Federalist No. 2
Author | John Jay |
---|---|
Original title | Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Series | The Federalist |
Publisher | The Independent Journal |
Publication date | October 31, 1787 |
Media type | Newspaper |
Preceded by | Federalist No. 1 |
Followed by | Federalist No. 3 |
Text | Federalist No. 2 at Wikisource |
Federalist No. 2, titled "Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay written by
Federalist No. 2 defines Jay's concept of a single American nationality, which he sees as brought together by
Federalist No. 2 was followed by three more essays that continued on the same topic. Since its publication, the conception of nationality presented in Federalist No. 2 has been a persistent issue in American politics. It relates directly to debates of naturalization and multiculturalism, and it was most directly challenged by the American Civil War that contradicted Jay's conception of unity.
Summary
Jay begins by emphasizing the importance of deciding whether the states should be united or separate. He argues that popular opinion has always been in favor of unity until politicians challenged the idea. He then provides arguments that providence has intended for the states to be one nation, citing both physical and cultural contiguity. He also describes a shared political history in which the states entered into revolution and governance as one nation.
Jay turns to the method of governance between the states, describing the government to that point as one formed urgently in a time of conflict. He compares this to the process undertaken at the Constitutional Convention, which he describes as more unified and more carefully planned. He also credits the members of this convention as being highly qualified and motivated purely by "love for their country". Jay reminds the reader that their plan should not be blindly accepted or opposed but carefully considered, likening it to the debate following the First Continental Congress. He argues that every congress since then has supported unity and that this is the will of the people. He concludes that failure to support the proposed constitution would result in disunity.
Background and publication
Federalist No. 2 was written by John Jay. Like all of the Federalist Papers, Federalist No. 2 was published under the pseudonym Publius in New York newspapers with the intention of explaining the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and persuading New York to ratify it.[1] It was first published in the Independent Journal on October 31, 1787, followed by the Daily Advertiser on November 1 and the New-York Packet on November 2.[2] Federalist No. 1, the only one of the Federalist Papers to have been released at this point, was only an introduction to the series. As such, John Jay was tasked with first developing the idea of a national identity in Federalist No. 2.[3]: 58 At the time Jay wrote Federalist No. 2, he was "America's leading foreign policy expert", which may have influenced his decision to write the essay on the subject of the advantages of unity between the states.[4]: 59
Analysis
Nationhood and union
Federalist No. 2 was one of the early papers that addressed the issue of
Some of the arguments used by Jay depended upon
Counterpoint to the Anti-Federalist Papers
Federalist No. 2 established the main idea of the Federalist Papers that Americans were a national community with a common interest that necessitated unity.
Jay insisted that the Articles of Confederation were not sufficient for a national government, as they had been created in the midst of a war, and that the Constitutional Convention took place in a calmer national environment that allowed for deeper consideration. He worked on the same assumption as Hamilton that failure to ratify the constitution would guarantee disunity between the states.[4]: 60 Anti-Federalists proposed amendment of the Articles of Confederation instead of total disunity, but the impression created by the Federalist Papers became widely accepted.[10] This was a rhetorical strategy often used by Jay, in which he presented the issue as a leading question to present his answer as the only correct one.[9]: 231–232
Tone
Federalist No. 2 took a softer and more optimistic tone compared to Federalist No. 1, covering many of the same ideas in a way that sought to invite harmony among competing factions rather than to insist upon its claims. Jay's condemnation of his political opponents are left more vague than in Hamilton's previous essay, and they are seen as less of a threat to the union.
Jay's impression of the
Natural rights
Federalist No. 2 is the only one of the Federalist Papers to make explicit reference to
Jay accepted that a government must be enforced, but he argued that it was the decision of Americans to enforce their own government through the American Revolutionary War that allows a people to engage in reflection to choose their own government and their national identity.[8]: 16 The philosophical relationship between rights and governance received little attention in future Federalist Papers, as their interest was how government should use its powers rather than if it should have them.[3]: 63 The concept's practical use to the Founding Fathers was limited to the right of revolution and the establishment of government, and its invocation in Federalist No. 2 does not extend beyond this aspect.[11]
Aftermath
The arguments of Federalist No. 2 presented the basic assumptions that would underlie the ideas of the Federalist Papers going forward.[3]: 63 It was directly followed by No. 3, No. 4, and No. 5, which all continued on the same subject.[5] The themes of Americans as a singular people and the importance of unity among them were revisited by Hamilton in No. 12,[3]: 86 Madison in No. 14,[6] and Jay in No. 64.[3]: 178
The
References
- ^ "Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-8131-6137-2.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-107-13639-7.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-4411-0814-2.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-931202-44-2.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-300-21645-5.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-226-21301-9.
- ^ JSTOR 25057166.
- ISBN 978-1-107-13639-7.
- ^ S2CID 143702430.
- ISBN 978-0-19-536307-4.
- ISBN 978-1-107-13639-7.
External links