Europeans United for Democracy

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Europeans United for Democracy
EUDemokraten – Allianz für ein Europa der Demokratien
UEDémocrates – Alliance pour une Europe des Démocraties

Europeans United for Democracy – Alliance for a Europe of Democracies, formerly known as EUDemocrats, was a

Eurorealist alliance of parties[8] and movements from 15 European countries. It operated as a transnational party at the European level (European political party),[9] according to Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003.[10] It incorporated members from both the left and right of the political spectrum
.

The party was set up under Danish law on 7 November 2005 and founded as a European Party in Brussels on 8 November 2005. Its first congress was held on 24 February 2006. Former Danish MEPs Jens-Peter Bonde and Hanne Dahl inspired the EUD's creation and first years. In January 2009, Swedish economist and former MEP Sören Wibe succeeded Bonde as President of the EUD. Following Wibe's sudden death in December 2010, former Irish Green MEP Patricia McKenna was named president of the EUD and Lave Knud Broch from People's Movement against the EU as vice president.

The founding parties of the party included the Danish

Iveta Grigule from the Latvian Farmers' Union.[11] These parties and members came from all sides of the political spectrum and were united in their criticism of the EU, although in varying degrees.[12]

Although the EUD's platform was not concerned with specific ideological matters, as it believed that such issues were best dealt with by national and regional parliaments under the democratic control of the people, the party itself was considered left-wing; David Hanley, head of the School of

European Studies at Cardiff University, called it a "core statement of left-wing Euroscepticism".[3] The EUD cooperated with other left-wing European parties.[4] The party was committed to increasing transparency, subsidiarity, diversity and budgetary control in the European Union, wanting to limit the Union to a free-trade zone and a safeguard of social and environmentalist standards, with integration efforts being only optional and limited to the minimum. The EU was to be prohibited from dictating a common foreign, economic and security policy to all members, and elements of membership were to be elective, with member states able to choose to participate in the free-trade zone only, without partaking in other elements of the European Union.[11]

In 2009, four of its affiliated MEPs were members of the

Iveta Grigule
were elected.

Ten members of national and regional parliaments from ten countries were also members of the EUD (as of 2014).

Political platform

The political aim of the EUDemocrats was to reform the present structures of the European Union. According to its political platform,[13] the EUD believed that decisions should be made at the lowest possible level (subsidiarity), thus giving an effective voice to the citizens of member states, regions and national minorities. It aimed to unite those who are critical of the EU for its undemocratic development and its ever-more centralising political features.

The EUD opposed the centralisation of political power in the EU institutions, and demanded democratic oversight and control of EU institutional powers and actions by national and regional assemblies. The party believed that European integration must be stopped as it would transform Europe into a centralised unitary state, arguing that while the initial impulse for integration were perceived economic benefits, the drive for integration also spilled over into political and sociocultural consequences. The EUD criticized Europe's mainstream parties for passively going along with the integration, often in an undemocratic or misleading fashion. The party described the progressing European integration as the result of the "permissive consensus of furtive elites [that] has once again pulled the wool over citizens’ eyes".[11]

The party's solution was to restore the principle of subsidiarity and regionalization in the union, stating that too the European Union had been given too much power that must now be "clawed back". The party's alternative was called "flexible integration", which would enable member states to use EU cooperation procedures only when all parties concerned wished to, without forcing any common policy on all members. The only issues to be decided at EU level were to be "truly cross-border issues", which the EUD classified as guaranteeing four fundamental freedoms (persons, goods, property and capital) and environmental policy.[11]

The policy areas that the party wanted to exclude from EU competence were common trade policy, criminal justice, education and cultural policy. The party also wanted to abolish the

European Constitution with a cooperation agreement between states, with the possibility for a member state to only choose a basic free-trade agreement without participating in other EU components. In regards to the electoral system of the EU, the party sought to make European Commissioners be elected by national electorates.[11]

Its four political core objectives were:

  • enhancing transparency on all political levels, especially in the EU by giving citizens insight into all documents and meetings;
  • strengthen real subsidiarity in the EU thus taking decisions at the lowest political level possible;
  • improving democracy and accountability by reforming EU institutions and structures making them function more democratically;
  • defending diversity in the EU by making it possible for member states to implement politics according to their national reality and by promoting flexible cooperation instead of fixed harmonisation.

The operational aim of EUD was to act as an effective political platform and campaigning organisation which is able to influence pan-European politics towards extending democratic structures in the EU. The EUD also sought to have candidates elected in

European elections
that shared its core Eurorealist political ideas and thus influence politics in the European Parliament itself.

The position of the party was described as a "minimalist Eurorealist position", as the EUD believed that while preferably the EU would not exist, some form of minimal integration had now become avoidable, but it should be constrained as much as possible. The EU was to be a free-trade zone with few, minimal supranational competences and minimized bureucracy.[11]

The party was critical of the

Lisbon Treaty and believed that many elements of it were breaching the political independence of the member states. It deeply opposed common defence and intelligence projects such as the European Union Foreign Service and European army, arguing that such projects "will undermine the member states foreign, security and defence policy".[14]

Despite the diverse nature of its founding parties, the EUD was seen as a "core statement of left-wing Euroscepticism", as its platform incorporated strongly left-wing concerns about the EU, including concerns about parliamentary control and distrust of the EU's military role, combined with an emphasis on the need to ensure environmental and social standards.

Campaigns

In March 2011, the EUDemocrats launched a campaign against the idea of direct-tax income for the European Union (including a tax on citizens, the banking sector, or the air traffic sector. The campaign was launched as www.noeutax.com Archived 12 August 2014 at the Wayback Machine.

In an effort to bring balance to the euro debate in the Baltics, EUDemocrats has started a Latvian web information campaign at www.parlatu.lv Archived 17 December 2014 at the Wayback Machine.

Membership

 Belgium:

  • Deutschsprachige Gemeinschaft Belgiens

 Denmark:

 Estonia:

 France:

 Germany:

 Ireland:

 Hungary:

  • MP Sandor Leszak
  • MP Andras Ptiski

 Italy:

 Latvia:

 Poland:

 Portugal:

 Slovakia:

 Slovenia:

 Sweden:

Notes

  1. ^ Nordsieck, Wolfram (2019). "European Union". Parties and Elections in Europe. Archived from the original on 8 June 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
  2. .
  3. ^ .
  4. ^ .
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. ^ Article by Géraud de Ville in Politeia (10/2007): Eurosceptics are Eurocritics or Eurorealists;
  9. ^ "Political parties at European level". Europarl.europa.eu. 29 March 2004. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
  10. ^ http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2003R2004:20071227:EN:PDF[bare URL PDF]
  11. ^ .
  12. .
  13. ^ EUD Political Platform http://www.eudemocrats.org/eud/content.php?id=18
  14. ISSN 1028-3625
    .

References

  • Laure Neumayer: Euroscepticism as a political label; in: European Journal of Political Research 2/2007.
  • Géraud de Ville: Eurosceptics are Eurocritics or Eurorealists; in: Politeia 10/2007.

External links