Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
This article is part of a series on the |
Constitution of the United States |
---|
![]() |
Preamble and Articles |
Amendments to the Constitution |
Unratified Amendments: |
History |
Full text |
The Eleventh Amendment (Amendment XI) is an
The Eleventh Amendment was adopted to overrule the
Text
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
Background
The Eleventh Amendment was the first Constitutional amendment adopted after the
Proposal and ratification
The Eleventh Amendment was proposed by the 3rd Congress on March 4, 1794, when it was approved by the House of Representatives by vote of 81–9,[3] having been previously passed by the Senate, 23–2, on January 14, 1794.[4] The amendment was ratified by the state legislatures of the following states:[5]
- New York: March 27, 1794
- Rhode Island: March 31, 1794
- Connecticut: May 8, 1794
- New Hampshire: June 16, 1794
- Massachusetts: June 26, 1794
- Vermont: November 9, 1794
- Virginia: November 18, 1794
- Georgia: November 29, 1794
- Kentucky: December 7, 1794
- Maryland: December 26, 1794
- Delaware: January 23, 1795
- North Carolina: February 7, 1795
There were fifteen states at the time; ratification by twelve added the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution.[6] (South Carolina ratified it on December 4, 1797.)
On January 8, 1798, approximately three years after the Eleventh Amendment's actual adoption, President John Adams stated in a message to Congress that it had been ratified by the necessary number of states and was now a part of the Constitution.[7] New Jersey and Pennsylvania did not take action on the amendment during that era; neither did Tennessee, which had become the 16th state on June 1, 1796. However, on June 25, 2018, the New Jersey Senate adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 75 to ratify the Eleventh Amendment.[8]
Impact

Almost exactly three years after its ratification, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in (1798) resulted in every pending action brought under Chisholm being dismissed due to the amendment's adoption.
Sovereign immunity
The amendment's text does not mention suits brought against a state by its own citizens. However, in Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890), the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment reflects a broader principle of sovereign immunity. As Justice Anthony Kennedy later stated in Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999):
[S]overeign immunity derives not from the Eleventh Amendment but from the structure of the original Constitution itself. ... Nor can we conclude that the specific Article I powers delegated to Congress necessarily include, by virtue of the Necessary and Proper Clause or otherwise, the incidental authority to subject the States to private suits as a means of achieving objectives otherwise within the scope of the enumerated powers.
However, Justice David Souter, writing for a four-Justice dissent in Alden, said the states surrendered their sovereign immunity when they ratified the Constitution. He read the amendment's text as reflecting a narrow form of sovereign immunity that limited only the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts. He concluded that neither the Eleventh Amendment in particular nor the Constitution in general insulates the states from suits by individuals.[9]
Application to federal law
Although the Eleventh Amendment grants immunity to states from suit for money damages or equitable relief without their consent, in
Territorial application
The amendment's applicability to
Treaties and foreign relations
International law scholar Thomas H. Lee argues that foreign states were intended to be excluded from the Eleventh Amendment's prohibition—i.e., that foreign governments would still be permitted to sue state governments.[14] However, in Principality of Monaco v. Mississippi, 292 U.S. 313 (1934), the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment also protects states from lawsuits by foreign entities, which Lee considers a departure from established jurisprudence;[15] his thesis is that the Eleventh Amendment exempted foreign governments in order to allow recourse for violations of treaty obligations, which in turn promoted positive and peaceful foreign relations between a fledgling U.S. and the international community.[15] Lee likewise argues that the Eleventh Amendment reflected the international legal principle of sovereign equality, whereby foreign states were of equal legal status to the U.S. states, and as such could bring lawsuits.[16]
See also
- Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
- Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
References
- ^ "Annotation 1 – Eleventh Amendment – State Immunity". FindLaw. Archived from the original on June 25, 2013. Retrieved May 4, 2013.
- ^ Susan Gluck Mezey (2006). "The Eleventh Amendment" (Archived 2017-12-08 at the Wayback Machine). Federalism in America: An Encyclopedia (Archived 2017-11-25 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ "4 Annals of Congress 477 (1795)". Archived from the original on October 20, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2014.
- ^ "4 Annals of Congress 30 (1795)". Archived from the original on February 6, 2018. Retrieved April 18, 2014.
- ^ "The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, Centennial Edition, Interim Edition: Analysis of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States to June 26, 2013" (PDF). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013. p. 42. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 25, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2014.
- ^ "U.S. Timeline 1790-1799". America's Best History. Retrieved February 5, 2021.
- ^ "7 Annals of Congress 809 (1798)". Archived from the original on February 6, 2018. Retrieved April 18, 2014.
- ^ "New Jersey SCR75 | 2018–2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved 2020-07-10.
- ^ "Dissenting opinion in Alden v. Maine". Legal Information Institute. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
- ^ "Ramirez v. Puerto Rico Fire Service and Office of Personnel (1st Cir. 1983)". Casemine. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
- ^ Guam Soc. of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada, 776 F.Supp. 1422 (D.Guam 1990)
- ^ Norita v. Northern Mariana Islands, 331 F.3d 690 (9th Cir 2003)
- ^ Tonder v. M/V The Burkholder, 630 F.Supp. 691 (D.Virgin Islands 1986)
- SSRN 575583
- ^ a b "The Origins and Fall of Treaty Supremacy and Its Significance". Opinio Juris. 2017-02-15. Retrieved 2023-04-07.
- ^ Thomas H. Lee, Making Sense of the Eleventh Amendment: International Law and State Sovereignty, 96 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1027 (2001-2002) Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/407
External links
- Clark, Bradford R. (2010). "The Eleventh Amendment and the Nature of the Union" (PDF). Harvard Law Review. 123 (8): 1817–1918. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 15, 2013.
- CRS Annotated Constitution: Eleventh Amendment
- Leaving the Chisholm Trail