Diet and obesity

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Available dietary energy across time
  no data
  <1600
  1600-1800
  1800-2000
  2000-2200
  2200-2400
  2400-2600
  2600-2800
  2800-3000
  3000-3200
  3200-3400
  3400-3600
  >3600


food advertising
, social customs and cultural influences, as well as food availability and pricing all play a role in determining what and how much an individual eats.

Dietary energy supply

Average per capita energy consumption of the world from 1961 to 2002

The dietary energy supply is the food available for human consumption, usually expressed in kilocalories per person per day. It gives an overestimate of the total amount of food consumed as it reflects both food consumed and food wasted. The per capita dietary energy supply varies markedly between different regions and countries. It has also changed significantly over time.[2] From the early 1970s to the late 1990s, the average calories available per person per day (the amount of food bought) has increased in all part of the world except Eastern Europe and parts of Africa. The United States had the highest availability with 3654 kilo calories per person in 1996.[3] This increased further in 2002 to 3770.[4] During the late 1990s, Europeans had 3394 kilo calories per person, in the developing areas of Asia there were 2648 kilo calories per person, and in sub-Sahara Africa people had 2176 kilo calories per person.[3][5]

Average calorie consumption

Change over time of the macronutrient composition of the US male diet
Change over time of the macronutrient composition of the US female diet
USDA chart showing the increase in soda consumption and the decrease in milk consumption from 1947 to 2001[6]

From 1971 to 2000, the average daily number of calories which women consumed in the United States increased by 335 calories per day (1542 calories in 1971 and 1877 calories in 2000). For men, the average increase was 168 calories per day (2450 calories in 1971 and 2618 calories in 2000). Most of these extra calories came from an increase in carbohydrate consumption, though there was also an increase in fat consumption over the same time period.

sweetened beverages now accounts for almost 25 percent of daily calories in young adults in America.[8] As these estimates are based on a person's recall, they may underestimate the amount of calories actually consumed.[7]

Fast food

As societies become increasingly reliant on energy-dense fast-food meals, the association between fast food consumption and obesity becomes more concerning.[9] In the United States, consumption of fast food meals has tripled and calorie intake from fast food has quadrupled between 1977 and 1995.[10] Consumption of sweetened drinks is also believed to be a major contributor to the rising rates of obesity.[11]

Portion size

A comparison of a typical 1984 cheeseburger (left) of 333 calories with a 2004 cheeseburger (right) of 590 calories as per the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute[12]

The portion size of many prepackage and restaurant foods has increased in both the United States and Denmark since the 1970s.[7] Fast food servings, for example, are 2 to 5 times larger than they were in the 1980s. Evidence has shown that larger portions of energy-dense foods lead to greater energy intake and thus to greater rates of obesity.[13][14]

Meat consumption

A 2010 study published in the

abdominal fat across a sample of 91,214 people found that even when controlling for calories and subjects with cancer or smoking cessation, meat consumption is linked with obesity.[17] Further population studies, reviews, and meta-analysis studies have corroborated the claim that greater meat consumption is linked to greater rates of obesity,[18] especially in regards to red meat and processed meat.[19]

Sugar consumption

Drinking more sugary beverages (including

free sugar intake increase or decrease their weight.[25]

Reviews indicate that governmental health policies should be implemented to discourage intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, and reduce the obesity in children and adults. Obesity has been rising in the 21st century.[20][21][22][23] Other than adding excessive calories, the mechanisms by which high sugar consumption causes obesity are unclear because of limitations in clinical research involving uncontrolled factors, such as overall diet, physical activity, and sedentary lifestyle.[clarification needed][20][21][26]

Ultraprocessed food consumption

Numerous large studies have demonstrated that eating ultraprocessed food has a positive dose-dependent relationship with both abdominal obesity and general obesity in both men and women.[27] Consuming a diet rich in unprocessed and minimally processed foods is linked with lower obesity risk and less chronic disease. These results are consistent among American,[28] Canadian,[29] Latin American,[30] British,[31] Australian,[32] French,[33] and Spaniard populations.[34]

