Evolvability
Evolvability is defined as the capacity of a system for adaptive evolution. Evolvability is the ability of a population of organisms to not merely generate genetic diversity, but to generate adaptive genetic diversity, and thereby evolve through natural selection.[1][2][3]
In order for a biological organism to evolve by natural selection, there must be a certain minimum probability that new, heritable variants are beneficial. Random mutations, unless they occur in DNA sequences with no function, are expected to be mostly detrimental. Beneficial mutations are always rare, but if they are too rare, then adaptation cannot occur. Early failed efforts to evolve computer programs by random mutation and selection[4] showed that evolvability is not a given, but depends on the representation of the program as a data structure, because this determines how changes in the program map to changes in its behavior.[5] Analogously, the evolvability of organisms depends on their genotype–phenotype map.[6][7][8] This means that genomes are structured in ways that make beneficial changes more likely. This has been taken as evidence that evolution has created fitter populations of organisms that are better able to evolve.
Alternative definitions
Andreas Wagner[9] describes two definitions of evolvability. According to the first definition, a biological system is evolvable:
- if its properties show heritable genetic variation, and
- if natural selection can thus change these properties.
According to the second definition, a biological system is evolvable:
- if it can acquire novel functions through genetic change, functions that help the organism survive and reproduce.
For example, consider an
Massimo Pigliucci[10] recognizes three classes of definition, depending on timescale. The first corresponds to Wagner's first, and represents the very short timescales that are described by quantitative genetics.[11][12] He divides Wagner's second definition into two categories, one representing the intermediate timescales that can be studied using population genetics, and one representing exceedingly rare long-term innovations of form.
Pigliucci's second definition of evolvability includes Altenberg's[3] quantitative concept of evolvability, being not a single number, but the entire upper tail of the fitness distribution of the offspring produced by the population. This quantity was considered a "local" property of the instantaneous state of a population, and its integration over the population's evolutionary trajectory, and over many possible populations, would be necessary to give a more global measure of evolvability.
Generating more variation
More heritable phenotypic variation means more evolvability. While mutation is the ultimate source of heritable variation, its permutations and combinations also make a big difference. Sexual reproduction generates more variation (and thereby evolvability) relative to asexual reproduction (see evolution of sexual reproduction). Evolvability is further increased by generating more variation when an organism is stressed,[13] and thus likely to be less well adapted, but less variation when an organism is doing well. The amount of variation generated can be adjusted in many different ways, for example via the mutation rate, via the probability of sexual vs. asexual reproduction, via the probability of outcrossing vs. inbreeding, via dispersal, and via access to previously cryptic variants through the switching of an evolutionary capacitor. A large population size increases the influx of novel mutations in each generation.[14]
Enhancement of selection
Rather than creating more phenotypic variation, some mechanisms increase the intensity and effectiveness with which selection acts on existing phenotypic variation.[15] For example:
- Mating rituals that allow sexual selection on "good genes", and so intensify natural selection.[15]
- Large genetic draft, or through changes in the probability distribution of the numbers of offspring.[15]
- Recombination decreasing the importance of the Hill-Robertson effect, where different genotypes contain different adaptive mutations. Recombination brings the two alleles together, creating a super-genotype in place of two competing lineages.[15]
- Shorter generation time.[15]
Robustness and evolvability
The relationship between robustness and evolvability depends on whether recombination can be ignored.[16] Recombination can generally be ignored in asexual populations and for traits affected by single genes.
