Ecdysozoa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Ecdysozoa
Temporal range: Cambrian - Recent Molecular clock indicates a possible Ediacaran origin[1]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Subkingdom: Eumetazoa
Clade: ParaHoxozoa
Clade: Bilateria
Clade: Nephrozoa
(unranked): Protostomia
Superphylum: Ecdysozoa
Aguinaldo et al., 1997
Phyla

Ecdysozoa (

phenotypes.[5] This clade, that is, a group consisting of a common ancestor and all its descendants, was formally named by Aguinaldo et al. in 1997, based mainly on phylogenetic trees constructed using 18S ribosomal RNA genes.[6]

A large study in 2008 by Dunn et al. strongly supported the monophyly of Ecdysozoa.[7]

The group Ecdysozoa is supported by many morphological characters, including growth by ecdysis, with moulting of the cuticle – without mitosis in the epidermis – under control of the prohormone ecdysone, and internal fertilization.[8]

The group was initially contested by a significant minority of biologists. Some argued for groupings based on more traditional taxonomic techniques,[9] while others contested the interpretation of the molecular data.[10][11]

Etymology

The name Ecdysozoa is "scientific" Greek, derived from ἔκδυσις (ékdusis) "shedding" + ζῷον (zôion) "animal".

Characteristics

The most notable characteristic shared by ecdysozoans is a three-layered

spiral cleavage as in most other protostomes. Ancestrally, the group exhibited sclerotized teeth within the foregut, and a ring of spines around the mouth opening, though these features have been secondarily lost in certain groups.[13][14] A respiratory and circulatory system is only present in onychophorans
and arthropods (often absent in smaller arthropods like mites); in the rest of the groups, both systems are missing.

Phylogeny

The Ecdysozoa include the following phyla:

Nematoda, and Nematomorpha. A few other groups, such as the gastrotrichs, have been considered possible members but lack the main characters of the group, and are now placed elsewhere. The Arthropoda, Onychophora, and Tardigrada have been grouped together as the Panarthropoda because they are distinguished by segmented body plans.[15] Dunn et al. in 2008 suggested that the tardigrada could be grouped along with the nematodes, leaving Onychophora as the sister group to the arthropods.[7] The non-panarthropod members of Ecdysozoa have been grouped as Cycloneuralia but they are more usually considered paraphyletic in representing the primitive condition from which the Panarthropoda evolved.[16]

A modern consensus phylogenetic tree for the protostomes is shown below.[17][18][19][20][21][22] It is indicated when approximately clades radiated into newer clades in millions of years ago (Mya); dashed lines show especially uncertain placements.[23]

The phylogenetic tree is based on Nielsen et al.[24] and Howard et al.[25]

 Bilateria 

Xenacoelomorpha

 Nephrozoa 

Deuterostomia

 
Protostomia
 
 Ecdysozoa 

Spiralia

Kimberella

610 mya

Older alternative groupings

Articulata hypothesis

The grouping proposed by Aguinaldo et al. is almost universally accepted, replacing an older hypothesis that

Annelida,[26] though later considered them unrelated.[27]
Inclusion of the
James Lake for the discovery of the New Animal Phylogeny consisting of the Ecdysozoa, the Lophotrochozoa, and the Deuterostomia.[31]

Coelomata hypothesis

Before Aguinaldo's Ecdysozoa proposal, one of the prevailing theories for the evolution of the

Eucoelomata (true coelom). Adoutte and coworkers were among the first to strongly support the Ecdysozoa.[32] With the introduction of molecular phylogenetics, the coelomate hypothesis was abandoned, although some molecular, phylogenetic support for the Coelomata continued until as late as 2005.[33]

References

External links