Eoarchean geology

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Eoarchean geology is the study of the oldest preserved crustal fragments of Earth during the Eoarchean era from 4.031 to 3.6 billion years ago. Major well-preserved rock units dated Eoarchean are known from three localities, the Isua Greenstone Belt in Southwest Greenland, the Acasta Gneiss in the Slave Craton in Canada, and the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt in the eastern coast of Hudson Bay in Quebec. From the dating of rocks in these three regions scientists suggest that plate tectonics could go back as early as Eoarchean.

A tonalite-trondhjemite and gneiss outcrop in Grimstad, Norway. TTG is a prevalent rock type in archean formations.

All three regions contain an abundance of

tonalite, trondhjemite and granodiorite (TTG) series rocks,[1][failed verification] with minor granulite to amphibolite facies gneiss complexes, which means that the original characters of the rocks has been disturbed by at least one ductile deformation at deep crustal conditions.[2][failed verification
]

Eoarchean geology is important in investigating earth's tectonic history. It is because the earth had just undergone an transformation to the present-day-similar convective mode and lithosphere from a magma ocean in Hadean Eon, to either a protoplate tectonics or an unstable stagnant lithosphere lid at its infant stages.[3] The earth's condition during Archean to Proterozoic (including Eoarchean era) serves as a crucial linkage between Hadean magma ocean to present-day plate tectonics.[3] Various interpretations have been suggested to explain the prevalent tectonic style corresponding to Eoarchean geology. However it can be, in general, classified into two tectonic models, which are vertical tectonics and plate tectonics.[3]

Explanation on the release of large amount of mantle heat is the prominent concern. Most of the evidences shows a probability that pre-plate tectonics dominantly involved intense surface volcanism, active magmatism and crustal recycling.

Occurrence of Eoarchean rocks

Eoarchean geology is dominated by:

  1. Mafic to ultramafic volcanics
  2. Tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG)
  3. Chemical sedimentary rocks such as chert and Banded-Iron-Formations (BIF)
  4. Subordinate clastic sedimentary rocks.
Distribution of Preserved Eoarchean rocks on earth crust
Name Age of the formation Location Dominant rock type Remarks
Acasta Gneisses 4.03 Ga to 3.96 Ga Slave Craton in Northwest Canada Highly deformed TTG, with interleaving amphibolite, ultramafic rocks and pink granites
Napier Complex 3.95 Ga to 3.8 Ga Enderby Land, Antarctica TTG, which has sedimentary protoliths
Itsaq Gneiss Complex Akulleq terrance at 3.9 Ga to 3.8 Ga Southwest Greenland Amitsoq TTG complex The largest and best-preserved fragment of Eoarchean continental crust
Saglek-Hebron block 3.86 Ga to 3.73 Ga East coast of Labrador supracrustal assemblage in Nulliak unit; Gneiss in Uivak units The region is divided into three regions; they are Nulliak, Uivak I and Uivak II
Nuvvuagittuq Supracrustal Belt about 3.8 Ga Superior Province, Quebec Two greenstone assemblage successions (1) Conglomerate, Garnet paragneisses, chemical sedimentary rocks

(2) Volcanic rocks, magic to intermediate tuff and chemical sedimentary rocks

There are some zircons dated back to the Eoarchean, but this does not necessarily indicate the host rock was formed in the Eoarchean, in

(1) Anshan Area in North China Craton[4]

(2) Sebakwe Protocraton in Zimbabwe Craton[4]

World Map showing the location of the most prominent well-preserved Eoarchean geology 1.Acasta Gneiss 2.Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt 3.Saglek-Hebron Block 4.Itsaq Gneiss Complex 5.Napier Complex a.Sebakwe protocraton b.Anshan

Isua Supracrustal Belt and the Isua Area

Main article: Isua Greenstone Belt
Map of Isua Area. Between the 3.7 Ga region (Marked in red) and the 3.8 Ga region (Marked in Green), it is the Isua Supracrustal Belt. It is located near Nuuk in Greenland (Inspired by Nutman et al., 2009, Modified for use)

The Isua Greenstone Belt, also known as the Isua supracrustal belt, is found at the Isukasia terrane in Southern West Greenland and hosts the oldest and well-preserved sedimentary and volcanic rocks dated between 3.7 and 3.8 billion years old. The 35-km long, 4 km wide greenstone belt had been deformed into a thin U-shape[5] pointing to the Southwest direction with an approximate diameter of 25 km.[6] It consists mainly of amphibolite metamorphosed from basalt, with chemical rocks, felsic units and ultra mafic units. The upper amphibolite metamorphic grade of these rocks, with local retrogressions, has stabilised (black) hornblende; these rocks are not "greenstones" because they experienced metamorphism well beyond greenschist facies. Nevertheless, the term "Isua Greenstone Belt" lingers on in the literature.[2]

