paleolithic artefacts date to 44±5 thousand years ago in the Main Chamber, 63±6 thousand years ago in the East Chamber, and 47±8 thousand years ago in the South Chamber, though some layers of the East Chamber seem to have been disturbed. There was blade production and Levallois production, but scrapers were again predominant. A well-developed, Upper Paleolithic stone bladelet technology distinct from the previous scrapers began accumulating in the Main Chamber around 36±4 thousand years ago.[9]
In the Upper Paleolithic layers, there were also several bone tools and ornaments: a marble ring, an ivory ring, an ivory pendant, a red deer tooth pendant, an elk tooth pendant, a chloritolite bracelet, and a bone needle. However, Denisovans are only confirmed to have inhabited the cave until 55 ka; the dating of Upper Paleolithic artefacts overlaps with modern human migration into Siberia (though there are no occurrences in the Altai region); and the DNA of the only specimen in the cave dating to the time interval (Denisova 14) is too degraded to confirm species identity, so the attribution of these artefacts is unclear.[49][9]
Tibet
In 1998, five child hand- and footprint impressions were discovered in a travertine unit near the Quesang hot springs in Tibet; in 2021, they were dated to 226 to 169 thousand years ago using uranium decay dating. This is the oldest evidence of human occupation of the Tibetan Plateau, and given the Xiahe mandible is the oldest human fossil from the region (albeit, younger than the Quesang impressions), these may have been made by Denisovan children. The impressions were printed onto a small panel of space, and there is little overlap between all the prints, so they seem to have been taking care to make new imprints in unused space. If considered art, they are the oldest known examples of rock art. Similar hand stencils and impressions do not appear again in the archeological record until roughly 40,000 years ago.[50]
The footprints comprise four right impressions and one left superimposed on one of the rights. They were probably left by two individuals. The tracks of the individual who superimposed their left onto their right may have scrunched up their toes and wiggled them in the mud, or dug their finger into the toe prints. The footprints average 192.3 mm (7.57 in) long, which roughly equates to a 7 or 8 year old child by modern human growth rates. There are two sets of handprints (from a left and right hand), which may have been created by an older child unless one of the former two individuals had long fingers. The handprints average 161.1 mm (6.34 in), which roughly equates with a 12 year old modern human child, and the middle finger length agrees with a 17 year old modern human. One of the handprints shows an impression of the forearm, and the individual was wiggling their thumb through the mud.[50]
Interbreeding
Analyses of the modern human genomes indicate past interbreeding with at least two groups of archaic humans, Neanderthals[51] and Denisovans,[22][52] and that such interbreeding events occurred on multiple occasions. Comparisons of the Denisovan, Neanderthal, and modern human genomes have revealed evidence of a complex web of interbreeding among these lineages.[51]
Archaic humans
As much as 17% of the Denisovan genome from Denisova Cave represents DNA from the local Neanderthal population.[51] Denisova 11 was an F1 (first generation) Denisovan/Neanderthal hybrid; the fact that such an individual was found may indicate interbreeding was a common occurrence here.[53] The Denisovan genome shares more derived alleles with the Altai Neanderthal genome from Siberia than with the Vindija Cave Neanderthal genome from Croatia or the Mezmaiskaya cave Neanderthal genome from the Caucasus, suggesting that the gene flow came from a population that was more closely related to the local Altai Neanderthals.[54] However, Denny's Denisovan father had the typical Altai Neanderthal introgression, while her Neanderthal mother represented a population more closely related to Vindija Neanderthals.[55]
About 4% of the Denisovan genome derives from an unidentified archaic hominin,
Before splitting from Neanderthals, their ancestors ("Neandersovans") migrating into Europe apparently interbred with an unidentified "superarchaic" human species who were already present there; these superarchaics were the descendants of a very early migration out of Africa around 1.9 mya.[58]
Modern humans
million years ago ) |
A 2011 study found that Denisovan DNA is prevalent in
In contrast, 0.2% derives from Denisovan ancestry in mainland Asians and
The timing of introgression into Oceanian populations likely occurred after Eurasians and Oceanians split roughly 58,000 years ago, and before Papuan and Aboriginal Australians split from each other roughly 37,000 years ago. Given the present day distribution of Denisovan DNA, this may have taken place in Wallacea, though the discovery of a 7,200 year old
In other regions of the world, archaic introgression into humans stems from a group of Neanderthals related to those which inhabited Vindija Cave, Croatia, as opposed to archaics related to Siberian Neanderthals and Denisovans. However, about 3.3% of the archaic DNA in the modern Icelandic genome descends from the Denisovans, and such a high percentage could indicate a western Eurasian population of Denisovans which introgressed into either Vindija-related Neanderthals or immigrating modern humans.[38]
Denisovan genes may have helped early modern humans migrating out of Africa to acclimatize[
In December 2023, scientists reported that
See also
- Red Deer Cave people – Prehistoric humans from 12,500 BCE in southwest China
- Homo longi – Archaic human from China, 146,000 BP
- Homo naledi – South African archaic human species
- Nesher Ramla Homo – Extinct population of archaic humans
- Timeline of human evolution
References
- ^ Zimmer, Carl (2 March 2024). "On the Trail of the Denisovans - DNA has shown that the extinct humans thrived around the world, from chilly Siberia to high-altitude Tibet — perhaps even in the Pacific islands". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 March 2024. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
- ^ S2CID 4415601.
