Ecoauthoritarianism
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Part of a series on |
Green politics |
---|
Ecoauthoritarianism (also known as an eco-dictatorshippolitical ideology which attempts to reconcile both environmentalist and authoritarian tendencies. It is justified by the belief of the inevitability and necessity of a strong central government to preserve the environment.
Characteristics
In 2010, political scientist Mark Beeson defined 'ecoauthoritarianism' as "...the decrease in individual liberty as governments seek to transform environmentally destructive behaviour."
right wing[citation needed].
Proponents of ecoauthoritarianism generally tend to critique
meritocratic system. Instead of a democratic rule, politicians would be chosen according to their expertise[citation needed
].
Within
illegitimacy of unsustainable politics in a democracy.[6] It emphasizes that democracy cannot be an absolute, since sustainability is a precondition for everything valuable. It shows how the overexploitation of resources, given its consequences, must be considered as violence and that in fact, many issues cannot be subject to democratic decision making nor should they be subject to democratic decision making. There are many instances where the state already interferes and where interference is essential for public safety.[7]
Ecoauthoritarian thoughts are gaining traction recently, as some people[autocratic governments when it comes to implementing good environmental governance.[9]
See also
- Deep ecology
- Ecofascism
- Eco-nationalism
- Green Imperialism
References
- .
- S2CID 154625483.
- .
- ISBN 9780203449554.
- ^ Meadows, D. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. et al. New York: Universe Book.
- ISBN 978-1-5376-7868-9.
- Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- ^ Beeson 2010, p. 276.
- ^ Bell, D. A. (2015). The China Model. Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy (Kindle ed.). Princeton University Press.