Ecgric of East Anglia

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Ecgric
Anglo-Saxon Paganism

Ecgric (killed c. 636) was a

Benedictine monk Bede
in around 731 AD.

In the years that followed the reign of Rædwald and the murder of Rædwald's son and successor Eorpwald in around 627, East Anglia lost its dominance over other Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. Three years after Eorpwald's murder at the hands of a pagan, Ecgric's kinsman Sigeberht returned from exile and they ruled East Anglia jointly, with Ecgric perhaps ruling the northern part of the kingdom. Sigeberht succeeded in re-establishing Christianity throughout East Anglia, but Ecgric may have remained a pagan, as Bede praises only Sigeberht for his accomplishments, and his lack of praise for his co-ruler is significant. Ecgric ruled alone after Sigeberht retired to his monastery at Beodricesworth in around 634: it has also been suggested that he was a sub-king who only became king after Sigeberht's abdication. Both Ecgric and Sigeberht were killed in battle in around 636, at an unknown location, when the East Anglians were forced to defend themselves from a Mercian military assault led by their king, Penda. Ecgric, whose grave may have been the ship burial under Mound 1 at Sutton Hoo, was succeeded by Anna.

East Anglian allegiances

Map of Anglo-Saxon Britain
The main Anglo-Saxon kingdoms

After 616,

Thames, the pagan Penda of Mercia emerged to challenge the pre-eminence of the new overlord (or bretwalda), Edwin of Northumbria.[3] The reversion of East Anglia to rule by Eorpwald's successor, the pagan Ricberht, possibly due to Mercian influence, temporarily overthrew an important pillar of Edwin's authority.[4]

In contrast, two sons of Rædwald's brother

Hereswitha, who was Edwin of Northumbria's grand-niece. This marriage was probably intended to reinforce the conversion of East Anglia to Christianity.[5]

Wuffingas identity

Ecgric was a member of the Wuffingas royal family, but his exact descent is not known, as the only information historians have is from Bede, who named him as Sigeberht's cognatus or 'kinsman'.[6] The 12th century English historian William of Malmesbury contradicts Bede, stating that Sigeberht was Rædwald's stepson. The name Sigeberht is not of East Anglian, but of Frankish origin. According to Bede, Sigeberht was Rædwald's son.[7] Rædwald may have exiled his step-son so as to protect the inheritance of his son Ecgric, who was of his own blood-line.[8]

It has been suggested by Sam Newton that Ecgric may in fact be identical to Eni's son Æthelric, whose descendants became kings of East Anglia.[9] Æthelric's son Ealdwulf ruled from about 664 to 713. After Ecgric's death, three other sons of Eni ruled in succession before Ealdwulf, an indication that Raedwald's line was extinct. Æthelric's marriage to Hereswith suggests that it was expected that he would rule East Anglia and he may have been promoted by Edwin before 632.[5] Æthelric was apparently dead by 647, at which time Anna was already ruling and Hereswith had gone to Gaul to lead a religious life.[10] It has therefore been argued that Æthelric and Ecgric were in fact the same person, a suggestion that is disputed by the historian Barbara Yorke, who notes that the two names are too distinct to be compatible.[11]

Ecgric/Æthelric placed as the son of Rædwald or the son of Eni

Tytila
?Rædwald?Eni
RægenhereEorpwaldEcgricSigeberhtEcgricAnnaÆthelhereÆthelwold

Joint rule

Rædwald's son (or stepson) Sigeberht renewed Christian rule in East Anglia after returning as a Christian from exile in Gaul (into which Rædwald had driven him). His assumption of power may have involved a military conquest.[5] His reign was devoted to the conversion of his people, the establishment of the see of Dommoc as the bishopric of Felix of Burgundy, the creation of a school of letters, the endowment of a monastery for Fursey and the building of the first monastery of Beodricesworth (Bury St Edmunds), all accomplished within about four years.[12]

During at least part of Sigeberht's reign, Ecgric ruled jointly with him over part of the kingdom of East Anglia.[13] A passage in Bede's Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum describing the reasons for Sigeberht's abdication also mentions Ecgric:

"This king became so great a lover of the heavenly kingdom, that quitting the affairs of his crown, and committing the same to his kinsman, Ecgric, who before held a part of that kingdom, he went himself into a monastery, which he had built, and having received the tonsure, applied himself rather to gain a heavenly throne":
—Bede, Ecclesiastical History of the English People[14]