The Isua Supracrustal Belt (ISB) is part of the Itsaq Gneiss Complex, in which most of the lithology are

orthogneiss.[2] Local orthogneisses were previously named after Amîtsoq Gneiss. Geologists often regionally divide the entire Isua Area into two parts along the ISB. The core of the U-shaped Isua belt, or the "northern gneisses", are mostly tonalite to granitic rock,[7] while the south to the belt or the "southern gneisses" are similar granitoid rocks.[7] Contacts between the ISB and the gneisses are in general strongly deformed and myloitic.[7]

The tectonic style responsible for the Isua area is still controversial. Either vertical plate tectonics[8] or proto-plate tectonics with subduction is viable.[2] Geologists who are proto-plate tectonic advocates often divide the Isua area into northern and southern terrane by the average dated age from the gneiss in each terrane.[9] Between these two chronologically different regions, a thin sedimentary unit lying in the Isua Supracrustal Belt is the dividing boundary.[2] These two terrane were juxtaposed and assembled between either 3680 to 3660 Ma[10] or 3650 to 3600 Ma.[11]

Lithologies

The Isua Supracrustal Belt was mostly deformed during the Eoarchean. In many areas, primary volcanic and sedimentary structures were obliterated.[10] However, in rare low strain areas, the original protolith structure is still visible. The major lithologies in the Isua belt are (1) tonalites of the Itsaq/Amîtsoq gneiss, (2) Basaltic pillow lava and pillow breccia, and (3) Banded Iron formations.[2]

Presence of the above lithologies enables study of the

paleo-environment
:

  1. paragneisses sometimes show graded felsic clast units, which means a derivation from felsic volcanic or felsic volcano-sedimentary rock.[11]
  2. Presence of pillow-structured lava and breccia indicates that there was liquid water in the eoarchean.[11]
  3. chemical sediment.[11]

A Subsequent U-Pb zircon-dating program demonstrated that the belt contains supracrustal rocks ranging in age from 3.8 to 3.7 billion years ago,[12] having only a ~100 million year variation of age within the belt.[12] 3.8 billion year old rocks are predominantly concentrated at the southern part of the belt while the 3.7 billion old counterpart are located at the centre and northern part.[12] The sequence experienced three isolated phases of metamorphism, at least one of them in the early Archean. It is argued this highly developed metamorphic history precludes assignment of these rocks as "greenstones".[7]

Similar looking Itsaq Gneiss bounds the Isua belt from North and from the South.

North of the Isua Supracrustal Belt

To the north, the Isua supracrustal belt is bounded by orthogneisses. Dominant tonalitic gneisses show a protolith age of about 3.7 billion years.[12] A low strain area of several square kilometres is observed in the northeast part of the Isua Belt.[9] Dominant phases are foliated metatonalites, with additional 3660 Ma diorite and 3655 to 3640 Ma granite and pegmatite.[13] Measured ages from the tonalites in the northern terrane are between 3720 and 3690 Ma,[2] which is 100 million years younger than those in the southern region.

South of the Isua Supracrustal Belt

The Southern region is mostly composed of a comparable orthogneiss to the northern region. However, the ages yielded from the protoliths are between 3872 and 3700 Ma.[9] The ages of the rock are generally 100 million years older than that in the northern terrane.

Amphibolites showing localised pillow structure reflects a submarine basaltic environment in the past.[2] Zircon overgrowth indicates an event of high-grade metamorphism between 3660 and 3650 Ma.[9]

Tectonics

Proto-plate tectonics in the Isua area in the Eoarchean – this sequence covers the collision of the 3.8 Ga region to the 3.7 Ga region between 3690 Ma to 3660 Ma. Inspired by Nutman et al., 2009. Modified for use

Subduction and lateral proto-plate tectonics

The Isua Greenstone Belt is currently under heavy investigation as it provides a unique opportunity to study early earth's tectonics. There is no single widely accepted tectonic explanation for the formation of the Isua supracrustal belt and the adjacent area, although some viable models have been proposed. One of the suggested explanations is proto-plate tectonics, with a convergent plate margin environment.[2]

A 3660 Ma to 3690 Ma collision can be speculated to have occurred between the northern 3.7 Ga region and the 3.8 Ga region, along a thin layer of sedimentary dividing unit in the Isua Greenstone belt.

