File:Moneytalkssinglecover.jpg

Summary

Cover of the single "Moneytalks" by AC/DC.

Source

http://rateyourmusic.com/release/single/ac_dc/moneytalks___mistress_for_christmas/

Licensing

© Copyright 1990 ATCO Records

This image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the work or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such covers solely to illustrate the audio recording in question, on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Moneytalkssinglecover.jpg true

To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. This tag should only be used for covers of audio recording releases. Either of the following may be helpful for stating the rationale: Template:Album rationale or Template:Non-free use rationale album cover. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Fair use for Moneytalks

This image is being linked here; though the picture is subject to copyright, I (Helltopay27) feel it is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

• It is a low resolution image of a single cover
• It does not limit the copyright owners rights to sell the film in any way
• It allows for identification of the single "Moneytalks"
• No free alternatives are possible
• It illustrates the single in question