Diana Zuckerman

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Diana Zuckerman
BornJune 17, 1950
NationalityAmerican
EducationSmith College(B.A)
Ohio State University (Ph.D)

Diana M. Zuckerman (born 16 June 1950[1]) is an American health policy analyst who focuses on the implications of policies for public health and patients' health. She specializes in national health policy, particularly in women's health and the safety and effectiveness of medical products. She is the President of the National Center for Health Research (formerly National Research Center for Women & Families) and the Cancer Prevention and Treatment Fund.[2]

Early life and education

Zuckerman earned her B.A. in

Yale Medical School she was a post-doctoral fellow in epidemiology and public health
from 1979 to 1980.

Career

She was on the faculty at Vassar College and Yale University, and directed a longitudinal study of college students as director of the Seven College Study at Harvard University, publishing books and articles on the impact of media on children, the impact of religion on the health of the elderly, and how women's life experiences influence their mental and physical health. She left academia in 1983 when she was selected as a Fellow in the American Association for the Advancement of Science Congressional Science Fellowship program.[3]

From 1985 to 1993 she worked at the

infertility treatments, financial conflicts of interest among National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant recipients, and the lack of safety studies on breast implants. Information from the hearings received widespread public health, government, and media attention, resulting in several policy and regulatory changes, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requiring implant manufacturers to submit safety studies for the first time.[3]

In 1993, Zuckerman joined the staff of the

non-profit organizations, including, from 1999, presidency of the National Research Center for Women & Families[3] (renamed the National Center for Health Research in 2014) and The Cancer Prevention and Treatment Fund
.

Her work focuses on improving the quality of

industry-funded research
. She has said:

You've heard of junk science — a term coined by corporations to describe research they don't like — but the real danger to public health might be called "checkbook science": research intended not to expand knowledge or to benefit humanity, but instead to sell products.[4]

In February 2011, Zuckerman and colleagues Paul Brown and Dr.

clinical trials prior to FDA approval, and that the FDA needed to use more stringent criteria for implanted medical devices and those used to diagnose serious illnesses, and an editorial in the same issue agreed.[6][7][8][9]
In April 2011, Zuckerman presented the results of the study at a hearing by the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging.[10]

Zuckerman is the author of five books, several book chapters, and dozens of articles in medical and academic journals, and in newspapers across the country. Her policy work has resulted in news coverage on all the major TV networks, including

Published articles

Zuckerman frequently writes articles regarding medical drugs and devices, as well as public health policy. Recent articles published in peer-reviewed journals include:

References

  1. ^ http://authorities.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?AuthRecID=3305166&v1=1&HC=1&SEQ=20071211042258&PID=27945 [full citation needed]
  2. ^ "Stop Cancer Fund - Information you can use. A voice you can trust". stopcancerfund.org. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  3. ^ a b c National Research Center for Women & Families staff listing Retrieved June 14, 2010.
  4. ^ Zuckerman, Diana (2002)Hype in health reporting Archived 2006-05-23 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved August 16, 2006.
  5. PMID 21321283
    .
  6. .
  7. ^ "Not enough safety testing on medical implant devices, studies claim". cbsnews.com. CBS News. September 30, 2014. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  8. ^ Thomas M. Burton (September 29, 2014). "Medical Devices Lack Safety Evidence, Study Finds". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  9. ^ "Studies criticize U.S. medical device approval process". Reuters. September 30, 2014. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  10. ^ "A Delicate Balance: FDA and the Reform of the Medical Device Approval Process". 13 April 2011.
  11. ^ Gardiner Harris (April 8, 2009). "F.D.A. to Check Safety of Old Devices". The New York Times. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  12. ^ Reed Abelson (October 27, 2009). "Quickly Vetted, Treatment Is Offered to Patients". The New York Times. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  13. ^ Ronio Caryn Rabin (May 3, 2015). "Long-Term Data on Complications Adds to Criticism of Essure Contraceptive Implant". The New York Times. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  14. ^ Marshall Allen; Olga Pierce (February 6, 2015). "Knee Replacement Device Unapproved, but Used in Surgery". The New York Times. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  15. ^ "Implant Maker Fixed Samples Only". The Washington Post. December 4, 2005. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  16. ^ "Breast implants: FDA stands by silicone implants". Los Angeles Times. June 23, 2011. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  17. ^ "Hip implants a bit more likely to fail in women". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. February 19, 2013. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  18. ^ "FDA panel supports firm's breast implant". boston.com. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  19. ^ SELF Staffers (January 26, 2011). "The True Price of Cheap Cosmetic Surgery". SELF. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  20. ^ "Key Staff". National Center for Health Research. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  21. ^ "Are Breast Implants Safe?". Medscape. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
  22. ^ "FDA Reviewing Safety of Essure Birth Control Implant". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2015-09-25. Retrieved 2017-02-24.