Particular processing ingredients used in ultraprocessed foods have been linked with increasing the risk of obesity further. Intake of

trans fat from industrial oils has been associated with increased abdominal obesity in men[35] and increased weight and waist circumference in women.[36] These associations were not attenuated when fat intake and calorie intake was accounted for.[37][38]

Similarly, heavy consumption of

fried food is linked to greater obesity risk on a population level.[39] On a more individual level, the relative risk of fried food consumption and increased weight gain seems to depend on genetic predisposition.[40]

Social policy and change

Prevalence of obesity in the adult population by region (2000 - 2016)
Prevalence of obesity in the adult population in 2016


New agricultural technologies have led to an overall reduction in the cost of food relative to household income, especially in

U.S. farm bill to over-consumption of calories derived from these crops and to rising obesity rates.[41] While increased consumption of foods derived from these commodities is correlated with an increase in BMI (at the population level), no current research supports a causal relationship between farm subsidies and obesity.[42] From a policy perspective, the cost of sugar would actually decrease in the US if the commodity support programs in the farm bill were removed, largely due to the tariffs in the farm bill that restrict the importation of lower-cost sugar available on the global market.[43]

Participation by adults in the

Food Stamps) is positively associated with obesity, waist circumference, elevated fasting glucose, and metabolic syndrome.[44]

Metabolism

Evidence does not support the commonly expressed view that some obese people eat little yet gain weight due to a slow metabolism. On average obese people have a greater energy expenditure than normal weight or thin people and actually have higher basal metabolic rates.[45][46] This is because it takes more energy to maintain an increased body mass.[47] Obese people also underreport how much food they consume compared to those of normal weight.[48] Tests of human subjects carried out in a calorimeter support this conclusion.[49]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Compendium of food and agriculture indicators – 2006". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Archived from the original on August 2, 2008. Retrieved February 18, 2009.
  2. ^ "Compendium of food and agriculture indicators – 2006". UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Archived from the original on August 2, 2008. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  3. ^ a b "Calories per capita per day". UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Archived from the original (gif) on September 1, 2017. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  4. ^ "www.fao.org" (PDF). UN Food and Agriculture Organization. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  5. ^ "USDA: frsept99b". USDA. Archived from the original on June 3, 2010. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  6. ^ "In the Long Run" (PDF). USDA. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 25, 2009. Retrieved February 17, 2009.
  7. ^
    PMID 14762332
    .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. ^ Lin BH, Guthrie J, Frazao E (1999). "Nutrient contribution of food away from home". In Frazão E (ed.). Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 750: America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. pp. 213–239. Archived from the original on 2002-06-11. Retrieved 2009-03-28.
  11. S2CID 28672221
    .
  12. ^ "Portion Distortion I". National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 17 November 2004. p. 7 – via Wikimedia Commons.
  13. PMID 15795457
    .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. .
  17. .
  18. .
  19. .
  20. ^ .
  21. ^ .
  22. ^ .
  23. ^ .
  24. ^ Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation (2003). "WHO Technical Report Series 916: Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases" (PDF). Retrieved 25 December 2013.
  25. . Increasing or decreasing free sugars is associated with parallel changes in body weight, and the relationship is present regardless of the level of intake of free sugars.
  26. .
  27. .
  28. .
  29. .
  30. . Retrieved 15 March 2021.
  31. .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. .
  35. .
  36. .
  37. .
  38. .
  39. .
  40. . Retrieved 15 March 2021.
  41. ^ Pollan M (22 April 2007). "You Are What You Grow". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-07-30.
  42. PMID 27379488
    .
  43. ^ Aubrey A (2016-07-18). "Does Subsidizing Crops We're Told To Eat Less Of Fatten Us Up?". NPR.org. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
  44. PMID 22170370
    .
  45. . Retrieved April 5, 2009.
  46. ^ Crowe T. "Monday's medical myth: 'my slow metabolism makes me fat'". Retrieved 15 November 2013.
  47. PMID 10927998
    .
  48. .
  49. ^ "mdPassport". Archived from the original on January 11, 2009. Retrieved December 31, 2008.