Easter controversy
The controversy over the correct date for Easter began in Early Christianity as early as the 2nd century AD. Discussion and disagreement over the best method of computing the date of Easter Sunday has been ongoing ever since and remains unresolved. Different Christian denominations continue to celebrate Easter on different dates, with Eastern and Western Christian churches being a notable example.
Quartodecimanism
First Council of Nicaea in 325
In 325 an
Synod of Whitby in 664
The Roman missionaries coming to Britain in the time of
This 84-year cycle (called the latercus) gave way to the Alexandrian computus in stages. The Alexandrian computus may have been adopted in parts of the south of Ireland in the first half of the 7th century.[12] Among the northern English, the use of the Alexandrian computus over the Britanno-Irish cycle was decided at the Synod of Whitby in 664.[13] The Alexandrian computus was finally adopted by the Irish colonies in northern Britain in the early 8th century.[14]
Modern calls for a reform of the date of Easter
After the
Several attempts have sought to achieve a common method for computing the date of Easter.
In 1997 the
. The reform would have been implemented starting in 2001, since in that year the Eastern and Western dates of Easter would coincide. This proposal, however, was never implemented.See also
Notes
- ^ Leviticus 23:5: "Mense primo, quarta decima die mensis, ad vesperum Pascha Domini est."
- ^ IshYoBoy.com (2018-03-30). "When Heresy was Orthodox: Quartodecimanism as a Brief Case Study | CSCO". Retrieved 2022-05-06.
- ^ "The Passover-Easter-Quartodeciman Controversy". Grace Communion International. Retrieved 2022-05-06.
- ^ "CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Easter Controversy". www.newadvent.org. Retrieved 2022-05-06.
- ^ Schaff, Philip; Wace, Henry (1890). A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Second Series. Parker.
- ISBN 0-8028-8129-7
- ^ Charles Jones, Bedae Opera de temporibus, (Cambridge, Mediaeval Academy of America), 1943, p. 25.
- ^ Bede, Church History of the English People, 2.2, in J.E. King, tr., Bede: Historical Works, Vol. 1, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, 1930, p. 205.
- ^ Columbanus, Letter to Pope Gregory, in A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Second Series, Volume 13, p. 40.
- ^ David Ewing Duncan, "The Calendar", 1998, p.105.
- ^ Easter principles and a fifth-century lunar cycle used in the British Isles Daniel McCarthy, Journal for the History of Astronomy Volume 24(3), issue 76, August 1993, pages 204-224.
- ^ Cummian, Letter on the Easter Controversy, PL 87.969.
- ^ Bede, Church History, 3.25.
- ^ Bede, Church History, 5.22.
- ^ "World Council of Churches". Archived from the original on 2008-12-05. Retrieved 2006-08-14.
References
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Easter Controversy". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- Jones, Charles W. Bedae Opera de Temporibus. Cambridge: Mediaeval Academy of America, 1943. pp. 3–104.
- McCarthy, Daniel (1994). "The Origin of the Latercus Paschal Cycle of the Insular Celtic Churches". Cambrian Medieval Celtic Studies. 28: 25–49.
- McCarthy, Daniel and Ó Cróinín, Dáibhí. "The 'Lost' Irish 84-year Easter Table Rediscovered", Peritia, 6–7 (1987–88): pp. 227–242.
- Mosshammer, Alden A. The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 0-19-954312-7.
- Walsh, Maura and Ó Cróinín, Dáibhí. Cummian's Letter De controversia paschali and the De ratione conputandi. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1988.
- Wallis, Faith. Bede: The Reckoning of Time. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2004. pp. xxxiv–lxiii.