Both terranes shows episodic deposition of volcanic

tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG). These TTGs are between 3720 and 3710 Ma old, with the composition of these relatively juvenile igneous rocks showing that it is sourced from partial melting of eclogitized mafic material, with high magnesium but low silica content. This can be explained by the partial melting of a subducted slab, which would mean the environment was comparable to a convergent plate boundary or a subduction zone setting.[10]

A thin metasedimentary unit derived mainly from banded iron formations, chert and carbonate rocks is believed to be the dividing unit between the 3.8 Ga region and 3.7 Ga region. In some well-exposed area, highly tectonized and recrystallised mylonites are present.[2]

Collision of the old and new block happened between 3690 Ma and 3660 Ma,[2] since 3690 Ma was the age yielded from the youngest tonalite,[11] which is only found in the Northern terrane. This can be interpreted as indicative of a much further distance between the northern region and the southern region at 3690 Ma than we see today. 3660 Ma is the age measured from the ultramafic-to-dioritic Inaluk dykes,[11] which is a common intrusion in both terrane. This potentially brackets the time of collision between these two intrusive events.

Alternative tectonic model: vertical tectonics

As plumes and impact structures are observed in Isua area, it is postulated that "vertical tectonics"[clarification needed] are also a viable method to reconstruct the Eoarchean Isua Area.[11] In addition, the material found in lateral transport thrusts has been recorded from both plume-related volcanic centers and in impact centres. This hypothesis however currently lacks crucial evidence for vertical tectonics, such as dome-and-syncline regional diapirs.[8]

Acasta Gneiss Complex

The

Slave Province which covers an area approximately 190,000 km2. After the initial documentation of very ancient zircons present in the Acasta River area,[15] a significant scientific debate regarding the true age of these important rocks was born. Some geologists suggested that all rocks in the Acasta region were highly metamorphosed and altered 3.3 billion years ago, so that their zircon ages were not reflective of the true ages of the rocks.[18] This debate culminated in a series of papers and comments regarding the discrepancy between zircon age information and whole-rock data.[19][20][21] The age debate has been mostly resolved by further work in the Acasta area by several research groups as well as the general acceptance by the scientific community of using in situ zircon U-Pb to obtain ages from complicated rocks. Although complicated rocks, with multiple age domains mixed together, do certainly exist in the Acasta region,[22] much simpler rocks are definitively present as well[23][24] so the entire Complex was clearly not wholesale overprinted by 3.3 Ga metamorphism. The oldest known rock unit in the Acasta region is a 4.02 Ga tonalitic unit termed the Idiwhaa Tonalitic Gneiss.[23]

Notably, one xenocrystic zircon core, which was included in a 3.92 Ga gneiss, has been dated to 4.2 Ga, which is the oldest age recorded in the Acasta area.[25] However, the rock that originally grew this zircon has not been found, and it may not even exist anymore. The ages of rocks in the Acasta Gneiss Complex have peaks at 3.92-4.02 Ga, 3.75 Ga, 3.6 Ga, and 3.4 Ga[17][24] which document major crust forming events.

Map of Acasta Gneiss Complex. Adopted and modified from Koshida et al., 2016

Lithologies

Dominant rocks in the region are variably deformed tonalitic, granodioritic, and granitic, and amphibolitic gneisses.[14][24][17] Mafic rocks such as amphibolite and ultramafic rocks are also present in the Acasta Gneiss Complex and occur in variable proportions throughout the Complex. A north-east trending fault divides the area into two domains.[24]

Eastern domain

The eastern area has an abundance of relatively massive tonalitic, granodioritic and granitic gneiss and gabbroic, dioritic and quartz-dioritic gneisses are present.[24] Four episodes of tonalite-granite emplacement shows ages of 3.94–4.02, 3.74, 3.66 and 3.59 Ga.[1][17]

Western Domain

The western area is dominated by layered quartz dioritic to dioritic, tonalitic to granitic gneiss and young foliated granitic intrusions.[24] It shows a formation of the granitic protolith of the layered gneiss at 3.97 Ga, followed by a 3.58 Gyr old granitic intrusion, which has been foliated.[1]

Mafic enclaves and inclusions

Mafic rocks are distributed within the entire Acasta Gneiss Complex as minor blocks such as enclaves and bands. The mafic rocks consist of massive to slightly foliated amphibolite, garnet amphibolite as well as hornblendite.[1][17][24] Mineral composition indicates that they had experienced metamorphism between amphibolite to upper amphibolite facies.[1]