According to Richard Hoggett, the practice of being ruled by more than one individual may have been a common occurrence in East Anglia as it was for the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of Kent and Northumbria. Ecgric and Sigeberht may have simultaneously ruled the peoples known as the North-folk and South-folk, who lived in the parts of their kingdom that would later become the counties of Norfolk and Suffolk.[15] However, Carver notes that Ecgric may not have reigned jointly with Sigeberht, but could just have plausibly ruled as a sub-king or served as an administrator within a region under East Anglian hegemony, only rising as king of the East Angles after Sigeberht's abdication.[16] In contrast with Sigebert, Ecgric seems to have remained a pagan. There is no evidence that he was baptised or that he promoted Christianity in East Anglia, according to D. P. Kirby, who notes that Bede wrote nothing that could imply that Ecgric was a Christian, in contrast to his praise of Sigeberht's efforts to establish Christianity in East Anglia.[17]

Reign following Sigeberht's abdication

In 633 the Christian kingdoms suffered a dual shock: Edwin of Northumbria's death at the hands of Penda of Mercia and

Bury St. Edmunds). His abdication, which cannot be dated, left Ecgric to rule the East Anglians alone.[19] Ecgric therefore ruled a kingdom that had been "evangelised in the united spirit of the Roman and Irish Churches", according to Plunkett, who notes that Felix would have respected the teachings of the Irish missionaries, despite his own strong allegiance towards Canterbury.[20]

Death

After Ecgric had been ruling alone for two years, East Anglia was attacked by a Mercian army, led by Penda. The date of the invasion is usually given as around 636, although Kirby suggests it could have been so late as 641.[21] Ecgric was sufficiently forewarned as to be able to gather an army, described by Bede as opimus or splendid.[22] Realising that they would be inferior in battle to the war-hardened Mercians and remembering that Sigeberht was once their most vigorous and distinguished leader, the East Anglians urged him to lead them in battle, hoping that his presence would encourage them not to flee from the Mercians. After he refused, on account of his religious calling, he was borne off against his will to the battlefield. He refused to bear weapons and so was killed.[15] Ecgric was also slain during the battle and many of his countrymen either perished or were put to flight. The location of the site of the battle in which the East Anglians were routed and their king was killed is unknown, but it can be presumed to have been close to the kingdom's western border with the Middle Angles.[15]

Ecgric is a possible contender, as well as Rædwald, Eorpwald and Sigeberht, for being the East Anglian king who was buried within Mound 1 at Sutton Hoo.[23] Rupert Bruce-Mitford suggests that it is perhaps unlikely that Ecgric's successor Anna, a devout Christian, would have given him a ship burial, but he does not dismiss the theory entirely.[24]

References

  1. ^ Hoggett 2010, pp. 28–29.
  2. ^ Yorke 1990, p. 62.
  3. ^ Kirby 2000, p. 55.
  4. ^ Plunkett 2005, pp. 97–99.
  5. ^ a b c Plunkett 2005, p. 100.
  6. ^ Yorke 1990, p. 69.
  7. ^ Yorke 1990, pp. 62, 65, 67.
  8. ^ Plunkett 2005, p. 72.
  9. ^ Hoggett 2010, p. 25.
  10. ^ Hunter Blair 1985, p. 6.
  11. ^ Yorke 1990, p. 68.
  12. ^ Plunkett 2005, pp. 1, 100, 106.
  13. ^ Bede 1969, chapter 18.
  14. ^ Bede 1999, pp. 3–18.
  15. ^ a b c Hoggett 2010, p. 32.
  16. ^ Carver 2006, p. 6.
  17. ^ Kirby 2000, p. 67.
  18. ^ Lapidge 2001, p. 164.
  19. ^ Bede 1999, p. 392, note 138.
  20. ^ Plunkett 2005, p. 105.
  21. ^ Kirby 2000, p. 74.
  22. ^ Plunkett 2005, p. 106.
  23. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1975, pp. 63, 99.
  24. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1975, p. 101.

Sources

  • Bede (1969). B. Colgrave; R.A.B. Mynors (eds.). Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum. Oxford.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )
  • ISBN 0-19-283866-0
    .
  • Bruce-Mitford, R.L.S. (1975). The Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial, Vol. 1. London: British Museum.
  • ISBN 0-85115-330-5
    .
  • Hoggett, Richard (2010). The Archaeology of the East Anglian Conversion. Woodbridge, UK: The Boydell Press.
    ISBN 978-1-84383-595-0
    .
  • ISBN 0-521-25902-9
    .
  • Kirby, D. P. (2000). The Earliest English Kings. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 67, 74.
    ISBN 0-415-24211-8
    .
  • Lapidge, Michael (2001). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
    ISBN 978-0-631-22492-1
    .
  • Plunkett, Steven (2005). Suffolk in Anglo-Saxon Times. Stroud: Tempus.
    ISBN 0-7524-3139-0
    .
  • ISBN 1-85264-027-8.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )

Further reading

External links
English royalty
Preceded by
King of East Anglia

with Sigeberht until c.634
c.630 – c.636

Succeeded by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecgric_of_East_Anglia&oldid=1198919852"