Without recombination
With recombination
Temporary robustness, or canalisation, may lead to the accumulation of significant quantities of cryptic genetic variation. In a new environment or genetic background, this variation may be revealed and sometimes be adaptive.[16][19]
Factors affecting evolvability via robustness
Different genetic codes have the potential to change robustness and evolvability by changing the effect of single-base mutational changes.[20] [21]
Exploration ahead of time
When
Another way that phenotypes can be explored, prior to strong genetic commitment, is through learning. An organism that learns gets to "sample" several different phenotypes during its early development, and later sticks to whatever worked best. Later in evolution, the optimal phenotype can be genetically assimilated so it becomes the default behavior rather than a rare behavior. This is known as the Baldwin effect, and it can increase evolvability.[26][27]
Learning biases phenotypes in a beneficial direction. But an exploratory flattening of the fitness landscape can also increase evolvability even when it has no direction, for example when the flattening is a result of random errors in molecular and/or developmental processes. This increase in evolvability can happen when evolution is faced with crossing a "valley" in an adaptive landscape. This means that two mutations exist that are deleterious by themselves, but beneficial in combination. These combinations can evolve more easily when the landscape is first flattened, and the discovered phenotype is then fixed by genetic assimilation.[28][29][30]
Modularity
If every mutation affected every trait, then a mutation that was an improvement for one trait would be a disadvantage for other traits. This means that almost no mutations would be beneficial overall. But if pleiotropy is restricted to within functional modules, then mutations affect only one trait at a time, and adaptation is much less constrained. In a modular gene network, for example, a gene that induces a limited set of other genes that control a specific trait under selection may evolve more readily than one that also induces other gene pathways controlling traits not under selection.[15] Individual genes also exhibit modularity. A mutation in one cis-regulatory element of a gene's promoter region may allow the expression of the gene to be altered only in specific tissues, developmental stages, or environmental conditions rather than changing gene activity in the entire organism simultaneously.[15]
Evolution of evolvability
While variation yielding high evolvability could be useful in the long term, in the short term most of that variation is likely to be a disadvantage. For example, naively it would seem that increasing the mutation rate via a mutator allele would increase evolvability. But as an extreme example, if the mutation rate is too high then all individuals will be dead or at least carry a heavy mutation load. Short-term selection for low variation most of the time is likely to be more powerful than long-term selection for evolvability, making it difficult for natural selection to cause the evolution of evolvability. Other forces of selection also affect the generation of variation; for example, mutation and recombination may in part be byproducts of mechanisms to cope with DNA damage.[31]
When recombination is low, mutator alleles may still sometimes hitchhike on the success of adaptive mutations that they cause. In this case, selection can take place at the level of the lineage.[32] This may explain why mutators are often seen during experimental evolution of microbes. Mutator alleles can also evolve more easily when they only increase mutation rates in nearby DNA sequences, not across the whole genome: this is known as a contingency locus.
The evolution of evolvability is less controversial if it occurs via the
Applications
Evolvability phenomena have practical applications. For protein engineering we wish to increase evolvability, and in medicine and agriculture we wish to decrease it. Protein evolvability is defined as the ability of the protein to acquire sequence diversity and conformational flexibility which can enable it to evolve toward a new function.[38]
In
Many human diseases are capable of evolution.
A better understanding of evolvability is proposed to be part of an
See also
- Evolutionary trade-off
References
- PMID 18212804.
- PMID 9671692.
- ^ ISBN 978-3-540-59046-0.
- .
- ^ Altenberg L (1994). Kinnear, Kenneth (ed.). "The evolution of evolvability in genetic programming". Advances in Genetic Programming: 47–74.
- S2CID 21040413.
- S2CID 248313305.
- PMID 35264797.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-691-12240-3.
- ^ S2CID 3164124.
- PMID 1732160.
- S2CID 11359207.
- S2CID 35770307.
- PMID 20585551.
- ^ PMID 23154809.
- ^ PMID 20598394.
- PMID 16581913.
- PMID 23335336.
- S2CID 11511132.
- PMID 23754851.
- PMID 29138304.
- S2CID 10868777.
- S2CID 12103318.
- PMID 16387877.
- PMID 21199946.
- ^ Hinton GE, Nowlan SJ (1987). "How learning can guide evolution". Complex Systems. 1: 495–502.
- S2CID 6964065.
- S2CID 13150906.
- PMID 18479505.
- PMID 19521499.
- S2CID 42288730.
- S2CID 123907349.
- S2CID 30954684.
- PMID 19917766.
- PMID 17915273.
- S2CID 11560256.
- PMID 21415350.
- S2CID 8951755.
- PMID 21371474.
- PMID 21115265.
- PMID 19765975.
- PMID 12079336.
- PMID 16868005.
- PMID 21408208.
- PMID 16581913.
- S2CID 25258028.
- PMID 23542341.
- ISBN 978-0-19-969259-0.
- ISBN 978-3-642-36159-3.
- S2CID 3164124.
- S2CID 8040576.
- PMID 22698669.
- PMID 17184282.
- PMID 18020711.
- .
- PMID 23517688.
- PMID 22761587.
- PMID 19355786.
- S2CID 2703146.
- S2CID 5710484.
- S2CID 8837202.