Tectonics

Though there is no well-accepted tectonic setting that formed the Acasta Gneiss Complex, various hypotheses have been proposed. First, the oldest rocks in the Acasta region, the Idiwhaa Tonalitic Gneiss, shows a distinctive geochemistry of high Fe but low Mg content, and a relatively flat REE pattern. Compositions like this occur in very few locations on the modern Earth, including modern Iceland. This led to the idea that the earliest phase of crust formation in the Acasta region occurred by petrologic processes similar to modern Iceland, that is, shallow intrusion of dry basalts and partial melting at low pressures.[17][23] Something changed at 3.6 Ga however, as the rocks formed in the Acasta Gneiss Complex have very different geochemical signatures at this time. This led to proposals for a subduction-like setting, or mobile-lid setting, at 3.6 Ga in the Acasta area.[26] Other authors, using the Thorium-to-niobium ratio in the amphibolites, suggested that subduction occurred much earlier, closer to 4.0 Ga.[1]

Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt and adjacent TTG

The

Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt (NGB) is located in Northern Quebec, covering approximately 8 km2 of the Hudson Bay.[27] It resembles a north-closing synform that plunges towards the south.[27]

The true age of the NGB is debated. Some argue that it is between 4.4 Ga

isotopic ratio of 142-Neodymium to 144-Neodymium, represent that the mafic host rock is also of Hadean age.[clarification needed] Significantly, the oldest detrital zircon with high correspondence to the host rock yielded an age of 3780 Ma that is argued to define the maximum age of these rocks.[29]

Lithologies

An Overview Map of the Nuvvuagituq Greenstone Belt and its adjacent TTGs. Inspired by and modified from O'Neil et al., 2012 and O'Neil et al. 2013.

The Nuvvuagituq Greenstone Belt is divided into three lithological units:[30][31]

The Ujaraaluk unit is an amphibolite enriched in cummingtonite, plagioclase and biotite, and depleted in hornblende, Gabbroic and ultramafic intrusive bodies, and a chemical sedimentary protolith, i.e. banded iron formations (BIF) and banded silicate formations (BSF).[32]

Within the largest unit, the cummingtonite amphibolite, a progression of garnet content and a regression of chlorite and epidote from west to east shows an intensification of metamorphism of amphibolite from green-schist facies to an upper-amphibolite facies.[30]

Surrounding tonalites, trondhjemites and granodiorites

The Nuvvuagituq Belt is bounded by Eoarchean

U-Pb zircon geochronology, the fourfold episodic TTGs were dated to be 3.76 Ga, 3.66 Ga, 3.5–3.4 Ga and 3.35 Ga in age.[33]

Tectonics

Proto-plate tectonics

Crustal recycling produced the TTGs surrounding the Nuvvuagituq Belt from arc-like source rocks, i.e. the Ujaraaluk Unit. A large scale simultaneous accumulation of TTGs and subsequent partial melting only occurs in particular tectonic settings.[28] It is speculated that their origin is related to crustal recycling in which the mafic crust and water were returned to the mantle, and as a consequence, arc-like mafic magma formed.[28] This resembles a subduction system in modern plate tectonics, but the geologic evidence is still insufficient to draw direct parallels.

References

  1. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2016.07.004
    .
  2. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2009.03.017
    .
  3. ^ a b c Stern, Robert J. (2008). "Modern-style plate tectonics began in Neoproterozoic time: An alternative interpretation of Earth's tectonic history". The Geological Society Special Paper. 440: 265–279.
  4. ^
    doi:10.1016/S0166-2635(07)15012-X
    .
  5. doi:10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00095-0
    .
  6. doi:10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00097-4
    .
  7. ^
    doi:10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00094-9
    .
  8. ^
    S2CID 4391599
    .
  9. ^
    doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0415:AOAEAG>2.3.CO;2
    .
  10. ^
    S2CID 56090267
    .
  11. ^
    doi:10.1029/2000TC001203
    .
  12. ^
    doi:10.1016/0301-9268(95)00066-6
    .
  13. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00431-7
    .
  14. ^
    doi:10.4095/130452. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help
    )
  15. ^
    ISSN 0091-7613
    .
  16. ISSN 1752-0894
    .
  17. ^
    ISSN 0301-9268
    .
  18. ISSN 0009-2541
    .
  19. S2CID 128838719
    .
  20. doi:10.4095/211627. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help
    )
  21. S2CID 128376754
    .
  22. ISSN 0016-7037
    .
  23. ^
    doi:10.1038/ngeo2170
    .
  24. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2006.11.017
    .
  25. ISSN 0091-7613
    .
  26. S2CID 135327282
    .
  27. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2012.07.009
    .
  28. ^
    doi:10.1130/G32623.1
    .
  29. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2012.11.054
    .
  30. ^
    ISBN 9780444528100. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help
    )
  31. S2CID 206514655
    .
  32. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.020
    .
  33. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.030
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eoarchean_geology&oldid=1187459679"