- ISBN 9781617313905.
- .
- )
- PMID 21829526.
- ISBN 978-0-19-882125-0.
- ^ from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2019.
- ^ from the original on 7 May 2020. Retrieved 29 May 2020.
- ^ PMID 28695206.
- ^ PMID 26630009.
- ^ PMID 31517046.
- ^ S2CID 188493848.
- ^ (PDF) from the original on 13 December 2019. Retrieved 7 December 2019.
- S2CID 225956074.
- ^ PMID 35581187.
- ^ PMID 21179140.
- PMID 28434540.
- ^ S2CID 206551893.
- ^ PMID 31043736.
- PMID 34557772.
- ^ from the original on 17 May 2020. Retrieved 29 July 2018.
- PMID 27020421.
- ^ a b c Viola, B. T.; Gunz, P.; Neubauer, S. (2019). "A parietal fragment from Denisova cave". 88th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Archived from the original on 26 September 2019. Retrieved 18 January 2020.
- ^ PMID 30651539.
- PMID 28784789.
- PMID 27429943.
- S2CID 43284294.
- PMID 24352235.
- PMID 26886800.
- PMID 28675384.
- S2CID 205352099.
- PMID 24305130.
- ISBN 978-1-137-27889-0.
- S2CID 4467094.
- .
- ^ PMID 21944045.
- ^ S2CID 216076889.
- ^ PMID 30981557.
- ^ S2CID 236994320.
- PMID 30814723.
- S2CID 28665590.
- S2CID 202676502.
- S2CID 206654741.
- ^ PMID 22936568.
- ^ PMID 25043035.
- PMID 28007980.
- PMID 29739306.
- PMID 30700881.
- ^ S2CID 239102132.
- ^ PMID 23687020.
- (PDF) from the original on 13 August 2012. Retrieved 3 May 2013.
- PMID 30135540.
- ^ PMID 24352235.
- PMID 30135540.
- PMID 29852022.
- S2CID 236784246.
- PMID 32128408.
- ISSN 2770-5005.
- PMID 26989198.
- PMID 21940856.
- PMID 24352235.
- ^ PMID 29551270.
- PMID 23341637.
- PMID 34433944.
- PMID 21868630.
- PMID 27032491.
- ^ Muscat, Baron Y. (2021). "Could the Denisovan Genes have conferred enhanced Immunity Against the G614 Mutation of SARS-CoV-2?". Human Evolution. 36. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
- PMID 36480515.
- ^ Zimmer, Carl (14 December 2023). "Morning Person? You Might Have Neanderthal Genes to Thank. - Hundreds of genetic variants carried by Neanderthals and Denisovans are shared by people who like to get up early". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 14 December 2023.
Further reading
- Karlsson, Mattis. From Fossil To Fact: The Denisova Discovery as Science in Action (Thesis). LiU E-press. ISBN 9789179291716. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
External links
- Media related to Denisova at Wikimedia Commons
- The Denisova Consortium's raw sequence data and alignments
- Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).
- Picture of Denisovan molar.