File:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Court opinion draft, February 2022.pdf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 12.17 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 98 pages)

Summary

Description
English: A draft of a US Supreme Court Court opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, first circulated by Justice Alito to fellow Supreme Court Justices on February 10, 2022 and published in an exclusive story on May 2, 2022, Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows by Josh Gerstein and Alexander Ward on Politico.com.
Date
Source Published by Politico and uploaded publicly to documentcloud.org.
Author
Samuel Alito  (1950–) wikidata:Q11138 s:en:Author:Samuel Anthony Alito q:en:Samuel Alito
 
Samuel Alito
Alternative names
Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr.; Samuel A. Alito; Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Description American magistrate, lawyer, judge, university teacher and jurist
Date of birth 1 April 1950 Edit this at Wikidata
Location of birth Trenton
Work location
Authority file
creator QS:P170,Q11138
; published by:
institution QS:P195,Q3109740
Location38° 53′ 26″ N, 77° 00′ 16″ W Edit this at Structured Data on Commons Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMapinfo


Licensing

This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain This file is a work of an officer or employee of the Supreme Court of the United States, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the file is in the public domain in the United States.

This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

Captions

Draft of opinion for Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

10 February 2022

application/pdf

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current03:46, 3 May 2022Thumbnail for version as of 03:46, 3 May 20221,275 × 1,650, 98 pages (12.17 MB)OverthrowsUploaded a work by Supreme Court of the United States from Published first by ''Politico'' and uploaded to [https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21835435/scotus-initial-draft.pdf]. with UploadWizard
The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed):

Global file usage

The following other wikis use this file:

View more global usage of this file.

Metadata